This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Done. Flayer ( talk) 15:22, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. :) Intothewoods29 ( talk) 03:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Why are you marking talk pages patrolled. It's happening every 15 seconds, are you using a bot? -- Jeandré, 2008-09-05 t11:38:55z
My basic attitude is that a generic header like that is harmless, and need not be deleted. -- Orange Mike | Talk 17:39, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. You left a message on my talk page that I'm not 100% understanding. I think you deleted the talk page that goes with one of my photographs. The talk page had a discussion of what kind of bird is in the picture, I think. It was deleted so now I can't see it.... Am I confused? Just wanted to make sure I understood what was going on. (You're deleting the talk page, not the picture, right?) Asbruckman ( talk) 17:25, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm not the original uploader of this file, rather the person that provided a PNG version with an improved rationale. A free alternative most certainly cannot exist, because the UI itself is subject to copyright.
I was very reluctant to upload it in the first place, but is it truly inappropriate for an article to contain a low-resolution graphical example of its primary function? — C M B J 10:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I wanted to let you know that images are no longer listed for investigation at the copyright problems board. {{ imagevio}} has been deprecated. Blatant image copyright infringements should be tagged {{ Db-i9}} for speedy deletion. Suspected copyright infringements should be listed at Possibly unfree images. I am moving Image:New Pic- Brant.gif to PUI for further investigation. Thanks for keeping an eye out for copyright problems. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:08, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
I had noted on this image page that the painting was photographed or uploaded into Wikipedia upside down.
This is actually a well studied and important minimalist painting. It was shown at NYC's Museum of Modern Art (MOMA) as recently as March of this year, and was mentioned the NY Times as recently as Jan 4 ( http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/04/arts/design/04wart.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=%22Suprematist%20Composition%22&st=cse&oref=slogin).
No mean feat, you know? This is an important work and should remain included in Wikipedia. Thanks for any advice you can offer...Please reply on my talk page. 207.237.198.152 ( talk) 04:25, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Why are you putting a deletion tag on the talk page? Deletion tags should be placed on the main page, and in any case this article does not justify deletion. -- Michael Johnson ( talk) 22:19, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
While many talk pages might fit the speedy deletion criteria, they also clog up the queue, so an alternative solution not requiring administrative assistance is replacing them with a generic talk page header {{ talkheader}} or something project specific.-- Tikiwont ( talk) 11:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)