This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello! Your submission of Ervin Marton at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset ( talk) 04:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Ervin Marton at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gerda Arendt ( talk) 22:33, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
For careful copyediting on the controversial John Yoo and Torture Memo pages where every sentence has been hard fought, which improved their grammar, syntax and spelling, without affecting their substance, balance or neutrality. ElijahBosley (talk ☞) 15:36, 18 January 2013 (UTC) |
On 27 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ervin Marton, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Ervin Marton, an internationally known Hungarian photographer based in Paris, was part of the French Resistance during World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ervin Marton. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 00:02, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Is there a page number about the 1966 exhibition in the article on Tihanyi? I waded through the article a couple of times but didn't find one. Anyway, it seems counterproductive to remove links to the artists' colony: we're obviously going to have an article on it at some point (there are whole books about it, as well as an article in Grove Art), summarizing its achievements in one place rather than repeating that summary in each of the artists' biographies, and a removed red link just means someone will have to go back and re-add it. - Biruitorul Talk 18:44, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
I'm going to move this discussion to the Browder v. Gayle page so that it's available to more readers. Maybe someone will know the answer. Parkwells ( talk) 20:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Sorry it's taken so long. Dougweller ( talk) 06:37, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Can we leave in the commentary on journal articles? It's important to be clear that Yates is fringe, eg the first Ancient American article discusses his claim that Cherokee culture is related to Greek, Jewish, Phoenician and Egyptian culture - or can we have a para on this instead perhaps? Dougweller ( talk) 16:17, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald Panther-Yates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Panther-Yates until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:18, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your contribution in few Bangladesh related articles. Beside my own job, it is very problemetic to manage huge time to enrich these articles and fighting against vandals. I wish you will continue your contribution on these article.-- Freemesm ( talk) 13:36, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
You have broken three references here, can you fix them please as I do not have the time to go through your edits to see which ones got messed up. Darkness Shines ( talk) 23:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Parkwells. As you have been working (a lot) on the Torture Memos page I thought I should bring to your attention an unexplained page move which has retitled it, that I have asked the Arbitration Committee to review and undo. ElijahBosley (talk ☞) 14:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Dear Parkwells, I've seen your copy edit in few of Bangladesh related articles. Can I invite you to copy edit Mahmudur Rahman's article? This article seems a pile of news, can you please arrange it's body according to encyclopedic manner? Thanks in advance. FreemesM (talk) 16:01, 24 March 2013 (UTC) |
Hey, I was reading your excellent work on the Jefferson–Hemings controversy this morning and thinking of nominating it for Good Article status. Would you have any strong objections? I'll be glad to take care of whatever issues arise in the course of the nomination if you don't feel like diving into it again. Thanks for all the effort you put into this one. -- Khazar2 ( talk) 15:19, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Parkwells, I see you've been improving the article on the Creole case. I am trying to create a page on a similar incident a few years earlier, when a coastwise slave ship called the Enterprise was forced into Bermuda by bad weather, and quick action by the locals compelled the release of slaves she was carrying. Would you take a look and suggest improvements etc? It's currently awaiting review at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Enterprise_%28slave_ship%29 Thanks RLamb ( talk) 22:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for your continued work over the long term on literature and poetry articles (among many others). Best wishes Span ( talk) 17:59, 3 April 2013 (UTC) |
Your 'Thanks for the Helping Hand' Award | |
Thanks. Here's hoping others will find the article useful and perhaps add to it over time. RLamb ( talk) 10:46, 4 April 2013 (UTC) |
All fixed. Parkwells ( talk) 13:19, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Parkwells, could you please help to c/e the Mahmudur Rahman article again? Due to current events a large scale change done there and it it seems not arranged according to WP:MOS. A non-encyclopedic emphasis was provided on MR's arrest and defaming government and court. Could you please take a look? Both me and another editor Crtew are welcoming you [ [4]]. Thanks in advance. -- FreemesM (talk) 12:27, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Please fix this error you introduced "charged with sedition in 2009, 2010, and 2012". You've confused defamation and sedition. He was charged with sedition only in 2010 and 2012. He was charged with defamation in all of those years above, but he was also charged with defamation in 2011. Crtew ( talk) 17:23, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Fixed and deleted notice. Parkwells ( talk) 19:02, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
I am doing some work on the article Archaeology of Igbo-Ukwu and would like permission to remove your template for merger. I am not quite done with the article, I think it needs copy editing as it is somewhat disjointed, I have been concentrating so far on adding relevant information in synopsis and adding references. Would be grateful for any help. Ochiwar ( talk) 15:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
They are beautiful cars built in the 1915-1929 period. Only 150 were built and none are known to exist. No mention on Wikipedia but I found this article: Greenfield Bus Body company. I started Frederick Patterson's page but I'm pretty bad at setting up a page from scratch. Are the pictures in the article public domain being so old or has Coachbuilt gained some copyright over them being on their page?
