Welcome!

Hello, Kmmontandon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  cohesion | talk 10:40, July 31, 2005 (UTC)

Taken from a safe location I am asumming? Sfan00 IMG 21:00, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Not sure why this wouldn't qualify as a current event - it's ongoing, it's receiving widespread media coverage, and the situation changes from day to day. Is there some way to narrow it down to "California Current Events," perhaps? If not, maybe there should be ... Kmmontandon 00:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC) reply

See Template:Current#Guidelines. If you desire the article about the occasion to receive wider visibility, perhaps you could nominate it for inclusion at the various Portal:Current events listings. Take a look at Wikipedia:How_the_Current_events_page_works. Basically, when many editors are editing some wildly popular article, the tag serves as a warning to editors. It was not intended to say "look--this is news." Otherwise several hundred thousand articles would qualify for the template. If the Moonlight Fire article comes to the point of having say 25+ editors on it in a day, by all means, add the template back. -- Yellowdesk 00:32, 11 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks much for stepping in on the GA effort on this one! After 2 noms, I decided to step back and take a breather on this article while working on some major overhauls to aerial firefighting related articles. A fresh imagination and set of eyes is exactly what this effort needed. AKRadecki ^Speaketh 23:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Just stopping by to say hi to a fellow northern Californian and to say thank you for improving Caribou Willderness article. I go too fast and leave out much-but sm trying to work on that editorial defect ;) Cheers Marcia Wright ( talk) 06:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for asking about it. If you look at the Forest Service ecological map or the geographic map from peakbagger, perhaps "northern boundary" is the wrong term. It's the northenmost point of the Sierra --- there is a short northwestern boundary, and a very long eastern boundary. I'll try to rephrase. — hike395 ( talk) 02:43, 7 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The article itself doesn't talk about the northern boundary --- implicitly it only talks about the northernmost point. So, it is correct as-is, as far as I can tell. — hike395 ( talk) 04:09, 7 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Your upload of File:BuzzardSprings.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 14:54, 5 March 2014 (UTC) reply

• Another one of your uploads, File:ChesterCAMuseum.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 14:26, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello, Kmmontandon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply