This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

→

Archive 15

Hi. I don't care much about the source. The name Holland as a substitute for the Netherlands is simply wrong. Within the Netherlands, there hasn't been a Holland ever since 1840. Fnorp ( talk) 11:20, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Well, that's what the supporting source says. I've simply followed WP:VERIFY. Please discuss at the article's talk or at WT:AIRLINE to see the way to handle this.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 15:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Well, the source has got it wrong. Inform yourself about the difference between Holland and the Netherlands instead. Why insist on using an archaic name for a part of the country instead of the real name of the whole country while all other names in that sentence are names of countries too? How is that attitude helping the accuracy of Wikipedia? See [ [1]]. I'm reverting your edit. There is no country Holland, there is no province or county of that name. Holland ended in 1840. Fnorp ( talk) 11:27, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

I used the material included in the source. I'll be adding a footnote with a clarification.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 11:55, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Right, thanks. Sorry to see though that you think that me trying to get the facts right is refusing "to accept a basic policy". Holland is not the Netherlands, that's a simple basic fact. I shouldn't have to have a "silly dispute" about it in the first place. Fnorp ( talk) 12:25, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

I think you're being a touch aggressive here. You could just make the correction without all the associated vitriol. Do you expect the same reaction of Germans insisting on Deutschland when English speakers use Germany? What if they insisted on people using the name of their language as 'Deutsch' and from the Netherlands as 'Nederlandersich?'That's right - it would be seen as pedantic and more than a little ridiculous. Archaic names often persist in different languages, and through common use are not archaic in those places. Whether or not the name Holland has the same usage in the Netherlands, and whatever its strictly technical definition, the name Holland is in common usage in English as an alternate name of the country, and it has been for centuries. Here I am playing Humpty Dumpty - the word means exactly what I want it to mean, no more and no less. Mdw0 ( talk) 03:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

I think that an encyclopedia should try to get the facts right. Your examples ("Nederlandersich", really?) indicate that you have no idea what this is about. This is not a matter of whether or not Germany should be called Germany in English, it's a matter of whether it should be called Prussia. Or whether it's OK to call Great-Britain England. Fnorp ( talk) 10:51, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

This is KLM's home site in Canada: https://www.klm.com/home/ca/en
I don't know whether it's accessible from other countries.
Click the "From" dialogue box - and Ottawa Rail Station (XDS) will drop-down.
The code XDS doesn't work at all websites, but it certainly works at KLM & AF sites!
KLM & AF provide bus connections (separately!) to and from YUL. Usually for $0, but not always.
Let me know if this isn't enough.
Peter
PMJzz ( talk) 02:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Airlines serve airports, not train stations. Take to WT:AIRLINE.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 02:29, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Seems to me that airlines serve passengers! And a smart airline will pick up / drop off passengers wherever they want to start from or go to. So, as smart airlines, AF & KLM serve Ottawa in this manner. The buses even have flight numbers! Did you check my link?
I added this info in good faith to help anyone who happens to visit this page. This is the first time - to my knowledge - that anyone has treated any of my contributors in this manner. I'm reluctant to re-add it without some assurance that my work won't be removed again.
PMJzz ( talk) 00:52, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

It will be removed, actually. If for any given reason an airline picks you up at a hotel, will you say that the airline serves that hotel and add the name of the hotel in the article? I don't think so.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 01:51, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

I note that neither of your replies addresses the verifiable info I provided. Your comment about hotel pick-ups was a red-herring - but staying with the facts, one can't book a ticket from a hotel, whereas one can book a ticket from, or to, XDS.
Noting your threat, I won't waste my time re-adding accurate and useful info to your page. Selfishly, it doesn't particularly bother me, because I already have the info. But taking a wider view, it is those users who don't have this info who will lose out.
That's unfortunate.
PMJzz ( talk) 19:13, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

There is a user continuing to add flags to the table as WP:AIRLINE content specifically states not to use flags for destinations tables. Please take a look. Citydude1017 ( talk) 18:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

User has been blocked for edit warring, reverted your edit, and removed your warning from your talk page. Page has been fully protected until 10 April 2015. 71.12.206.168 ( talk) 04:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Kenya Airways page, your edit caused a redundant parameter error ( help). ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

In the source that was provided, there was a date indicated, but it also said that the route had still to be approved (which was expected, but I assume, not certain or official). Then, I'd be rather reserved about including (already) Bogotá in the future destinations, with a determined date to start those operations. I have been editing the map of the destinations. I'll put Colombia in dark blue, if a more asservative source is provided and/or in the other Wikipedias (namely the Turkish!) there is a consensus about this new destination. Viet-hoian1 (discussion) 00:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Amsterdam will be new cargo destination for Uzbekistan Airways. Flights will be operated in cooperation with Korean Air, but using their own equipment (76F).

Please be so kind to change this.

https://www.uzairways.com/en/news/boeing-767-300-flights-new-format-navoi states: "At the time of transition to summer navigation on the 29th March, 2015 Uzbekistan Airways will perform new regular cargo flights from Navoi airport to Amsterdam, Shanghai and Mumbai." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.132.94.3 ( talk • contribs • WHOIS) 18:18, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Biman started it,s domestic operations in 6 APRIL , 2015 . So it has now 25 destinations in total . Look at the following list according to Biman Bangladesh Airlines destinations - Dhaka , Barisal, Bangkok-Subarnabhumi , Chittagong, Abu Dhabi , Dubai-International , Cox's Bazar , Jessore , Rajshahi , Sylhet , Saidpur , Kolkata , Delhi , Yangon , Hong Kong , Dammam , Jeddah , Riyadh , London-Heathrow , Doha , Kuwait , Muscut , Kuala Lampur , Kathmandu , Singapore . so , please be kind to change it's destinations .— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shishir2312 ( talk • contribs)

You cannot use Wikipedia articles as a source for other articles per WP:CIRCULAR.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 10:10, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello Jetstreamer!

I see you have removed a reference to planespotters.net which I had placed on Biman Bangladesh Airlines due to it being an unreliable source. I always had my doubts on that site (for various reasons), but used it anyway due to the fact it was used on other airline pages, notably: Regent Airways, United Airways, Novoair and US-Bangla Airlines. I understand the articles I mentioned aren't as well monitored as Biman, but they have references from the site being used nonetheless. Now that I am sure of its unreliability, should I have it removed from them? There could be other articles using it too.

I would like to point out, to date, I haven't really found anything on planespotters.net which I could definitely label incorrect either from personal knowledge or with info from reliable sources. Moreover, many articles use the site to cite important details. Let me know what you think should be done, feel free to do anything on your own as I might not be available for the next few days.

Thanks

Rihaz ^{( Talk to me • Stuff I did)} 17:29, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

@ Rihazrihazrihaz: Hello Rihaz, it's good to stay in touch again. For the cases you mention, I do not recommend to remove the source from that articles unless more reliable sources are found. Typically, the information provided by the airline should be enough to support the fleet table, but there are carriers that do not give out this (e.g. Libyan Airlines), so an alternative should be found. The unreliability of Planespotters.net, ch-aviation or Airfleets has been raised by many users a number of times, but they keep being used massively accross airline articles. Specifically for Biman Bangladesh Airlines, I believe there's no need to supplement the information provided by the airlines itself. Please note that, given that this official info does not include the recently incorporated Dash 8s, there's a separate reference included for these aircraft. Hope this helps. Do not hesitate to contact me for anything else. Regards.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 17:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

All right, those refs stay where they are then. However, I do believe we should maintain the same standard for all articles and so not allow questionable sites to be used anywhere.

Rihaz ^{( Talk to me • Stuff I did)} 05:56, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I don't understand why you removed the map from Tehran Imam Khomeini Airport. Is it something bad with it? Shouldn't it be there?

I would like to get a good answer from you. Well you know how it feels when you spend hours on something and someone else just deletes it by one single click... AminC99 ( talk) 16:55, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

@ AminC99:  There's no project consensus for having these maps in airport articles.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 18:22, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello JetstreamerI'm happy to talk to you.

• The size of the fleet of EgyptAir now 80 aircraft .
• This site of the Ministry of Civil Aviation of Egypt

Ministry of Civil Aviation of Egypt

• Thank you for your cooperation

Fady Adel Azmy ( talk) 04:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

The link above includes 12 Embraer aircraft operated by EgyptAir Express, which is a separate airline and has its own article. Furthermore, the fleet table was properly supported by a reference and your change was not in agreement with that reference.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 23:28, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

According to http://airlineroute.net/2015/05/06/ar-lhr-sep15/, Aerolineas Argentinas will be operating limited service to Heathrow in the months of October and September 2015. A user continues to add it but it was removed. It looks like it will operate as one-off special occasion charter flights (and it doesn't seem to be a regular service hence the words "limited service") but I am not sure it is notable to include in the table. Citydude1017 ( talk) 04:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

@ Citydude1017: To me, it seems the airline will operate these flights as a prospection to evaluate the re-opening of the Buenos Aires–London route. I don't see any problem with their inclusion.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 13:21, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Why does the source not support the number? At least in my world 43 (which is supported by the source I provided) minus 3 equals 40! SideshowBob7 ( talk) 11:58, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

WP:VERIFY requires a citation that directly supports the changes. What you're doing is original research.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 12:20, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

You've got to be kidding ! That's simple math (although obviously to high for some people!) and not original research! SideshowBob7 ( talk) 17:30, 11 May 2015 (UTC) And since you seem to like policies so much you might want to have a look at this one: WP:IAR and this one: WP:CALC SideshowBob7 ( talk) 17:39, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

@ SideshowBob7: I don't think I have a problem neither with simple nor wih complex maths, I have a Ph.D. Aside from that, nobody reading the article can possibly guess the way the Qatar Airway's order book changed since December. WP:VERIFY is crystal clear and WP:CALC mentions consensus among editors. Where's your consensus? And it doesn't mater if I like policies or not, they are there to be followed. As I once said to you, do not edit Wikipedia if you're not prepared to stick to these policies.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 21:19, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

You removed the 747 entry with valid reference citing wiki policy stating leased aircraft are not to be listed, so can the 777-200 and Dash 8 be removed from Biman fleet since they are leased too. 139.190.230.234 ( talk) 14:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Absolutely. You may proceed.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 21:14, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

I wont because it dosent make sense, as two distinct types will not be shown as part of fleet, leading to the article appearing as outdated or factually incorrect, thats the point I wanted to make. 98.124.175.72 ( talk) 21:49, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your clarification of what 'Verify Source' means. Kind regards Buckshot06 (talk) 22:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello Jetstremer, you reverted an edit regarding the placement of a Portalbar stating that Portals are not external links. That's correct, but before lecturing others, you should read the guidelines for the use of Portalbars which you can find here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Portal_bar. I quote: "Within articles, this template is usually placed at the bottom of the article just above the navboxes." (and NOT at the "see also"-section) which was correcty done and has been criticised by you as wrong, which it isn't. You can discuss if the use of Portalbars instead of Portals makes sense, but don't lecture others based on your lack of knowledge of the rules you seem to refer to. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.171.148.3 ( talk) 10:23, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Here you can find a link to the guidelines supporting my position. This discussion already took place at Talk:Germanwings Flight 9525.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 10:26, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

This [2] edit is the last one of many that added content not supported by the reference provided. I don't know why

“

All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material.

”

from WP:VERIFY is so difficult to understand. I won't continue the back and forth additions and removals. Instead, I'm requesting admin help to solve this. Please note that protection of the page had been requested [3], but it was declined.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 10:45, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

The WP:VERIFY policy stands. A single incident of this does not merit the article and the policy while states the intent, there are many possible means of resolution including using the {{ cn}} template. Further, the information does not appear to be incorrect. According to this source it would appear that Volaris will have a connection from Mexico City International Airport to Chetumal International Airport. While the burden is on the original editor to provide a viable source, it also appears they're a less experienced editor (as indicated in their attempt to add a photo gallery) AND it's possible the source they provided does contain that information. It's difficult to tell because it's behind a java UI where that information needs to be pulled. I suggest some patience and understanding is forwarded to them. Also be aware that most of the flight destinations are not supported by a reference. It's likely they're copying what has already been done in the article. If you removed that piece of information, it's possible they would take that as a cue and gut most of the article (by which against WP:VERIFY they could also do since most of it is unreferenced). The key in verify is "contentious" material. The rest can be improved upon as the article grows. Not all articles are expected to be perfect from their start. Mkdw ^talk 18:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

@ Mkdw: Thanks for replying. I'll be using the source you provided above. The information could be correct, but it was not supported by any of the sources the user provided, I tried to tell them this but they thought they was doing right.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 22:24, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

I came across this list: List of airlines of Kosovo, and what called my attention was the alleged Air Prishtina founded in 1981. At that time, Prishtina and Kosovo were part of Serbia, within Yugoslavia, and I am not an expert but I can say I am familiarized with the airlines events that happened there in history. As early as 1970s there were some minor regional airliners in Yugoslavia (besides the major ones), but I never heard about Air Prishtina. Now, from what I saw on their website, seems that ever since the beginning till now they were only a simple travel agency offering flight seats at real airlines operating in the airports in the region (namely Pristina and Skopje as it seems). So I am not sure if then they can qualify really as an airliner. Here they talk about their partners for flight operations (from what I read they have zero planes of their own), and even in their history article I also fail to see any plane mentioned, not even leased ones. I am not wanting to be too bold and remove Air Prishtina from the List of airlines of Kosovo without having your opinion first. It is not anything urgent btw, have a look whenever you have time and tell me what you think. Best regards, FkpCascais ( talk) 02:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

@ FkpCascais: I've searched across Flightglobal. No results for Air Prishtina.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 20:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

OK, so I can definitely remove it then. Many thanks for help! FkpCascais ( talk) 21:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Jetstreamer. I made a few additions to the page, but I think the information I put doesn´t need any sources. It´s just a fact of everyday´s life. Where do you find a source to verify that transportation to and from airports is -and has always been- a problem in Argentina? It´s something any Argentinian (or somebody who´s travelled to the country) will agree with. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.245.226.227 ( talk) 00:02, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Read WP:VERIFY, a basic policy.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 20:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello Jetstreamer,

To clarify, Copa Airlines left SkyTeam the same time as Continental Airlines (now merged with United Airlines) left SkyTeam as well on October 24, 2009 (to join Star Alliance). Continental Airlines and Copa Airlines were partners and shared the same frequent flyer program until the former fully merged with United Airlines in 2012. That same year, Copa Airlines fully joined Star Alliance as a member. I think a full date (October 24, 2009) for Copa Airlines leaving SkyTeam should be provided as oppose just the year that Copa Airlines left SkyTeam; it should be more or less specific. If you have any concerns, please reply and we can discuss.

Sincerely,

An anonymous aviation enthusiast. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.69.43.147 ( talk) 04:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

I've started a thread a the article's talk and you did not reply.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 14:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Link me please? I don't see the link on the page. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.69.43.147 ( talk) 16:40, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Talk:SkyTeam#Departure_date_for_Copa_Airlines.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 18:30, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Excuse me, are you a machine or a real person? All editions I made are correct and based on web pages and other consulted sources. Thanks. For example: About the beginning of AeroMexico's Mexico City-Boston service today is June 1, 2015

.-My edition is constructive and does not affect the content of Wikipedia. Thanks, again.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.132.171.202 ( talk) 00:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Hey. Can you take a look at this page? LOT Polish Airlines is ending 4 destinations from Warsaw (Chisnau, Zagreb, Belgrade, and Yeveran) beginning 1 July 2015 and there is a source but however a user is insisting that these routes are resuming in January 2016 and I have reverted his edits because the source provided doesn't state that services will resume. Citydude1017 ( talk) 06:23, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Dear, just a quick word of appreciation for your efforts. If I knew how to implement it, I'd award you the seven-bladed propeller with radishes and garlic medal! Jan olieslagers ( talk) 20:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

@ Jan olieslagers: Appreciate this, but please note that there seems to be people that do not agree with with you and me [4].-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 21:19, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Dear Jetstreamer,

How do you do? I am the Web Content Manager for flynsa (KSA) and will be updating the wikipedia page for flynas going forward. THanks very much for your efforts so far in keeping the page up to date. I have already carried out some major editing to correct inaccurate information relating to our future network plans - we are not about to start a route to the US!

If you have any questions please let me know.

Regards,

Richard Slater rslater@flynas.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramslater1 ( talk • contribs) 13:53, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

@ Ramslater1: Don't have questions but a comment. What you did in this [5] edit is an unexplained removal of content. I have reverted it because it is supported by a reliable source. Given that Flynas is not the official page of the airline and that it seems you're on the first steps of editing Wikipedia, I suggest you to read the core content policies. Best.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 21:52, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Dear Jetstreamer,

I have re removed the content and explained its deletion - the sources cited are reliable but well out of date (regarding potential new routes) and are all superseded by the much more recent articles referenced (17,31,32) which announced the end of the Global Routes Program and thus signified that the routes to destinations such as Nigeria and Chine will not happen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramslater1 ( talk • contribs) 06:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Apologies - I meant to write articles 17,27,28 - not 17,31,32. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramslater1 ( talk • contribs) 06:10, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

I don't see anything wrong with mentioning that there were plans to start those routes despite the airline subsequently shelved them. The content has been restored and the Airline project has been informed about your actions. Again, the article is not the airline's official website and we have policies regarding content.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 10:29, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

That's nice to know - I do see something wrong with providing outdated, erroneous information. Looking across several other airline pages, this is not standard practice at all. Appreciate it isn't the airline's official page, but shouldn't the information be as up to date and factually correct as possible? Ramslater1 ( talk) 11:38, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

The information is supported by reliable sources, as required by basic policies. That's enough for inclusion. And the information is not inaccurate, as it says the airline once intended to fly to some destinations. It doesn't claim it actually does.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 21:17, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Greetings, the change I made for this aviation accident was from the first source, " http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19880915-0" which had been previously sourced in the article after "At the time of the accident the aircraft was less than a year old" under source 1.

I would prefer to discuss the re-removal before there is another revert as to prevent WP:3RR. My main reasoning behind adding this was the fact that the majority of other major airline disasters have the accident description from either the FAA/ICAO. I am personally reading it, but adding the source as well as well as changing it slightly to add another link within the article to bird strike. -- KoRoBeNiKi SSBWiki Rollback Moderator and chess specialist 13:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Bird strike as a possible cause of the accident was already mentioned in the first paragraph of the ″Accident description″ section. I've reverted your edit. And please check your spelling before hitting the ″Save changes″ button.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 00:50, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

I noticed your recent edit to Aeroflot. There are good reasons why {{ date}} should not be used in mainspace, and especially not to supply an argument to citation templates:

• See Template:Date#Description. Note that it says, in bold, "This template should only be used internally in other templates." In other words, it should not be used directly within mainspace articles, but only as a sub-template within another template.
• This is reinforced in the citation template documentation. See Template:Cite_news#COinS: Use of templates within the citation template is discouraged because many of these templates will add extraneous HTML or CSS that will be rendered in the metadata.

I would add that {{ date}} in this context is pointless: it does nothing useful and merely serves to clutter up the article.

I have therefore removed these templates from Aeroflot. Regards, NSH002 ( talk) 17:11, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

I need your help. An IP continue to restore flags to that list as WP:AIRLINE-DEST-LIST and MOS:FLAGS says no flags in airline destination list. The IP will revert again. However, I have left a message at his talk page, directing him to the links provided, I have also requested semi-protection to the article. Can you keep an eye on the page. Thanks! 97.85.113.113 ( talk) 06:05, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello Jetstreamer,

You talked about reliable source but my source was Wikipedia and I have done this change according to following link; /info/en/?search=List_of_the_world%27s_busiest_airports_by_passenger_traffic , so please do this change to my name or to your name by yourself and do the corrections.

Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.252.20.160 ( talk) 13:34, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

WP:CIRCULAR. Wikipedia cannot be used as a source for Wikipedia.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 15:11, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello

Air Arabia Maroc wants to update their Wikipedia pages, but you sir undid all the editing, the infos available on the page are outdated and need refreshing — Preceding unsigned comment added by AAMaroc ( talk • contribs) 14:30, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

There's no need to duplicate the content of Air Arabia Maroc destinations so I'm removing the destinations list.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 14:53, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Dear talk:Jetstreamer @Jetstreamer, you removed all the updates, Will keep the same template and destinations on a separate wiki, but we'll need to update the pages, Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by AAMaroc ( talk • contribs) 15:02, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

I asked about the issue here. Please take a look at WP:BRINT. K9re11 ( talk) 16:55, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Taking the matter to WP:ANI is just too much as this is a technical discussion and not a vandalism/disruption issue, but let it go your way.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 17:48, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello. You were quick to revert my edit to the article, but your reasoning does not appear to fit. I explained I had shortened the section, and didn't actually add any new facts, just rewrote some. If you'd preferred an additional reference, it would have been much more beneficial to find one rather than hit undo. Thanks, Cloudbound ( talk) 17:27, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, but it wasn't me the one that needed to provide additional sources per WP:BURDEN.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 13:19, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

If we all had that attitude, nothing would work on Wikipedia. Cloudbound ( talk) 16:20, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Maybe, but we have clear policies regarding the addition of content.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 18:01, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Would you mind commenting here. —  LeoFrank  ^Talk 16:04, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

I'd Like if you will upload my editing again. The source for that editing, is this. Slav4 ( talk) 00:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

I've reverted your revert on this page as the citation was already in place at the end of the following sentence. A quick click through the link would have indicated this, rather than just blindly hitting the revert button. In order to avoid issues with any other overzealous reverters I've placed the cite at the end of both sentences. Stifle ( talk) 13:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello Jetstreamer,

If I was caught in any wrong-doing, I would like to sincerely apologize for my mistakes. I believed the sources that were being inserted were clear and concise, as well as proper. If these sources are not described in this way, I would like to extend my apologies to the Wikipedia community and the parties involved. The reason for repeating my editing is because I believed that these corrections were both factual and critical to a more informed audience on the topic of the Wikipedia page. It is my understanding that, because of these edits, that an independent review of these edits and my ignorance of the warnings that were given are currently being discussed. I hope that this issue can be resolved in a mature and orderly manner. If you would like to comment or make a suggestion to me, please do. I would love to hear your feedback in order to ensure this does not happen again. Thank you very much for your contributions to Wikipedia, and once again, I do apologize for any wrong-doings or errors that I caused, and any inconvenience that I have caused you, or the Wikipedia community as a whole. Warmest regards, and keep editing to make a bigger, better, and factual Wikipedia that can be trusted! Hopefully, my editing skills will improve as time goes on. Thanks again!

Zhayden123 ( talk) 22:11, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

@ Zhayden123: I have reported you at WP:ANI. If you commit not to add more unsourced content into articles I'll be happy to withdraw that thread.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 22:13, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello again,

I do commit not to add any unreliable sources that may compromise the information seen on any Wikipedia page. I will have to do some reading and studying on proper editing, and possibly look at some tutorials or examples of these things. Thanks for messaging back.

Zhayden123 ( talk) 22:17, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

@ Zhayden123: Good to hear. The thread at WP:ANI has been withdrawn [6]. Please do take a look at WP:VERIFY before attempting to add any kind of unsourced content again. Please also note that the best way of collaborating with the project is to discuss any change anytime it has been reverted with a proper explanation in the edit summary. A good place for inquiries regarding airline-related articles is WT:AIRLINE, where a number of project-related editors (myself included) can assist you with anything you might ask.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 22:26, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your help Jetstreamer.

Zhayden123 ( talk) 01:10, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

@ Zhayden123: You don't seem to be understanding the verifiability policy. Your latest changes to List of Boeing 737 operators have been reverted. You should start to make edits in line with the core content policies.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 03:54, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi. There seem to be some ediors constantly warring to add dest maps back to the article. Not sure if they are meatpuppets or socks or just three editors who happen to want the same unwanted thing to be added. There also seems to be an addition of Top international destinations to the article which was I'm pretty sure decided not to be added. I'm sick and tired of reverting these edits as it's making the page look a lot more ugly. Could you please monitor the page? —  LeoFrank  ^Talk 10:35, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

On my twitter i have seen messages from airlines regarding new service. I have been unable to load any sources because of service errors. please excuse me for any misinformation. I have thorohuly checked and found such info to be right.— Preceding unsigned comment added by MLGMasterDutch ( talk • contribs)

@ MLGMasterDutch: All your recent unsourced changes below have been reverted.

Please read WP:VERIFY regarding the addition of new information to Wikipedia. By adding unsourced facts into the articles above you have violated one of the core content policies. The persistent violation of any of these policies may lead you to a block. Thanks.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 00:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello Jetstreamer, it is annoying that you remove updates of the new schedule of Atlasglobal UA which have been published on their website. These flights are available to book, and based on the reservation engine it's possible to find out the start date. If you really want to do something positive for Wikipedia, then please write an article about Atlasglobal UA as it's a new airline in Ukraine. You have recently removed the routes Lviv-Istanbul, Kharkiv-Istanbul and Odessa-Istanbul. Please have a look at the website of the airline and you will see when these routes are being opened.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.75.202.15 ( talk • contribs)

All I did was to follow WP:VERIFY, a basic policy.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 00:39, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Your approach makes it very difficult for people to publish the latest information on Wikipedia. According to WP:VERIFY a reliable source should be used. I believe there is no better source in this case than the timetables and booking engine as published on the website of the airline. All newspapers will use this information to write their articles, so what is the sense to wait for an (English written?) article about the new routes? Please have a look once again at the website of Atlasglobal and you will see that everything is published in their timetable and you will be able to book these flights ^{[1] [2]}.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.75.202.15 ( talk • contribs)

The second source above can be used to support the additions. Go ahead.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 12:07, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Please note that I have reported User talk:Zhayden123 to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Cheers. Magnolia677 ( talk) 01:29, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

The shootdown occurred about a month after the Kano air disaster. I don't have a source, but the Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1973 includes all accidents that may be considered notable from that year. None approached the mark of Libyan Arab Flight 114. I won't re-add this information it until I find an outside source.

76.88.118.8 ( talk) 23:06, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

"I don't have a source". Please read WP:VERIFY.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 23:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

¿Me podrías decir ahora por qué quitaste la edición del aeropuerto? ¿Ahora que fue lo que no te gustó? La ruta comienza en esa fecha, te guste o no te guste. Al parecer te sientes el dueño del aeropuerto. Vmzp85 ( talk) 23:30, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

WP:VERIFY reads ″All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material.″ Please communicate with me in English if you're using this talk page, as this is English Wikipedia. Thanks.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 13:25, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Ecuatoriana de Aviación never flew to Israel, Spain, Uruguay, Costa Rica, Paraguay, Canada or Brazil. You should check it. You can be shure that Ecuatoriana never had one single flight to these countries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.46.165.18 ( talk) 05:18, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello Jetstreamer, all dates from Braunau am Inn District of the Municipalities are after correcting not o.k. The newest dates from 01.01.2015 will be not shown, but always the dates from 2014. What ist wrong here? Regards -- Sweepy ( talk) 20:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

@ Sweepy: Have you tried to ask for help at the article's talk?-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 21:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

No, because I thought, you can help or clear. Regards -- Sweepy ( talk) 21:39, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Done today. -- Sweepy ( talk) 19:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Cool.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 19:20, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

I saw, that's not cool because nobody does not react/correct. Please look at this site my comment in terms of not seeing at point 2. I am not satisfied to give despite notice and nothing happens. I think it feels obviously nobody in charge and I'm disappointed. Nevertheless

thank to you and regards -- Sweepy ( talk) 19:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Well, you write the city names such they were 150 years ago. Today they are different. How to cite such obvious things? I mean "Ruschuk" and "Philipopolis". They are "Ruse" and "Plovdiv". I'm sorry, I read your message today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.25.57.35 ( talk) 08:38, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Could you weigh in here? Thanks, —  LeoFrank  ^Talk 15:13, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello Jetstreamer, will you be so kind to delete the headline Lippische Bergland because it was wrong. I redirected the correct Lippisches Bergland. Thanks and regards -- Sweepy ( talk) 17:55, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Redirected [14].-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 18:32, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello once more, I asked you to delete the headline. Now you've the wrong redirect renewed. That's not o.k. Regards -- Sweepy ( talk) 19:50, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

There's no reason to remove the page. I'd fix the redirect if you tell me which is the correct target page.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 22:17, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello Jetstreamer, will you be so kind, to redirect above German name at Zgierz. When I will do it, the redirect goes to Gornau -without redirect-note!-. This is wrong! Thanks and regards -- Sweepy ( talk) 10:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Would you mind taking part in this disscussion ( talk:Pisa International Airport) about a new charter section in Pisa International Airport.
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss ( talk) 23:05, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Stop deleting my changes they are true and they are right you have no right to delete all my changes and fixes on the El Al fleet page and Arkia fleet page I worked on them for a long time you have no right to delete all of my work I'm gonna change it every day until you stop because I am the right to change these pages all of all of my work are from the news and more so stopppp!!! Goodbye Sammymaster15 ( talk) 19:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Read WP:VERIFY.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 21:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello Jetstreamer, please can you help me at above. My supplements are not showing. Did I made a mistake?

+ | mayor= Michael Ziche ( Landrat (Deutschland)

+ | party= CDU

Thanks in advance and regards -- Sweepy ( talk) 08:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

With your contributions and work to aviation articles, you would easily pass RfA. sovereign° sentinel (contribs) 02:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I was looking for a source about Alitalia CityLiner and SkyTeam, and another user has found two sources: The first source ( http://www.wegotravel.ch/it/compagnie-aeree/alitalia-cityliner-ct) says clearly that Alitalia CityLiner is a SkyTeam member, but I don't know if It is a reliable source. The second one is from Alitalia website ( http://www.alitalia.com/it_it/millemiglia/programma/regolamento/edizione-2013-2015.html) where is written (in Italian) that in this document the writing "la compagnia" (the airline) relates to Alitalia and Alitalia CityLiner, and later says that "la compagnia" is partner of SkyTeam. Which one is better in your opinion? Wjkxy ( talk) 07:32, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

( talk page stalker) I would say that the Alitalia website is more reliable than Wego.com. sovereign° sentinel (contribs) 09:24, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Agree. The second one is more reliable.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 10:12, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I add the affiliate :) Wjkxy ( talk) 10:41, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

It says in the article some where sold to Canadian based low cost carrier westjet. But I added a source anyways — Preceding unsigned comment added by Canadianspartan ( talk • contribs) 20:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

@ Canadianspartan: Awesome. I've expanded the source you added [15].-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 00:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Jetstreamer. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Something about a "typo error". I'm not the filing party but look forward to seeing some discussion from you, cheers, Drcrazy102 ( talk) 08:48, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Jetstreamer,

is this argument enough for your?????!!!!

look first before you change

thanks

http://www.ch-aviation.com/portal/news/40926-aerolineas-argentinas-begins-b737-700-phase-out

News

Aerolineas Argentinas begins B737-700 phase-out

23 hours ago

Aerolineas Argentinas (AR, Buenos Aires Ezeiza) has begun phasing out its fleet of twenty-two B737-700s with the first - LV-CAM (msn 30243) - having been returned to its lessor on Monday, October 5. The aircraft are to be replaced by an incoming fleet of twenty new B737-800s which are scheduled to begin arriving from Boeing (BOE, Chicago O'Hare) between 2016 and 2018. The -700s are currently used on flights throughout Argentina as well as to Brazil, Bolivia, Chile, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sasha2881 ( talk • contribs) 11:17, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

The changes I made are valid, just because there is no official source for deliveries until the end of the month from Airbus doesn't mean they didn't happen. http://bloga350.blogspot.pt/2015/10/airbus-delivers-a350-msn11-and-msn8-to.html?m=1

Anthonyribeiro (
talk) 05:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

THe source above is not reliable. Read WP:VERIFY.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 13:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi! Aeromexico cancelled the Atlanta flights so the related reference is no longer applicable, it was a note from 2012 when the route was first announced. Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coyatoc ( talk • contribs) 10:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

@ Coyatoc: The reference says the airline restarted services to the city in 2012. It's an excellent support to the fact that the destination was served once. Entries for terminated destinations must be backed by reliable sources.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 11:06, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Correction of "Delta Airlines" to "Delta Air Lines" is not a violation of WP:UNBROKEN. It is actually correction of a spelling error since "Delta Airlines" is not the correct spelling and therefore should be changed to the correct spelling of "Delta Air Lines". This is actually noted at WP:UNBROKEN as a good reason to change a link. Please do not revert such corrections, thank you. 2602:30A:2EFE:F050:884:A54E:F6D5:C2AF ( talk) 22:39, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Supporting source mentions ″Delta Airlines″. WP:VERIFY applies if you don't like WP:UNBROKEN. Nothing more to discuss.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 14:51, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Jetstreamer, for your reference, please review Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:Edit warring, and Wikipedia:Editing policy . It could be useful for you, before using any warning template, from now on. Thank you, ( Rgvis ( talk) 19:12, 18 October 2015 (UTC))

@ Rgvis: Likewise, it will be useful for you to read the core content policies, of which WP:VERIFY is one of them. Regards.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 21:55, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

So, you should have verified, or asked (or even used Wikipedia:Citation needed template), before any action of content reverting ( Wikipedia:Revert only when necessary), Jetstreamer (especially, when we talk about this kind of content). Your actions were rude, and definitely, they were not in the true Wikipedian spirit, sir!
At least, Zurich00swiss realized and recognized that he was in error ( User_talk:Zurich00swiss#Blue_Air). ( Rgvis ( talk) 12:13, 19 October 2015 (UTC))

@ Rgvis: Say whatever you want. Do not edit Wikipedia if you're not prepared to follow the policies.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 19:07, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

If I may say whatever I want, how about "you're an arrogant prick"? You must be one of the worst newbie-biters [16] [17] (and not just newbie [18] [19]) around. No such user ( talk) 22:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

WP:CCPOL.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 00:59, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

...and none of the CCPOLs says that any edit not satisfying all of them must be reverted immediately. It takes effort and judgement from experienced users to assess whether a) the information added is truthful and useful, in which case a source should be sought for, or at minimum, statement tagged with {{ cn}} in the hope that someone will provide it in a reasonable period or b) the information is wrong, misguided or constitutes blatant vandalism, where an immediate revert is justified. Pages provided by Rgvis above provide helpful guidance and describe best practices how to deal with imperfect edits, in particular WP:IMPERFECT (Perfection is not required: Collaborative editing means that incomplete or poorly written first drafts can evolve over time into excellent articles.) and WP:PRESERVE (Fix problems if you can, flag or remove them if you can't. Preserve appropriate content.), both parts of WP:EP policy. Judging on the contents of your talk page, and my short experience with you, you seem to place no effort whatsoever to separate the grain from the chaff. Particularly in the ever-changing area of air transport where you work, numerous accurate but imperfect updates by newbies and IPs are forever lost by your knee-jerk reverts. As an experienced editor, you should know better. No such user ( talk) 08:45, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

See WP:BURDEN.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 16:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

See m:DICK. I think I'm done here. No such user ( talk) 22:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

I think you are. Neither I'm here to make you my friend nor I asked for any opinion of yours.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 00:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I've noticed that " Tobibln ( talk)" is continually adding or removing unsurced stuff to aviation-related articles, as you can see in his contributions. This user usually adds codeshares or remove flights. I've checked on airlines' websites many flights that he has removed and he's generally right; the problem is that he never gives a source or an explanation for his changes. As I know that you're really prepared in these issues, I'd like to ask you if you can do something with him, as he never answers at his talk page and I don't know how to tell him to stop doing it. Thank you. Wjkxy ( talk) 19:09, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

If you find s(he) has added unsourced content, report them. I gave them a final warning regarding this.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 20:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

I haven't understood... do I have to show you the edits or I have to report it to an administrator? Wjkxy ( talk) 15:20, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

I gave the editor a final warning regarding their addition of unsourced content back in April. S(he) is well aware of this. You can report them if they continue with the unsourced additions.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 15:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Ok thanks, but I'm not sure if this and this are considered unsurced edits, maybe the second one? Thanks. Wjkxy ( talk) 17:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

The first one definitely is.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 01:08, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

I corrected a typo on Vietnam Airlines, where "Delta Air Lines" was erroneously written "Delta Airlines" (that's a common mistake). You reverted my edit, and pointed to WP:BROKEN: could you please read it again? It states that "Good reasons to bypass redirects include [...] Spelling errors and other mistakes should be corrected. Don't link to a misspelled redirect". Since Vietnam Airlines is obviously talking about Delta Air Lines in the ref, and since there's obviously a spelling error in that ref (yes, references can have mistakes sometimes), I don't see why "Delta Airlines" should be kept instead of "Delta Air Lines".

Slasher-fun ( talk) 21:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

That's not a spelling error. It's the name appearing in the supporting source. This is another proof that you do not understand WP:VERIFY. Read it and then we can discuss this further.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 21:03, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

That is a spelling error in the supporting source. Delta Airlines does not exist, it is called Delta Air Lines. Easy way to see that the source has a typo: it links to Delta conditions of carriage, which state "Unless otherwise provided, any reference to “Delta” in this document refers to Delta Air Lines, and also refers to the Delta Shuttle, and the Delta Connection carriers". If you think every reference is 100% reliable, including this one, then why not also turn the KLM link into "Royal Dutch Airlines", or the El Al link into "Israel Airlines"? Slasher-fun ( talk) 21:21, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Jetstream, você está se dedicando DEMAIS à wikipedia. Tira uma folga. Como dizia Dastardly ao Muttley: "Those medals you wear on your moth-eaten chest should be there for bungling at which you are best". Tenho corrigido os erros da wiki, mas não invejo nenhuma de suas comendas ou estrelas. Prefiro pilotar aviões e passear com minha familia, bem longe do computador... RobertoRMola ( talk) 19:27, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Do whatever makes you happy.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 20:04, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

https://www.flickr.com/photos/jajadelera5/15651555211 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felix Pavlovic editor ( talk • contribs) 00:52, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

@ Felix Pavlovic editor: Images are not reliable sources, let alone these drawings hosted by a blocked user.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 01:34, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

I added a source per your request on ABX Air for the hubs it has. Generally though sources are left off hubs in the infoboxes per WP:Airport, and put somewhere in the article. Usually sources are only added if someone challenges the status of the hub. I think it is pretty clear though that these two aiprots are ABX's hubs if you look at the destination lists with 27 from CVG and 15 from MIA. Unless you somehow want to challenge this, although it is on their website as I cited, the sources should not be there. Also, looking at your edit history, you tend to revert a lot of unsourced edits, which is very appropriate and awesome in most cases, but I would caution you to read WP pages on the particular topic before reverting every unsourced edit. Sorry if I sounded rude at all, that is not my intent. Thanks. Stinger20 ( talk) 02:18, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

@ Stinger20: Please read WP:VERIFY and WP:INFOBOXREF. Your addition is not sourced elsehwere in the article, so I will require a reference supporting your changes.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 13:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Done already. Thanks.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 14:02, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. You may want to participate in the discussion at Talk:Rossiya (airline)#Requested move 16 December 2015. Also, do you know the difference between a joint-stock company and an open joint-stock company, in terms of Russia? Seems that Aeroflot is an OJSC, while Rossiya is just a JSC? Thanks, Wbm1058 ( talk) 17:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Dear the info I'm giving over those 2 orders of the type airbus a330-300 was on our Belgian news so this info can be found at VTM news! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.227.162.122 ( talk) 17:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

You should provide sources for your changes per WP:VERIFY, honey.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 18:37, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi i am new in wikipedia i wanna know about one thing that is about wikipedia scholarship. can you tell me something about this? Mohammed Galib Hasan ( talk) 05:58, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 21:40, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

@ Bzuk:Thank you very much. Merry Xmas for you too!-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 00:36, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Why did you revert the update? GogoLive123 ( talk) 16:47, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

The reference you added says the airline is negotiating the aircraft, not that they have been ordered.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 17:54, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi Jetstreamer, this is regarding your recent revert linked here: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Balkan_Bulgarian_Airlines&diff=698248687&oldid=698243500

I do see the source you used, it opens to the correct page and everything. My contention is that source itself has typos on the spelling of Gorna Oryahovitsa and Stara Zagora, and that Philippopolis has not been used as a name for Plovdiv since the middle ages, certainly not in the 1950's. I think most of this should be apparent by naming of those cities in both Wikipedia and Google Maps (notice that you need to redirect the internal links for those city articles to correct for the typos/outdated names).

Let me know what you think! MrChupon ( talk) 23:46, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello. As always, I support the use of the names appearing in the sources backing the content.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 02:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your prompt response. My contention is that while the current source material seems to be great for describing the state of this airline in the 1950's, it appears to be a poor source for the correct spelling/naming of these Bulgarian cities. You can see that the map in that source refers to Yugoslavia as 'Jugoslavia', yet we don't use that spelling anywhere on Wikipedia, not in the Yugoslavia article, and not even in the article we're discussing which has references to Yugoslavia within. If I had a source that listed the headquarters of United Airlines as in 'Chikago', but otherwise contained good information, surely we wouldn't need to keep that typo in the article?

