This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, Javert. You have new messages at Dylan620's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for the coffee. Now I just hope it had come 5 hours earlier – I was so cold I woke up! ;P Dylan 620 ( contribs, logs) 10:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Do you think I would be allowed to create one of those essay pages called "WP:Jimbo is always right". Sorry if I've interrupted your huggling. Anyway, don't hate me if I don't re. soon, I have to go. Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 11:00, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Sure, I don't see why not. Essays are the opinions of one or more editors in the Community. So, go for it. :D Javért | ^Talk 11:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Listen to this, this is genius. If he argued, that would be him being right, so he couldn't argue (the essay would be about how everything he says seems to become policy). Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 11:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Be sure to come up with a witty link. Javért | ^Talk 11:04, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! Javért | ^Talk 13:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

SIGN YOUR COMMENTS WITH 4 TILDES!!!! Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 13:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Haha, oops. If it makes any difference, that was an automated edit by tools.wikimedia.de. Granted, I clicked "Save page", but it had already filled out the fields for me. Javért | ^Talk 13:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair enough. What's a TUSC anyway? Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 14:07, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

As far as I understand, it's an identifier for user on toolserver.org. By the way, any chance you can stalk my talk page and hit Vicenarian with "SIGN YOUR COMMENTS WITH 4 TILDES!!!!" next time he forgets his signature? Javért | ^Talk 14:09, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

I'll try. But I'm not on that often. About that essay I was on about, there is already WP:JIMBOSAID, which is basically whaT I WOULD HAve written. :( Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 14:12, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

←Haha, nice. If there's anything that you would add, you should. Or you could expand this essay Javért | ^Talk 14:14, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

There's something weird about your contributions. It says you have infinite edits per day. Or is this just a result of the name change. Heres a link [1]. Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 14:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

lol, that's gold. I didn't know that I was on Wikipedia that much. Seriously, though, all my T'Shael edits haven't been re-attributed to Javert yet, so that's probably why. If you'll look in the history of this page, T'Shael is still credited with edits. Should be fixed later today. :) Javért | ^Talk 14:27, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Aye, T'Shael has it right; ( edit conflict) It often takes a day to add all the edits, so the counter will sort itself out eventually :). (See Wikipedia:Changing_username/Front_matter#Effects of a username change). BTW, nice name... Although I still prefer the first one (TSBLD), but that's differing opinions I guess :) - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 14:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

←Thanks. :) I didn't think anyone remembered TSBLD, but both you and Mentifisto have brought it up today. Oh, wait, I gave you a barnstar as TSBLD. That may be why you remember? Javért | ^Talk 14:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Where did that one come from? A song? TILDETILDETILDETILDE Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 14:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Yep, "Wild at Heart" by Gloriana. So, I also see that you saw Sponge's hidden message. ;) Javért | ^Talk 14:44, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

No actually, I remember it from a certain conversation I promised I wouldn't tell anyone about ;) - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 14:46, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Uh oh. Javért | ^Talk 14:47, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Whenever I leave a short message on this page, it always grows into a long, completely unrelated discussion. ;-) Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 18:16, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I had noticed that, too. It's quite impressive when you really think about it. Javért | ^Talk 18:20, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

←I'd like to know what this "mysterious conversation" was about. Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 18:23, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Haha, I would too, as I seem to have forgotten. :) Javért | ^Talk 18:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi ! Thanks for making my wikibreak template more readable. Nice to see there are some people stalking my talk page too... Rkr1991 ( talk) 16:19, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Haha, no problem. :) Javért | ^Talk 16:19, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

I was moseying around, see this editor who I'd never seen before, named after one of my favorite literary characters. Lo and behold, it's you. Wacky. Nice name. Lәo_{( βǃʘʘɱ)} 20:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Haha, thanks. :) Javért | ^Talk 00:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Bonjour Javert, Thanks for moving my sandbox to the appropriate place. Obviously I am a newbie and am playing around a bit. I appreciate your help. Merci! La mome ( talk) 23:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh, wow and felicitations on being named wikipedian of the day--I just noticed that. You really are a good sport! Thanks again La mome ( talk) 23:46, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Merci. :) You are welcome. I hope that you enjoy it here and wish you the best. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to drop me a note on my talk. Javért | ^Talk 00:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Ok, the new name threw me. I don't log on for a couple of days and I don't recognize the place :) I left a note about this on User:LessHeard vanU's talk, but I doubt he's awake. Does that look strange to you? I've not seen it before and I may be making a mountain from a molehill. See ya 'round Tide rolls 00:54, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Yep, I'd take it to AN/I. It's a veiled legal threat, but a legal threat nonetheless. And yes, things change fast here. Spongefrog accused me of stealing T'Shael's user pages. :) Javért | ^Talk 00:56, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

I posted to AN/I. As for the name, I didn't suspect theft but I spent 20 minutes negotiating redirects before I figured out what was going on...lol Cheers Tide rolls 01:02, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

haha, yeah. I need to tag the majority of those for deletion. Just been too lazy to do it so far. ;) Javért | ^Talk 01:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi. My auto-block has expired, and I'm catching up on a few bits and pieces before I reset it. Thank you very much for having reviewed the article Ralph Regenvanu. I'm not sure where I'd be able to find an image of Mr. Regenvanu... There are pictures of him in the media, but of course they're copyrighted. Likewise, the only two pictures of him on Flickr are copyrighted. If the article could do with pictures, I'll add one of the Vanuatu Cultural Centre. There's a CC-BY one on Flickr.
Regarding an infobox... Just to be sure, what kind of infobox should be used? If there's a general infobox for Members of Parliament, I can't seem to find it. Aridd ( talk) 10:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, I thought that there was one, but I can't seem to find it either. A generic "Infobox person" will suffice in the absence of a specific one. Regarding the photos, anything that you can find that would be relevant (e.g. the Vanuatu Centre) to the article is a definite plus. I can sympathise with the lack of free images as I am currently searching for one for Ruthie Henshall. Best, Javért | ^Talk 10:09, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Could you confirm the name of the second user? I see deleted contribs for Boboy9, but none for the other that you mentioned. Thanks! Plastikspork ( talk) 01:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done Plastikspork ( talk) 01:44, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

FYI, see Block of User:Paul kenneth monroyo mora. Plastikspork ( talk) 16:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Plastikspork. As far as I can tell there are four accounts, Paul kenneth monroyo mora ( talk · contribs), Boboy9 ( talk · contribs), Paul kenneth mora ( talk · contribs), and Paul kenneth m mora ( talk · contribs). These are all suspected socks of 2toy mora ( talk · contribs), though I'm not familiar with that situation, though it seems likely. I, too, was inclined to AGF the user totally ignoring repeated urgings to stop. MLauba and I briefly discussed it here, if you're interested. Best, Javért | ^Talk 16:39, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

I sent you an email to confirm your new address before I create the accounts. If you would be so kind as to reply. :-) Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 15:13, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done, thanks. :) Javért | ^Talk 15:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

And your accounts are  Done. No problem! :) Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 15:18, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

And now they are appropriately labeled. :D Javért | ^Talk 15:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

• You might also want to disclose somewhere wrt your previous/alternate accounts. =) – xeno ^talk 15:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I was going to say something about that... :) – B.hotep • talk• 15:29, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Good idea guys. Please see user:Javert/Socks. Javért | ^Talk 15:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi...can you tell me specifically what sections you feel read like an advertisement...i ask because i did a rewrite of this article about a year ago and made certain to leave out adjectives of any sort embellishing the products or services and making sure that there were no external links embedded in the text of the article....i have not significantly altered the article since —Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshaygs ( talk • contribs) 16:40, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

I do a lot of tagging, let me look again and then I will get back to you. Javert ^{( T · C)} 22:43, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

You could say he's "tag happy." Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 23:16, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

True. But that wouldn't be very nice. Javert ^{( T · C)} 23:17, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Indeed. And I am a paragon of niceness. Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 23:20, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Please read wp:civ. Javert ^{( T · C)} 23:20, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Wee bit grumpy? :( Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 23:22, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

←No, I'm good. I was being facetious. :) Javert ^{( T · C)} 23:23, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Ah yes. Hard to gauge emotion online. Hence why they invented emoticons. :-D :-? Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 23:27, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Good point. I fail at the internet sometimes. ;) What is ":-?"? Smoking a pipe? Javert ^{( T · C)} 23:28, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

I dunno. I just made it up. And it's the Internet. It's a proper noun, since there's only one and it's pretty freaking sweet. Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 23:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I had intended to put "teh internets", but forgot to misspell "the". I am a failure at failing. :) Javert ^{( T · C)} 23:35, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

DING! Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 00:09, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Replied. :) Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 00:13, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Love that bit. :D -- Dylan 620 ( contribs, logs) 17:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Haha, thanks Dylan. :) I shamelessly pilfered it from "Thug Story". Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 17:21, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I can't think of any irrelevant comments to interject here. So I'll write this relevant comment: How did you bypass that Wikibreak enforcer? You didn't do that JavaScript disable thing did you (I have no idea what I'm talking about here, I just read something about it on Wikipediholic test, so you'll have to forgive me if that makes no sense). Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 19:35, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh, wait, this is much more important. So read it first (probably too late now). How do you get those messages to come up when someone edits your page. Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 19:37, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

