FYI- I am moving to delete the Nordic_R1a_Y-DNA_Project article. It never should have been created and seems to be abandoned.-- RebekahThorn ( talk) 19:43, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
You reverted my edit here with a remark.
The reason for the original edit, replacing "parameter" by "state" was because the title of the article is Functions of state and indeed the article is about the state of a thermodynamic system. How, then, can these states be suddenly be called "parameters" by means of your undo? Should the need be to describe a system where the parameters are indeed a function of something (are you familiar with parametric amplifiers? I am.) then you may well have a case. But that is definitely not so in this instance since the title of the article is "Functions of state", not "Function of parameters".
I suggest you replace my edit, please. -- Damorbel ( talk) 19:32, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi! I notice you have extensive knowledge in this area, so thought to ask: do you think this is a good idea to integrate such articles together? It could include articles on GA, APS, STA, and spinors; there doesn't seem to be a template:spinor, recently I may have overloaded the template:tensors with spinor-related/-biased links, although there is a Template:Algebra of Physical Space. I'm not sure if this has been discussed before (and haven’t had much chance to look..). Thanks, M∧Ŝ c2ħε Иτlk 22:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for contacting me, I'm flattered that you have such a high opinion of my abilities as an editor. I'm not sure, though, I want to get into creating a whole new article - maybe it could be done first as a new section in Israelites, and then hived enough if there's enough to say?
I did a little research - it seems NP Lemche has some useful things to say about the tribal nature of early Israelite society, but that's perhaps not quite what the section/article should be about - it should treat the literary 12 tribes, with whatever can be said about that. I'll see if I can find a few basc books that can serve as an entry point. PiCo ( talk) 03:23, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Isaac ben Abraham of Dampierre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dampierre ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:14, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
A few months ago, you participated in a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Did you know about Gibraltar-related DYKs on the Main Page. I am proposing that the temporary restrictions on such DYKs, which were imposed in September 2012, should be lifted and have set out a case for doing so at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Gibraltar-related DYKs. If you have a view on this, please comment at that page. Prioryman ( talk) 22:07, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Jheald. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Book of Leviticus.The discussion is about the topic Book of Leviticus. Thank you. - Mr X 02:53, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Chatan Bereshit, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.
If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - Camyoung54 talk 21:17, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot ( error?) 09:17, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hospice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medicare ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:12, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Please discuss. Bearian ( talk) 20:27, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Just so you have it to hand, I thought to start my own subpage, using a bit of your crystal-clear phrasing in one place - hope it's OK. I don't want to steal any of your work or ideas, just trying out my own thoughts. If we agree, we can merge mine with yours to produce the real mainspace article. Thanks, M∧Ŝ c2ħε Иτlk 21:09, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Human Genetic History#Guidelines desperately needed. Thanks. Dougweller ( talk) 12:30, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Your statement about whether the Wikipedia Manual of Style should continue to require British-style punctuation in all articles contains a factual inaccuracy. In British English, placing periods and commas inside the quotation marks is "just plain wrong." In American English, however, leaving them outside the quotation marks is just plain wrong. One of the threads in this discussion provides a long [ | list of sources] confirming this. The main argument in favor of changing WP:LQ is that it requires editors to use punctuation that is "just plain wrong" right now. I realize that this might not change your preferences for British-style punctuation, but it would be best if that preference were not based on misconceptions. Darkfrog24 ( talk) 11:07, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Please remove that image - Moonriddengirl protected the article pending a decision in the discussion, not pre-empting it. - Sitush ( talk) 18:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Can you please go through the talk page of this article & comment your opinion on 'battery operated rickshaw driver's protest'
Summary of it is as below.
Topic- Which of the two versions be preferred to go into the protest section of 'Article'
Option A -
ADD - The AAP has supported various regulatory complaints raised by rickshaw operators in Delhi.
KEEP - the rest of the 'protest' section as it is.
Option B -
ADD - On 16 September 2013, Aam Aadmi Party supported e-rickshaw driver's demand in Delhi that there should be a policy on battery operated rickshaws in the capital city to stop their exploitation by Delhi Transport Department. Party also said that a subsidy should be given to manual rickshaw drivers who want to purchase e-rickshaws. Earlier in June 2013, the party had supported agitations of rickshaw drivers against ban on advertisements on auto rickshaws alleging that the ban is imposed because most rickshaw drivers supported Aam Aadmi party & carried their banners.
remove - On 10 June 2013, Kejriwal supported the agitation of Delhi auto rickshaw drivers, who were protesting the Delhi government's ban on advertisements on auto rickshaws. Kejriwal claimed that, auto rickshaw drivers supported his party and they carried AAP's advertisements on their auto rickshaws and this is the reason for Delhi Government's ban and he challenged that volunteers of AAP will put 10,000 advertisements on auto rickshaws as a protest.
There is no conflict over the validity of citations.-- ratastro ( talk) 05:44, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Sigh. How do they work? Do they even do Google searches for books, etc? I've found Bulldozer archaeology which first claimed the term was coined by Simcha Jacobovici, and now that he reintroduced it. You wouldn't know it's a common term that's been around since at least the middle of the 20th century, or that Israel was attacked for bulldozer archaeology several years ago. And it should obviously had the archaeology category added. Dougweller ( talk) 12:52, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
TKK! bark with me if you're my dog! 22:46, 7 October 2013 (UTC)