Welcome!

Hello, Gombang, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

If you're interested, please check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Indonesia; we always need more help with articles relating to Indonesia. Rigadoun (talk) 15:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello again Revolution, are you sysop in Indonesian Wikipedia ? Help me! I was blocked there because (accusation) canvassing. Padahal belakangan ini saya tidak pernah melakukan hal semacam itu. Perilaku saya untuk mengikutkan beberapa pengguna untuk ikut nimbrung di sebuah pembicaraan Warung Kopi pun cuman sekedar mengikut-sertakan saja. Lihat saja halaman daftar kontribut saya disana. Mohon untuk (kalo bisa) dicabut status pemblokirannya.

Oh ya, saya mohon juga agar membebaskan SockPuppet saya disana berakun id:Pengguna:Erik Evermtus karena akan digunakan sebagai akun pengganti jika akun utama dicuri oleh orang lain seperti id:Pengguna:Kenrick95Sock -- Erik Evrest ( talk) 09:13, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Tapi gimana yang terjadi dengan User:Si Gam Acèh. Ia ketika lagi sedang protes anti gambar Muhammad saja juga melakukan canvassing sama di WBI yang bunyinya kaya gini:

“

Assalamu 'alaykum wr. wb Menyambut hari kelahiran Nabi Muhammad saw, saya mempunyai sebuah pemikiran agar Wikipedia Bahasa Indonesia dapat mengirimkan surat permintaan penghapusan gambar-gambar penghinaan terhadap Nabi Muhammad saw. yang dimuat di berbagai proyek Wikimedia terutama sekali di Wikipedia Bahasa Inggris. Kalau WBI tidak bersedia, kita bisa menggalang suara-suara wikipediawan Indonesia terutama sekali yang muslim untuk menandatangani surat pernyataan meminta penghapusan gambar-gambar penghinaan tersebut.

”

Namun buktinya ia tak pernah diblokir di WBI apalagi dengan alasan canvassing itu. Yang ada ia malah diblokir secara global dan itu pun karena dianggap telah melakukan vandalisme di berbagai tempat serta membuat akun siluman, bukan karena canvassing. Itu artinya peraturan canvassing tidak berlaku donk. Lagipula peraturan canvassing tidak ada di WBI, cari aja sendiri. Jika belom ada peraturannya ya. Lagipula canvassing itu juga diantaranya memasukan spam promosi ProyekWiki juga yang sampai saat ini masih dilakukan bahkan oleh usert terkenal, para petinggi WBI, dan yang mempunyai status yang lumayan terhormat. Pokoknya inget nih kata-katanya Iwan Novirion di Warung Kopi Usulan:

“

kalau semua hal di Wikipedia Bahasa Indonesia ini harus berdasarkan yang ada di Wikipedia English ataupun Meta, kenapa gak sekalian aja bahasanya di samakan/ditukar dengan bahasa Inggris? Lain ladang lain belalang donk, mas. Sesuatu yang tidak dianggap tabu pada suatu tempat, belum tentu tempat lain menerimanya. Memang WBI bukan milik warga Indonesia saja, tapi milik dunia. Tapi pada kenyataannya warga Indonesia yang berkumpul disini

”

Jikalau pemblokiran bagi kaum canvassing sudah sah di WBI. Tapi kenapa yang pas si Gam Aceh tidak pernah diblokir dengan alasan itu. Coba jelaskan ! Kalo beliau tidak kenapa saya iya ? Kalo gitu saya merasa dipermainkan donk. Berarti saya tak layak menyandang status blokir itu dan harus di CABUT!

Dan coba lihat sumber Google Images dengan kata kunci "Canvassing" dan "Provokasi":

• Canvassing ==> http://www.google.com/search?hl=id&biw=1277&bih=642&gbv=2&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=canvassing&btnG=Telusuri&oq=canvassing&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=&gs_sm=s&gs_upl=103127l105755l0l10l10l0l2l2l0l409l2024l2.0.4.0.2l8 . Lihatkan, daftar gambarnya mendominasi gambar orang lagi kampanye dari rumah ke rumah.
• Provokasi ==> http://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&hl=id&source=hp&biw=1276&bih=642&q=provokasi&btnG=Telusuri+Gambar&gbv=2&oq=provokasi&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=&gs_sm=s&gs_upl=925l2608l0l9l9l0l2l2l0l337l1562l1.1.4.1l7 . Lihatkan, daftar gambarnya mendominasi perkumpulan orang sedang demo.