I can see that this has been added and reverted in the past by others using the same logic, so I went to the trouble of sourcing the spelling of each of these cities on Google Maps, which I contend is reliable source material. I'm going to go ahead and put my edits back, please consider this before reverting again. MrChupon ( talk) 05:28, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

@ MrChupon: Users in the past did not provide any soures for their changes, so that's out of discussion. My concern is that it seems we have an issue with WP:VERIFY, as it requires sources directly supporting the material. You did not remove the original citation, but your addition of references close to the city names are weird. If I read the article for the first time I don't understand the logic of these references. Maybe an explanatory note will help.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 12:25, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

One more thing: Jugoslavia redirects to Yugoslavia...-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 12:27, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, this is BaderJF regarding the reference it's available on their Twitter page and website, so I will change it back. Baderjf ( talk) 22:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

@ Baderjf: I will revert it unless you provide a reliable source for your edits, per WP:BURDEN.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 01:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Jetstreamer! From Monday on, could you update the map that is the Turkish Airlines destinations article. I'll be away for 6 months, so I won't be able to do it, and I don't know if anyone else will do so. Thank you for your attention! Chocofrito ( talk) 11:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

• The "unsourced addition" is taken directly from the report, with minimal rephrasing just to prevent copyright violations (we probably cannot simply copy paste).
• The same is true for my following edit. It is close to the sentence in the report but it is not the same.

In both cases sentences were simplified to make them easier to read rather than to follow strict legal language, probably required for the report. I have reverted both changes. Please watch more that you are doing.

Audriusa ( talk) 07:33, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

@ Audriusa: Please read WP:VERIFY, WP:BURDEN. You added a totally unsourced sentence in this [20] edit. And the sourced addition is an exact copy of what appears in page 75 of the report, which is a clear copyright violation.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 14:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

The report says (literally, the conditions for a takeoff performed towards the sea and at night provided no external visual references that would have allowed the crew to be aware of the direct proximity of the sea (page 75) and also Consequently, the Commission of Inquiry recommended, on 9 August 2001, that Civil Aviation Authorities ask training organizations and operators under their authority to integrate into type rating and recurrent training programs, for crews of all aircraft likely to be subject to false stall warnings, the elements necessary to recognize and manage such a false alarm during phases of flight close to the ground. (page 76). The edits I made are based on these sentences from the report. Audriusa ( talk) 16:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

WP:COPYVIO reads ″Even inserting text copied with some changes can be a copyright violation if there is substantial linguistic similarity in creative language or sentence structure; this is known as close paraphrasing, which can also raise concerns about plagiarism. ″ You wrote ″The takeoff performed towards the sea and at night provided no external visual references that would have allowed to be aware of the direct proximity of the sea.″ in the diff above, whereas the report reads ″the conditions for a takeoff performed towards the sea and at night provided no external visual references that would have allowed the crew to be aware of the direct proximity of the sea.″ The similarity between the words in the report and your addition is outstanding. I'm marking it as such so others can handle this properly, as you do not seem to understand this.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 23:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Appreciated all over the world, coffee is known for its energizing effect on people. wiki tamil 100 12:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

ET was added to the JFK, ADD, and Lome Airport articles with service starting June 27, 2016. Nowhere in the source provided mentions June 27th only June. I think it should be removed. Also, Ethiopian had not opened ticket sales for this route yet. 166.177.187.145 ( talk) 08:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Yes, they should be removed-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 13:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Need your view on this article, an editor is removing content and replacing it with his own preferred version listing only commercial operators and that too just current ones, I dont know if he expects others to add separate list of non-commercial operators in there and a yet another separate one for former operators and another for former non-commercial operators.

Another thing that's bothersome is that he is doing away with the country-wise list format, this makes it difficult to know which country an operator belongs to, especially multiple airlines with obscure names from a single country and those with no articles in wiki that appear red, who wants to click on every airline to know which country it belongs to when they can be listed country-wise, more so having to google airlines with no aritcle in wiki, look at the list for US alone so many airlines that operated 747s with a few still using them, I find it as a viewer much better to see them all listed as under United States rather than spread out alphabetically in a single list comprised of operators from all over the world, havnig to click on each to find out how many operators were there in the US is tedious and annoying when it can be simplified.

That said the editors table does look sharper and cohesive with the table of first and last deliveries below it, maybe a country-wise table can be made using that look, alot of effort has gone into finding all former operators of 747s and doing away with that as well as the non-commercial operators is unfair on those who put in time and effort to compile the list, a more reliable reference source airfleets.net can be used to verify most current and former operators as well. 139.190.165.199 ( talk) 07:53, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

I started a discussion at the article's talk.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 13:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, it took alot of effort to compile that list, deleting info because the sourced sites arent considered valid is a tad too rigid, let it be to viewers discretion what they make of it, atleast there are references rather than none. 139.190.165.199 ( talk) 15:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

I've been around Wikipedia for 12 years, and I was an administrator on one of the Slavic versions. However, I don't want to use that username, so I'm just using my IP from where I live. I do understand that you need sources, in a perfect world, source enough would be the fact that I work for the company so I know very well what kind of aircraft I fly on, but alas, I do understand the rules.

Therefor, I'll ask you to provide sources for the aircraft configurations that are shown in the article as of now, and then I can provide mine and finally update the article to the current configurations.

178.152.73.54 ( talk)

Seat layouts supported by official information, the one that supports the entire fleet table.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 01:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Okay, keyboard warrior, you win. I'll just go on working on these airplanes not believing my eyes, but believing Wikipedia. Have a good one, and do bother to read the sources, you might learn a lot.

- 178.152.73.54 ( talk)

Hi Jetstreamer, I noticed you recently reverted my edits to the article on Turkish Airlines, stating that the targeting of a Turkish Airlines aircraft by Al-Shabaab is not notable because "cancellations occur all the time". I would disagree, it does seem notable to me as the group stated that they targeted Turkish Airlines because they are the flag carrier of a NATO state and to target intelligence officals and NATO soldiers. LoudLizard ( talk) ( contribs) 14:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

@ LoudLizard: Would you mind taking this to the article's talk? Thanks.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 20:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

@ Jetstreamer: Sure, no problem. LoudLizard ( 📞 | contribs) 20:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

What neutral sources do you propose for Aeroflot destinations ? For destinations specifically, not for politics around our unification w/Russia! Francois ( talk) 11:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

( edit conflict)The change you made seems less neutral to me, regardless of the Aeroflot schedule. The schedule says the airline serves Simferopol, there's no discussion about this. The concern here is the location of the city, and the article for it clearly states the country this city is located in is in dispute.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 11:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Can we neutralize it by saying "Russia/Ukraine" with ref: "status disputed"? This us what we do in Russian WP. BTW, Ukrainian government now bans Aeroflot, or any other Russian company, from flying to any airports in the Ukraine. Francois ( talk) 12:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

@ Francois: That's good for me. Go ahead!-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 17:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello Jetstreamer,

The mentioned 737-300 (OO-LTM) is in a derelict condition at Brussels Airport. Currently it's on a position which is not photographable. Brussels Airlines has not operated the plane in its own fleet since it was transferred to Korongo Airlines.

