Welcome!

Hello, Manytexts, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Quadzilla99 ( talk) 07:01, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

No problemo. Hope you like it here. Quadzilla99 ( talk) 07:04, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I saw you on the recent changes page and you look to be catching on really fast. AaronY ( talk) 11:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The main policy article here is WP:DEL. As a brief summary: deletion should be a last resort for articles that cannot be improved to be acceptable. So it is a good idea to have a week's discussion which may bring in people with ideas for improvement - that's the AfD process. But there are many articles so clearly unacceptable (copyright, attack, blatant advertisement, "Johnny is cool LOL!!!"... ) that (fairly tightly-defined) criteria have been agreed for speedy deletion, and any admin can delete those at sight. Even then, the workload at AfD would be unnecessarily high, so the PROD process is provided for uncontroversial deletions - if no objection is raised within seven days, it goes. Because that is only for uncontroversial deletions, anyone may remove a PROD, for any reason, and even after deletion a PRODded article will automatically be restored on request at WP:REFUND - though it may then be taken straight to AfD.

In the case you raise, I think there is enough doubt that I suggested going straight to AfD. As with many aspects of Wikipedia, there is no central Authority that will do that for you - I agree that notability is doubtful here, but I am not strongly motivated enough to do anything about it myself, though I will help if you need help with the process. The instructions are at WP:AFD#How to list pages for deletion, though I advise reading the whole WP:AFD page first, and looking at some current debates, say Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 January 12, to get a feel for it. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 12:14, 17 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Sorry, JohnCD, didn't see your line on where to reply. Thanks for steering me in the right direction I am not so confused now. Manytexts ( talk) 00:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC) reply

On 4 May 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ivy Benson, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that bandleader Ivy Benson and her all-female band were the first entertainers invited to perform at the VE Day celebrations in Berlin at the request of Field Marshal Montgomery? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project ( nominate) 18:03, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Wow, thanks. Manytexts ( talk) 00:45, 5 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi, that message you're referring to is from 4 years ago :D Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 17:01, 3 December 2011 (UTC) reply

As per MOS:BIO and MOS:DATE, date of birth's should be set out in the lead section as (born November 12, 1972), not just the year and the specific day/month in a subsequent section. Thanks, -- Jimbo ^[online] 11:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC) reply

No worries, it's impossible to keep up to date with some of the updates and changes of policies at times! -- Jimbo ^[online] 11:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your last comment on the talk page. I guess the best lesson to learn from this is not to meddle with something while it is on the main page. In this case it had been written by an experienced list-writing editor, it had been reviewed for DYK, and had been passed by an administrator. Perhaps concerns are best discussed first on the talk page, and then amendments can be agreed, or explanations given. The architect's name appropriately starts the lead, and it is linked but not emboldened; this is the agreed style for a list. -- Peter I. Vardy ( talk) 17:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your message. I would edit the article as you see best - if the source seems at odds with what's now written, I'd just correct it and make a note on the discussion page. Thanks for clarifying your points. All best wishes of the season. Span ( talk) 11:03, 24 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Remember to check when you aren't sure, or you aren't sure you're sure, or even when sure... English is very messy, what with being a combination of Latin, Greek, German, French, Indian (preponed anyone?), and even newly invented words. Strangely, even the OED doesn't have 'pyric', but it must come from 'pyre'. Sometimes I cheat and use Google, which isn't so farfetched now that they have indexed the Google books collection.

Google "pyric herbivory"

your edit

my hissy fit

'pyric' is not a misspelling. 24.28.17.231 ( talk) 01:56, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply

My answer in case you're watching this page:

Hi thanks for sharing. My powerMac dictionary has "pyrrhic" and my inner masters-educated spellcheck picked it up first. Furthermore, Wikpedia's article Pyrrhic victory One of the first rules of google is expect misspelling as the norm & two, expect to find it when you google it. If it's American, then pardon me good sir/madam. I'm surely all for continuity in an article, though I opt for excellent spelling. And pardon me a second time for not following hissy links. :) I try to keep out of trouble on wikipedia, having been *bitten* too many times. Manytexts ( talk) 02:15, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply

On the other hand you may be right, Manytexts ( talk) 02:22, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply

(ec) (people sometimes put this mark in saying "edit conflict", when the same page is simultaneously updated by multiple people - you've got a busy talk page! :-) )

Having been tickled by mention of checking WP usages, I thought to check Wiktionary and, alas, there is no 'pyric' at Wiktionary. That is not too unexpected for a domain-specific usage such as "pyric herbivory" however.

My mention of using Google is valid, I think, as it can find such strange usages and explain the 'why' of them. Thus searching for "pyrrhic herbivory" got 1 hit (at WP), while "pyric herbivory" gets 740 or so hits. While the article mentioned wildfires, I'd not thought of wikt:pyre and such derivation as a possibility. It was only after some searching (and after the "no hits" using pyrrhic) that I finally happened upon 'pyric' as the explanation.