I especially like this car. Alatari ( talk) 19:32, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
I worked on Frederick Patterson's article tonight with my IP account. I should have logged in but the temptation to go to the watchlist and lose 6 more hours of my life is too great. I added a selection of sources on the talk page. The one 1980 newspaper article has some distinct differences in details. The book about Black Masons is likely the prime source for most the other sources. Yeah, Charles is a notable man of history and needs his article along with the company article. Frederick was a Republican and knew Booker T and worked on getting Harding elected and supposedly is the first black athlete at Ohio State. Alatari ( talk) 08:43, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Oh, I can't quite figure out which Episcopal church Frederick was in. Was it the AME or the white church? His wife was maybe white (the 1980 newspaper said there was a stir about their marriage) and Methodists were abolitionist very early and it would be interesting if he was a member of his wifes church. Her name is messed up and given in three different forms of Qutz, Utz or Outz. Alatari ( talk) 08:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Fixed. Parkwells ( talk) 19:03, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I see you agree with me (unsurprisingly) that User:Ngunalik's source for the presence and suppression of Black Hebrews in Uganda is unreliable. He is pushing the same claim with the same source in the article Acholi people; I've deleted it and I've informed him about policies, but I just don't have the time to watch the article and conduct the long discussion-cum-edit-war that is sure to follow (there seems to be a lot that isn't clear to him). Could you possibly keep an eye on his actions with respect to that article as well? Greetings, -- Anonymous44 ( talk) 17:07, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
You've suddenly started editing the abovementioned article in a manner inconsistent with policy. I'm not sure if you've violated 3RR yet, but I would think you are close. You would be the second editor in 2 weeks that I have had to take to An/I over POV pushing on the article. I would suggest you discuss any proposed changes to the lead on the article talk page first. The lead is a long-standing consensus based text that reflects the content of the article.-- Ubikwit 連絡 見学/迷惑 07:26, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Something went wrong with your last edits to the Talk page of the article, as I noticed that neither the text nor your signature was showing up. I wanted to post the Amaon link to the book mentioned on my Talk page under your post, so tried reversing the order of passages, with some success, but it is still not right. If you know how to fix it, please do.-- Ubikwit 連絡 見学/迷惑 15:09, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in the above topic.
Looking at your edit of 10 May [at 19.19] - after "Models of circumcised male organs were found at Great Zimbabwe", I wonder if it might be worth retaining the portion: "(the Lemba appear to have introduced that practice into southern Africa)" - because Gayre was trying to make the point that there was evidence of a connection between GZim and the Lemba. [You have left the ((ref name="Junod"/)), which as it stands now is not really appropriate to the previous sentence]. Regards, -- DLMcN ( talk) 07:20, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Fixed dabs and deleted notice. Parkwells ( talk) 14:57, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Fixed and deleted. Parkwells ( talk) 20:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
c/e
I'd like to thank you for your many invaluable edits to the history of Chełmno extermination camp. It was in a bad shape when I first approached it on 22 April 2013 with further expansion, from 24,103 bytes to 39,981 bytes a month later. I'd like to encourage you also to take your time, and make sure that little errors are not reintroduced (as in the case of Kafka's own sister). Some errors were also introduced with your edit to reception of the film Shoah (film), but I will wait till your finished to avoid any potential confusion. Great job, by the way... And thanks for the c/e to the Chełmno Trials. I will submit it to WP:DYK today as intended. All best, Poeticbent talk 18:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you! | |
---|---|
Hi! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch ( talk) 19:45, 22 May 2013 (UTC) |
Hi! Apparently, a disgruntled former member tried to edit this article according to his/her perspective, resulting in a poorly formatted attack. I put a band-aid on it, but was unable to restore the reflist, which I see as the worst problem. (The whole thing is a general mess, though.) Your expertise there would help should you care to dabble. Best wishes, Yopienso ( talk) 17:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanted to say thanks for your copyedits at Guatemala, History of Guatemala, and Guatemalan Civil War. Copyediting is under-appreciated work and I think you've done a good job of increasing clarity and brevity while preserving meaning. I also note with appreciation your edits at Franz Kafka :-) !!! groupuscule ( talk) 19:43, 30 May 2013 (UTC) P.S. Do you read Spanish?
