Please familiarize yourself with WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT before editing further on airport articles. There are standards to be followed. HkCaGu ( talk) 20:50, 13 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Luxembourg – Findel Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Again, please familiarize yourself with WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT before editing further on airport articles. HkCaGu ( talk) 08:19, 22 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Lisbon Portela Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albastar ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:58, 27 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luxembourg Findel Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stockholm Airport ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. HkCaGu ( talk) 18:25, 23 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Please don't make sweeping changes to these. Per WP:UKNATIONALS, these changes should be discussed in article talk. -- John ( talk) 23:44, 23 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Related to the matter, I've reverted all the changes you made to airline articles (like adding the French flag to entries involving French overseas territories). They were unexplained, and also don't serve the purpose of a wikilink: if anyone is interested in knowing that New Caledonia is a French territory all s(he) has to do is click on the wikilink. Airline articles are not the place for claiming sovereignty. Please do not reinstate them, and rather gain consensus at WT:AIRLINE for such controversial modifications. Thanks.-- Jetstreamer  ^Talk 17:43, 2 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi, I use a semi-automated tool to monitor recent changes. I noticed you decapitalized "French" so I made a good-faith revert as French should be capitalized. The rollback tool undoes all changes made by the affected user, so I inadvertently removed your prior edit from that page as well. My apologies, feel free to restore it but do capitalize French – see MOS:CAPS. I have no idea why you thought it was a good idea to create a page in my user space to contact me. Please simply use my talk page next time. Thanks — MusikAnimal ^talk 19:24, 1 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Strasbourg International Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athens Airport ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply

This issue has come up numerous times, and the problem is always the same: no editor has ever come up with a source explicitly stating that Furtado has Portuguese citizenship. There are numerous sources that indicate that she has Portuguese ethnicity, and numerous sources about Portuguese law related to blood relationships, but no single source that puts the two together.— Kww( talk) 23:33, 25 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tarbes–Lourdes–Pyrénées Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rome Airport. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:58, 28 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Coltsfan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Nicola Sturgeon because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nicola Sturgeon is a scottish citizen. If you want to change that, use the discussion page of the article to expose your point of views. Coltsfan ( talk) 20:51, 24 May 2015 (UTC) reply

It doesn't change the facts that you are doing it in the wrong way. If what you say is true, find sources to back it up and only change the article after using the discussion page of the article to expose your views with other users. Coltsfan ( talk) 10:48, 25 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Thank you for the terrific new information you are frequently adding to passport, ID card and visa articles!

I was somewhat surprised to see all the templated grouches above.

Some of them are unsigned and most do not provide any diffs of the edits complained about but, from what I've seen of your work, I assume they are the work of misguided grinches.

From your inside knowledge and user name, I assume you work in the air transport industry? -- BushelCandle ( talk) 15:51, 3 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of KLM destinations, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer  ^Talk 13:10, 14 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Your stats show you use the edit summary very rarely - why? Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 16:10, 29 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Melilla. Please do not use small font in infoboxes. Elizium23 ( talk) 17:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andalusia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Juan Marín. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC) reply

After your the Population density line in the box displays no more. I have tried to force the value 96, but it won't work. Robertiki ( talk) 19:50, 15 November 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of sportspeople with dual nationality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gerson Rodrigues.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 9 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, if you are closely connected to Luxair (as your name suggests), you should consult WP:COI when editing Luxair-related articles. Thanks. Janhrach ( talk) 13:55, 13 January 2024 (UTC) reply

I’m not lol, just a Luxair fanatic. It has been my airline of choice since my very first flight. I follow all the airline’s update with great enthusiasm but I’m far from working in the aviation industry (unfortunately). Gregori-luxair ( talk) 06:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Oh, I understand. I'm sorry to make an unsubstantiated assumption about you. Janhrach ( talk) 19:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC) reply

No worries!

Glad to help with any Luxair updates though :-) Gregori-luxair ( talk) 09:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Luxembourg Airport, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 09:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply