Hi there. You are obviously not a new editor to Wikipedia. Can you please declare what your main account is? -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 00:50, 9 August 2021 (UTC) reply

I have another account, but I don't want to reveal it because the account name is my real name. I sent an email to the Arbitration Committee writing that I didn't want to use an account with my name. They answered that I could make a clean start. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-Bor-uEvshuIYH5vLppXYQM_f4QzSlx3/view?usp=drivesdk ObserveOwl ( talk) 10:57, 9 August 2021 (UTC) reply

If I revert again, I will be on a 3RR vio. So it would be better if you would do it please? -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 12:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC) reply

@ John Maynard Friedman: I've sent a message on the unregistered user's talk page instead. ObserveOwl ( talk) 14:47, 4 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Thank you. The IP address has been bouncing about, so I don't really expect that to work unless you are lucky to catch them while active. They haven't engaged with talk:Maus#Section moved. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 17:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC) reply

It has been a day since I've edited his talk page, so I reverted that edit and two other edits I found problematic. ObserveOwl ( talk) 16:25, 5 February 2022 (UTC) reply

@ John Maynard Friedman... another unregistered editor thinks it is "hiding"... Should the article be protected? ObserveOwl ( talk) 06:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Makes sense, at least for a week or so. I assume you know about wp:request for page protection. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 11:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC) reply

I see we both did the same RPP. I got in first but I see no reason why you can't add your remarks to support my request? -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 17:53, 14 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

On 20 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Password Game, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the creator of The Password Game was unsure whether winning the game was possible before releasing it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Password Game. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, The Password Game), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Kusma ( talk) 00:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC) reply

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 7,987 views (665.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot ( talk • contribs) (he/ it) 03:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Saw this on DYK and had to check the game out. One of the best small games I've played since Wordle came out- thanks for writing this article and getting it on DYK, it's a fantastic game and I'm glad you put it out there. MyCatIsAChonk ( talk) ( not me) ( also not me) ( still no) 01:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Hey, thanks for your kind words. I became quite surprised how my work has been noticed; an experienced editor even used the thank tool on the article's creation edit. It's always very nice to see the support I receive for the time I spend here, especially on my talk page. (Also, that's the first enwiki article I've published. ) ObserveOwl ( talk) 14:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Do you intend to bring it to GA? - Cukie Gherkin ( talk) 04:12, 9 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hm. I haven't been caring much about the article lately, except for some occasional visits to the edit history to see if anyone vandalized it. It once came across to me that it had some potential for GA, but since English is my third language, I feel quite insecure about the way I write. (I am the author of the majority of the article. [1]) This made me question whether it complies with GA criteria 1a ("well-written"). Also, the two paragraphs in the gameplay section have a large difference in size, which feels a bit wrong... but I can't come up with a better way of writing it.

Since I can't assess what I wrote with absolute certainty, I have to ask: do you think the article is close to meeting the GA criteria? ObserveOwl ( chit-chat • my doings) 06:39, 9 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Oh, I have no idea. I just had the idea of writing the article, but saw you wrote it already. If you want, I can do a copyedit and nominate it as a co-nomination between the two of us sometime. - Cukie Gherkin ( talk) 07:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Sorry for the delay. I'd be glad if you do a copyedit; feel free to make any major changes if needed. ObserveOwl ( chit-chat • my doings) 09:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Sure thing. Also, I'm not certain about applying the free license to the screenshot; while it is just text, I believe that the format of the page is still copyrighted. Either way, I'm going to try a different screenshot. - Cukie Gherkin ( talk) 13:42, 9 August 2023 (UTC) reply

@Cukie Gherkin The original screenshot has a license confirmed by Neal Agarwal himself - see the file page, it has an OTRS ticket. This means that Agarwal sent an email to Commons' Volunteer Response Team confirming that the screenshot is under the CC BY-SA 4.0, so it is not copyrighted. I'm sorry, but I might have to restore the original screenshot and speedy delete the fair use one. ObserveOwl ( chit-chat • my doings) 16:18, 9 August 2023 (UTC) reply

I see, thank you for the clarification. - Cukie Gherkin ( talk) 16:20, 9 August 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Cukie Gherkin: Your copyedits have been very helpful, thank you. Mind if I nominate it tomorrow (in 12 hours or so)? There's an ongoing GAN Backlog Drive until the end of this month and many people are currently reviewing nominations, so it could be a good idea to nominate it before September. I'll be reading the nomination instructions today before sleeping. ObserveOwl ( chit-chat • my doings) 21:04, 25 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Okay, I've read the instructions and analysed the criteria, and I already feel confident enough to put the GAN template on the talk page. (You will also be allowed to respond to the reviewer's suggestions.) ObserveOwl ( chit-chat • my doings) 23:10, 25 August 2023 (UTC) reply

wow, the article barely passes the minimum prose size requirement of 800 words for the drive - with 801 words ObserveOwl ( chit-chat • my doings) 23:20, 25 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Password Game you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kung Fu Man -- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 15:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The article The Password Game you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Password Game for comments about the article, and Talk:The Password Game/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kung Fu Man -- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 18:22, 26 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Sarah McCreanor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 08:15, 11 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi ObserveOwl, I am currently working on improving San Andreas with the goal of nominating it for GA sometime this month. I see you are the biggest contributor, so I wanted to ask you whether you had any objection, or if you had anything you wanted to add to the article. Thanks! RetroCosmos ^talk 13:44, 8 January 2024 (UTC) reply

@ RetroCosmos: Hi! Yes, I substantially expanded the entire Development section by translating from the Portuguese article (the section only had a sentence before I expanded). There's still content in the Portuguese development section that I didn't get to translate, involving the character conception and technical aspects. The reception section is also quite short in comparison to the Portuguese one; while the English article doesn't even appear to mention awards, there's a whole list of awards and accolades received by the game in Portuguese. I could try to expand the article further by translating, if you want. ObserveOwl ( chit-chat • my doings) 14:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC) reply

That's awesome. My Portuguese is not too good (read: nonexistent) so your help would be amazing on that front.

If the Portuguese one is an FA - maybe the English one might have a shot! I have a dream of nominating it for TFA for the 20th anniversary of its release (26 Oct 2024) but maybe that might be not enough time. RetroCosmos ^talk 14:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC) reply

That's interesting, I'm willing to help. Which part of the article do you think would benefit from a translated expansion first? I want to point out now that I've noticed a few issues in the Portuguese article. While translating, I saw a few cited sources (like WhatCulture and Sportskeeda) marked as unreliable at WP:RSP, so I made my best to replace them with reliable ones. Also, now that I'm revisiting the article, maybe that section has too many quotes. ObserveOwl ( chit-chat • my doings) 18:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Oh wow, I've been quite busy last week, but I see now that the article has been greatly improved. If you need any more help with adding stuff from the Portuguese article, please let me know. ObserveOwl ( chit-chat • my doings) 13:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC) reply

(Nice work, RetroCosmos and @ Rhain!) ObserveOwl ( chit-chat • my doings) 14:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Oh yeah, forgot to mention that the article in Portuguese is featured. ObserveOwl ( chit-chat • my doings) 14:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC) reply

FlipaClip, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

PARAKANYAA ( talk) 21:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC) reply

On 27 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sarah McCreanor, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sarah McCreanor imitates objects under hydraulic presses through dance? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sarah McCreanor. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Sarah McCreanor), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 ( talk) 00:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC) reply

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.

⇒ SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 16:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC) reply