Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 23:14, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
"fewer subclauses and big words"
Thank you for quality articles beginning with Wao Kele o Puna, for Pesticide degradation and Moving to Work, for an outline of animal pages, for expert copy-editing, saying "My sentences generally have fewer subclauses and big words than those they replace." from the start in 2008, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.
Your survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_egQxBvGKIxtPh1b&Q_CHL=gl
I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.
Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs ( talk) 12:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Lfstevens!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! »
Shadowowl |
talk 13:39, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
|
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac ( talk) 10:48, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Thanks for creating Carbon farming, Lfstevens!
Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Reviewed, well done. Thanks for creating such an article, I enjoyed reading it and found it to be an intriguing method of improving agriculture.
To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
SamHolt6 ( talk) 04:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, this person is a woman, so referring to them using the pronoun "he" feels odd. Generally, in Slavonic countries you can tell the gender by the name: if it ends in -a then it's almost certainly a woman. – Uanfala (talk) 10:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Lfstevens. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " CT examinations".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the :draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh ( talk) 13:00, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello Lfstevens. Thanks for the copyediting you have done on Mohan Parmar and Vishnuprasad Trivedi. However, I still don't understand why you have put 'notability' tag in both articles. Apparently, both the writers have received several awards for their literary works. Also, the award received by both the writers are notable itself. I am still confused about your understanding of notability. Apologies if I am wrong. Thanks. - Gazal world ( talk) 12:05, 10 November 2018 (UTC)