While Google has a valid reputation for also finding the incorrect, searching for a pair of specific word combinations will be a "pretty good" verification of which one is correct. (though sometimes it can only point out that there is more than one correct answer - see WP:ENGVAR)

As far as toothiness goes, sometimes pointers are felt as too sharp. Beg pardon. As I largely do minor edits fixing misspellings, the accidental change from good to bad doubly freaks me out. Out of such paranoia I do try to check that I haven't gotten it wrong. I am surprised often enough to keep checking. I have sometimes had to search a lot to find out that e.g. "metalled road" is a perfectly valid English usage, if one is from India anyway. (And which then explains the double 'l')

As a peace offering, may I give you these gems? "Petrach" ( Petrarch, "protrubences", "Butirnt" (s.b. Butrint), "helf a year", "With the induction of the Indian troops" (s.b. introduction), "unfinching", "kindgom", "color pattering", "and founted two", "Alternetivly", "in urban ares", "in scare supply", and "to aquatint himself". (that last must refer to me?) 24.28.17.231 ( talk) 03:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi again - you made me laugh so hard I can't remember what the trouble was except that we agree that in addition to Egglish being messy, the internet doesn't help except to spread the mess further. Now there are words I feel are wrong if I don't find them their. And if peeps worldwide put a's in when they doubt the existance of an e, we're in bigger trouble then before, because lately I notice it works both ways. I hope you stick around because you are both fastidious, a detailed researcher, yet flexible. Will you be getting (Indlish) an account name & sticking around? Manytexts (talk) 03:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC) PS I will enjoy your peace offerings gladly. Thank you. *bows*

Btw, thank you for smartening the look of my DYK article, Manytexts. Appreciate it. A: My pleasure. Manytexts ( talk) 02:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Saw your work, thanks for taking an interest. I cleaned up some of the references and fixed a bad link. I wish there was a better source of information somewhere so that the article might qualify for DYK because I think strange cars of the past are interesting. -- MTHarden ( talk) 14:20, 16 February 2012 (UTC) reply

You might want to check out WP:Cite when filling out the details in the reference citation. I hear what you are saying in respect to the reliability of the information, probably should check WP:IRS, which should give you some clues - anyhow good luck. Dan arndt ( talk) 01:51, 23 February 2012 (UTC) reply

You still need to expand the citations. Dan arndt ( talk) 07:00, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply

What you need to do is use the citation template (see above) something along the lines of the following: <--Nower, Lia. "Bobby Darin's Car Still A Dream". St. Louis Dispatch. Lee Enterprises. Retrieved February 23, 2012. ---> Dan arndt ( talk) 01:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC) reply

It should be too hard to convert the existing references to using the format above but am happy to do it for you (simply a cut & paste exercise really). Dan arndt ( talk) 03:41, 28 February 2012 (UTC) reply

You might have to give me a partial credit on the DYK.... Dan arndt ( talk) 06:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC) reply

• Thanks for the barnstar (much appreciated) just a shame that the article never got recognition through the DYK process - anyway if you ever want help on an article in the future let me know. Dan arndt ( talk) 01:15, 28 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you for 'unearthing' the fact that I had used the word three times in the Silks article. I am very grateful!!! Thank you. ( Galaxycat ( talk) 12:39, 18 June 2012 (UTC)) reply

I was not expecting a gift at all. Thank you so much. I am looking forward to the next episode ( Galaxycat ( talk) 12:50, 18 June 2012 (UTC)) reply

On 16 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sam Fullbrook, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Australian Sam Fullbrook was known as the "last of the bushman painters" (rural artists), yet his works were sophisticated, widely shown and collected internationally? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sam Fullbrook. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady ( talk) 23:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC) reply

/info/en/?search=Special:Book

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frank Bennett (occultist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abramelin operation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roger Degueldre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreign Legion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 13 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks for nominating The Indestructibles article. Will you be able to resolve issues that I brought up? -- George Ho ( talk) 00:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Thanks for checking the article & status, but I'm not sure I have time or that the articles are substantial enough. They already seem repetitive. Manytexts ( talk) 10:13, 21 January 2015 (UTC) reply

On 13 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Indestructibles, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that two circumpolar stars known as The Indestructibles marked heaven as a destination for the Ancient Egyptian pharaohs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Indestructibles. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Parmenides, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:48, 27 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Tim the Yowie Man, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Sundayclose ( talk) 13:28, 21 May 2015 (UTC) reply

You were given a previous polite notice about marking all of your edits as minor, but you ignored it and continued the same behavior. Consider this a warning. Stop marking all edits as minor or you may be blocked from editing. Please read WP:MINOR. If there is something about the idea of "minor edit" that you don't understand ask here and we will try to explain. Otherwise the next time you mark an edit as minor inappropriately all future inappropriate edits will be reverted and dealing with your disruptive edits will be escalated. Sundayclose ( talk) 13:00, 8 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Sundayclose ( talk) 02:42, 9 July 2015 (UTC) reply

I appreciate the information, and in case you didn't know Trivialist was the one that said whether someone is a character actor is subjective, not me. Wikiman103 talk 20:06, 20 July 2015 (UTC) reply