( edit conflict)I disabled JavaScript. I use Firefox, so I went to Firefox → Preferences → Content → then un-checked "Enable JavaScript" and "Enable Java". After this, I undid my addition to my monobook and then re-enabled Java. :) Hope this helps. For the edit notice, I just typed what I wanted to say at user talk:Javert/Editnotice. To create one of your own just go to user talk:Spongefrog/Editnotice and start typing. :) Best, Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 19:39, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I will do that now. Fortunately, I understood none of that Firefox stuff, so if I ever block myself, I won't be able to undo it. Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 19:42, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

←No problem. Also, any admin can edit your monobook. So, if you mistakenly WikiBreak yourself for 20 years, just make a note on your talk page (as SockOfSpongefrog). Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 19:43, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Sponge would NEVER do that, though. Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 00:09, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Haha, it'd be funny, though. Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 00:12, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Redirects resulting from reverting page-move vandalism can be tagged for deletion using {{ db-vandalism}} or {{ db-g3}}, which avoids getting into the issue of whether {{ db-redirtypo}} or {{ db-r3}} is strictly applicable in each case. -- R'n'B ( call me Russ) 20:33, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I had toyed with the idea of tagging them {{ db-g3}}, but ended up erring on the side of caution with {{ db-r3}} Thanks for the heads up and I apologise if I created extra work for you. Best, Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 20:35, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

for the *! NawlinWiki ( talk) 21:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) It was long overdue. Best, Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 21:22, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes, here you are. A nice 4-be-2 red one. That's for continuing to spam your casual knitwear enterprise in your signature and talk pages throughout the Wiki-kingdom. Shame on you. ;) – B.hotep • talk• 22:41, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

LOL! I love it. :) I will continue my shameless spamming indefinitely. :D Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 22:46, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Please note: for external use only. And lovely with Marmite. – B.hotep • talk• 22:58, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, I suppose that I should tender my resignation to the Prefect of Police.. :) Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 23:11, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the vandalism reversion on my talk page ( diff). Newportm ( talk) 01:15, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 01:17, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

You've been loved by Midnight Comet

Hey there! Midnight Comet has loved you by placing a heart icon in the top-right corner of your userpage. Don't worry, it's not vandalism, but simply a small way to spread the WikiLove. If you don't really like it, feel free to revert it and make it go away, and no hard feelings; after all, it's just a small token of appreciation. If you like it, just add your name here, but again, there's no need to feel upset if you don't. Love and best wishes, [midnight comet] [talk] 13:44, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you so much! :) I added my name to the list. Btw, I'm not going to put the heart on your userpage since the breast cancer ribbon will block it; so you can do what ever you want. -- [midnight comet] [talk] 13:44, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome, and thanks. :) I think that there's a userbox somewhere. If not, I might possibly make one. I can scoot the ribbon and/or heart over, but I think the lock stays there no matter what. Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 16:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry. I was angry. LuLouLouis ( talk) 20:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the reverting the vandalism done to my talk page. - Zhang He ( talk) 01:08, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 02:10, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Weird. My friend just moved to China, +8 UTC. It's exactly twelve hours later there than it is here. Time zones give me a headache.

Oh, and, she can't get on Wikipedia. Great Firewall. Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 01:36, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Interesting. The article on the Great Firewall states that Wikipedia is one of the sites "beginning to be unblocked," but she says she can't get on en: or zh:. Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 01:39, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Hm.. that is pretty strange. I have the feeling that I'm missing something here..? Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 02:10, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Not really. She just Skyped me and I asked her if she could get on to Wikipedia and she could not. Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 03:16, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh, nevermind. I don't know what was wrong with me, but I was confused. Sorry. ;) Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 03:18, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Nothing quite so sublime as realizing I wasn't blocked. Thanks :) Tide rolls 05:29, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Haha, no problems. If it makes you feel any better, I was blocked, too. ;) Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 05:31, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Yet, we continue to edit...if I wasn't so lazy I'd report a glitch. Tide rolls 05:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

We're part of a secret user group called "unblockable". :) Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 05:37, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Can I be in it. Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 09:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Haha, Tide Rolls, that's a really great block reason. And no, Sponge, you may not be amongst the "Unblockable." Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 11:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

You're mean. :-( Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 12:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

←My first block was for being "retarted". Granted, not as good as what Tide Rolls received, but still interesting. Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 17:13, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Who is this Ben Blocked fellow? ;) – B.hotep • talk• 22:44, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

I dunno, but if I have him, I should probably give him back.. ;) Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 00:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Apparently I'm popular tonight. Thanks for the talkpage patrols. Shadowjams ( talk) 06:00, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

And thanks for the user page revert while I was busy blocking a few accounts. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 06:12, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

You're both welcome. :) Cheers, Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 06:13, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

How many to do you speak?! Also, you could say in your editnotice that you abide by WP:TTR. You know, a more positive message. Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 18:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Three, why, what's up? In regards to my edit notice, you think it's a little.. rude, the way it is now? If so, I'll change it as I don't want to give off that vibe. Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 18:20, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

No, that was meant to be joking, you hapless fuckwit. :) And I ask about languages because of your recent translation over at UAA. Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 18:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh, oops. :) Something has been wrong with my "joke detector" lately. Probably from being blocked three times yesterday. ;) Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 18:28, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Aww, you know anything from me will either be a) joking or b) .... well, see a). Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 18:30, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm sorry. I dunno what's been up with me lately. Maybe I need more porno and interactions with cheap prostitutes..;) Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 18:34, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done ;-D Vicenarian ^{( T · C)} 18:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

lol, thanks. :) Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 18:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Well I think it is very rude. :( Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 20:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

←What? Oh, my edit notice. Why? -- Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 00:41, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

- WP:MYSPACE - you may want to read the article. Please refrain from notifying other editors of e-mails, which are not connected with Wikipedia. While it's great having editors who want to contribute to the project, your recent actions and chatting on talk pages make it look like you are not very serious about the project. People are here to work together on the encyclopedia, not have chat sessions on talk pages.

(NOTE: THIS IS A JOKE) Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 19:55, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

By the way, did you know toenails can take up to 6 years to decompose? Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 20:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

No problem, when I first looked I almost made the same mistake :) - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 00:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

On the bright side, I learned about a new gadget. ;) Javert ^{I knit sweaters, yo!} 00:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 13:10, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

My first non-admin closure! :-D Exciting! Vicenarian ^{( Said | Done)} 17:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Haha, cool beans. :) I remember my first non-admin closure (can't remember the article, for the life of me, though) like it was yesterday. Then, I started closing MfDs but accidentally used the AfD close template on my first MfD. Great times. Seriously, though, participating in XfD is one of my favourite things to do here. "You've made the first step into a larger world." :D javert (stargaze) 18:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi guys. I've not inserted anything irrelevant/innapropriate/random into your talk pages for a while, and I thought you might miss me. Spongefrog , (talk to me, or else) 20:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Actually, I had noticed that my talk page has lost some of it's "flavour" so to speak. And, nice hidden message, by the way. :) Best, -- javert (stargaze) 22:14, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations, Javert! The first week of each monthly cycle of "Wikipedian of the..." will consist of repeats from the previous month; the repeats did not received WOTW last month.
For your further kindness to others, your hard work around the wiki, and for being a great user since the last time you were Wikipedian of the Day, you have been named "Wikipedian of the Day" once again, for today, July 30, 2009! Keep up the great work!
Note: You now have another chance to be Wikipedian of the Week!

Happy editing!

[midnight comet] [talk] 00:01, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Aw, cool beans. :) Thanks, Midnight! -- javert (stargaze) 00:12, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations! However, if you think you're going to win Wikipedian of the Week, my friend, you are sorely mistaken... :-D Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 03:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

That's okay. I have my eyes set on "Wikipedian of the Year" :D -- javért ^stargaze 03:27, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Doesn't Jimmy always win that? Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 03:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Good point. I hadn't thought of that. -- javért ^stargaze 03:40, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

It was only an edit conflict which prevented me from posting the editing stats on the latest RfA. I shouldn't of even tried to beat you at what appears to be your designated field. :P Lәo_{( βǃʘʘɱ)} 01:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

And much congrats on the Wikipedian o' the Day. Nice. Lәo_{( βǃʘʘɱ)} 01:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Haha, thanks. I enjoy posting editing stats for RfA's as it's fun and makes me feel somewhat useful. :p -- javert (stargaze) 01:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Heh. Well, it's better than me; I never vote in any, so adding the editing stats or suggesting WP:NOTNOW to those that snow is about all I do on WP:RfA. Lәo_{( βǃʘʘɱ)} 02:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Ever thought of getting more involved? RfA is a fun place. :) -- javert (stargaze) 02:19, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

With my experience being two failed RfAs, "fun" isn't the word I would use. It sure is fun to watch though. :D Lәo_{( βǃʘʘɱ)} 02:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Kind of off the subject, but do you use Twinkle? It's been acting up for me lately; won't tag things for speedy deletion, etc. -- javert (stargaze) 02:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

←No problems here. Maybe it's your sily Mac, Javert. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 13:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

It can't be. My Mac is *awesome*. I can still warn people, but it won't tag anything for deletion. I've uninstalled it, reinstalled it, and nuked my cache like 5 times, but it's still not working right. :( -- javért ^stargaze 17:37, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry 'bout the absence. I do use Twinkle, yes, though not really for vandalism reversion. However, it hasn't been acting up or doing anything weird for me. Huh. Lәo_{( βǃʘʘɱ)} 22:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

No problems, I think that I've fixed it. I think that it was interfering with some other script in my monobook, so I took it out of my monobook and just enabled it in gadgets. :) --javért ^stargaze 22:46, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Javert, i was just wondering if every time i bring a article up to start class, from stub class, i have to request an assessment. I understand the difference between the two, and i am happy to request an assessment for anything over a start-class article. Thanks a lot, Chumchum14 ( talk) 09:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi, sorry for the delayed reply, but I just noticed your query. Generally, you shouldn't assess articles that you have made major contributions to, but IMHO anyone can tell the difference between "stub" and "start" and if you want to assess an article as "start" class after expanding it from a stub, I can't foresee there being any problems with that. Hope that helps. :) Cheers, javért ^stargaze 20:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

I was very iffy about how to approach that user name... was it a problem at all... where to take it. The editor appears to have taken heed of the article flags or explanation on the talk pages. Thanks again. - sinneed ( talk) 05:10, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) →javért ^stargaze 05:51, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

...freaky. :) Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 21:36, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Who, me? :) →javért ^stargaze 22:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations, Javert! For your kindness to others, your hard work around the wiki, and for being a great user, you have been awarded the " Wikipedian of the Week" award for this week! Keep up the great work!
Note: You could also receive the top award, "Wikipedian of the Month" for this month!

Happy editing!

[midnight comet] [talk] 00:00, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Swift! Thank you very much. :) →javért ^stargaze 00:02, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations – you deserve this 100%. :) Best, Dylan 620 ( contribs, logs) 00:05, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Dylan, I appreciate the kind words. :) →javért ^stargaze 00:11, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. You might even deserve to beat me! Err, not quite yet. :D -- Dylan 620 ( contribs, logs) 00:13, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Haha, maybe one day. ;) But, I agree, not yet. :) →javért ^stargaze 00:15, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

But alas, for now my friend, you have me beat. :D Anyway, regarding the next adoption lesson; I'll get to compiling it now. Cheers, Dylan 620 ( contribs, logs) 00:25, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

←Splendid, thank you. :) Sorry about the delay in my reply time, but I'm working on some stuff on Simple. Sorry. :) →javért ^stargaze 00:35, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Good job. I agree, you truely deserve this;) Schnitzel MannGreek. 02:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, SMG, I appreciate the accolades. :) →javért ^stargaze 02:16, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations, good sir! On another note, take a look here. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 02:37, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, V, I appreciate it. In re to Jimbo, I saw that earlier (Jimbo's is another talkpage that I watch ;)), and I think that it's a fabulous idea. Blocks by Jimbo seem to carry more "weight" (for lack of a better word) than blocks by other admins. What do you think? →javért ^stargaze 02:43, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Anything Jimbo does administratively is automatically going to create a boatload of drama, regardless of the circumstances. I see no need to strip him of any of his user rights, nor the need to remove his honorary status as Founder. On that, note, however, my advice to him would be to step further back. Become more of a constitutional monarch, in a way, with acknowledged "reserve powers" only to be used in the most extraordinary of circumstances. Let the community and/or ArbCom deal with everything else. I think his baby has gotten to a point where it can govern itself pretty well. He may just need to let go a little more - if only because of the unnecessary attention it attracts. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 02:50, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

←I agree with you totally (big surprise). I wasn't advocating desysopping Jimbo, just that he needs to be more like the Queen of England and let Parliament and Gordon Browne run everything. Points which you stated much more adequately than I. ;) →javért ^stargaze 02:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Naw, you're Wikipedian of the Week! You get to be the more adequate one... for now... Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 03:00, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

I remember when you first came to Wikipedia and asked me how to put the "rollback" icon on your user page. How you've grown since then.. ;) →javért ^stargaze 03:03, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

... is up. :) -- Dylan 620 ( contribs, logs) 02:33, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Cool beans. Thanks, Dylan. :) →javért ^stargaze 02:44, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

For the user page revert. Strange, I do believe it's the first time it's been vandalised for quite some time! Cheers. :) – B.hotep • talk• 15:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

I've been doing a bit of work on Simple too. I find it very therapeutic! Right, back to the wikibreak til tomorrow. – B.hotep • talk• 15:56, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

You're quite welcome. We had a bunch of crazy IP action going on this morning. And, I totally agree about Simple. I, too, enjoy the slower pace. :) →javért ^stargaze 19:28, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

I was equally surprised when it turned out to not be POV when it had an edit summary like that. I'm beginning to think these articles are more trouble than they're worth. Alan16 ( talk) 22:50, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for that fix and the rather odd supporting question at my RFA. Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 00:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. I'm sorry that it didn't turn out like you had hoped. Best, →javért ^stargaze 00:45, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

A new concern has been posted on the Joseph Brant Aseneau page regarding conflict of interest, can someone please explain more. Edits have been made only to add more reliable references to the work and research that has been done. Bobuller ( talk) 01:15, 2 August 2009 (UTC) - Thank You.

A conflict of interest is when someone close to the subject of an article edits the article in question. You may do better asking Mufka ( talk · contribs) about this as they were the one to tag it with the {{ coi}} tag. All I did was to assess the article for WikiProject Biography. Sorry that I can't be of more help. →javért ^stargaze 01:22, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

What I was trying to do is show him and other people on WP the truth on what really happened on wikipedia. It wasn't me and I've been trying to get the arcieve oversighted and a new category made where all accounts I didn't make would go. Schnitzel MannGreek. 19:37, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

What do you think? Schnitzel MannGreek. 19:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

I think that posting information that you have requested to be oversighted on an other user's talk page, IMHO, shows a lack of seriousness in getting the matter resolved to your satisfaction. →javért ^stargaze 19:39, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

I was just trying to tell exactly what happened and the truth....I never had a reform and I'm not behind the abusive sockpuppets, just the ones that I tried to create to contact wikipedia and start anew. I didn't say this before because I thought no one would believe me until I came this far and gained some trust. I emailed someone saying this(I won't reveal who)to ask for an oversight. I noticed that Spongefrog mention my reform and since he had no email,the only way was a talk page. I meant to gather support and to inform people that in real life I'm not behind any abuse. Schnitzel MannGreek. 19:44, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

If you think that that was the best course of action, then by all means, do so. However, I still do not think that it was a good idea to post information in another public place after asking for it to be oversighted. →javért ^stargaze 19:49, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

I twasn't the information I posted, just the background. Schnitzel MannGreek. 19:52, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

You're missing my point. But it doesn't matter, what's done is done. Let's go build an encyclopedia. :) →javért ^stargaze 19:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edit. I was simply removing this conversation. I didn't think you would mind, but what's the point of leaving them. Can you remove it? Schnitzel MannGreek. 00:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

I reverted your edit because you removed the entire conversation from my talk page. While removing comments from your own talk page is perfectly acceptable, removing comments from other user's talk pages is not per this. Thanks, →javért ^stargaze 00:22, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

I remember one time that we were having a conversation, I asked you to delete it and you said yes. Now I'm asking, can you please remove this? Schnitzel MannGreek. 00:29, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

←I would rather not, thanks. →javért ^stargaze 00:30, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't mean to sound blunt but are you mad at me? I remeber that normally, you would have. Why not now, I don't want this to be archieved and what's wrong with removing it. Schnitzel MannGreek. 00:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

No, but if you didn't want it archived you shouldn't have posted in on my talk page in the first place. I don't want it removed because I like to keep a record of all my on-wiki interactions. Thanks for understanding. →javért ^stargaze 00:36, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Why did you do it before, it sounds like you were much more sympathetic before. Schnitzel MannGreek. 00:38, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Just so you know, continuing to post on this topic will delay the auto-archiving. In the future, if you have something that you wish to discuss and you don't want evidence of the discussion on-Wiki, you should use the Email user button. Thanks, →javért ^stargaze 00:40, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

On the Simple DYK! Also, don't mess with me. You know what I'm talkin' about... stay away, self-promoters and sockpuppeteers. VICENARIAN is in the house. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 01:32, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Haha, thanks. =) And, if you are referring to what I think you are referring to, then yes, I agree totally with you. =) Not so sure about you "being in the house", though, I don't see you here. ;) →javért ^stargaze 01:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Self-promoters? Spongefrog , (talk to me, or else) 18:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

