Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 13:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:52, 26 May 2009 (UTC) reply

In articles written in American English, please leave punctuation inside quotation marks. Edits such as these are not necessary. Thanks, Drmies ( talk) 02:11, 28 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 22:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 03:25, 5 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I created the map that you asked me to make. If you need help with anything else, feel free to contact me again. --- Acntx ( talk) 00:55, 6 June 2009 (UTC). reply

Hi, it's me, Artichoke-Boy. I need your advise on something: do you think I should nominate Chanteuse for deletion per WP: NOTADICTIONARY? Or do you think it's not necessary? If you think it should be nominated, though, do not nominate it for me. Just tell me if I should or shouldn't. Thanks a lot.  ARTICHOKE-BOY  (Talk) 19:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the help (this is my first time requesting an article for deletion).  ARTICHOKE-BOY  (Talk) 15:38, 7 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which succeeded with 56 in support, 12 in opposition and 3 neutral votes. I am truly honored by the trust that the community has placed in me. Whether you supported me, opposed me, or if you only posted questions or commented om my RfA, I thank you for your input and I will be looking at the reasons that people opposed me so I can improve in those areas :). If you ever need anything please feel free to ask me and I would be happy to help you :). All the Best, Mifter ( talk)

Mifter ( talk) 23:45, 6 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your GA review of Beriah Magoffin. Though it was only your second review, it was very similar to reviews I've received from more experienced GA reviewers. I don't think you were particularly hard on the prose; I think your suggestions made the article much better. I hope my responses have adequately addressed your concerns and you will be able to pass the article to GA soon. Thanks again. Acdixon ^{( talk • contribs • count)} 01:26, 8 June 2009 (UTC) reply

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 15 June 2009 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. End of line. DustyBot ( talk) 10:00, 12 June 2009 (UTC) reply

could have at least fixed the grammatical error instead of just reverting it, way to fail at wikipedia 98.30.168.129 ( talk) 22:53, 12 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Thank you for the review. It was certainly on par with the other reviews I've seen at GAN, and paid good attention to details like prose and images. The only thing that was different was the fact that the review was done in parts and did not use a list of the criteria like {{ GAList}} or {{ GAList2}}. However, neither are really big deals. I myself do peer reviews in 2–4 parts sometimes. The list isn't required either, but it does provide a quick and easier overview of how the article stacks up against the GA criteria.

In summary, it was a good review, and I hope you keep it up. ( Guyinblack25 ^talk 02:51, 13 June 2009 (UTC)) reply

Following a discussion on the Project's talk page, we will be updating WikiProject Pokémon's list of participants. To do this, all users previously listed as "Active" have been moved to the "Inactive" list; after this change anyone may add/re-add their name to the "Active" participants list. As your name was one of those on the Active members list, I am notifying you in case your active interest remains. Thank you for your cooperation in our efforts to keep our list of active participants as accurate and up-to-date as possible. ~ Amory ( user • talk • contribs) 04:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 11:52, 16 June 2009 (UTC) reply

I have removed the {{ prod}} tag from Man's Best Friend (manga), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{ prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! .

Reasons:

1. There is a least one RS review found Review Sequential Tart
2. Inu mo Arukeba is the Japanese Romaji translation of Man's Best Friend. Anime News Network profile

Cordially -- KrebMarkt 12:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi Mm40. It's me, Artichoke-Boy. As I've told you on Friday, I'm currently working to create an article on CARET, a secret Department of Defense research program that has been theorized to exist. This will be undoubtedly the most complex article I have created. My question is that, considering most of the article's sources are based purely on speculation (people claiming they have worked for the organization, sightings of crafts that are claimed to have been made by the organization, etc.), will that cause problems in the reliability of the article? Let me note that I WILL NOT write this info as FACT. For example, I will not write "CARET is an organization...," but rather "CARET is a supposed organization..." Thanks for your help.  ARTICHOKE-BOY  (Talk) 13:45, 21 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC) reply

I saw that you added a nobreak space in there. Personally I think it is better to replace all units and conversions with {{tl:convert}}. This converts all of the output to comply with the MoS. If you leave off the target, it even selects the correct convert to option. I always use abbr=on to use abbreviations and the lk=on for the first use to meet the MoS policy on links. Vegaswikian ( talk) 21:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC) reply

That's fine, sorry for the inconvenience. Thanks.-- Sabrebd ( talk) 17:27, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Stop reverting my edits man. They aren't unconstructive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Captain Spleen ( talk • contribs) 12:08, June 26, 2009

How is it unconstructive deleting content which is clearly only directed at European people? English speaking wikipedia users from Canada, Australia, here in the US and New Zealand, would have no interest in 3 paragraphs of Turkey production in England. Especially as we eat it the most. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Captain Spleen ( talk • contribs) 12:16, June 26, 2009

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Renato Santos. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Sérgio Leite. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: João Márcio Arrais. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Sidnei Sciola. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Diogo Fernandes. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Diogo Leite. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Pedro Trigueira. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Rodrigo Araújo Costa. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Benvindo António Moreira. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: João Marcos Andrade. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Adama François Sene. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Francisco Adriano da Silva Rodrigues. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jorge Silva. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:12, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Bruno Monteiro. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:12, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Michel Baroni. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:12, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Pedro Manuel da Silva Moreira. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:12, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi Mm40. I have a quick concern that I would like to have your feedback on. When determining if an article is an orphan, I know that there are a number of links that don't count, and that includes links in lists. Would you consider a navbox template a "list" (see Wikipedia:Lists#Navigation)? Thanks for your help.  ARTICHOKE-BOY  (Talk) 21:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Okay, thanks a lot. Although, I don’t think that the whole "walled garden" thing is an issue at all, because (I way I see it), there are articles that link to the article which holds the navbox template, which links to the article I'm determining is an orphan or not.  ARTICHOKE-BOY  (Talk) 21:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Alright, I'll keep an eye on it. – Juliancolton |  ^Talk 02:17, 29 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 02:12, 30 June 2009 (UTC) reply