Fixed and deleted bracket notices. Parkwells ( talk) 14:50, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Fixed and deleted. Parkwells ( talk) 21:49, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey. I noticed you made a few edits to the Arkansas Post page and I've been working on a few related articles. What would you think about moving Arkansas Post National Memorial to a new page dedicated solely to the historical settlement ( Arkansas Post (Historical Settlement)?), while keeping a separate page for the memorial itself? I'm planning to do an overhaul of the page soon anyway (just organizing some sources) and the page mostly discusses the history of the settlement anyway instead of the actual memorial. I posted on the article's talk page about it, so feel free to reply there or here with your input/opinion. Samuel Peoples ( talk) 18:31, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Fixed and deleted. Parkwells ( talk) 22:48, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Paterson (automobile) was there two separate Patterson auto manufacturers producing vehicles in the same decade? These and the P-Greenfield cars from Ohio? That has got to confuse things. 97.85.168.22 ( talk) 03:42, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
On 21 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Arkansas Post, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Arkansas Post was relocated at least three times during its existence because of both war and flooding? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Arkansas Post. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 16:04, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Fixed. Parkwells ( talk) 17:14, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
On 26 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jacobo Timerman, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that lifetime Zionist Jacobo Timerman (pictured) survived arrest and torture in Argentina's Dirty War and reached Israel in 1979, only to return to Argentina five years later? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jacobo Timerman. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:02, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey hey hey hey Parkwells! You are a great editor and fun to work with. You also seem knowledgeable about Reconstruction Era history. Maybe you'd have some interest in reviewing the newly revised 40 acres and a mule article? Aloha, ~ groupuscule ( talk) 19:19, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
I, SarahStierch, hereby award you, Parkwells, the World Digital Library Barnstar for your fabulous contributions to the World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership. I do hope you will continue to contribute, and thank you for all you do to expand on Wikimedia's mission of sharing free knowledge! SarahStierch ( talk) 16:17, 30 June 2013 (UTC) |
Hi Parkwells! Thanks for participating in the World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership. Your contributions are important to improving Wikipedia! I wanted to share a few updates with you:
Keep up the great work, and please contact me if you need anything! Thank you for all you do for free knowledge! EdwardsBot ( talk) 16:40, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Parkwells, thanks a lot for taking your time to improve Paraguayan War. -- Lecen ( talk) 17:34, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
All fixed. Parkwells ( talk) 12:12, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Fixed. Parkwells ( talk) 23:45, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Fixed; deleted notice. Parkwells ( talk) 22:03, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Fixed; deleted notice. Parkwells ( talk) 21:48, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Our Lady of Guadalupe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tilma ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:03, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Parkwells. You have already expressed your opinion once at Talk:Armenian Question about this. I thought that perhaps my Requested move 06 August 2013 might be of interest to you also. Thanks. Poeticbent talk 18:01, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Frederic De Frouville may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
article, I am wondering why you put Ohkay Owingeh in italics? Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 23:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Fixed and deleted notice. Parkwells ( talk) 01:56, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:10, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:56, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to William Croswell Doane may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:18, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sven Haakanson may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 03:16, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cathedral of All Saints, Albany, New York may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:19, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Walter Harper may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:21, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nenana, Alaska may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hudson Stuck may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:05, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mission Church (Arctic Village, Alaska) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 01:45, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sholto Douglas, 19th Earl of Morton may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:59, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Punch (slave) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:22, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:26, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed you recently expanded the Harry Karstens article. I am wondering if you would be interested in helping me expand that for DYK, as you seem to know more about it than me. I was working on a series of the first McKinley expedition in my userspace, and your edit forced me to stop procrastinating! Cheers, ~ Hue Sat Lum 04:07, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits to Camp Douglas. This was one of the first articles, if not the first, to which I made significant edits. I have thought it probably needed cleaning up, but it can be hard to go back to an article on which one has spent considerable time. Usually, I go back to review an article a few times soon after I write or significantly edit it, but after awhile it fades from thought unless some changes show up on my watchlist. I hope I would do a better job today, at least with the tone. I was actually a little surprised that I had picked up some POV words and thoughts from Levy or used them even if I came up with them.
