Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Kirtap92. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Redalert2fan ( talk) 11:29, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Regarding your edit, Alejandro was not found in the reference. Can you supply reference with Alejandro in hungarian chart? Regards, SunCreator ( talk) 23:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Okay, found it the week before. SunCreator ( talk) 00:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled " Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. Yves ( talk) 17:18, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited List of number-one singles of 2012 (Hungary), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page M.I.A. ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC) reply

The image here illustrated the recording artist, not anything tied to the section it was placed in. The caption was a bit questionable too (what indicates or illustrates that it's the title track being performed and how is this even relevant to the comercial performance section when neither are mentioned there?) There seem to be more than enough images illustrating Lady Gaga in Born This Way, so how does another enhance readers' understanding of the prose? Dont get defensive and make personal attacks, make your point. Does the argument "The article needs that picture" sound like a valid rationale? Dan56 ( talk) 22:32, 22 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Please try and justify your changes before reintroducing them to the article. Communicate here, my talk page, or the article's talk page. I'm citing Wikipedia guidelines, your citing Wikipedia articles and the preferences of editors who contributed to them. Dan56 ( talk) 22:50, 22 September 2012 (UTC) reply

If I "won", then why did you revert the edit? I opened up a post at the article's talk page here. Either take a look at the guidelines I cited or dont bother commenting on the issue. Dan56 ( talk) 23:02, 22 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Not so fast, check the talk page. Dan56 ( talk) 00:20, 23 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Since you are among the editors who made at least 10 edits to " Blurred Lines", I was hoping you might take the time to contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC) reply

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lady Gaga, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — IB ^{[ Poke ]} 06:17, 21 November 2017 (UTC) reply

— IB ^{[ Poke ]} 07:40, 21 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm QEDK, a clerk at SPI. This is a warning to refrain from collaborating with other editors to extend your viewpoint. Please realize that further disruption may result in administrative sanctions. -- QEDK ( 愛 ☃️ 海) 07:28, 24 November 2017 (UTC) reply

You're normally pretty good with observing and keeping a date format consistent; however, in your rush to copypaste the Hungarian year-end charts to different articles, you've disregarded that different articles have different date formats (on Havana (Camila Cabello song), for instance, you used "17 February 2018" instead of "February 17, 2018"—Cabello's articles use American date format). Also, please use en dashes in the reference titles instead of hyphens per MOS:ENDASH. Thank you. Ss 112 02:37, 18 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi, you recently added some data from streaming charts, e.g. Hungary (Stream Top 40) in I Don't Wanna Live Forever#Charts. I think this isn't supposed to be done per Wikipedia:Record charts#Dependent ("component") charts; Ss112, could you confirm since I don't edit as much in this area? (There are several other charts there which look like component charts but I don't know enough about them.) Jc86035 ( talk) 08:38, 19 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi @ Jc86035: generally component charts are not warranted if the song has charted on the main overall chart of a country and should not be included. Howver, I believe Kirtap92's reasoning (I believe they previously explained it at Template talk:Record charts) is that there is not one "official" overall Hungarian songs chart, and they are split between radio, streaming and such. There's even a chart titled just "Single Top 40". I thought one would consider this the overall, but I don't think it is as I'm not very familiar with the Hungarian charts. Kirtap can probably better explain it. Ss 112 08:46, 19 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi @ Jc86035: and @ Ss112:! Yeah, you are right, there's no main chart in Hungary, all aspects have a different chart, that's why it's necessary to post them all. "Rádiós Top 40" is the official airplay chart for Hungary (when it comes to audience impressions). "Single Top 40" is the digital and physical sales chart combined. "Stream Top 40" doesn't need any explanations: it counts streams from Spotify, Deezer etc. We also have "Dance Top 40" which is also not a component chart. It measures the top 500 DJ's weekly playlists, and this way it determintes the ranking, about which is the most played dance song through the country. There's also a chart called "Editors' Choice" which is an airplay chart, but that one is not relevant, as it is basically just counting spins and not audience impressions. There's a similar system in the Billboard Charts when it comes to airplay charts. (Rádiós Top 40=Radio Songs, Editors' Choice=Pop Songs Chart) Lastly we have a chart only for Hungarian artists called "Magyar Rádiós Top 40". So "Rádiós Top 40", "Single Top 40", "Stream Top 40" and "Dance Top 40" are all main charts measuring different things. Then "Editors' Choice" and "Magyar Rádiós Top 40" aren't relevant as "Magyar Rádiós Top 40" is the component chart of "Editors' Choice", while "Editors' Choice doesn't count audience impressions, only spins. That's why I never post them. If there are any further questions feel free to ask me. Kirtap92 ( talk) 16:23, 19 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi Kirtap, I have a couple of questions for you. Firstly, thanks for adding the Hungarian Streaming charts position, but this should be in a separate table for 2018, not added to the 2014 charts. Secondly, are we sure that this is the Band Aid 30 version? The picture in the Hungarian chart table is of Band Aid 30, but the chart simply says "Band Aid". i think it is more likely that it is the original 1984 version that has charted, and that the Hungarian charts have used the wrong picture to caption this. Is there any way of checking which version it is? Richard3120 ( talk) 17:59, 4 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Happy New Year to you too, Kirtap. No problem, it just seemed likely to me that it would be the original version of the song that people would be streaming, not the 2014 version. This kind of thing where chart companies put the wrong picture to the record is common - for example, in the UK the OCC has put the picture for Volume II next to the chart history of Elton John's Greatest Hits Volume I ( https://www.officialcharts.com/search/albums/elton-john's-greatest-hits/ - click on the + sign if you can't see the picture on a mobile device).

I didn't see it as a "mess-up", just an understandable mistake considering the ambiguity in the source. I suspect I will have to check the chart histories of all these classic Christmas records for the last four or five years, as I am sure with streaming they will now chart every year, which will result in some very long chart tables (see " Fairytale of New York" for an example). Richard3120 ( talk) 20:36, 4 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

So I have a doubt regarding the Hungary charts since there are 4 different of those Template:Single_chart#Non-Billboard_charts. I wonder if in an article we can use them all or we just use the stream when the song doesn't make it into the single charts, and should't the single one be the main instead of the radio? I'm asking you since you edit charts more than anyone else I know on wikipedia and very likely have more experience regarding this, I was even wondering if this works like billboard there is a main and the others are component charts or not, like the dance one or not.

I have already asked Ss112 who edits tons of charts and he gave me his opinion, but said since you are the one who usually add those charts to ask you as your knowledge is better on this matter.

Best regards, MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 15:59, 24 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi Kirtap. I see you include the artist= and song= params for the Hungarian charts quite often. Maybe you copypaste another template and just add the year= and week= params, but you don't need artist= and song=, as I'm sure you know, the Hungarian charts are accessed through year+week not the artist name and song title, so best to just leave them out in future. Also, you added "26 March 2020" as a date to several articles today; I've corrected them to 2021. Just a heads-up for the future. Thanks. Ss 112 19:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Ss112: Hi! Sorry for the mistakes, I'm gonna try and do it like you suggested in the future. For some reason I keep writing 2020 sometimes even though it's March of 2021 already. Gonna try and concentrate on not doing that. Thank you! Kirtap92 ( talk) 19:54, 26 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page You Are Not Alone, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A " bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 16:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC) reply