Welcome!
Hello, Wormke-Grutman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Joaquin008 (
talk) 13:11, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
See WP:MILPOP for the official explanation. This is not a fantasy encyclopedia, so the template is not suitable in most articles here. Imagine what would happen if stacked tons of those templates for every game in every article on tanks. Try gaming.wikia.com. ASCIIn2Bme ( talk) 14:40, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Template:Units in Age of Empires II has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Cambalachero ( talk) 17:34, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Southern Nations, Nationalities and People's Region. Since you had some involvement with the Southern Nations, Nationalities and People's Region redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). አቤል ዳዊት (Janweh) ( talk) 22:49, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello Wormke-Grutman,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Arcadia (popular culture) for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije ( talk) 18:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Enderta Province, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tembien. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Agula may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 14:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 17:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, in response to your question on the Liberal Democrats talk page - there are many similarities between the Orange Book wing of the Lib Dems and the Conservatives, especially the one-nation faction which tends to dominate the Conservative leadership these days. The similarities are that both are broadly pro-free market and pro-free trade, Atlanticist and liberal interventionist on foreign policy, believe in global warming, support same-sex marriage and supported membership of the EU. This is what made the Conservative–Liberal Democrat coalition agreement possible. The centrist and Blairite New Labour faction of the Labour Party would also find many areas of agreement with these two groups.
However, the biggest differences are that the Orange Book Liberal Democrats have a very liberal stance on immigration, while the Conservatives are somewhat more restrictive, and that the Conservatives are much stronger defenders of the traditional role of British institutions, such as the Church of England, the monarchy, First Past the Post, the House of Lords, the military and law and order (through the courts and the police), while the Liberal Democrats are more inclined to support reform in these areas, such as proportional representation and drug decriminalisation. On civil liberties issues such as detention without trial and warrantless surveillance, the Conservatives, like Labour, typically make libertarian arguments against such measures when in opposition, but emphasise national security in these areas when in government, while the Liberal Democrats have been fairly consistently liberal on these issues.
The Conservatives also have more eurosceptic influences (the Orange Bookers supported British membership of the euro and even European federalism, both of which the Tories overwhelmingly opposed), and the influence of Thatcherism has made the Tories more liberal than the Orange Bookers on economics - the Tories generally want greater cuts to spending and taxation. Among the Tory backbenchers, there is an even more substantial difference, as many of them opposed same-sex marriage and are critics of the global warming theory. Some such as Michael Gove are neoconservatives, which makes them more willing to intervene militarily than the Orange Bookers would be, while others such as John Baron are disinclined towards foreign military intervention from a nationalist "putting Britain first" perspective, ironically bringing them more in line with the left-leaning social liberal faction of the Liberal Democrats.
-- Jay942942 ( talk) 11:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Scope creep. Wormke-Grutman, thanks for creating Spatiomap!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. One of the references no longer works. No reference explain exactly why the subject is notable, or indeed what they are. Google Books are a good source. Thanks.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Scope creep ( talk) 23:29, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Wormke-Grutman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Wormke-Grutman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Grutman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcadia in the arts and popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)