If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
Hi, I undid your revert. The page was blanked by its creator. So I tagged it for deletion. Cheers - DVdm ( talk) 16:11, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
- OK, I'm sorry, thank you for tagging it for deletion. -- Iste Praetor talk 16:13, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Iste Praetor! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Hi. Sorry I issued a warning for a vandalism edit on the above article when, in fact, you were quicker with the revert. Regards. Denisarona ( talk) 07:15, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- No problem, it doesn't matter to me who puts the template on the vandal's talk page :-) Regards -- Ist e ( ☎) 15:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello Iste Praetor
You received this message because there is a new version of huggle ready for use. Please download
http://code.google.com/p/huggle/downloads/detail?name=huggle%202.1.19alpha.exe and do any tests you want on any wiki you can use it on. Please bear in mind it's a testing version and it may contain bugs, so be very carefull. Should you find any issue, please report it immediately to our feedback or tracker. Thank you. I am definitely not a bot, so please send me a message in case you didn't know what is this about, or needed to know anything more. In case there will be no bug reports, stable version will be released in 4 days. In case you don't want to receive this information, please remove yourself as a beta tester of huggle.
Petrb (
talk) 23:12, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited La Maison du Chocolat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tokio ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:05, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| For your great work on reverting vandalism. Keep up the great work! Torreslfchero ( talk) 19:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC) |
- Thank you, it's very nice to get this one :) I don't have time to revert vandalism here very often, as I'm active on many other wikis, but I'll do my best ;) Cheers, Iste ( D) 19:34, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
The same deletion that you reverted has been made again to this article. Normally, I would revert that again myself, but I think you might wish to look at it again. It seems to be sourced although my uncertainty about whether it is adequately sourced gives me a little pause. Although the person deleting this may object to the content (what the substantive objection may be isn't clear from the edit summaries), perhaps it is in large part the section title which annoys him. Maybe changing that to "Possible interpolations" might help if this is valid material which should remain. I hope this is not an imposition to bring this back to you. Donner60 ( talk) 20:55, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hi! Thank you for your message, I probably wouldn't have noticed this if you hadn't informed me. User:Mifter Public reverted the content removal again and tagged the article, which is certainly a good idea IMHO. Even though there might be room for improvement in this section of the article, I think it is not the right course of action to remove the text without giving a valid reason. Regards -- Iste ( D) 17:10, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Hey Iste Praetor; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 22:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I am sending you this message because you listed yourself on meta:Huggle/Members as a beta tester. We desperately need attention of testers, because since we resolved all release blockers, we are ready to release first official version of huggle 3! Before that happens, it would be nice if you could test it so that we can make sure there are no issues with it. You can download it packaged for your operating system (see Wikipedia:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta) or you can of course build it yourself, see https://github.com/huggle/huggle3-qt-lx for that. Don't forget to use always latest version, there is no auto-update message for beta versions!
Should you find any issue, please report it to wikimedia bugzilla, that is a central place for huggle bugs, where we look at them. That is i mportant, if you find a bug and won't report it, we can't fix it. Thank you for your work on this, if you have any questions, please send me a message on my talk page, I won't be looking for responses here. Thanks, Petrb ( talk) 15:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Iste_Praetor, we are to release a new major version of huggle, but we did receive almost no feedback from our beta testing team, which you are a part of (see https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members). It would be of a great help if you could download it (if you have windows, all you need to do is getting http://tools.wmflabs.org/huggle/files/huggle3.1.0beta.exe and putting it to a folder where you have installed huggle) and test it. You can always get a help with making it @ #huggle connect!
Major changes:
- Multisite support - you can now log in to unlimited number of wikis in 1 huggle session and get a huge queue of all edits made to these wikis. This is good for smaller projects which gets overlooked often.
- Ranged diffs - you can select multiple revisions and get a huge diff that display all changes done to them.
- Fixes of most of bug reports we had so far
In case you found a bug, please report it to bugzilla: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?product=Huggle&list_id=147663 thank you! Petrb ( talk) 10:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Hey Iste_Praetor! You are receiving this message because you are subscribed at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers
I have recently launched a new downloads for beta testers that contains nightly builds of huggle, eg. versions that are built every day from our master branch and contains latest huggle. These builds are currently provided only for Windows and Ubuntu. You can find them here: http://huggle.wmflabs.org/builds/
Please keep in mind that these don't have any automatic updates and if you download and start using nightly build, you will need to update it yourself! So don't get yourself to running old version, it's possible to install both stable and nightly huggle, which is what I suggest.
Keep the bug reports coming to phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/task/create/?projects=Huggle Many thanks! Petrb ( talk) 09:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)