Archives ( Index)

1

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quba rugs and carpets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quba rugs and carpets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Someone, i guess^{( talk i guess| le edit list)} 21:34, 2 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hey, thanks for reverting the vandalism, but your revert did not remove the vandalism in it's entirety. Please go through the article's history or the section you are reverting to ensure you remove all the vandalisms. I have reverted to the last good version for now. Thank you for keeping Wikipedia vandal free and good job, and happy editing :) —  The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 07:14, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Got it, thanks for the heads up! Morris80315436 ( talk) 21:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to FareCompare: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 00:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sure, I'll try to warn them from now on. Morris80315436 ( talk) 08:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The "Accidental revert" was me pressing the revert (vandal) in the ip's contribs and it assumed than your revert was the new vandalism. :) begocc ^questions? 08:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply

No worries, I assumed so as well and reverted the edit. Happy editing! Morris80315436 ( talk) 08:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply