This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
The AFC Backlog Buster Barnstar
|
||
Congratulations, Kilopi! You're receiving the Invisible Barnstar because you reviewed 91 articles during the recent AFC Backlog elimination drive! Thank you for you contributions to Wikipedia at-large and helping to keep the backlog down. We hope you continue reviewing submissions and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! Mdann52 ( talk) 12:35, 18 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hello! Thanks much for the explanation of the reversion on the Sierra Wireless article; it was very much appreciated. We'll try to ensure that those words don't make it into any other revisions. We do have a number of other suggested edits to the article that are visible in my Sandbox page; would you mind taking a look and seeing if they would be acceptable or suggesting changes to the edits we'd recommended so that we can better adhere to the neutral POV that Wikipedia is looking for?
Again, thanks for the explanation, as it was very helpful. Mdrozdowski ( talk) 20:58, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Shon Brooks ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Dear Kilopi -- I have been assigned to make your recommended changes to the Wiki page draft for Shon Brooks of Brooks Financial & Entertainment. In your remarks, you say that the text is too self-promotional. Can you tell me more what you mean since the text and his accomplishments to me seem very straightforward and factual and is supported by reference evidence.
Thank you. Michael Dabney ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaeldabney ( talk • contribs) 14:33, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Healthy Paws Pet Insurance may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for looking into Weber Shandwick for me. You're completely correct that CorporateM's rewrites have substantially improved the quality of the page with respect to neutrality and tone. 94.12.56.203 ( talk) 08:58, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Kilopi, I received your notice blocking the post I created for the J.L. Smith company history and was hoping you could clarify what the problem was. Is it simply that I used an ip address associated with the company? I was rather careful to read and examine dozens of other company histories and I'm fairly certain that I did nothing contrary to Wikipedia's standards. Please let me know what I can do to amend the situation. All the best 72.243.98.146 ( talk) 19:37, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
You PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 17:06, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Dear Kilopi,
I have noticed you deleted almost all the information on one-way kegs. The current information leaves the wikipedia reader though empty handed. And the last sentence 'They may use either bag in ball or bag in box technology' is misleading incomplete and not correct. There is no one-way keg with bag-in-box technology.
The last thing we want is to deliver 'spammy information' . We tried sincerely to be objective. So please advice us what we can do better to take care that there is more and reliable information available on one-way kegs.
Kind regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twee en een ( talk • contribs) 10:36, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kilopi. The sentence is now correct. We'll do our homework and write a stand alone using quality references wherever possible. Thanks for your advice! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twee en een ( talk • contribs) 11:28, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the bubble tea! Yes, that was a bit odd, and it has happened to me a couple times as well. Wish I could tell you what causes it. Glad to help in a small way, and know you'd do the same. All the best, 78.26 ( I'm no IP, talk to me!) 17:03, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
You suggested "scans of newspaper clippings"? The thought is appreciated, but in most cases providing such scans means posting them somewhere, and in most cases that would be a violation of copyright, not something to be encouraged. Thank you. 66.191.153.36 ( talk) 23:38, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks very much for the feedback on the Sierra Wireless article; I appreciate it. The explanation and the example you provided was extremely helpful. We'll look for additional non-primary sources to add to the one we've currently cited. Thank you again for the help and the info - we'll figure this out yet. Mdrozdowski ( talk) 15:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello Kilopi,I would like to inquire about the reasoning behind the removal of the OnResearch Wikipedia page. Can you please help me understand specifically why the page was taken down? In addition, I would appreciate learning about how to make the page more Encyclopedic? For instance, I would like to understand why and how this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EResearch_Technology_Inc is different? Thank you for your time. Mkhabaz ( talk) 20:47, 22 July 2013 (UTC)Mkhabaz
Hello! Due to a security update to the wiki software, older versions of STiki are no longer functional. You've been identified as a user of STiki, and are kindly asked to upgrade to the current version at Wikipedia:STiki#Download before continuing with use of the tool. Continuing to use older versions will be detrimental to the STiki project. Please see Wikipedia talk:STiki#Errors for a discussion of this issue or to respond to this message. Thank you! 04:53, 21 August 2013 (UTC) |