Jelas bedaKHAN! Lagi pula coba liat halaman yang berisi pandangan kebijakan Wikipedia sini mengenai canvassing ==> WP:CANVAS. Ada tidak kata "provokasi"/"provocation" disana. Berarti tidak ada hubungannya DONK. Kaya Mammoth ama Piramid dihubung-hubungkan aje. -- Erik Evrest ( talk) 04:27, 18 June 2011 (UTC) reply

OK, i present use English in there. But, try to view a page containing clay Wikipedia policy regarding canvassing here ==> WP: CANVAS. See also this part ==> Wikipedia:CANVAS#Inappropriate notification. There is no word "provocation" or its synonyms, or there kind. Not right. Means nothing to do. -- Erik Evrest ( talk) 11:18, 19 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Therefore, the reason for blocking me because I said that itcanvassing. Well, I do not do it but lately in the Indonesian Wikipedia. But tell me this MimiHitam provocation. But as you look at WP: CANVAS there is no word "provocation" as I said earlier. That means the same as abuse of authority. So blocking is feasible status revoked and the blocker can be removed his admin status -- Erik Evrest ( talk) 11:45, 19 June 2011 (UTC) reply

but not if you look at WP: CANVAS is not included either in each word and its synonyms.-- Erik Evrest ( talk) 12:10, 19 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Tolong, saya diblokir lagi di WBI dengan alasan "intimidasi". Lha, saya tak melakukan intimidasi kok. Saya hanya suruh mempertimbangkan lagi keputusan mereka. Saya bahkan semakin lama semakin halus peribahasanya pada setiap voters sekalian. Dan lagi, pada pengusulan sebelumnya saya bahkan melakukan lebih buruk dari pada itu kenapa saya tidak diblokir ? Atau karena saya mengejek pak Sentausa "Si Lamban dari WikiLand" sama saya mengejek mas Ezagren "Anak Durhako" ? Lha, itu kan cuma lagi bercanda aja. Sama halnya Anda beri julukan pada id:Pengguna:Willy2000 "BadutWiki" disini ==> id:Pembicaraan Pengguna:Willy2000/arsip3#Interwiki. Mohon pertimbangkan lagi lah, kasihanilah saya to masak saya harus menikmati liburan Lebaran yang kemudian masih dilanjutkan pada saat liburan Natal nanti dengan keadaan didalam jeruji besi gini. Sama halnya dengan masa pemblokiran sebelum ini dimana saya harus melewati liburan sekolah dengan keadaan sama kaya gini. Coba bayangin kalo Anda jadi saya itu bagaimana ?-- Erik Evrest ( talk) 06:53, 9 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Pertama, Anda tidak berhak menyuruh-nyuruh siapa pun. Soal bercanda, apakah orang yang Anda candai sependapat itu hanya bergurau? Tampaknya tidak. Terakhir, ucapan minta tolongnya mohon jangan sembarang salin tempel. Gombang ( talk) 09:55, 9 September 2011 (UTC) reply

(for english speakers: Actually this should be brought up at Indonesian Wikipedia. Nothing relevant for en.wp here, move along.)

