Why are you changing the wordings in Road signs in the Philippines? — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 12:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC) reply

I'm adding the official sign ID of all the signs AND using the official wording by the Highway Safety Design Standards Manuals: Part 2 - Road Signs and Pavement Markings Manual by the Department of Public Works and Highways of the Republic of the Philippines.

Stop turning CORRECT data into false data!

https://www.dpwh.gov.ph/dpwh/references/guidelines_manuals/highway_safety_design_standards_manual

Everything I changed is 100% in line with the official wording of signs as in this document. The official document of the Depart of Public Works and Highways of the Republic of the Philippines. Additionally I've added all the proper sign IDs

It's a lot of work to add all of that AND fix the few errors I've found AND fix several inconsistencies.

Stop screwing my CORRECT data with wrong, inconsistent and at several points even WRONG data.

@ Mrgenie: That is a simplified version of the document. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 12:37, 20 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Example!

Other warning road signs

• 
  Vertical clearance
• 
  Low clearance
• 
  Slow down, accident prone area
• 
  Bumagal, madalas ang aksidente dito (Slow down, accident prone area)
• 
  Slow down, merging traffic ahead
• 
  Lane ends, merge left
• 
  Slow down, weighbridge ahead

You don't see what's wrong here??????????

Both the W9-1A and W9-1B are Vertical Clearance signs

but W9-1B is the Low clearance sign and W9-1A is the clearance sign

W9-1A is NOT the Vertical clearance sign, because BOTH signs are vertical clearance signs. Road This is NOT me making this up, it's in the official document of the Department of Public Works and Highways of the Republic of the Philippines - Highway Safety Design Standards Part 2: Road Signs and Pavement Markings Manual.

I stick to the letter and the word and the sign-ID of the official document. And it's a lot of work to stick literally to the official document ..

"That is a simplified version of the document." That's listed as official source at the bottom of the wikipedia page! If you have a better source, then it should be at the bottom of the page of the wikipedia entry.

You can't just say:"I have a better source" and then not mentioning the source at the bottom of the wikipedia entry..

every contribution must be substantiated.

I can substantiate my contributions.. Because I'm using the official sources and listed as source in the wikipedia entry

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Road signs by the DPWH PH is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Road signs by the DPWH PH until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 04:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Well you won. I delete my wikipedia account .

Not interested in dictatorship on wikipedia. Good luck! I was adding correct information from official sources. Since I'm being dictated that we do not want correct information from official sources on wikipedia.. bye

Now I know what wikipedia is all about..

fake, false, incomplete, incorrect information.. aka worthless.

Good luck with the project!