@ Mikeblas: Apologies. I did not realize that I removed the aliased reference for the Glazier encyclopedia from the Irish Americans article. -- CommonKnowledgeCreator ( talk) 20:58, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- No worries! Please do double-check that I made the right fix, tho. -- Mikeblas ( talk) 22:31, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
I disagree! The sources are not about this monkey, someone is just making stuff up here! 86.83.56.115 ( talk) 22:28, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- It would be best to discuss this on the Talk page of the article in question. That way, anyone interested in the changes can participate instead of just us. --
Mikeblas (
talk) 01:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sure, go for it. But this a pretty slam-dunk case. Article is about A, source is about B, you cannot make a claim about A based on a source about B. For example: A. penguins are birds, B. humans wear dresses and work in finance =this doesn't mean we can claim penguins wear dresses or can work in finance. Apparently you disagree, thus reverted my improvements, hence I am here convincing you penguins don't wear dresses... I'm assuming most people already know this... 86.83.56.115 ( talk) 02:49, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
In humility, thank you for pointing out the error I made and I do appreciate you fixing it. Raffybund ( talk) 01:26, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- No worries! It's not about humility -- I just want to make sure that when I fix something, the original author has a chance to double double check check the fix I made. Maybe I misunderstood their intent, or didn't implement the best possible solution. -- Mikeblas ( talk) 01:54, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
There was a problem with the damage section where it didn’t showed the word costliest fully and I tired too edit it. But thanks for readjusting it Colin777724 ( talk) 04:48, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!
Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:57, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi, in October 2020 you have replaced undefined references with fact tags in this page [1]. I've recently replaced it with the official statement from Lega Pro which attests the rules for classification. It is located in the template of Group A table. Why isn't it ok?-- Iennandrea ( talk) 09:32, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- your edit uses a reference named "figc", which is not defined in the template. You can see the visible error message in the template's references section: "Cite error: The named reference figc was invoked but never defined (see the help page)." That error was also appearing in the articles which used this template. -- Mikeblas ( talk) 17:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)