Please do not modify this page without User:Penwhale's consent. This is an archive of his talk page. Thank you!

Hey, thanks for clearing up the confusion about NWN prestige classes - I am now a lot less confused than I was before! :) -- QuantumEleven 12:10, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)

Hey-- No Problem-- :P I'm just a REALLY LAME D&D player. \^o^/ -- Penwhale 8:00 Dec 25, 2004 (EST)

I've moved your vote from WP:RM to Talk:Cardiff Central in line with the new voting guide lines that all votes and comments should appear on the talk page of the article to be moved (The new system was initiated on the second after a straw poll on the WP:RM talk page). Philip Baird Shearer 08:51, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Oh! I didn't realize that... The policy was not very clear on where comments should go into. Thanks! Penwhale 08:54, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• reference

Thanks a lot Penwhale. :-D Please say whatever come up into your mind, and don't hestitate if you want to talk about something bad about me. — Insta ntnood 14:34 Mar 4 2005 (UTC)

Sure.

By the way, the two provinces are streamlined rather than scraped. Gotta make it clear or else people will be misunderstood. :-P — Insta ntnood 14:45 Mar 4 2005 (UTC)

Taiwan and Fukien. If I got it correctly Chang Po Ya was a governor general after Taiwan Province and its provincial government was streamlined. — Insta ntnood 14:55 Mar 4 2005 (UTC)

I guess the Fukien Provincial Government is still there. They have to keep it or they have to change the constitution, or to incorporate them into another province (i.e. by changing provincial boundaries), like Pratas, once part of Hainan Special Administrative Region of Kwangtung Province, were made part of Kaohsiung City. — Insta ntnood 20:26 Mar 3 2005 (UTC)

• replied

The sharing at RfC seems to be over. I have made a response there. Please take a look. I do hope that with everyone's effort Wikipedia will soon be the best encyclopedia ever. :-D — Insta ntnood 21:25 Mar 5 2005 (UTC)

Funny as it may seem, I was actually looking for a vandal that would jump on me. I really needed to vent. Not at the expense of being unprofessional, of course :) Thanks for the compliment.— Ëzhiki (erinaceus europeaus) 19:08, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)

Rant is good. Ever feel like ranting randomly because people don't get your point? :) Penwhale 19:13, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hehe, tell me about it :)— Ëzhiki (erinaceus europeaus) 19:14, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)

I'm currently suffering from that... See Here to find out why I'm having a need to rant :P — Penwhale 19:25, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

As you like. But try modifying it to the appearance you like, and remember to give me the credits, lol. :-P — Insta ntnood 19:47 Mar 4 2005 (UTC)

The previous discussion are archived at the discussion pages, namely, Talk:List of metropolitan areas in Taiwan and Talk:Politics of Taiwan. If a centralised location is necessary, perhaps we can do it on user page, such as User:USERNAME/Information for Taiwan-ROC dispute. — Insta ntnood 10:04 Mar 5 2005 (UTC)

Centralized location is good. Penwhale

Hello Penwhale. I have proposed at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese) to change the title of some articles and categories. Would you be interested to join the discussion and say something? — Insta ntnood 20:37, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)

It's great u're finally back. Welcome back, and please come over and say something. — Insta ntnood 13:04, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)

Got kidnapped? — Insta ntnood 13:13, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)

By myself. Penwhale 13:14, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Good. — Insta ntnood 13:22, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)

Here's a very rough trial on how the list can be split into two.

• List of Republic of China-related topics, compare
• List of Taiwan-related topics, compare

Please take a look and tell me what you think about it. :-P — Insta ntnood 19:09, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)

Hello Penwhale. Despite the ongoing discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese) over the use of the terms "mainland China" and "People's Republic of China", SchmuckyTheCat and Huaiwei have listed category:Cities in mainland China, category:Companies of mainland China and category:Laws of mainland China onto Wikipedia:Categories for deletion.

Your vote is now essential and vital for the survival of these categories, and to avoid attempts to bar the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese) from truly enforced. — Insta ntnood 20:48, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)

Update: there's also a poll at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese). — Insta ntnood 01:01, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks Penwhale. — Insta ntnood 12:21, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)

Following the long discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese) regarding proper titling of ROC-/Taiwan-related topics, polls for each single case has now been started here. Please come and join the discussion, and cast your vote. Thanks. — Insta ntnood 06:14, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)

Hello Penwhale. There's another poll on the scope of the Taiwan article here. The proposal is to include " the geographical and cultural features of the lands controlled by the Republic of China (Taiwan) " into the article. — Insta ntnood 14:02, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)