People who add content to Wikipedia with the sole purpose of promoting themselves, their bands, their books, their employers, etc. I find that 99% of the time, content added by self-promoters is biased, spammy, non-noteworthy and generally does not belong. This is becoming an increasingly big problem now that the project is so large and popular. Everyone with something to sell wants a page here; you'll get great Google results on the back of Wikipedia's popularity. It smells and is possibly the biggest current threat to Wikipedia's integrity. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 19:11, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Couldn't have put it better myself. I delete spam with extreme prejudice. I should have that on a T-shirt. :) – B.hotep • talk• 19:55, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Or a sweater... :D →javért ^stargaze 19:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

But it doesn't look like you're doing them anymore. :( Instead, you are promoting your vast telescopular emporium! Evil spammer, be gone! – B.hotep • talk• 20:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

←I have a lot of business that I have to promote first! :) →javért ^stargaze 20:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I thought you were talking about users like me who unashamedly brag ask for Barnstars outright (even if it works), and put links to their Barnstar/Award pages in their signatures. Spongefrog , (talk to me, or else) 20:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

We have no objection to you promoting your Wikipedia persona, Sponge. :-) Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 20:11, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I am currently working on the article. Please do not rate yet because it has not completed. THank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ironboy11 ( talk • contribs)

I have a question, how do i remove the rating? Also, is there anyway I could translate foreign languages pages into English Languages? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ironboy11 ( talk • contribs)

00:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Ok. →javért ^stargaze 08:39, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

I am a flesh-eating robot. Spongefrog , (talk to me, or else) 14:48, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi. You'll need to contact me on IRC (nick Rjd0060). - Rjd0060 ( talk) 13:30, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Confirmation edit. →javért ^stargaze 22:03, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

I am confirming that that was, indeed, a confirmation edit. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 22:13, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Confirmation confirmed. :) →javért ^stargaze 22:33, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

[mad pierrot] [t  c] has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers!

Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{ subst:WikiPint}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I've seen your work fighting vandalism, new page patrolling, etc and I am impressed. Drink up! [mad pierrot] [t  c] 20:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Ah, cool beans. :) Thanks! →javért ^stargaze 04:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

You mean this type of stuff cannot be undone? Bejinhan Talk 07:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh,ok. For example if an IP address user has a history of vandalism can I stile approve the request? Bejinhan Talk 07:08, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Depends on how recent, how much, and what type. You also want to check the block log. In this case, however, the username was as far as you needed to go. Have you read WP:U? →javért ^stargaze 07:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

For example if the vandalism was done say a year ago and there are lots of it? Yeah, I've read through WP:U a few times. Bejinhan Talk 07:33, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

CAN'T YOU STAY WITH ONE NAME??!!!? Not really, I think your new name is cool. But it is confusing to remeber who is you. :) Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 14:55, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

lol, I'm going to stick with this one. ;) Finally got my SUL all fixed up, sans it.wiki, but you have to wait 7 days before usurping a name. →javért ^stargaze 20:33, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Mazca has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!

because I just blocked the vandal that seemed to love you so much, and wouldn't want you to feel left alone. ;) ~ mazca ^talk 08:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

lol, thanks mazca. :) Admittedly I was starting to miss the little bugger. He seemed to really want me to have some userboxes. ;) →javért ^stargaze 08:47, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

I came across this[ [2]] when editing. You might know more about this "Bambifan" for I've noticed you mention him to another user before. Thought I should let you know;) Schnitzel MannGreek. 17:24, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Ah, okay. Thanks. →javért ^stargaze 22:18, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for this, I guess. I was trying to decide which version of the barnstar I liked best. I'll go with the community version...for the sake of harmony :) Tide rolls 10:23, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

lol, no problem. I actually prefer the vandalised version better. Probably wouldn't go over well, though. ;) →javért ^stargaze 10:24, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

You're right, of course. Darn it. Tide rolls 10:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

User Ratel is trying to archive an active discussion in Aktion T4. This User Ratel is clearly involved in the discussion.

• First attempt to archive the active discussion
• Second attempt to archive the active discussion
• Third attempt to archive the active discussion
• Fourth attemot to archive the active discussion

• First warning
• Second warning

comment made by 190.25.101.144 ( talk) 07:09, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

No, that's not what is happening. Apparently you keep removing the autoarchive settings and Ratel keeps putting them back. Ratel isn't trying to archive active discussions as discussions with timestamps newer than 3 days won't get archived. →javért ^stargaze 07:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

• In the discussion it was asked for a "reliable" (according to Wikipedia Policies) source, supporting that Aktion T4 was euthanasia and that any euthanasia is not unlike Aktion T4, because the current article claims the contrary in this section: Aktion_T4#T4_and_euthanasia.
• There are a lot of sources, but at least one "reliable" (according to Wikipedia policies) source was provided in this post: Talk:Action_T4#propaganda_pro_euthanasia_.3D_crime_apology. This source (Alexander Leo, Medical science under dictatorship, New England Journal of Medicine, No.241, pages 39-47) states that Aktion T4 was euthanasia and that any euthanasia is not unlike Aktion T4
• User:Ratel claims euthanasia has nothing to do with Aktion T4 and he is involved in the mentioned dicussion.
• Therefore: why is he allowed to archive exactly all the discussion including the post providing the demanded source?
• Note that User:Ratel posted his first attempt to autoarchive the discussion some hours after the post providing the demanded source.

comment made by 190.27.99.91 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:25, 10 August 2009 (UTC).

Again, there's nothing wrong with setting up autoarchiving of a busy talk page. You've already violated 3RR, so it's best not to revert Ratel again. →javért ^stargaze 08:30, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I just got a message saying I've been vandalising articles and making edits I haven't made. Someone's using my IP address to make changes to articles. I'm in the process of calling my ISP to settle this, I thought I should let you know as it was your name that appeared to be warning me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.169.204.122 ( talk • contribs)

Unless your IP is dynamic, then multiple people can have that IP address over time. If you didn't make the edits, the best thing to do is to register an account so that warnings meant for other people will not be read by you. →javért ^stargaze 10:33, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I think perhaps you intended to write "Unless your IP is static (...)", or alternatively, "If your IP is dynamic (...)" :) decltype ( talk) 10:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I go away for a little while and Javert loses his mind. *tisk tisk* Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 13:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Oops. Yeah, I meant "Unless your IP is static..". Last time I try and make sense late at night. ;) Thanks decltype. :D And I really don't think that I had a mind to lose in the first place, lol. →javért ^stargaze 21:30, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 05:50, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Just notifying you of this comment I made, please be specific with your rationales when reporting users. Not a big deal at all, but trust me, a small mistake like that can escalate into something bigger. For example, an admin being hasty and blocking a user with continuous vandalism on say, two articles, when they have not violated the final warning rule. That would lead to a whole controversy, which is the one thing that stinks about this project. :) Best, ceran thor 12:24, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I realize that too, but then you need to say that. Keep up the good work, please. ceran thor 12:25, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

I thought that it was obvious. →javért ^stargaze 12:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

It is, but it saves time. ceran thor 12:52, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Fair enough. I'll remember to do that next time. →javért ^stargaze 12:53, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

		The Hello Barnstar
		This is to say hello to a fellow Wikipedian User F203 ( talk) 19:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC))

Cool bean, thanks. :) →javért ^stargaze 22:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

... thanks from a vandal? Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 22:36, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

lol, that's freakin' awesome. I've never seen a vandal be appreciative that he was reverted and warned. Maybe we are in a galaxy far, far away. :) →javért ^stargaze 22:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

If you're still there, get on teh Huggle. The vandals are out in STORM tonight. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 05:59, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Ooh..good, I needed something useful to do. It'll take me about 5 minutes to restart my computer in Windows. →javért ^chat 06:00, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Did someone encourage random attacks on Wikipedia, like in the media, or somewhere online? Because I'm seeing a lot of just "test edit" IP gibberish. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 06:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure, but I've seen several "abc" type entries myself. Odd. →javért ^chat 06:13, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Time for sleep. Would like to stay and help, the vandals are out like the Perseids tonight. G'night Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 06:38, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

←What day is it today? Can anyone tell me? – B.hotep • talk• 10:18, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Wednesday, August 12, 2009.. 5:20:29 AM. :) →javért ^chat 10:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

And what might that mean? To me maybe? – B.hotep • talk• 10:27, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh, shit! I actually noticed this earlier and forgot to say something. It's your birthday! Happy birthday. :) →javért ^chat 10:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. What did you get me? Oh, don't tell me. Let it be a surprise! – B.hotep • talk• 10:38, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

