There is a straw poll taking place here, and your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc ( talk) 01:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited List of American Civil War battles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Bull Run ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:28, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey. For some time I have been wanting to bring some mine articles to FA but I am not sure of one thing. Would the owner need to be included in the article? It is hard to find out who the owners are for some mines, especially the mines that I have been writing about so it would be nice if the mine owners are necessary. Volcano guy 20:27, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
hi Ling.Nut3, congratulations on your tremendous work on the ELP page! I'm impressed. Unfortunately I can't help you much these days — besides my usual workload, I have the extra problem that my internet has stopped working at home, and I can only access it from my office. I hope I can get back to editing the page when my internet problems are fixed. In the meantime, good luck with your edits. — Womtelo ( talk) 00:56, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
For your work on list of endangered article series Solomon7968 ( talk) 09:55, 2 April 2012 (UTC) |
Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Hey, hey, Ling.Nut. Different name, but the same scholarly gent, I'm sure ;). Probably don't remember me, but you, myself and DK started the 3K project a while back. Wanted to just drop in and say cheers. Good to see you're still doing good by the Wiki. Anyways, have a good one and maybe I'll drop in a bit more now. Had bone graft surgery recently and need to kill some time while I'm off work. Cheers, mate. The Cake is a Lie T / C 05:26, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Also god to see you around. I had noticed you doing some minor work on the list there, it will be good eventually. I'm doing great thaks - lots of work and therefore lots of procrastination and therefore lots of wikipedia. You know how it is. ;) ·ʍaunus· snunɐw· 02:44, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the source help! Veganchic ( talk) 12:07, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
As the editor who moved in the new draft, I've responded to your concerns there. Qwyrxian ( talk) 07:17, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Sorry to ask you to carry on the conversation at Talk:Timeline of world history but I'm afraid I don't know enough about Wiki regulations to answer this guy's barrage of rejoinders. Do you think you could finally settle him down? Thanks. Serendi pod ous 05:18, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
That made me laugh. Out loud. Really. Johnbod ( talk) 00:30, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello Ling, it's good to hear from you. I wonder if you could take a look at something and give me your advice on how to proceed. You may remember my interest in West Virginia in the ACW from our collaboration on the ACW battles list. Sorry if this is confusing—the Operations in Western Virginia article has been moved and replaced with a disambiguation page, which is the crux of the issue. I'm sorry if this gets long winded...
First some background: the campaignbox Template:Campaignbox Operations in Western Virginia has been in place since 2004, and the name comes from the campaign list done by the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission, American Battlefield Protection Program of the National Park Service at http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/abpp/battles/bycampgn.htm. In 2010, an editor created "Operations in Western Virginia" as a redirect to West Virginia in the American Civil War which had some information covering that campaign. Last year, an editor created Western Virginia Campaign (which was probably misnamed) which describes the same campaign.
A few days ago, I noticed a new editor, User:30 SW had added unrelated battles to the campaignbox (which is where I entered into the fray) and I reverted the change and left a note on the editor's talk page. In examining some of the editor's other changes, I resolved some ambox templates the user had placed and one of them was on the "Western Virginia Campaign" article which I saw was about the same "Operations in Western Virginia" campaign, so I wikilinked the campaignbox to that article.
I then noticed that the IP 168.244.11.2 (which has been editing for about a month) had changed "Operations in Western Virginia" from a redirect to a "dumping ground" article unrelated to the "Operations in Western Virginia" campaign, so I reverted to the redirect. I didn't realize it at the time, but there's a related discussion on categories at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 May 5#Category:Battles of the Operations in Western Virginia of the American Civil War which was changed from a Speedy rename where an admin notes "the nominator changed Operations in Western Virginia from a redirect to a short article." and "I'm pretty sure C2D doesn't apply when you invent the article in the middle of the nomination, but maybe I don't understand the nominator's intent." The IP later reverted my revert.
I weighed in at the category rename discussion (and in fact supported the IPs rename proposal) and was considering looking in to how to move "Western Virginia Campaign" to "Operations in Western Virginia" when User:30 SW moved the "Operations in Western Virginia" page to Western Virginia military operations of the American Civil War and created a disambiguation page at "Operations in Western Virginia". User:30 SW has now also created Operations in Northern Virginia which is just as dubious.
So, in conclusion, my thoughts are that the "Western Virginia Campaign" article should be renamed to "Operations in Western Virginia" to match the campaignbox and the official CWSAC/ABPP/NPS name. I wish I had done it earlier, but now, how would I best go about unraveling all this? I assume the disambiguation page needs to be deleted first...
Perhaps the "Western Virginia military operations of the American Civil War" and "Operations in Northern Virginia" articles should also be listed for deletion, since the basis for such an article seems to have been made up out of thin air and there is no significance to grouping battles from totally unrelated campaigns together geographically in that manner. Thanks for any insight you may have. Mojoworker ( talk) 17:00, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Ling. My thoughts:
Mojoworker ( talk) 07:02, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the reminder. I was on a break at the time. Must update my userpage! Dougweller ( talk) 14:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
GoP T C N 08:08, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
To make these changes you allude to, I suggest two possible approaches: either (1) use a template, say {{ UNESCO Languages in Danger definitions}}, so that the wording (and formatting, and citing) of the definitions can be kept consistent across all the articles they appear on (one disadvantage of this approach is that other editors might not like using a template for regular article text like this, so you might get some pushback on it) or (2) just link to one copy of the definitions, say in the article Endangered language, from all the other articles/lists (might want to warn in an <!-- HTML comment --> in the target article that other articles link to it, to discourage other editors from changing the section heading thereby breaking all the incoming links). - dcljr ( talk) 00:59, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
I've replied at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hugh de Neville/archive1 - I'd appreciate if you could revisit? Ealdgyth - Talk 19:57, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments! I have fixed all the issues you brought up at the DNA nanotechnology FAC page and I'd appreciate it if you would revisit your assessment of the article. Antony–22 ( talk⁄ contribs) 21:59, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
How do I know you're the real Ling.Nut3? Languagehat ( talk) 12:24, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
The article is much improved since your last comment, and your input would be appreciated at the Paul McCartney FAC. — GabeMc ( talk) 03:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
The Paul McCartney article has now been thoroughly copyedited top-to-bottom by numerous editors including User:Lfstevens, who is a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors. If you can find the time in your busy schedule, please consider stopping by and taking another look, and hopefully, !voting. ~ GabeMc ( talk| contribs) 03:40, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Well, I see you've been quietly working here under a third incarnation for some time, Ling.Nut[1|2|3]. You know I honestly believe that this crazy place is a lot better with you here rather than otherwise. It's still crazy, just crazy in a good way. All the best, Alan W ( talk) 04:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Please give me two goddamn seconds before you flip eight shits about one broken link.
You seriously responded to my edits less than a minute after they were made. Less than one minute. Have you nothing better to do? It's fixed now, within policy, and clearer. I don't edit much. I don't have a mind-link to the Admin discussions whereupon you behead a chicken to determine what totally useless new rules to shove into your Biblically-proportioned list of policies, which, for the record, merely represent suggestions. And I follow them anyway.
98.251.50.153 ( talk) 07:20, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
It was added by an anonymous user without citation. (23:27, February 10, 2012 174.34.21.165)
It was also contradicted by the facts presented in the article. It seemed to me much more like an expression of a personal opinion rather than an attempt at improving the factual accuracy of the article. Otherwise, I would have tagged it instead of deleting it. TaintedMustard ( talk) 16:25, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
You might be interesting in the dispute on my talk at User talk:Br'er Rabbit#The Coral Island and the recent article history. I saw your comment about [not] "adding shout-outs to the refs section". Br'er Rabbit ( talk) 11:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for editorial efforts that helped Avery Brundage become a WP:FA.
This user helped promote Avery Brundage to featured article status. |
-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 22:28, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
There is currently a straw poll taking place here. Your input would be appreciated. ~ GabeMc ( talk| contribs) 03:01, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello! I've seen you around on Indigenous languages of California articles ... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject Indigenous languages of California, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of Indigenous languages of California on Wikipedia? Please feel free to join us. |
Just a heads up that I've closed your report from earlier this summer to allow the name. Consensus seemed to be to allow it, and the discussion had gone stale. If you have any questions, feel free to ping me. StarM 01:59, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
please perform opnion in my section about (compare the term between of siamese and thais) -- โจ : แฟน ท่าเรือ : เกรียนที่ หน้าตาไม่ดีแห่ง ไร้สาระนุกรม : พูดคุยกับ ควายตัวนี้ ได้ที่นี่ 19:58, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello. I’d like to thank you for commenting on the Long-tailed Ground Roller’s FAC nearly a year ago, and apologize for having to step away from Wikipedia prior to the FAC’s completion to deal with my studies. I've gone through all of the old commentary and believe that I have resolved it. I’m confident I have the time to finish the FAC, and I have re-nominated the article here. I would greatly appreciate it if you could give the article another look. Thanks. Rufous-crowned Sparrow ( talk) 17:58, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
The Endangered Language Immersion School Bus Pass | |
You've earned a free pass on the Endangered Language Immersion Schoolbus of your choice-- this one is Montana Salish-- for all your work on the List of endangered languages in the United States! Djembayz ( talk) 01:36, 20 May 2013 (UTC) |
Hi Ling.Nut3, I might get back to this article sometime soon. I have been largely inactive editing volcanology articles for quite some time. Volcano guy 17:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
by The Interior ( talk · contribs), Ocaasi ( talk · contribs)
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. -- The Interior 21:37, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:44, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)