Saya tidak menyuruh, saya hanya meminta. Saya wajar donk melakukan hal itu karena Wikipedia adalah tempat kebebasan berpendapat. Mengenai orang yang saya candai juga sependapat bahwa itu hanya gurauan, bahkan orang tersebut tidak setuju dengan status pemblokiran tersebut, nih buktinya ==> http://id.wikipedia.org/?title=Pembicaraan_Pengguna:Stephensuleeman&diff=prev&oldid=4693300
Yap, itu pesan seorang user WBI bernama Sentausa yang mendapatkan pesan kalo saya sedang diblokir dan minta dicabut status blokirnya dan menyinggungnya kepada Stephensuleeman si tukang blokir. Sentausa adalah kunci akan penuntasan masalah ini mengingat Mimihitam (seorang pengurus) mengatakan bahwa Sentausa merupakan salah seorang yang saya intimidasi-kan ( bukti) Bukankah yang namanya "masalah" adalah "dimana ada 1 pihak yang dirugikan" yang itu berarti pihak tersebut merupakan kunci ke arah mana "masalah" ini akan berakhir. Keputusan pengurus itu kan (kurasa) hanya karena mereka merasakan kalau saya sedang bertindak seperti itu. Padahal sebetulnya tidak. Sama halnya Anda lihat orang lagi kecopetan terus copetnya lari dan Anda gebukin tuh copet namun Anda haruslah hentikan karena sebetulnya adegan pencopetan itu cuma sedang syuting sinetron aja Demikian juga dengan permasalahan saya sekarang ini, saya diblokir tapi sebetulnya dengan "korban" menyatakan bahwa permasalahan ini cuma karena kesalah pahaman saja. -- Erik Evrest ( talk) 09:55, 10 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Gom, katanya saya nih dikurangi masa pemblokirannya. Kok sampe saat ini masih 6 bulan sih di kotakan merah di halaman penglihat daftar kontribusi saya ?-- Erik Evrest ( talk) 10:05, 15 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Sebelumnya lebih lama dari 6 bulan. Gombang ( talk) 10:17, 15 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Bo'ong, sejak kapan ? Liat aja tuh tag blokir yang diberikan Stephensuleeman yang udah dari bahela (dahulu kala) di halaman pembicaraan saya. Udah deh ngaku aja. Saya tau Anda mau dipandang baek. Yalah saya pandang baik Anda karena Anda telah menghibur saya dengan mendongengkan saya sebelum tidur mengenai masa blokir saya di WBI udah dikurangi Makaci ya, saya jadi bisa bobo ini Bagi saya Anda tu paling baek dari seluruh Wikipediawan karena udah menghibur dengan penghiburan macam tu -- Erik Evrest ( talk) 13:26, 15 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Maksudnya sebelum diblokir sudah didiskusikan dulu oleh pengurus. Awalnya usul pemblokiran Anda itu lebih lama dari enam bulan. Jadi itu sudah diringankan. Gombang ( talk) 14:13, 15 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Yaelah, Anda mainan pake kosakata jargon di Warkop WBI biar yang tidak setuju ama pemblokiran saya ini jadi tenang, gitu ! Anda bilang kayak gitu biar para pengurus di WBI tidak dipandang diskriminatif dengan beberapa WBIwan dan tidak dipandang pilih kasih ? Pasalnya kalo kayak gitu maksudnya tidak usah dikatakan karena yang mereka inginkan adalah perpendekan masa blokir di saat masa blokir, bukannya perpendekan usulan masa blokir sebelum masa blokir Itu bukan memperpendek namanya tapi memperpendek tapi dalam pengusulannya, gimana seh ? Oh ya, coba deh liat 2 pranala ini :
serangan pribadi serta makian (dalam bahasa Inggris) 1
makian dalam bahasa Inggris 2
Yap, kedua pranala tersebut menunjukan makian kasar nggilani lan ngedani dalam bahasa inggris yang melebihi makian saya dari salah satu pengguna bernama Serenity. Serenity itu termasuk dalam pengguna lama dari WBI tapi masih berstatus pengguna WBI biasa namun setidaknya keseniorannya telah terkemuka mengingat ia salah satu pembangun Wikimedia Indonesia. Tapi betapa anehnya jika Anda dan saya melihat makian itu yang ternyata dibuat oleh seorang senior. Geleng geleng kepala saya. Saya liat log pemblokirannya ternyata lagi hanya pernah diblokir selama palingan 2 jam dalam 2X berturut-turut. Yalah mungkin karena dia kontributor WBI senior yang lagi stress jadi terpaksa dilakukan pemblokiran untuk ya palingan penenangan aja. Tapi bagaimana dengan saya yang juga udah WBIwan aktif diblokir sampai 6 bulan ? Yalah mungkin karena saya pernah diblokri karena melakukan hal keburukan yang sama sehingga segitu lamanya. Memang benar demikian. Dulu pernah diblokir selama seminggu dan sebulan. Tapi masak sih sebagai kontributor terpandang didemikiankan ? Kenapa tak 2 jam seperti si Serenity ? Apakah pendaftar tahun 2009 masih dianggap newbie bagi mereka ? Apakah mereka itu WikiVampir sehingga ngelakuin kelakuan kaya ginian ==> id:Wikipedia:Silakan hantam. Bukankah sudah diatur disini bahwa setiap pengguna harus dipikirkan secara positif bahwa mereka ingin berkontribusi yang baik untuk kemajuan di WBI. -- Erik Evrest ( talk) 10:49, 16 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Poinnya kesalahan Anda dinilai sudah cukup berat dan berulang untuk dihukum lebih berat. Soal kontributor terpandang, itu kan pendapat pribadi Anda saja. P.S. Bila Anda ingin berdiskusi lebih lanjut, silakan lakukan lewat surel. Saya tidak akan melayani diskusi di sini lagi. Gombang ( talk) 11:48, 16 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code that was emailed to you.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
• If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 18:11, 16 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

• • Then go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
  • Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
  • Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
  • You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (Your account is now active for 1 year!).
• If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelpcengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
• Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
• Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 18:27, 24 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Sorry for the disruption but apparently the email bot failed. We'll resend the codes this week. (note: If you were notified directly that your email preferences were not enabled, you still need to contact Ocaasi). Cheers, User:Ocaasi 21:17, 24 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Check your email. Enjoy! Ocaasi ^{t | c} 21:43, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply

-Sent again, check your inbox. If that fails, email me at wikiocaasiyahoo.com and i'll reply with your code. Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 20:58, 28 January 2013 (UTC) reply

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC) reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC) reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC) reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi Books & Bytes recipients: The Wikipedia Library has been expanding rapidly and we need some help! We currently have 10 signups for free account access open and several more in the works... In order to help with those signups, distribute access codes, and manage accounts we'll need 2-3 more Account Coordinators.

It takes about an hour to get up and running and then only takes a couple hours per week, flexible depending upon your schedule and routine. If you're interested in helping out, please drop a note in the next week at my talk page or shoot me an email at: jorlowitzgmail.com. Thanks and cheers, Jake Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC) reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC) reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC) reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC) reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC) reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:23, 4 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC) reply

The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC) reply

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:30, 1 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC) reply

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC) reply

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC) reply

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply

19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC) reply

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC) reply

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC) reply

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC) reply

 I invite you to please join the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari.

Hello, we are seeking help with the Sarah Azhari article, created in 2013 & recently the subject of a deletion proposal. At issue was whether or not the Indonesian language sources establish notability. I am inviting you to the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari#Help with Indonesian language sources because you are in the Category:User id-N & have a minimum of 1,000 edits across all Wikimedia projects.

I realize that some of you are very busy while others may no longer be editing. Nevertheless, I thought it wise to consult with you.

Thank your for the work that you do on Wiki[mp]edia! Peaceray ( talk) 21:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC) reply