I'm a planespotter with 15 years of experience, so you can trust me that I'm not talking b*llshit here ;-)

Best regards, Robin Bamps 2A02:1811:431:6500:40D2:2FA1:B0DB:89D6 ( talk) 02:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

WP:VERIFY. Personal experience is not considered a reliable source.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 02:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

My edit on British Airways is correct. Because there is only one Hyderabad in India. Hyderabad now become the capital of newly found state Telangana which was split out from Andhra Pradesh. So please reconsider my edit.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Anshuman.jrt ( talk • contribs)

First of all, you should sign your posts. Regarding this [21] edit and my reversion, please read WP:UNBROKEN.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 10:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

No se en que te afecta que este correcto el nombre de los aeropuertos, no estoy borrando nada, únicamente dejo la referencia correcta. Te recomiendo dejar los corajes... Vmzp85 ( talk) 21:13, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

I recommend you to communicate with me in English so anyone can understand what's this about. I've started a thread at Talk:Aeroméxico destinations.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 21:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Jetstreamer, The change I did was to put Santo Domingo under its own Dominican Republic section in Aeromexico Connect, it was never changed to Aeromexico. Please undo your changes, now SDQ is showing incorrectly under Mexico and the table is corrupted. Thanks. Coyatoc ( talk) 00:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

@ Coyatoc: I've reinstated your edit. I apologise for that. This is a clear sign that I'm badly needing vacations.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 00:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Please take part in this discussion —  LeoFrank  ^Talk 16:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I was wondering if I could get your opinion here. Thanks! - ✈Sunnya343✈ ( talk) 15:30, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the edits. I did make an error and corrected it to 2012. Department of Cheese ( talk) 21:02, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

@ Department of Cheese: Do not use Wikipedia as a source. Please take a look at WP:CIRCULAR.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 21:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I'm answering here to avoid a possible long discussion on that page. Could you please tell me which dispute is remained unsolved? I supposed that situation about title was clear after all because you didn't answer anymore. ZPσβ ( talk) 11:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

I have nothing to reply to. I'm against the move and the only comment after my last one and your last one at Talk:Zagreb International Airport mentioned WP:COMMONNAME. Two users are in favour of the move, and other two editors are against. That's no consensus at all.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 11:43, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

I read comments once again when you mentioned 2:2 result. The situation is 3:1 (users Ansh, SpeedyGonsales, ZuriPolako have nothing against renaming) and from that point I wrote that title should be changed, ZPσβ ( talk) 11:54, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

SpeedyGonsales did not openly support your proposal.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 20:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Err... Yes, he did. He wrote "FFS, this wikipedia is full of examples that accuracy is more important than some commonality, from HIV/AIDS or Martin Luther King, Jr. onwards. WP:COMMONNAME can be (and/or should be) redirect to full, official name, in this case." And his further explanation goes for giving a preference to accuracy than to commonality if we read correctly. ZPσβ ( talk) 21:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

If that's your interpretation I won't block the intended move further. It is true that users had enough time to discuss, so you may proceed. The article can be moved back to the current name at any time if this is decided in the future.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 21:36, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Before any change, I will put some comment about our discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports so that can be clear we don't have a big dispute anymore (of course, we have still different opinions which are legitimate). And I just want to ask you regarding to your experience on Wikipedia, what to do if someone arbitrarily change a title? How to repair the title in that case? ZPσβ ( talk) 22:11, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

It will help that someone not involved in the discussion closes it.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 22:48, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Since you frequently edit the Ethiopian Airlines page, I thought I'd get your opinion...

I'm not sure if airlineroute.net is a reliable source, but it seems like ET is planning to end Boeing 757 passenger service in May (See Link 2). But an earlier source stated it would end this month (See Link 1). I'll let you make the final decision on the changes that should be made to the page.

PS: If you don't remember who I am, you got me blocked for sockpuppetry a while ago. I just want you to know that I've changed.

Link 1: http://airlineroute.net/2016/04/04/et-757-s16update1/ Link 2: http://airlineroute.net/2016/04/11/et-757-s16update2/

Triple A ( talk) 17:34, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

I remember you. And yes, airlineroute.net is considered a reliable source.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 19:50, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

I see how you changed. WP:BATTLEGROUND clearly persists [22].-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 22:37, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

@ Jetstreamer:, I fail to see how I'm "fighting" with you, and how " WP:BATTLEGROUND clearly persists". You removed an edit, and said "Not going anywhere without a source". I properly added two sources to reference the my edit, but yet you fail to see it as a good addition. And I'm also pointing out how you'd always post redundant messages on IP, or registered user's talk pages after they make incorrect edits to point out the nuisance in this practice. You are not always correct you know. You act like an admin when you are not. You may have been on Wikipedia for a long time, and you may have a lot of experience editing, but I do not see a title that says you are an admin. Last, I have reinstated the edit you removed at Oman Air. Let me add, the article that is behind paywall as you say in your edit summary does the job as a source. It briefly AND CLEARLY explains how the airline will wet-lease two 787s from Kenya Airways. It clearly says that before you are not able to read the rest of the article. Please see it as a good edit for once. And I suggest you to refrain from removing it, as it may be considered as an edit war (as a truely experienced editor like you should know). Please carry on with more important issues now. -- Triple A ( talk) 15:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

I never said I was an admin. And I referred to your edit summary, not to your changes. By the way, your changes are not in agreement with WP:AIRLINE-FLEET-LIST as no wet-leased aircraft are to be included in fleet lists.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 18:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed that you had reverted my change in Vietnam Airlines due to Added sources do not say how many aircraft of each type are in fleet, although my source, from Vietnam Airlines don't say how many air craft but the air craft configuration is more correct than source from ch-aviation. I doubt that source from ch-aviation is correct, too.

Hence, please keep my change which shows correctly the configuration of Vietnam Airlines's aircraft.

The last time, you had reverted my change due to Planespotters is not a reliable source and new orders are not firm yet according to sources given, however as far as I can observe, the fleet information from Plane Spotters matched with information provided by Vietnam Airlines information which can be observed through flightradar24. But I agree it's less reliable than other source since it works like a forum, however the reliability of ch-aviation is still in debate, see Talk:Alitalia/Archive 1#Fleet issue.

I still suggest to re-work my change since it's the most reliable source by now. 0x44616E68 ( talk) 03:54, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

I have reverted your changes again. If you start a discussion you have to wait for the response before reverting. That's basic courtesy. Aside from this, your changes do not support the number of aircraft in fleet. Moreover, planespotters is not a reliable source. You may want to start a thread at WT:AIRLINES to gain consensus for its use. The citations you added only support seat configurations. They can only be used for this purpose.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 12:38, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, in regards to my changes and the verification of the topics, 1 is that I live there and know about them, 2 please read the news or the company website for proof. If you have no idea in regards to that matter please don't undo the changes. Baderjf ( talk) 12:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

See WP:VERIFY. Your knowledge about the matter doesn't count.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 15:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Here's a link to the announcement: http://www.alhayat.com/m/story/12380587 Baderjf ( talk) 09:56, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

I don't read Arabic.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 12:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Then please do the work to undo all the IATA code put on every airlines pages : [23]. Good luck. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bouzinac ( talk • contribs) 12:56, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Do it yourself. I don't have the time for that.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 12:57, 23 April 2016 (UTC)