The album has been made and released, and the album article has been made as well... Hands —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harry2DaMax ( talk • contribs) 19:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC) reply

And it is the second single as stated in many interviews and her Glastonbury performance, I tried to use this as a reference but Im new to this and I didnt know how to.. http://www.inthenews.co.uk/inconversation/entertainment/music/little-boots-the-next-video-will-be-more-me--$1301388.htm

Ive come across many articles that say that the subject of it is the "upcoming single"

My internet access cut out due to weather while I was in the process of trying to create the article. But a hearty thank you for attempting to remove everything within 2 minutes of creation, instead of affording me or anyone else the opportunity to complete it. The warning and it's lack of tact was equally welcomed, although I'm not sure it adheres to the five pillars, specifically respecting other users and assuming good faith.

JerseyGirlMedia ( talk) 01:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Then perhaps the appropriate action would be to change that, or create a new article with the correct name, and not leave a scalding message on a user's talk page asserting that it's being deleted for other reasons.

And as it stands, the article does not qualify for speedy deletion, so you may want to remove it from being a candidate for it.

JerseyGirlMedia ( talk) 02:06, 1 July 2009 (UTC) reply

To add, having checked the article and the title, "Baum" is capitilized properly. So if that's your sole reason for a speedy deletion nomination, it's completely erroneous.

JerseyGirlMedia ( talk) 02:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC) reply

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 15:31, 1 July 2009 (UTC) reply

		Military history reviewers' award
		By order of the coordinators, for your help with the WikiProject's Peer and A-Class reviews April to June 2009, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject Reviewers' award.   Roger Davies talk 12:20, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{ WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Hiya,

Some users have decided to try and relaunch WP:SPOTLIGHT. I've helped out a bit; hope I'm not 'treading on any toes' here; it just seemed like the best approach was to simply give it a try - hence changing the project page around, and starting to work on an arbitrary article.

If you want to get involved, please do so. I will let the other previous 'coordinators' know too. Cheers,  Chzz   ►  16:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 23:23, 13 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:Spotlight/Newsletter/2024/May

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 11:57, 28 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 05:16, 4 August 2009 (UTC) reply

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 20:27, 9 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 04:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC) reply

I think I made all the changes you suggested but if you see anything else please let me know. -- Kumioko ( talk) 20:22, 22 August 2009 (UTC) reply

I did the rest of the improvements to this article. Could you take another look and see if it needs anything else?-- Kumioko ( talk) 19:26, 24 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Oh no problem.-- Kumioko ( talk) 00:58, 25 August 2009 (UTC) reply

I wanted to let you know that I did a lot of the suggestions you left. I will work on the rest over the next day or so but feel free to let me know if you see anything else.-- Kumioko ( talk) 18:14, 26 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Ok I think I have addressed all of you concerns other than adding in some more data for his family life and time at school. Could you please take a look and let me know if it needs anything else? -- Kumioko ( talk) 18:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Great thanks, 1 more Medal of Honor recipient down and about 3400 to go. I had no problems with your comments I think you did very good and I appreciate the quick reponses. -- Kumioko ( talk) 19:26, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Can you explain why you would create an account called Fartnuggets ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) ? Toddst1 ( talk) 21:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply

The following 3 exchanges of this conversation have been movedhere from User talk:Toddst1 for continuity as it's discussing this editor's behavior: Toddst1 ( talk) 21:26, 24 August 2009 (UTC) reply

I was unsure about whether or not the name was allowed. The username policy says this: "Offensive usernames are those that offend other contributors, making harmonious editing difficult or impossible." I don't believe this username would offend anyone, and although it may look odd on sight, "harmonious editing" isn't difficult. Mm40 ( talk) 21:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply

I've re-added the bit about profanity in the username policy. Somehow it slipped out. Toddst1 ( talk) 00:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC) reply

I don't consider "fart" profane. Mm40 ( talk) 20:45, 24 August 2009 (UTC)}} reply

It's indisputably vulgar. In case you're not sure what vulgar means, when related to language, that means "offensive in language : earthy b : lewdly or profanely indecent". Which part of the username policy don't you think applies: the offensive part or profane? As an account creator, I would expect you to have a better understanding of WP:U. Toddst1 ( talk) 21:26, 24 August 2009 (UTC) reply

I just wanted to say that I completely understand why you wanted to speedily delete this article, and frankly I would have wanted to tag it also, but I took a good look at it and felt that it didn't quite meet any speedy deletion criterion, so I took the liberty of replacing the speedy tag with a prod tag. My apologies for second-guessing you. I will keep a close eye on it and, if the prod tag is removed, will take the article to AfD unless you beat me to it. If you have any questions or problems, I'm at your service. Accounting4Taste: talk 21:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your note. It might have been a case where nothing would save the article, and I was tempted -- VERY tempted -- but I thought I would allow for the off-chance that there is a history to this phrase and my websearch was off-base. Thanks for understanding. Accounting4Taste: talk 21:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC) reply