I finished your sweater. :) →javért ^chat 10:40, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Happy day! Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 12:04, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi, sorry if this is in the wrong place, but I want to know why you keep reverting my changes to the Marvin Gaye article. His birth name was in fact Marvin Pentz Gay, Jr., without the E. I attempted to change the article twice, and the second time I even listed an alternate source, and you still reverted it. What gives? Is it better to be inaccurate than to be accused of homophobia for listing someone's real legal name? It says right in the article itself that he added the E because of connotations that the word "gay" was developing during that time. Also, the sidebar lists his birth name as having no E at the end of the surname. It has the same citation as it does in the first line of the article, and yet you revert it. Why? I really don't understand. I've had a problem with Wikipedia employees reverting my changes before, due to what seems to be an abuse of power. I thought the point of us being able to edit this site was so that we could correct inaccuracies? I know for a fact that this article was correct at one point. Some fan probably added the E because they thought someone had previously removed it as an immature joke. But I can assure you that his birth name was Marvin Pentz Gay, Jr. His father's name was Marvin Pentz Gay, Sr. I have an alternate source as well. It is the same one I listed in my edit summary, which you seem to have ignored before: http://www.nndb.com/people/207/000022141/. Please don't just revert a change without looking at the facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.124.136.213 ( talk • contribs)

First of all, I'm not a Wikipedia employee. I don't get paid for this, I do it for fun. As to why I reverted your edit the second time, it was a mistake. People make them. Sorry. →javért ^chat 06:59, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

We do it for fun because there's something very wrong with us. And abuse of power around here is reserved for certain special volunteers, who DEFINITELY have something wrong with them... Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 12:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Haha, true that. →javért ^chat 12:27, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

...I would clean out CAT:TEMP because it seems rather neglected. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 21:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm not surprised! 29,000 users, and the conditions of not deleting are:

• they are not indefinitely blocked;
• they are IP addresses;
• they are tagged as sockpuppets. They should not be in this category in the first place

And they have to have been on there for a certain amount of weeks! Imagine running that through ya noggin before deciding what to delete! That mop would be in a very dirty bucket, I prefer to keep mine clean. :) – B.hotep • talk• 21:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

But such a good project for the Big Red Delete Button! And it's easy - seems to me like you just look at the block template and if it's an indef, and it's been, oh, a month since the block, DELETE. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 21:38, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

One month seems a short time to me. It is correct, but what if that indef blocked user comes back with a sock 1 month and 1 day later? There would be nothing to refer back to... hmmm. – B.hotep • talk• 21:44, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

You'd still have the indefed user's contrib history to reference for potential sockery. Most of the time, these are just talk pages with successive warning templates and an indefinite block. Perhaps greater care should be used in more complex cases, but a one off vandal username doesn't need a talk page. (And if an indefed username with a deleted talk page comes back with a sock, the page can always be recreated for the sock tag.) Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 21:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

True, blue. But you have to wonder: what is the point of deleting them? I think that question was asked on the talk page about a year ago. And at this point, it would seem a never ending task – this user here tagged nearly 4000 album articles in one month and never even thought about the light at the end of the tunnel until I was there, all bright eyed and blinky. :) Hey, here we are on Javert's talk page, talking through him, and he's probably trying to get on! Still, gotta love that orange bar, eh? – B.hotep • talk• 22:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

To avoid troll feeding, I think is the idea. Getting rid of the user pages is ultimate denial. Certainly not the most important administrative task out there, but it's one that makes me get all mop-itchy. And Javert won't mind us abusing his talk page, he has his pills to calm him down... ;) Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 22:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

I suppose it's one of the only times you can delete a page and not expect a "you deleted my page" message within the ensuing 12 hours – or if you did, ya got da sock! Anyway, that's my final comment today. I officially have 45 minutes of my WikiBirthday left, so I am going to enjoy it by not being on it! Guten nacht. Buenos noches. Ciao. – B.hotep • talk• 22:15, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

I love my pills... :) →javért ^chat 22:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

←Not going to opine on the matter, sir? Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 23:00, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Too busy with my opiates. →javért ^chat 23:01, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

I wondered if I could request your help. There is a sockpuppet accusation going on on my page and wondered if you could check it out and provide a neutral party opinion. Thanks. -- Scythre ^Talk _Contribs 21:30, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Sure. May not be until tomorrow, though. I'm going to have to be off and on for probably the rest of the day. →javért ^chat 22:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{ subst:Vangel}}! [midnight comet] [talk] 19:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) →javért ^chat 19:16, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

…for both your kind words and your correction to my userpage -- Avi ( talk) 06:24, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. :-) →javért ^chat 06:34, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 04:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

is a cool thing to do. Lәo_{( βǃʘʘɱ)} 19:11, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

You'd do the same for me. :-) You're quite welcome. →javért ^chat 18:28, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

...purposefully vandalize my user page, just so you'll have another noble deed to perform. :-P Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 20:57, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Interesting idea. I just might try that, as long as Javert cleans it up. Lәo_{( βǃʘʘɱ)} 01:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

@ V, if your user page gets vandalised, I'll probably just leave it and laugh.. :-p. @ Leo, well, I'm on vacation right now, so I'm trying to not spend a whole lot of time on the internet, so it'd be best to wait until Monday. :) →javért ^chat 18:28, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your participation in my recent RfA. I will do my very best not to betray the confidence you have shown me. If you ever have any questions or suggestions about my conduct as an administrator or as an editor please don't hesitate to contact me. Once again, thanks. ·Maunus·ƛ· 12:35, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. :-) Best of luck in your new role, →javért ^chat 13:03, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Hey Javert. After some thought, I have decided to graduate you from my adoption program. To be honest, I was hesitant to accept your request to be adopted back in June because I believed you already had plenty of experience, but I decided to help you out anyway. Explains the low amount of lessons, doesn't it? :) You may now add the following userbox to your userpage:

This user has graduated from the adoption program by Dylan620! Kudos!

Cheers, Dylan 620 ( contribs, logs) ^{help us!} 16:50, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Aw, cool beans, Dylan, thanks. :) I appreciate the help you gave me and will display the userbox with pride. Best, →javért ^chat 16:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Congrats! Check your email for a special graduation notice! Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 16:54, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Well done. I presume you got an A* ;D, good luck in the future. Best, - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 16:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Aw, thanks, guys. :) I knew I had some friendly talk page stalkers somewhere. :-p →javért ^chat 17:00, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

@ Javert: You're welcome! If you need any help along the way, don't hesitate to ask me. :) You've earned the right to roam free, just like Vicenarian before you. @ Kingpin: An A it is. :) Cheers, Dylan 620 ( contribs, logs) ^{help us!} 17:06, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

@ Dylan: thank you, I will, and I hope you keep this talk page on your watch list and interject if you feel compelled. :) @ Vicenarian: I have responded to your kind email. →javért ^chat 17:12, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Why do you all keep saying "@"? And what does "teh" mean? You're all going to have to add pre-emptive explanations for me when you leave confusing messages here. Happy St. Stephen's Day and Ramadan! Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 14:56, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

←@ Spongebob – it means a comment directed at a specific person. I believe it has become more prevalent with the advent of Twitter (because I don't remember seeing it so much before!). HTH. – B.hotep • talk• 15:06, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

HTH? That's an insult isn't it! Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 15:15, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

And "teh" is a common misspelling for "the". :-) →javért ^chat 15:22, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

HTH = hope that helps. I just made it up, tbh. – B.hotep • talk• 15:25, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

lol, you can't just msu whenever yfli. :-) →javért ^chat 15:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

yic, wm! :) – B.hotep • talk• 15:28, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

hehe, fe. :) →javért ^chat 15:30, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

You two have a lot of internet slang to teach me. :P -- Dylan 620 ( contribs, logs) ^{help us!} 15:36, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

←hehe, most of this is made up as we go. :-) →javért ^chat 15:56, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

If you're there, there's a good deal of vandalism going on. Fire up the old Huggle and help us out. STAT! Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 00:32, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

And once again, I fail at being helpful. →javért ^chat 13:58, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Naw, you just weren't around. That's okay, it's good to have an actual life! :) Must've been some sort of vandalism field day. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 21:33, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Speaking of vandalism field days, have you seen Simple lately? I used to edit there, but left because that place is terribly organized and they give sensitive user rights to people who have no business having them. At any rate, they've been ravaged by proxy vandals lately. It's been rather humorous to watch. :-) →javért ^breakaway 21:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Maybe that means they need MORE help, especially from good eggs like you! Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 21:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Bleh. :-) →javért ^breakaway 21:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Howdy, partner! Just a quick note that your new frame makes your talk page very hard to read – perhaps you could remove the centering and bolding? Cheers, Dylan 620 ( contribs, logs) ^{help us!} 01:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

I kind of like the bolding, but I'm working on fixing it so it aligns left. If you know how to do that, I'd appreciate it. →javért ^breakaway 01:06, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

I think I'd be better off contacting the folks over at the tech pump about that; I might break your talk page by mistake. :P Cheers, Dylan 620 ( contribs, logs) ^{help us!} 01:11, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

I would never forgive you for that.. :-p. How does it look now? I'm still going to be messing around with the colours, but is the layout more user friendly? →javért ^breakaway 01:13, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

MUCH better. :) I guess that this or this would suit better with me for background colors, but it's your choice. -- Dylan 620 ( contribs, logs) ^{help us!} 01:18, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Ah, good. :-) Those are pretty colours, but I think they would make my sig a tad harder to read. I'll probably keep it the colour it is until I get bored at 1:00 in the morning. :-p →javért ^breakaway 01:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

