That hatnote template should not be used on that article. If you notice, it adds:

"U.S. Route 1-9 Toll" redirects here. For other uses, see U.S. Route 1-9 Toll (disambiguation).

where the "U.S. Route 1-9 Toll (disambiguation)" portion is a redlink. That means there is no page with the title "U.S. Route 1-9 Toll (disambiguation)", nor should there be. We'd only create a disambiguation page if there were multiple instances of highways named "U.S. Route 1-9 Toll", and there are not. I think you want t add it too call out the fact that "U.S. Route 1-9 Toll" redirects to the article, but that's not what the template is for. To call out a redirect title, you bold that title in the text of the lead.

Before we go any farther, I just have to ask: is there any place where they use a US 1/9 shield with a toll banner plate? If not, then "U.S. Route 1-9 Toll" doesn't really exist and we shouldn't add that name into the text. If they do use that sign assembly, then we can. Imzadi 1979  → 19:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC) reply

If you’re talking about the toll banner being put on highway signs, then there may be a few on ramps entering 1-9 in Fort Lee, NJ where the GW bridge toll is. Though I don’t know if they do considering there would probably be a toll banner with I-95 instead, since that’s the dominant route. Jason Ingtonn ( talk) 03:10, 8 May 2022 (UTC) reply

In the future, please indent your replies on talk pages per Wikipedia:Indentation. You may also notice there are reply links after comments on talk pages; using that will set the correct indentation level for you and ensure that your comments are automatically signed. Imzadi 1979  → 14:49, 10 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The article New Jersey Turnpike you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:New Jersey Turnpike for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Trainsandotherthings -- Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 20:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. ( t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC) reply

The articles for New Jersey roads do need work, and all of your input is most helpful. In terms of Henry Hudson Drive, it does not appear that there is enough to merit a standalone article, so it was changed to redirect to Palisades Interstate Park Commission, where you already added material about Henry Hudson Drive. Alansohn ( talk) 15:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC) reply

I understand, thank you for the advice Jason Ingtonn ( talk) 08:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of state highways in New Jersey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newark. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 15 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to John Pizzi. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and the existing reference is a non-reliable source. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. FatalFit |  ✉ |  ✓  04:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO - YouTube and Facebook are not acceptable or reliable sources. The individual's website is a primary source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Pizzi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt ( talk) 06:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jason Ingtonn! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt ( talk) 06:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brewster Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brewster Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 20:20, 21 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

( t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Neal Agarwal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CreamyP ( talk) 07:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reference marker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lake Placid.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply