The only reason I took a username with dotcom in the end is because nitinkhanna is not available. My intention was to make some edits, show to the Wikipedia community that I am serious about being a member and then request to take over the defunct account of nitinkhanna. That is my actual name and my identity on most of the Internet and I'd like to keep that username. The two edits I've made were in the interest of fixing things on Wikipedia, not self-aggrandizing. Please unblock my edit permissions and grant me the username of nitinkhanna.
Accept reason:
This is how I expected this would turn out. Since no one's used that name in the nearly seven years since the account was created, you may
usurp it—follow the procedures there.
Daniel Case (
talk) 19:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Nothing more than a dictionary definition. If the article could be expanded with examples of this concept in action, we might have something, but I suspect that the concept has never been seen in action, so such examples will be hard to come by.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
@WikiDan61 I believe that every word should find a place on Wikipedia. If one day we come across sources for the use of the word, someone can add to the page. Books that mention the word 'ptochocracy' can currently be found in Google Books, but since I own none of them, I cannot quote from them. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Nitinkhanna (
talk •
contribs)
I created an entry on
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not a dictionary and I hope you can address it there with regards to my logic. Thanks for pointing out the resource... I'm also going forth and adding a Wiktionary page, but I believe the word has a better place on Wikipedia, where people can find more information and expand this stub.
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ptochocracy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:39, 6 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Proof of ownership
This is a post made by myself, Nitin Khanna, to prove ownership of this account with regards to ownership of the Global account nitinkhanna.
Nitinkhanna (
talk) 18:48, 3 March 2015 (UTC)reply