Levy's book is one of the few that I have used as a source that I do not own or could not get online, either free or through Questia. As I recall, he resides in the Chicago area.
He is a lawyer, not an academic historian. The generally positive comments in the review you linked shows that his book was rather good and was well received, at least by the reviewer. I did not think his POV was extreme and I tried to balance that with other sources. I don't recall that he had other books on the Civil War, so it is not surprising he has lower visibility.
Levy made a few mistakes but they did not affect the overall value of his book. He was not aware that the "rank" date of a Civil War brevet general may have had very little coincidence with the confirmation date, even the appointment date, especially for the omnibus appointments that ranked from March 1865 but were not made until 1866 or even later in some cases. So he should not have been surprised that Sweet was not referred to as a general near the end of the war - because that appointment had not been confirmed, probably not even made, at that time.
The review of Levy's book, although only one long paragraph, hits many of his high points and does a good job. Levy also makes the point that the camp was located in a very bad place, low lying with bad drainage, and should have been moved. That was proposed at least once, as I recall. It was difficult to clean it up or upgrade it where it was located. Also, the conditions and treatment of the prisoners was not uniform over time. They both got better and worse depending on the commander and the circumstances. Some improvements were made, but others could have been made. Some downgrading in treatment or diet could have been avoided.
The article originally relied in part on the History Channel documentary. I have seen that program. It is reasonably good but I wanted to eliminate citations to it. It also has been the subject of a little POV pushing. Someone was trying to gradually soften some of the wording. I ultimately let a few of those edits go but finally had to stand up for the fact that it was a bad place and there was little excuse for it - except perhaps revenge for actual or suspected treatment of Union prisoners, which is noted. That's a reason, but not really an excuse. Some of the characterization words may have come from Levy or his opinions but some may have been my way of transitioning - such as from what might appear to have been the case to what the source, Levy or another, more convincing says. I am more attuned to this now and I think I would be unlikely to use such words, at least not very often.
I tried to keep some of the much shorter article which exited prior to my edits but I think I did omit or change some things that were unsourced or did not quite fit into the new section structure I used.
I believe that Hoffman had some oversight of Camp Douglas before he became commissary general of prisoners. I think he may have been stationed outside Washington, DC. Detroit comes to mind. He may have had some sort of regional position. I cannot recall and I wanted to write to you before looking for more information, in case I found none or was delayed I will try to find something on Hoffman's previous tenure, although I probably will need to go to the library if I need to find something in Levy's book, unless there is an excerpt on line.
I think that prisoners were made to work in many camps. I think they were "paid" in some way, but clearly it was not much. I think there was some sort of restriction on work but I will have to do a little research to see if there was any formal restriction or convention. I have a couple other books which might have something on this. I will look.
You are right that some of the bad conditions existed due to ignorance. The fact that Union soldiers died at Camp Douglas when they were training there or when the group that was awaiting exchange had to live there for a few months, and even some of the guards suffered, is a good indication of this. If this point is not made clearly enough, perhaps I can find a source that could be added.
When I saw the readability scale several days ago, I thought I would run a few of my articles through it. Because this one is long, it was done when I was new to editing and I had some thought it might have ended up a little dense, I put the article through the readability test. I was surprised, and actually a little pleased, that it had a decent readability score.
I justified the length of the article, to myself, on the basis that the camp had several uses, several commanders and many changes over time. There also were a number of incidents that seemed worth recording. I also wanted to cover the points in the History Channel show, which I had seen not long before I worked on the article. I also found it difficult to summarize some points because they changed over time.
I am quite glad that you have done such a fine job of editing the article. It relieves me from a nagging feeling that I should go back and clean it up. (One or two of my other early efforts probably need the same treatment.) I will look for sources on the points raised. I have gone on at some length but it is an interesting subject and the article did need some additional light. Donner60 ( talk) 03:20, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:57, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
On 2 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Harry Karstens, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Hudson Stuck, Harry Karstens, Walter Harper, and Robert Tatum were the first to successfully climb Mount McKinley (pictured)? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:03, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
On 2 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Walter Harper, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Hudson Stuck, Harry Karstens, Walter Harper, and Robert Tatum were the first to successfully climb Mount McKinley (pictured)? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:03, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:38, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Delete. Parkwells ( talk) 13:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Please respond. Geo Swan ( talk) 03:01, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Is "Recognised" suitable to describe English on the Brunei info-box in regards to this Section 2 of Article 82 on the Country's Constitution?
Article 82
Section 2 - An official version in the English language shall be provided of anything which, by this Constitution or by any written law or by the Standing Orders, is required to be printed or in writing, and such version shall, in addition to the official Malay version, be accepted as an authentic text. Alevero987 ( talk) 23:04, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Cite error: The named reference <ref name="New York Times"/> was invoked but never defined. Please fix. -- Frze > talk 07:29, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:13, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello Parkwells, The Pedro Albizu Campos page has been protected from further editing because of the edit warring that is going on. Please discuss the issues involved with User:Nelsondenis248 in the articles "talk" page and reach some sort of agreement so that the "protection" can be lifted. Thank you. Tony the Marine ( talk) 15:40, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Some users have been working hard on Category:Pages with broken reference names. Parkwells ( talk) 22:27, 21 October 2013 (UTC) Here you added new references / a new reference ref name="pmid9134437" but didn't define it. This has been showing as an error at the bottom of the article. Cite error: The named reference was invoked but never defined. Can you take a look and work out what you were trying to do? Thanks -- Frze ( talk · contribs) 17:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
This edit is bad. It's shown in several sources that Memorial Hospital merged with Sloan Kettering to form Memorial Sloan Kettering http://www.mskcc.org/. Andrevan @ 22:03, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! Would love any feedback you have! Andrevan @ 17:10, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
here, for comparison, some Aponte-Vazquez work: the interesting thing is I don't have access to Spanish language sources. I do cover his claims briefly. Andrevan @ 18:18, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
One of the most interesting ideas is that Rhoads was doing work for other doctors on the locals, and he wasn't just curing diseases, he was also occasionally causing them. In the case of sprue we know this to be true, see Lederer, which I can also send you if you haven't read it - we don't understand how he was doing this - diets? They were on a rigorous diet because it was work with volunteers, largely - sprue isn't some mysterious uncured disease by the way, it's considered like celiac disease or gluten allergies, I believe. This kind of ethical breach - eat a weird diet see if you get sprue - is considered par for the course for 1930s era racist white doctors, and the reveal isn't controversial. One thing that Aponte-Vazquez says is that Katz doesn't speak Spanish and didn't read some of that. There is also some brief Rhoads correspondence with Flexner about finding polio samples. Somehow polio had spread to P.R., Flexner knew of this, and Rhoads went to collect samples, which he sent back to NY. Also, on the funding issue, the Rockefeller Foundation did reimburse Rhoads for his car, which to me to is pretty damning that they ended up using the Cidra research, which I think someone actually basically says. The question is when he was writing Stewart, who worked at Sloan-Kettering in cancer, was he referring to an actual cancer transplant attempted, or merely, as he says, joking around? Payne puts into writing that Beverley "doesn't accept the joke explanation" of the letter. Andrevan @ 18:38, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
check this one out and also feel free to go to the archive :) Andrevan @ 22:30, 23 October 2013 (UTC) [5]
But, for the Rhoads article, I think we have to get back to facts: you say above they forced people to "eat a weird diet see if you get sprue - is considered par for the course for 1930s era racist white doctors" - Lederer wrote it wasn't a weird diet; it was what many poor people lived on. They weren't dealing with really healthy people and making them sick; they were dealing with a large group of people living with these endemic problems caused by hookworm and tropical sprue and the latter caused by diet, they thought, although didn't exactly understand. 100 of the 250-270 people they saw with anemia already had tropical sprue. Based on what drs knew at the time, this was at least in part because of their limited diets. The drs were trying to learn what caused it, in order to prevent and/or find additional ways to treat it. The fact that it is a continuing problem in PR shows that the solution is still not simple - and can't be blamed just on 30s era US doctors. Parkwells ( talk) 09:27, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