The simplest thing to do is to discuss it directly with the editor. Chances he/she will be understanding if you approach them nicely. Also try to find some citations to back up any changes when someone thinks they are not of merit. AaronY ( talk) 16:36, 15 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bindi (decoration), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jyoti. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 'Salem's Lot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wetback. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:15, 26 February 2016 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Datok Keramat. Since you had some involvement with the Datok Keramat redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Alexander Iskandar ( talk) 17:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lydia Delectorskaya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matisse Museum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 16:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shapurji Edalji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holy Trinity Anglican Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Artemis may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)

have linked Artemis (Doric ''Artamis'') to ἄρταμος, ''artamos'', i.e. "butcher"<ref>{{LSJ|a)/rtamos|ἄρταμος|ref}}.</ref><ref>{{LSJ|*)/artemis|Ἄρτεμις|ref}}.</ref> or, like [[Plato]] did in ''[[Cratylus (dialogue)|Cratylus]]'', to {{ Longmans, Green and Co|location=London|year=1887}}</ref><ref name="Charles Anthon"/><ref>{{LSJ|a)rtemh/s|ἀρτεμής|ref}}.</ref> in western Anatolia in historical times. In the ''[[Iliad]]''<ref>Homer, ''Iliad'' 21.470 ff).</ref> she came to blows with Hera, when the divine allies of the Greeks and Trojans engaged each * Kharisteria Festival on 6th of Boidromion (third month) celebrates the victory of the [[Battle of Marathon, also known as the Athenian "Thanksgiving".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 06:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cherufe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minhocao. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacques Vallée, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magonia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Shepherd Freeman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medical discharge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 8 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Al Weaver, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Norton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:41, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aaron Hopa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamilton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rainbow Serpent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carpet snake ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 4 August 2018 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Malkovich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles VII ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:08, 1 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Re your edits to Great Cross of Hendaye - please do not add, or re-insert, unsourced or poorly sourced material to any article. Please also do not abuse the "rollback" button, see WP:ROLLBACKUSE. Neutrality ^talk 12:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Re this edit, in this context (art works) "Hellenistic" is correct (the usual word used when referring to the Hellenistic period). By contrast "Hellenic" is usually understood to simply mean Greek (of any time period). Paul August ☎ 16:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Thank you Paul August Manytexts ( talk) 23:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trepanging, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malay. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello Manytexts. Hope you don't mind me asking this, but I'm curious. In your recent ref desk question here, you mentioned that you had asked about the book years ago and had received an answer. But that question from 2009 was posted by a user with a different username. Are you the same person? The reason I ask is because I interacted with that user a few times, and sometimes wondered why they suddenly stopped posting in April 2009. Best wishes, -- Viennese Waltz 07:28, 20 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Same question (and from the same city, as well). -- Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM ( talk) 08:45, 20 September 2021 (UTC) reply

You are both right. I felt quite nostalgic when I saw the pedians that answered. It was a singular question. When I was user J.R. and vanished, I was having difficulties with a persistent WP jerk or two, and similar in real life so I just fled. I was so anxious I couldn't even face my own page. When I came back as Many, I felt attacked by someone I rebuffed who related the issue to another person about me on their talk page as "the lunatics are taking over the asylum." It's a small but sturdy element on WP. This time, I'm still around but being a bit of a shy gnome in editing. I'm touched that you're curious and staunch. So nice to meet you again. I'm not surprised you both detected in true Refdesk style, who I am. Much Wikilove, J.R. / Manytexts ( talk) 23:19, 20 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Many thanks for the reply, and it's good to know you're still on the pedia. See you around! -- Viennese Waltz 05:20, 21 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Likewise you, 🕶 Manytexts ( talk) 06:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Good to see you back at the ref desk. You were and are sadly missed.

BTW, it seems that the lunatics had also taken over the White House and occupy No 10, Downing Street.

It is time us (intermittendly) sane folks retreat to our loony bins. -- Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM ( talk) 16:56, 21 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your kind words @ Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM. It means a lot to me. We have our own spectacularly unqualified leader who just shafted the French and imagines he's in with the big boys. The delusion that being in the eye of the storm is a good thing worries us here as well. Seems there's a need for personal loony bins for us relatively sane ones for sure. :) Manytexts ( talk) 18:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi Manytexts! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Andrew Garfield that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KyleJoan ( talk • contribs) 13:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi Manytexts! I see that you're still doing this. Would you please read Help:Minor edit? Thanks! ☿  Apaugasma ( talk  ☉) 14:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks. I realise this means syntax changes and links are major edits, on looking at this: A good rule of thumb is that edits consisting solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of the content should be flagged as minor edits. And I take it that correcting information is included in major edits and I understand adding information is always major ed. Manytexts ( talk) 21:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mythic humanoids, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shade.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Could I interest you in taking a look at Geomancy to see if you think it has earned a removal of the {{Cleanup reorganize|date=October 2013}} tag? I made some edits to try to clean it up. Thanks if you can. -- Louis P. Boog ( talk) 22:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply