Hello Lancini87! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 23 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 939 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{ unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Martín Stefanonni Mazzocco - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Susana Pagano - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Ricardo Caballero Tostado - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Amanda Olivares - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Doukissa Nomikou - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Carolina Morán - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Yessica Ramírez - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Blanca Zumárraga - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Tatiana Rodríguez - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Danette Velasco - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 06:54, 17 January 2010 (UTC) reply

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nancy Taira, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Taira. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. VernoWhitney ( talk) 14:08, 26 February 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Carlos Slim Domit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability. Seems to fail WP:NOTABILITY in any case

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. meco ( talk) 19:45, 12 March 2010 (UTC) reply

An article that you have been involved in editing, Carlos Slim Domit, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Slim Domit. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. meco ( talk) 15:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC) reply

There is a lot of vandalism and nationalism creaping into articles like hers. Sorry I didn't catch the extra country when I did the revert. However, I am not sure if Belinda has Mexican citizenship. I doubt it because while she is a big performer in Mexico and points south, she is also big in Europe and did a tour in Spain. I have never read or heard anything about her getting Mexican citizenship (I've followed her since about 2006 as a performing actress and singer.

Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(biographies)#Opening_paragraph is explicit but because lots of countries grant dual citizenship to children born abroad, the secondary nationalists like to fight over getting the dual citizenship recognized. I am having a battle with Nelly Furtado and James Belushi. Nelly supposedly received Portugese citizenship but was born in Canada and achieved notability there, in the U.S. and Latin America. In Belushi's case, it is really easy. He received supposedly honorary Albanian citizenship in 2009 way after he became notable. But it is a bit clouded because supposedly he received ambassadorship too at the same time. I know honorifics such as that which come after notability usually do not get mentioned in the lead sentence but there are exceptions.

If you look at their talkpages, you can see the ongoing discussion. Alexis Bledel's citizenship seems to have died down but flares up and her talkpage is also filled with the issue. Thanks again, cheers! -- Morenooso ( talk) 10:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply

BTW, after I saved here, I noticed the topic above. It exists as Carlos Slim. I recently mentioned on Nelly's talk (she's singing Spanish as I type on MTV Tres Espanol) that even the nationality issued flared on him. On his talkpage, an editor tried to assert that he is American because he was born in North America. That still brings a chuckle or two. -- Morenooso ( talk) 10:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Oops, my bad. This is the son. -- Morenooso ( talk) 10:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Could you restore the citations to Belinda's nationality as Mexican? Another user destroyed them. If he reverts me, you should cite him and report him to WP:AIV as he now has two level four warnings for this. -- Morenooso ( talk) 05:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi, You could asked her, but the serious references we have (Nuestra Belleza official page) has the name with J, and we must fit us to that. At the moment we have a serious reference that show the name with X, we change it. Greetings.-- Alex Duilius ( talk) 03:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC) reply

You are trying to start an edit war in the article Mexican people based on your own views and prejudices which you wish to portray in this article. You have not shown any contribution to the discussion page outlying your reasons for removing figures of darker skinned Mexicans from the Infobox and replacing them with lighter skinned people. You have repeatedly accused me of having a racial agenda to try and hide Mexico's white population but in actuality it has been you who has been engaging in unsourced manipulation of data and imagery in this article to feign the numbers of White Mexicans to the detriment of the accuracy of the Article. You are over-representing whites in this article that deals with Mexicans and which the sourced data demonstrates are only around 9% of the overall population. Racism in Mexico is still a very serious problem, and it is well known that whites are overrepresented. But this is Wikipedia and we are making an honest effort to be as accurate as possible without distorting the reality of the issue. I have never denied Mexico's white population. I stand by the facts, you on the other hand have turned this into a personal matter for yourself.

I tried to make a compromise by removing the obscure actor Ramon Novarro to make way for Guillermo del Toro who is obviously much better known. You, on the other hand, saw fit to single out Marco Rito-Palomares solely because of the color of his skin and not because the article needed to be fair and balanced. In the discussion page we touched upon balancing the Infobox to also show women, politicians, writers, and scientists. I added both Rodolfo Neri Vela and Marco Rito-Palomares because of their scientific credentials. You ignored this and removed Marco Rito-Palomares and added yet another artist which we discussed were already overrepresented in the Infobox. So in my effort to keep the article fair and balanced I removed an actor and replaced him with a director, keeping both scientists and not removing any of the women or other important figures. If you keep distorting the Article I will call on the moderators to intervene and settle this issue. Ocelotl10293 ( talk) 03:07, 15 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Re: My only agenda is to keep the article accurate, fair and balanced. I have had to admit many mistakes and inaccuracies and remove many things which I added which were shown to be untrue or outsourced that I had, at first, believed to be accurate ever since I created this article. This is how scholarly rigor works; we yield to the evidence and facts, we listen to what other editors have to say and accept their contributions as long as they are accurate (which usually means they have a reliable sources) and not permit mere opinions or ambiguous points of view to be used in any dogmatic way. If you care for this article with any degree of honesty you will agree to keep it accurate and balanced. Ocelotl10293 ( talk) 12:20, 16 August 2010 (UTC) reply

		The Original Barnstar
		...and for all the wonderful things that you have done! Your dedication to Mexican titleholders and pageants in general is really appreciated. Keep up the good work! John KB ( talk) 12:28, 14 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi, wikipedia ship, please do not change the correct information about this page, wi do not want to start a war publications, thanks, visocap group —Preceding undated comment added 18:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC). reply

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{ Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{ User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 18:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Omar Ortiz Uribe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{ hangon}} to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot ( talk) 23:00, 22 March 2011 (UTC) reply

The article Roberto Assad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This subject does not appear to meet the general notability guideline required for inclusion as a stand-alone article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ErikHaugen ( talk | contribs) 17:18, 18 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Is it possible for you to review every country's medal count at the Pan American Games? Please and thank you. Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions 04:58, 31 October 2011 (UTC) reply

The country at the Pan American Games pages are all wrong (the ones with no lead). Some like Canada, Aruba are right I have gone through them. Thanks! I am asking you to do it so it avoids two editors adding on top of each others numbers. Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions 05:10, 31 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Those are incorrect unfortunately. Only 2007 and 2011 are for sure right. Its a big headache. Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions 05:14, 31 October 2011 (UTC) reply

No need for a sorry, the main nation pages are wrong so are the medal tables of all the games - 1951, 2007 and 2011. The medal table on the all time medal table pages is correct, so maybe you can add to that just the Guadalajara 2011 totals. Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions 13:22, 31 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Another user has saved us time by finishing it off. Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions 14:32, 31 October 2011 (UTC) reply

The subpages are wrong, because they listed Aruba has having won a medal, and that was wrong. The medal table on the Pan American Games page was also wrong until I fixed it. The ones on the Guadalajra 2011 history section is the best to use. Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions 20:35, 31 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ana Brenda Contreras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:55, 26 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Víctor Estrada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matamoros. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Gracias por arreglar las categorías de la gente de Michoacán. Aquí te dejo un "brownie" virtual. ¡Saludos! ComputerJA ( ☎ • ✎) 21:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Category:Footballers from Mexico City, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William 15:03, 15 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Evangelina Pérez Zaragoza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vista Hermosa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 1 March 2015 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ivonne Soto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivonne Soto until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf ( talk) 20:08, 25 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joaquín Solano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicontepec. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:28, 15 July 2015 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniela de Jesus Cosio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniela de Jesus Cosio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   Velella   ^{Velella Talk}   22:00, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emmanuel García, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vaca. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC) reply

I have a problem with your move of Daniel De La Rosa to Daniel de la Rosa. What is your basis for doing that? I've NEVER seen De La Rosa's name listed as de la Rosa. On his Twitter account it's De La Rosa: [1]. On his USA Racquetball ranking page, it's De La Rosa [2]. I don't think there's any better evidence than that for De La Rosa over de la Rosa. Thus, I'm going to change it back. -- Trb333 ( talk) 04:44, 2 August 2015 (UTC) reply