I like the colors, FWIW. Also, stay away from crocodiles... Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 03:16, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

←Hehe, yes, apparently they castrate people now. →javért ^breakaway 03:17, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

With fast-moving RfAs, it's sometimes hard to keep a track of things, so I just thought I'd point out someone raised a question (which I assume was directed at your !vote) in this section. I only just noticed it about 10 hours after the event. Don't know whether it has any bearing. :) – B.hotep • talk• 14:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

I was sorta/kinda wondering the same thing, actually. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 15:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

The BLP has libel in the history; not much in the way of real encyclopedic information, "XYZ is a governor from Estonia, some info about his campaign". Delete it and let it be recreated, or fix it up and delete/selectively restore. This is an opinion that may not be shared by many, but it bothers me enough that I can't support any more. I hate flip-flopping on !votes, but Question 8 hadn't been asked when I !voted. Best, →javért ^breakaway 15:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

That's fine. Wasn't trying to change your !vote, just wondered if you'd caught the discussion. By the way, I don't approve of flip-floppers either. There's at least one person who does it on a regular basis, sometimes having an entry in each and every section at some point. – B.hotep • talk• 15:32, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

As I always say, we are all entitled to our opinions, except when I decide otherwise. ;) Opposes can be brutal, though. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 15:36, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

@ Bubba: I hadn't seen it, so thanks for bringing it to my attention. :-) You mentioned someone having a !vote in every section of an RfA, so I think I know who you're talking about. That was what I wanted to avoid, so instead of "move to oppose", I just struck my !vote out. @ Vicenarian:haha, well I suppose I should've explained my position on the actual RfA, and yes, I agree that some opposes can be brutal. Best, →javért ^breakaway 15:38, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

I voted "Support" in that RfA (and it wasn't a one-sentence vote either), so thank me incessantly, nominator. Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 17:25, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

←Uh.. I didn't nominate UIS. →javért ^breakaway 17:29, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Flip-floppers...there's another occasion where you failed to leave an explanation for poor Sponge. Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 17:32, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm getting annoying so I'll stop editing this page. Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 17:32, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

No, no, you're fine. :-) A flip-flopper is someone who changes their mind a lot. Like John Kerry REMOVED POV.. :-p →javért ^breakaway 17:34, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

No, no ,I wasn't referring to you. I knew it was a self-nom (if that's correct). It's just to make UIS feel better. I was edit conflicticated, so forgive me if this contradicts the new info. Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 17:36, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Haha, nice. :-) →javért ^breakaway 17:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Hope your vacation was refreshing! -- Dylan 620 ( contribs, logs) ^{help us!} 19:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Aw, thanks. :-) Yeah, it was pretty nice.. I got to spend some time with a lot of my family that I haven't seen in awhile, and STILL found time to edit. :) →javért ^breakaway 19:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Any idea what I should do with this article (or better still do it for me)? I have a feeling it's just copied from the back-cover of the book. I know it's not your area of speciality, sorry. At least you have an area of speciality. Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 21:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

 Checking... →javért ^breakaway 21:03, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, it looks okay to me. Granted, it's copied verbatim from those websites, but then it is in quotation marks. Still, the copyright notice at the bottom of the website in question bothers me, but it doesn't look like the article creator is trying to pass this off as his own. But like you said, this isn't something that I'm very active in, so if any of my talk page stalkers want to chime in, I would be most appreciated. →javért ^breakaway 21:08, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay. Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 08:58, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay, this isn't something I spend a lot of time on either, but if I understand correctly; while the text is currently quoted, it should provide the authors name, and a link to where it's from (under each quote, rather than at the bottom of the section), so as to avoid plagiarism (although the brackets are good, they are not good enough on their own). We are fine to quote small amounts of copyrighted text (articles are allowed to use " brief verbatim textual excerpts from copyrighted media"). But, it would be preferable to use a free equivalent, the text should also be cut down a bit (there's currently quite a lot), and the source should be better cited. I haven't got much time at the moment, so I would suggest reading WP:NFC for yourself. Cheers, - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 11:01, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi there Javert :). How things going? A while ago you expressed some interest in archiving WP:RFPERM pages. As DustyBot has been inactive, I've created a semi-automated tool to help with archiving the requests. If you'd like to have a go with it, send me an email (I'll need your email address, as Wikipedia doesn't let me attach files). If DustyBot doesn't come back, I may create a fully automated bot to archive the requests. If it does come back, this tool could still be useful, as DustyBot doesn't archive Autoreviwer and NPWatcher requests. If you no longer have an interest in archiving, then that's fine, just let me know. By the way, I only created the tool today, so it isn't by any means perfect. Best, - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 23:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Pretty good, Kingpin, thanks. :-) I'll send you an email from my main account once I get back home, it that's alright. I had noticed your last few edit summaries included (semi automated), so I was going to ask you about it, so thanks for bringing it up. Best, t'shael the sock ^{Talk to my master} 02:15, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Email sent. →javért ^breakaway 03:04, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

I can't thank you enough! There are times I simply feel I'm wasting my time trying to parry off the nonsense which seems to make up the vast majority of new entries...and then something like this comes along. Thank you so much and it is GREAT to have you back. Owe ya an e-mail re. my brother's Star Trek collection, BTW.  :) Humbly, -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 05:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

On its way. I'll give you an alternate e-mail to respond to instead of the one I have listed here. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 05:30, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

• Yeah, I need to establish a special account. However, if you check your own e-mail, I just fired one off to you. PMDrive1061 ( talk) 05:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Nope, there's no need. As the format need should be demonstrated on the page in a commented section. I'll check all the pages to see if they have this. Also, I've replied to your email (in a coupla seconds). - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 12:08, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for helping me and my colleagues test the NICE interface modification. Depending on when you installed the tool, you were only presented with a specific subset of the features we have developed. We are ready to roll out the full feature set which, we expect, will make the gadget significantly more useful. Before we do that, we'd like you to answer a few questions about your activity in Wikipedia as it relates to undoing other's edits and what you thought of the NICE features you were shown.

The survey will ask for your Wikipedia username, but you can participate anonymously if you choose. To do so, send me an email with an address I can respond to and I will have the survey software respond with an anonymous token for you to continue. -- E poch F ail ^{( talk| contribs)} 17:52, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

10-4, good buddy? Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 01:12, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

PS, I can help with accounting homework, being an accounting student myself. :) Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 01:13, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

How did you know what my major was...? o.O →javért ^breakaway 01:42, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

You had it on your user page at some point. Technically, I'm business administration with a finance minor, but I've loaded up on accounting as well. Go UMUC!!! I go to class online - in my underwear, if I so please! ;) Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 01:53, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh, that's right, I had forgotten about that. Lucky about being able to go to school in your underwear; I have to be fully dressed and drive 30 miles. →javért ^breakaway 01:55, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

The power of the interwebs. Of course, it means I must be very disciplined, as it is easy to lose track of class when it's all in cyberspace. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)}

		The Original Barnstar
		For your dedication to clerking at CHU and related pages. Great work! – Juliancolton |  Talk 01:41, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Wow, Julian, I don't know what to say. :-D Thank you very much! →javért ^breakaway 01:42, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

A barnstar from such a respected Wikipedian! Wear that with pride, friend. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 01:52, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

You gots a Barnstar from Juliancolton! Even my 19 Barnstars don't measure up to this. I'm so jealous. Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 14:52, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Aw, thank you very much, MC! It's very much appreciated. :) →javért ^breakaway 02:14, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

On a side note, I like how you've redesigned the barnstars. They're very pretty. →javért ^breakaway 02:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Seconded. I only hope to one day be worthy of such a beautiful award myself! Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 04:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

<les mis humour>Perhaps one day you can be as great/worthy as... JAVERT.</les mis humour> :-p →javért ^breakaway 04:36, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps one day, you will be Javert. Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 20:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

That's what I'm hoping for. ;-) →javért ^breakaway 20:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

←Your namesake committed suicide by throwing himself off a bridge. I'd prefer it if you did not do that. K thx bai. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 20:54, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

lol, but what a fun way to die. :) →javért ^breakaway 20:55, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

No, the BEST way to die (I mean, since we all will EVENTUALLY) is an overdose of benzodiazepines. Basically, you fall peacefully asleep and your autonomous functions slowly shut down. It's how they euthanize animals. Yeah, so, I'd like that, or in my sleep, please. In a good 60+ years. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 20:59, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

But it's more exciting for those left behind if you do it Javert's way... →javért ^breakaway 21:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay, this got morbid real fast. Time for me to leave work. You go get yourself a DYK, mkay? ;)

Haha, I haz an ideaz at least. :D →javért ^breakaway 21:03, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

So, any ideas for a new article we could create in collaboration? I'm itching to create one, but every idea I have, there's already a page!!!!! Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 04:17, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

