Welcome!
Hello, Noaccountaccount, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Jenks24 (
talk) 06:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
I don't know who you are, but--aside from the butchering of the content--the writing is just awful. I am trying to contact people higher up in the Wikipedia administration. I just do not believe that it is right, or proper, that you should be able to come on to Wikipedia, and mess with an accurately written description and his work.
Martin Eden 5
FROM: Martin Eden 5:
FYI: The Roger Feinman debate" is a case in point Roger Feinman--who died recently--was a disbarred lawyer who was also fired from CBS News. He was extraordinarily jealous of Lifton, and began his absurd attacks back in the days of Compuserve. Lifton has documentation from Compuserve's attorneys warning Feinman to cease and desist, or be expelled form the Compuserve discussion group. To be fair (to Feinman), the original description written here in Wikipedia includes an accurate description not only of Feinman's absurd charges, but also of Feinman's disbarment, along with an Internet link to those legal proceedings. If someone is going to insist that Feinman (and his absurd charges that Lifton made up his theory to get a book contract) is to be aired, then it seems only fair that the fact that he was a disbarred lawyer (along with the proper citations for that) plus the fact that he was fired from CBS News, should also be listed. Alternatively, the entire Feinman matter should be dropped.
FYI #2: Why in the world would anyone want to include, in a biography of Lifton (who had already earned a Bachelor of Engineering Physics degree from Cornell, in 1962), the fact that --in 1966 (that's 45 years ago!) the fact that he was dismissed from UCLA because of his pre-occupaton with the JFK case? This seems especially irrelevant when in fact Lifton then went on to earn a Masters Degree, from Cornell University, in that very subject. So who is it that is writing, here, in such a biased and uninformed fashion?
For whatever reason, the person who had been attempting to "edit" this pieces indulges in such unfair and biased writing.
I have many other comments to make, about this sorry state of affairs, but the above is all I have time for right now.
Martin Eden 5
- Hi, My edits come from following Wikipedia guidelines and working from available sources, at least to the best of my ability. Noaccountaccount ( talk) 23:22, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia.
- Regarding one of your recent edits, that is the one you made to David Lifton, it did appear to be a particularly large removal of material, and although you wrote an excellent Edit Summary, it was reverted on the advice of a "bot". I have undone that revision and reinstated your editing.
- May I refer you to the welcome page to learn more about contributing this encyclopedia. Your edit can be found in The History here.
- If I can be of assistance from now on, please do not hesitate in contacting me, either on my Talk page, or via the Wikipedia E-mail system.
- Please accept my apologies, and, for my part, I blame it on that damn "bot" and iGLOO.
Good editing! -- Gareth Griffith-Jones ( talk) 08:39, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Noaccountaccount. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |