|
|
I see that you're a student at Georgia Tech! I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Georgia Tech, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Georgia Tech. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! LaMenta3 20:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks for the super speedy revert of my vandalised user page! Keep up that RC Patrol! Pedro | Talk 15:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Why did you restore the older warnings? This is a school ( [1]), and the person who just vandalised is likely not the person the other warnings, made over a month ago, were intended for. -- NE2 16:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's my understanding that warnings for vandalism, test edits, ect should be left in place for future editors or admins making a block decision.
Gtg204y 17:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Since those warnings are so old, admins would not take them into account. --
NE2 17:08, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've added Template:SharedIPEDU to the page, however I still feel the old warnings should be left in place. Gtg204y 17:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Since those warnings are so old, admins would not take them into account. --
NE2 17:08, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
It's enough I have to clean up after bored children at school. HalfShadow 18:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, I noticed the additional vandalism after the first revert and ended up putting it back in trying to fix it, my fault entirely Gtg204y 18:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
hello, I am not sure how to contact you hopefully this works......I need your help with my page.
Thanks for keeping an eye on Macedonians (Greek). That IP is most likely a sockpuppet of banned User:Pulvis angelus a.k.a. User:Macedonia.eu a.k.a. User:87.119.119.37 and many more. Look, he even does the characteristic "fix" edit summary when removing material [2] [3] [4]. Is it possible to get him blocked?-- Domitius 14:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Heh heh...the vandalism was just out of some random streak of mischief...sorry 'bout that. Camelcast 14:52, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
yesterday i wrote an article on nuglasses, as it was my first submission I spent several hours viewing other similar submissions and attempted to make my submission similar. When I submitted it I immediately got a speedy deletion notice. I then placed a hangon and left a message on what I thought was the correct talk page explaining my actions and detailing the two sites in particular I had based my submission on. This morning I can't find the page nuglasses or any response. Can you please explain what I have done wrong and what is going on? Serico 06:10, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello I have created a page for U-ParkIT and it was deleted I am new to this and I was hoping you could help me understand what need to be changed...Thank You..Aparcalo Aparcalo 19:40, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
We aren't trying to violate any of the rules. We will to do whatever we need to to comply, we just want people to know about this incredible technology. If you could give me any other feed back that would be great thanks Aparcalo 20:01, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
I am having a hard time with the {{hangon}} which page do I put it at the top of? There is no page, it was a speedy deleted, can you help me?
Aparcalo 20:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Why did you just revert my edits to the Bozell/Bozell Worldwide page. I only put things up that are true. What is wrong with that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Swept14 ( talk • contribs) 14:19, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
I read some more of what you posted on my account. I do work for the company in the article, so there may be a conflict of interest. But, I have a lot of good information, honest, information that I would like to post. Again, what is wrong with that? I don't want to get blocked, I just want to know the right way in going about this.
Thanks,
Swept14 14:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
I understand that maybe what I added was too long and I will definitely remove the "Founder's Story Section", but I do think that other sections are relevant such as history and portfolio. We are an advertising agency and showing some of our examples is the most relevant thing that I can think of.
Thanks,
Swept14 14:30, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my schools wilipedia page. Someone I know is a pain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Treynate2 ( talk • contribs) 19:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
hey, how's it going? with regard to the focus point press entry I have been working on-- I understand your concern for individuals writing about companies that may seem irrelevant or not notable. However, this is journalistic trade publication covering a niche financial market. I believe this is worthy of mention in a worldy encyclopedia for a of the reasons I mention in the article in the 3rd and 5th paragraphs.
I have spent some time reading a lot of guidelines of notability and speedy deletion. Some other admins have even sided with me and declined speedy deletion. What other references, besides those that I have provided, are necessary? I would like to clarify this in an effort to improve the entry. Thanks for your time -- Stdalton 13:27, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
No I agree, by all means trim the lead, its too long, but the "mario mario" naming stuff is uncited in the lead, and cited in the body of the text, and you deleted the cited information....I say keep the reference in the body of the text that has sources and cut it out of the lead where it is unsourced. Judgesurreal777 15:21, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
.jpg) |
As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! |
Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor ( talk) 14:53, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)