This page is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be
added to this page.
Final Review
Hi Nandini, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:
Language: On the whole, the article employs proper English spelling and grammar. 5 points.
Structure: The structure is a bit idiosyncratic and does not appear to follow any template. 4 points.
Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
Accuracy: Most of the claims are backed by citations, but not all of the citations are of the same quality. 4 points.
Relevance: Not all of information is relevant, particularly the Culture and Religion sections, which could probably be combined and shortened considerably. 3 points.
Length: Word count 1918/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 4 points.
The final score is 25/30. Have a great summer!
Chuck Haberl (
talk) 23:38, 11 May 2021 (UTC)reply