How about Darwin's book "Insectivorous Plants"? →javért ^breakaway 04:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Sold. I'm a HUGE Darwin fan myself, I've read On The Origin of Species three times. Let me see if I can reserve it at my local library. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 04:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Splendid. :) I'll do the same myself. →javért ^breakaway 04:35, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Apparently the entire work is available online. →javért ^breakaway 04:38, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Naturally, as it's now likely public domain. I suggest we take a read-over and then confer. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 04:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Or I could let you do all the work an then throw my name on it? :-p Hehe, no, that sounds like a good idea. I won't have much time until Thursday, tho. Is that satisfactory? →javért ^breakaway 04:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Haha, absolutely. I won't have much real focused content creation time until the weekend. (I need time and focus for things like GA reviews and content creation, focus I sadly lack during work and other such distracting events.) I'll see if I can get something going off-wiki and then post a draft. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 04:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Sounds good, I'll try and do the same on Thursday. Then, we can combine the best of both of our drafts. I shan't have much time starting Monday, tho, for that is when classes resume. :( →javért ^breakaway 04:48, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Bah, class. I don't have class until the end of September, myself. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 04:50, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Lucky. Tho, this probably means I finish my semester before you. :) So I shall be laughing come December 17th when I am through until January. :D →javért ^breakaway 04:52, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

←Nope, that's roundabout when I finish. :-D I'm taking compressed online classes, as I am a workin' man. (Working, as in, I sit here doing nothing most of the time, and they pay me.) Shout out for UMUC! Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 16:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Also, Insectivorous Plants (book). I've already nom'd it for DYK. ...yeah, sorry, I just get writing and it comes to me. :) Feel free to tinker/add more/look for sources, so you can get some credit. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 16:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Ah, no biggie. Congrats. :) →javért ^breakaway 16:54, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

For reverting that! What did that even mean? Hekerui ( talk) 18:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

You're quite welcome. :-) As to what it meant, I have no idea. Looked like random vandalism/nonsense to me. Best, →javért ^breakaway 19:55, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

You can't put html code for templates inside an article...also, the singles are also covered in Template:Pink. Why put them again?-- 12345abcxyz20082009 ( talk) 21:04, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I see what you mean, I thought you removed the infobox. Please accept my apologies for the misunderstanding. :) →javért ^breakaway 21:06, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

No problem ;) -- 12345abcxyz20082009 ( talk) 15:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

The quote. I was just about to revert you(edit conflict on your own user page does seem strange) thinking, "Grrr...Vandal" (Not really) Anyway, it's one of my favorite sarcasticyetstranglytruebutcompletelyfalsewithahintoftaprica quote. Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 22:04, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Hehe, yeah, I'm like Sauron.. I see everything. :) Anyway, I'm glad that I said something that you felt was quote worthy. :) →javért ^breakaway 22:05, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Yep, much worthier than the garbage I spit out. :) Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 22:06, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Meh, I've had a lot of practice with sarcasm. :) I've never seen you say anything that I would deem "garbage", tho. Don't be so hard on yourself. →javért ^breakaway 22:08, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Sarcasm is the word of the day. Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 22:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I see. :) Apologies, then. →javért ^breakaway 22:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

That quote will continue to inspire me always. :) Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 22:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

←Haha, I'm glad. :) →javért ^breakaway 22:19, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

PS, where did you find the "Doing" thing on your talk page? Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 00:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

It's a template. Just put {{ doing}} where you want it to appear. →javért ^breakaway 00:24, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Ahh...thanks. Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 00:26, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem. :) →javért ^breakaway 00:27, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Is there one that says "Done"? Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 00:28, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

See {{ done}}. :) →javért ^breakaway 00:29, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes! Thanks! Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 00:31, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

No problem. :) →javért ^breakaway 00:32, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

...has been moved to the prep area. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 14:39, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Looks like a good page. Bear in mind (Vicenarian) that it would have been better for an independent editor to add to the prep area ( Wikipedia:Did you know/Guide). Anyway, no harm done here, the page looks fine (although it only just passes the size test, is there anything else would could be added to it?). Also, thanks for adding the Nokia Booklet :D - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 16:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Aye, I realize it would've been better to have another editor add it, but there was a hole to fill and an American story was needed. You're welcome, I didn't realize Nokia ever made computers! Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 16:14, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Heh, me neither, until I found an article in the BBC news (which is where I look for new articles to write). Me thinks this new Booklet will be popular. If only because it is a Nokia, and their unbelievable 12 hour battery claim. - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 16:40, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Yay. I'm excited, this is my first DYK after 13,000 edits, lol. :) @ Kingpin, yeah, it passes the size test by 97 characters, so pretty close. I'm reading several books right now about theology, etc, and will update and expand the article as I can. Thanks again, Vicenarian, I appreciate it. :) →javért ^breakaway 21:06, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

←You're welcome. As you may be aware, I apparently run DYK now... Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 21:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

lol, yes, I see that. Second (?) day on the job and already running the place; good show! :-p →javért ^breakaway 21:13, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Barely 24 hours. Yeah, see, this is why people think I'm a sock of some super experienced user. (I am NOT, BTW, you TPSs.) I take WP:BOLD quite literally. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 21:16, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

From my perspective you're just incredibly helpful and you learn very fast, so it may give people not familiar with you pause, though I don't see why. Some people just learn quicker than others. :) →javért ^breakaway 21:18, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

" You... would make a good sockpuppet" ;D... take that as a compliment. @Javert, I can easily top that! 35,000 before my first DYK :P - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 21:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

←I do take that as a compliment, thanks. :) Anyone who wants to join me in preparing the DYK hooks is welcome... I'm really only doing it so much because no one else is. And furthermore, I like doing it. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 21:32, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

I would help, but I don't want to commit to something and then not be able to fulfill said commitment because of school. →javért ^breakaway 21:41, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Naw, you don't have to commit to anything. Just pop in every now and then and help. :) Got my textbooks in the mail today. Gonna be a looooong semester. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 23:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

hehe, I got mine last week. When I opened it up, I died a little inside. :) How many hours are you taking? →javért ^breakaway 23:39, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

12 semester hours. Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 23:44, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

PS: Our DYK hooks are up for the next update in approximately six hours. T:DYK/Q4 Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 23:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Hehe, yeah, I've been stalking it. :D I'm going to wait up to see it. →javért ^breakaway 23:46, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Lucky. >:( Just kidding. I looked at it, and I think it's good. :) Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 01:04, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

←Thanks, Abce2, I appreciate it. :) Tho, credit for the hook goes to Vicenarian. →javért ^breakaway 01:06, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Your welcome. I've been looking into DYKs, and with all my "progress", I'm still confused. In other words (aka the truth), I've haven't really done anything. And I congratulate Vicenarian too. And now I'm off to do something I just realized I can do when I'm bored. Cheers, Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 01:12, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

lol, have fun. :) →javért ^breakaway 01:13, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

I have replied on my talk page. Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 01:16, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

This user is a sock puppet of everyone.		A userstar, err... or is it barnbox?
		This user has created a really cool userbox for me. Nuff' said. Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 01:23, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Hehe, thanks, Abce2! I appreciate it. :) →javért ^breakaway 01:27, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Your welcome. Cheers, Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 01:28, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

On August 28, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Justice of God in the Damnation of Sinners, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page ( here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

≈  Chamal  ^talk ¤ 05:08, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Hooray! Well done :). Even if it's pushing mine off :(. - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 05:09, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Aw, that sucks. :( I'm sorry. →javért ^breakaway 05:12, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry... The doctor says I will be "just fine".... - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 05:14, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

lol, that's good, then. :) →javért ^breakaway 05:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Woo hoo! Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 09:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Well done to all. :) – B.hotep • talk• 09:27, 28 August 2009 (UTC);;

I'm making t-shirts - "I got a DYK on the front page of Wikipedia and all I got was this lousy message box." Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 09:38, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Nice! And can I have a t-shirt too? :) Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 12:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

lol, thanks guys. Vicenarian, don't forget to add "and a pretty icon on my userpage". :D →javért ^breakaway 16:18, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

DING!!!! Vicenarian ^{( Said · Done)} 19:31, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

You have a reply to your digital epistle, kind sir. →javért ^breakaway 22:31, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Is there a reason you're edit warring to restore useless templates to the page? Clearly the user knows they're blocked. - Rjd0060 ( talk) 23:03, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

I am/was under the impression that if you're blocked you're not supposed to remove the block template from your talk page. →javért ^breakaway 23:14, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

As far as I know, there's no "rule" saying this. If you take a look at WP:UP#CMT it says that declined unblock templates and shared IP headers are all that shouldn't be removed. Putting policies aside, there's no benefit in edit warring with a user on their talk page. So I'd ask that you don't do it in the future (unless of course the user was doing something disruptive - but this one was simply blanking the page). - Rjd0060 ( talk) 23:18, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Ah, fair enough. I apologise and will refrain from such behaviour in the future. →javért ^breakaway 23:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Just wanting to tell you. (read the whole bottom thing. User talk:MBK004 Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 00:15, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

I can understand Javert's view here. He doesn't want anyone to miss the fact that the IP has trangressed the accepted behaviour on Wikipedia. Once he becomes an admin (and he will), he will realise that we do check page histories thoroughly (although in some cases, because we are human, we don't and we need a few pointers because we are busy IRL, etc). But to call it edit warring is a slap in the face for people who (I know) are trying to protect the integrity of this great encyclopedia we are trying to build. Having said that, J-Man, there is a lot to be said for letting the vandal think they have the last word. ;) Email me if you want clarification. – B.hotep • talk• 00:16, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Your last point is most important. Edit warring (and that is what it was, regardless of intentions) is pointless, counter productive, etc. No reason for it.The policy these users were pointing to did not back their actions as "block messages" were not mentioned. That said, I've made my opinion known and don't plan on continuing discussion on the matter. - Rjd0060 ( talk) 01:25, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

And, I'm sure, as he said, he won't do it again. Or will at least think twice depending on who's on duty. – B.hotep • talk• 01:28, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Given that others have agreed with such actions, I'm not (any longer) asking Javert or anybody not to do it. I'd hope they seriously consider whether what they're doing is going to benefit anything, however. I'm not in any position to stop somebody from doing it. I just find it completely pointless and unnecessary. - Rjd0060 ( talk) 01:34, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Hello. Not sure if you have it watchlisted, but I tried to add some clarification to the IP talk page discussion taking place on MBK004`s talk page. The section in question is User talk:MBK004#User talk pages. Thank you, — Kralizec! ( talk) 04:31, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

←Thank you for both the heads up, and the clarification. Regards, →javért ^breakaway 04:37, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

That I am using my grand 10,000^th edit to post on your talk (I got the idea from when you did the same with Vicenarian a couple months ago). :D Cheers, Dylan 620 ( contribs, logs) ^{help us!} 02:32, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

lol, thank you. :D *feels honoured* →javért ^breakaway 03:01, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm honoured that you think something uttered from my fingertips is worthy of a quote at the top of your talk page. :) – B.hotep • talk• 10:06, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

So am I. Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 11:41, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Hehe, I saw that in the advice you gave Dylan on article writing. It's so true, I just had to put it in my user space somewhere. :) Javert ( talk) 17:25, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

What...happened, to, your...signature?

P.S. - I'm going to refrain from leaving irrelelvances [sic] now. You're probably too busy with college to tolerate them now. Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 17:35, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

No, don't do that. Your posts keep me sane, Sponge. As to my signature, I just decided to go back to the generic one that the software gives you. :) Javert ( talk) 17:38, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

It won't last (your signature, I mean, not my posts). As Abce2 said "If you want me to go away...I won't", EXCEPT IN THIS [sorry for the caps lock] case, it doesn't work, because that's the opposite of the situation. Ah. Well, I'm off to change "passed away" to "died", Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 17:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

What the? When did I say that?? Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 18:29, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Does anyone know where that quote came from? Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 20:11, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Not sure, tho I do remember seeing it before. Javert ( talk) 20:13, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

I KNOW. LET ME EDIT! Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 20:14, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

It was B.Hotep here. Sorry, sorry, sorry. I got confused...as usual. Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 20:15, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't remember saying anything like that. Strange. Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 20:14, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay, that explains it. Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 20:16, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Javert. You've got new messages here. (technically this isn't talkback) Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 20:27, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank You(apology accepted;))I decided to log on and saw the message you left. I decided to do some reaserch about it and I am most troubled with the fact of [ [4]]. I wonder who could be impersonating me. If it is possible to get someone to look into it and maybe preform some sort of check---such as a checkuser. I'd like to know who is behind this for I feel that I'm being stalked; although I haven't been as active recently so it could be a vandal I've delt with before? Please look into this. Thanks;) Schnitzel MannGreek. 18:27, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm honestly not too sure, SMG. Checkuser "isn't for fishing", but I would think that it could be done in this case. Have you thought of asking a CU (J.delanoy perhaps)? Regards, Javert ( talk) 18:51, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the impersonator's edit Javert. I've responded with my thoughts about SchnitzelMannGreek's message on his talk page. Thanks again :) - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 19:23, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Not at all. :) I made a comment in regards to your comment at SMG's talk. Javert ( talk) 19:24, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

I've added two questions following your comment, which is made up of two sentences, in reply to my comment on SchnitzelMannGreek's user talk page xD - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 19:27, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Good point. Thanks and sorry I didn't get back to you guys earlier;)I'll see what I might do when I have more time...maybe I'll consult J.Dealony or just ignore the vandal.;Happy Editing;) Schnitzel MannGreek. 20:01, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

With all due respect, there's just about no way I'll see a post by you if your sig is just the standard one. :( <prays that Javert is crowned Wikipedian of the Month> -- Dylan 620 ( contribs, logs) ^{help us!} 23:23, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the kudos. While it would indeed be an honour, there's no way I can beat out the others who are up for it. :) As to my sig, I'll probably end up going back as this one is rather boring. Regards, Javert ( talk) 23:54, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage August 26th. I didn't even realize that What's-Wrong-With-Jihad? vandalized it until today. I also didn't realize that an IP I was reverting yesterday vandalized my page yesterday until today, but Divine Alpha reverted the IP, so I'll thank him for that. Thanks again. - Zhang He ( talk) 17:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

No problem, you're quite welcome. :) Javért ^Talk 17:51, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes, very welcome. Lord Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 18:48, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations, Javert! For your kindness to others, your hard work around the wiki, and for being a great user, you have been awarded my top award, the " Wikipedian of the Month" award for the month of August! Keep up the great work!
If you wish you can add {{ User:Midnight Comet/WOTM/UBX|August 2009}} to your userpage.

Happy editing!

[midnight comet] [talk] 00:03, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Dang. I didn't win. Real meaning:Wow! Congrats! Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 00:04, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

I guess ol' Midnight heard my prayers; congrats, pal! -- Dylan 620 ( contribs, logs) ^{help us!} 00:07, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Wow! Very unexpected, but very appreciated! Thanks, MC! :) And thank you Dylan, and Abce, I appreciate the kind words you posted. :) Javért ^Talk 00:12, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Random quote I like. (second to yours)

Oh great, there's a yeti outside

—  Jamie Hyneman

Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 00:14, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Nice! Congrats Javert. :) ~ mazca ^talk 00:30, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, mazca, I appreciate it. :) Javért ^Talk 00:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

(Re from my talk): You're the one who rocks; you're Wikipedian of the Month =P Anyways you deserve this 100%. Hugs, -- [midnight comet] [talk] 00:42, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Congrats, you lucky jerk. ;) The V-Man ^{( Said · Done)} 00:58, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. :) I'm digging your new sig, btw. Javért ^Talk 00:59, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Excellent--truely well earned. Hopefully I might get this in the future. Thanks for being a great user:) Schnitzel MannGreek. 01:00, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, SMG, I appreciate it. :) Javért ^Talk 01:02, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

I figured it was about time to shake things up a bit - Bubba always calls me "The V-Man" and I like it. :) The V-Man ^{( Said · Done)} 01:15, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Hehe, yeah, I had noticed that. It suits ya, V-Dizzle. :p Javért ^Talk 01:16, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! I'm going to be offline for a few days, but enjoy your stardom. You do deserve it, J-Shizzle. Peace, The V-Man ^{( Said · Done)} 01:25, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Haha, thanks. Enjoy your break. Javért ^Talk 01:26, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Why am I always several hours late when something interesting happens, Lord Spongefrog , (I am a flesh-eating robot) 10:30, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Dunno. Happened to me too. Still...CONGRATS! And BTW, I think the yeti quote is more properly attributed to Adam Savage. Like you care.  :)) -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 05:38, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, PMDrive. :) Javért  |  ^Talk 06:40, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Accualy, Jamie did say that. Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 22:24, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

...runs alphabetically, I just realized. This is why I am always LAST to have my archiving done.

They should warn you about that before you pick a username. The V-Man ^{( Said · Done)} 17:07, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Hehe, change your username to *Vicenarian, and you'll be one of the first ones. Javért  |  ^Talk 22:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

I quite like my name, thankyouverymuch. :) The V-Man ^{( Said · Done)} 02:06, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

[ [5]] Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 05:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

I iz sockz now? Lulz. Javért  |  ^Talk 05:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Reminds me of a song I made one time after I was accused of socking. "If your a sock of Verbal and you know it clap your hands!" Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 05:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

lol, I keep forgetting that you're a sock of everyone. Javért  |  ^Talk 05:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Yes, yes I am. I really don't like at this time of day/night, because not that many admins are around. Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 05:30, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

I think NW is on, but not sure. I'm about to go to bed (I have an eight am class tomorrow). Hopefully I don't wake up to the "You have been accused of SOCKPUPPETERY" template :). Javért  |  ^Talk 05:32, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Well, I'm just glad that no checkuser would run a check like that. (wait, does that mean they know where I live?? *gasp*) :) Abce2| Aww nuts! Wribbit!(Sign here) 05:34, 2 September 2009 (UTC)