It is a well-written stub, though I wonder if it is notable? I am in the UK and I'm unfamiliar with US politics. Otherwise, good. Pelarmian ( talk) 09:47, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of David Benac for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Benac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Benac until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:53, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello Nicool9. I noticed that you're very keen to get David Benac into Google search results [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Do you know Benac? If so you have a conflict of interest and should read our policy of conflict of interest editing (in brief: don't do it). Have a good day. – Joe ( talk) 09:22, 13 July 2017 (UTC)