Hello, Mxhyn16, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GPL93 ( talk) 21:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC) reply

---

Hello, I'm Whiteguru. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Whiteguru ( talk) 20:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Legacies (TV series), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. — YoungForever ^(talk) 01:21, 25 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jerry Bruckheimer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gemini Man. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 7 July 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trauma (I Prevail album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 5 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. The AllMusic genre could is not a reliable source for genres and should never be used. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:51, 9 August 2021 (UTC) reply

You continue to make the same changes, and do so without explanation. Both need to stop. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:35, 22 August 2021 (UTC) reply

I know I'm sorry about. It's just it kinda feels weird to separate the genres by using commas. I feel like putting in flatlist just makes it more suitable. I hope you understand. Please don't block me. I just want to improve something. Mxhyn16 ( talk) 06:38, 22 August 2021 (UTC) reply

I couldn't block you if I tried. Lists are lists, and comma are commas. Feel free to read the documentation at {{ Infobox musical artist}}. Long unformatted lists are beneficial for those who use screen readers, but too many people treat them as decoration, which they aught not to be. The rest of your work is good though! Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:40, 22 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

I’ve put in a protection request for Scream 2022. Had a feeling the vandalism would increase. Sure there were registered users restoring the unverified summary, but especially since it’s now multiple IPs, it felt right-- CreecregofLife ( talk) 06:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC) reply

You just made a series of ≈20 consecutive edits to Halo (TV series), starting with the addition of ≈40,000 bytes of content, which was then whittled down to -4 bytes, and a visible difference of minor changes to four words. You didn't leave any edit summaries, nor is there any comments from you on the article talk page that would explain this unusual editing. It would be helpful to do so in the future. Also, instead of blowing up the page history, and all the watchpages of editors monitoring this page, could I suggest that in the future that you use the preview function to make changes while limiting the number of actual edits, or work on the content in your User:Mxhyn16/sandbox, then transfer the finalized version to the article with a single edit. Please keep these suggestions in mind going forward, thank you. - wolf 07:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC) reply

I was trying to fix the page because it wasn't constructive. So I copy and paste the last page for a manual revert. But I accidentally double up the page. I didn't even notice because I thought it didn't work. I was using my phone to fix the page. Using a computer would've been easier, but I had use my phone because it was getting late. I'm sorry about that. Hope you understand. Thank you Mxhyn16 ( talk) 17:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Is there a particular reason why the edit was deemed "Completely unnecessary" to the point of reverting everything? I am using guidelines to help expand the "Reception" part of the article, and I am citing a variety of different sources ensure that the article is well versed, instead of being pulled out of no where; plus as per Snowmanonahoe "at least provide a source(s)" which I have been. Reception to a show is important to any wiki page on media, such a movie or tv show, and just leaving it "oh it's all positive" without putting in any level and counterbalance of "but there are some criticisms" is biased. Whatever concerns and criticism fans may have with the show, I am not using fan reaction on social media but actual critic and other publisher articles to add to the point. Literally on a section in a TV article about Reception, deleting sourced criticism and only leaving in the "it's all good man, nothing to see here but positivieity and rainbows" is counterproductive, biased, and not servicing the article nor the world of media and associated praise and criticism. Mxhyn16 [[User:Duyneuzaenasagae|Duyneuzaenasagae] — Preceding undated comment added 16:35, 31 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Please assume good faith and do not use offensive language towards other editors like you did [1]. LancedSoul ( talk) 19:54, 5 December 2022 (UTC) reply

I totally understand. I know I'm not supposed to offensive language toward other editors. It's just I can't do everything myself. Someone has to do it.

Hello, I noted that the use of % isn't been used, but it was reverted because it is against MOS:PERCENT. CastJared ( talk) 14:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm CastJared. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Last of Us (TV series) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CastJared ( talk) 03:14, 19 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Last of Us (TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. CastJared ( talk) 03:14, 19 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Thanksgiving (2023 film), you may be blocked from editing. Grachester ( talk) 01:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Castlevania (TV series). Please don't re-add genres without sources. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 21:46, 3 August 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Jenna Ortega. Sundayclose ( talk) 02:02, 16 August 2023 (UTC) reply

I just realized that it was changed to 2024. Have you heard of edit summaries that might prevent this kind of misinterpretation? Sundayclose ( talk) 02:07, 16 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Yeah I heard, I just forgot to put it in why I changed it. I put 2024 because the Emmys was delayed due to the strike. Mxhyn16 ( talk) 02:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Rehsarb. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Monarch: Legacy of Monsters that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rehsarb ( talk) 23:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Can you explain why you reverted this, please? -- Alex_21  _TALK 05:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

While I do feel like edit was in good faith, I felt that there was no need to improve the Halo page. The edit you made had no impact. For example, you added a reference in season 2 in the series overview. Having that reference was unnecessary and doesn't serve an impact. That's why I reverted your edit. It just doesnt serve any purpose. Mxhyn16 ( talk) 07:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

I have explained why that reference is there, and it is required per policy. However, "I can see nothing wrong with the article and there is no need to change anything at all" is not a valid reason to revert; I also made other edits to the article, all of which were valid. -- Alex_21  _TALK 10:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Monarch: Legacy of Monsters. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — k6ka 🍁 ( Talk · Contributions) 04:52, 3 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I've noticed you've done some reverts of good faith edits are Fallout (American TV series) without a reason. You're also pushing up against WP:3RR. Be mindful. -- ferret ( talk) 01:50, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You are blocked for 3 days for edit warring and personal attacks/incivility. Sergecross73 msg me 23:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi, so I noticed that I've been blocked for 3 days. Let me clarify the whole situation to you. I did not see his edits as good faith. I saw that as vandalism because he put 🐂💩 and ask people to prove him wrong for the citation. I reverted his edits and he reverted mine. That's when I immediately lost my cool from that and I shouted some explicit words to him. I also forgot about the 3RR since I reverted his edits for about 4 times. I realize I was in the wrong and I never should have lost my temper from that. I should have use the talk page instead of having to edit warring with him. I am deeply sorry for the troubles I have caused. If you do not want to unblock me, that's totally understandable. I took a break from Wikipedia for a month after a previous situation. I can handle having not to edit for 3 days. Mxhyn16 ( talk) 23:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you for the explanation. It is good to see that you have the awareness of what happened to be able to write that explanation above. It makes me hopeful that this won't be an issue moving forward. If taking a month off in the past has helped, I do think taking a bit of time off to wait for the block to be expire would be helpful in this case too. (Not a month, just the 3 days.) Sergecross73 msg me 13:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC) reply