A different topic - I noticed your comment in your paper saying that the government's failure in recovery in the aftermath of this contributed to the rise of the opposition and Nationalist Party. I'd like to learn more about it - do you have recommendations for articles or books on that? the WP article on the earthquake doesn't deal at all with the political aftermath; the main article doesn't much address it, nor does the Nationalist party article. There are certainly other examples of natural disasters leading to changes in the political landscape in other places, so I think it's a good point, and the timing is right. Parkwells ( talk) 14:15, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Done. Parkwells ( talk) 15:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
dear Parkwells, Could you please have a look on this 2013 Operation at Motijheel Shapla Chattar article? It is needed a thorough c/e.-- FreemesM (talk) 10:20, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your quick c/e on 2013 Operation at Motijheel Shapla Chattar article and making it to a decent, balanced one. FreemesM (talk) 03:11, 27 October 2013 (UTC) |
Hi, I'm surprised you weren't notified about this since you are specifically named. I haven't come up with a statement that suits me. In a rush . . . Yopienso ( talk) 16:42, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
fixed. Parkwells ( talk) 21:20, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Fixed. Parkwells ( talk) 19:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 20:29, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Is this "external link" suitable under the WP:EL guidelines? The publication has the same name and claims to follow the same tradition but I'm not sure. Alatari ( talk) 16:53, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:24, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Noted your edits to Lillie Langtry. Minor issue is first paragraph where you changed it to say: born Emilie Charlotte Le Breton, was a British actress who was celebrated as a beauty and public figure. In May 1877, Lady Sebright invited her to "an evening at home". One of the fascinations about her is that in these early days she was NOT an actress but a celebrity - famous for no other reasons but her looks and ability to enchant. When she fell on hard times she took up the acting career (1881). I think that this should be reflected in the summary section at the beginning of the article.
Ted
Sidpickle ( talk) 08:24, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.
``` Buster Seven Talk 17:10, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
I appreciate your sensitive improvements. John Foxe ( talk) 01:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC) |
I appreciate your efforts to copy-edit a number of the Restoration Movement pages (some of them clearly need help), but a number of your edits have had the effect of changing the content of sourced text in ways that are inconsistent with the specific sources cited. Some have introduced factual errors.
A good example is a sentence that mentioned "congregations that refused to subscribe to the Philadelphia Confession." It linked the Philadelphia Confession to the article on the 1689 Baptist Confession of Faith because the Philadelphia Confession doesn't have it's own article, and the article on the 1689 Baptist Confession discusses how the Philadelphia Confession was derived from it. Your edit changed the sentence to say "congregations that refused to subscribe to the 1689 Philadelphia Confession." This seems like a simple and obvious edit, but it's incorrect. The Philadelphia Baptist Association wasn't established until 1707. They added a couple a couple of sections to the 1689 Baptist confession, renamed it the "Philadelphia Confession", and formally adopted it in 1742. If we wanted to add a year, we could call it the 1742 Philadelphia Confession, but the source we're citing doesn't do that.
Good copy editing can be incredibly useful, and I'm sure you don't mean to change the content of the articles - but many of your edits have have had that effect. I've been going back and checking these changes one by one, and it's taking me hours. It would be very helpful if you could be a little more careful about not changing the content when you do your copy editing. EastTN ( talk) 20:55, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Fixed. Parkwells ( talk) 20:47, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello Parkwells/Archive 6! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women artists. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women artists, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women artists page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement! |
SarahStierch ( talk) 03:11, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:05, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Delete. Parkwells ( talk) 09:58, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Fixed. Parkwells ( talk) 21:30, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your edits at " The Wife of His Youth". What do you think of putting the article up for good article review? Would you assist me in getting it ready and/or responding to any concerns in that process? Best, -- Midnightdreary ( talk) 16:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Fixed. Parkwells ( talk) 12:02, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
"In 1898 he was defeated for the state Republican" ... What? They only had one in Texas? Clarityfiend ( talk) 01:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
All fixed. Parkwells ( talk) 01:42, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Done Parkwells ( talk) 23:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |