I am not an administrator so I cannot help you with this. I think that the proper place to place your request would be Wikipedia:Requests for page protection and administrators will take it from there. Rentzepopoulos ( talk) 11:53, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for @ Rentzepopoulos: information. It's so helpful
Hello Kim Dong Kyu,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Angel's Knock for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Meatsgains ( talk) 19:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Airwarcrystalcastlesnap.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ( Talk • Contribs • Owner) 17:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Airwarcrystalcastlesnap.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 19:19, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. 183.171.180.244 ( talk) 14:12, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
The article Assalamu Alayka (Maher Zain song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of independent notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
JTtheOG (
talk) 19:54, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Big Enough (Kirin J. Callinan song), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages EDM and Country song ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:08, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Forced conversion, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 13:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
@ Acroterion:Wtf are you blind? I gave it OBVIOUSLY. The reference is broken. It says "404" and you say i'm dOn'T gIviNg A vALId rEASoN? Kim Dong Kyu Speaking 13:32, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gotta Be You (2NE1 song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:28, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
There are sources calling Hotline Bling a single off of Views. There are no sources calling Dynamite a single off of Be. Yea it’s a single, and yea it’s included on the album, but unless there are sources saying 'Bts new single off of their new album, Dynamite' or something like that, we can’t include it as that would be WP:SYNTH and WP:OR. So please self-revert (revert your edit) until we have sources saying the song is a single off of the album. D🐶ggy54321 ( let's chat!) 19:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Dynamite (BTS song) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. (CC) Tbhotch ™ 19:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Taurus (astrology), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ceres. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:34, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Nehme1499. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to LGBT rights in Lebanon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Nehme 1499 18:24, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
The consensus was to delete the bubblegum dance article, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bubblegum dance. Please do not restore it again. Schazjmd (talk) 14:58, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello GogoLion! Your additions to Styles of pop music have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 16:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Hey. As I see, you mainly basing and creating hierarchy according to Allmusic. I don't recommend doing that, as there are a lot of mistakes, conventions and inaccuracies. Their hierarchy often feels senseless and way too random, not talking about that it has not been updated for 15 years already. For example, they use the whole New Age category as a group of everything that doesn't fit in the other categories, while for traditional folk music they sometimes use 3 different entries for the same genre, placing it in 3 different places in the hierarchy. Their Pop/Rock hierarchy also seems random for many things there. After building this excessive list of genres over the last six months, which is based on 5-8 external catalogues (incl current wiki's categorizing), I recommend you to use as a basis Rate Your Music's hierarchy: rateyourmusic.com/genres. They back up every genre and its place in the hierarchy by external sources (including allmusic, when their placement makes a sense; but when it comes to newly arisen genres sources are often non-reliable enough for wiki's policy tho), and also it's the most objective one you can find in the internet - quite a large community every time discuss every move and edit regarding music genres and always comes to consensus on the placing genre in the hierarchy, i.e. doing wiki's job. Yes, on wikipedia RYM is considered non-reliable. But most edits on RYM are also based on external sources, discussed in excessive detail and simply logical. The sources they use can be found in the any genre's editing history. So I think it's just right to use their hierarchy (but also look up for additional sources to move it to Wikipedia). Solidest ( talk) 19:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Nope. I also found some mistakes on RYM. - GogoLion ( talk) 09:58, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
You say user-generated editing site like RYM is more trustable than a site that built by music experts like AllMusic? Do you know who are AllMusic contributors? - GogoLion ( talk) 13:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Binksternet Sir, maybe you could explain to him about RateYourMusic credibility? GogoLion ( talk) 22:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Metropopolis and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 30#Metropopolis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 21:12, 30 December 2021 (UTC)