This is the talk page for God Emperor
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Speedy tag on St. MacCartan's Convent Primary School
I removed your speedy tag from this article as schools are specifically excluded form A7. WP:CSD#A7 states that A7 applies to "An article about a real person, an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools) ..." (my emphasis). There's a long held consensus at AfD that articles on primary schools and their equivilant should be redirected somewhere sensible that (hopefully) mentions them so have done so. Dpmuk ( talk) 20:18, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Just a friendly note on Matt speziani. I declined your no content speedy deletion request because there was definitely enough content to identify the subject. (NFL draft choice). However, a quick gsearch showed the whole thing was a load of bull, so I deleted it as a G3 vandalism. HTH!-- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:50, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, I saw that you had redirected it, and was about to ask someone if a page like this was supposed to be redirected or deleted. Thanks for deleting it, I wasn't completely sure if Userpage: was a correct page space. -- Christopher Kraus ( talk) 21:22, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Just a friendly note on Lynwood Slim. I declined your speedy deletion request, because there were clear claims of importance (winning awards). If you think this article still needs to go, AfD would be the way to go.-- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. Please be more careful when tagging articles for speedy deletion criterion A1 as you did here. A1 only applies if there is no context at all. In this case, it was easily clear that the article was about and it took me just one minute to clean it up per MOS. Regards So Why 11:04, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Excusa me mr. emperor. I find user name much offensive to me. Please stop remove article that shows much important to me. It is much not offensive as you User name. You are not God, and Not emperor. I ask you please change your name. Leave La Dia De Los Giambios alone. Thanks You WendyGoatsGruff33 ( talk) 21:00, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Hola amigo, que es la problema? La dia de los Giambios esta muy importante y es funda en la biblioteca del mundo. Muffintops69 ( talk) 20:59, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- GE, thank you for tagging La Dia De Los Giambios for speedy deletion. I have done so. I'm also keeping an eye on the two accounts who commented above, who appear to be interconnected somehow. Cheers. — C.Fred ( talk) 21:08, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
I see you've had some problems tagging articles for speedy deletion in the past...are you a premature evacuator? Muffintops69 ( talk) 13:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks a ton for putting the reflist template on my Osterby Head article. I greatly appreciate it!-- Boy of The Waters ( talk) 17:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
1111tomica ( talk) 16:54, 25 April 2009 (UTC) why have you moved igri bez granici from album without it... yes there is a need for disambiguation because there is a single and album with the same name... 1111tomica ( talk) 16:54, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Bongo matic 11:39, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
I have a feeling that this article will be refused speedy as the New York Times obit gives some notability I would suggest if you still think it doesn't meet notability guidelines then AfD is probably your best option on this thanks and happy editing. BigDunc Talk 11:42, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
Was it you who tagged the Filehippo page for deletion?
pw —Preceding unsigned comment added by PrivateWiddle ( talk • contribs) 13:59, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it was. God Emperor ( talk) 14:01, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
I moved all the information to the more appropriate title List of -cide words. Know, I do not care if my article is deleted.
Hi God Emperor, Hope you don't mind, but I've declined the speedy on Filipciuc Ivan as I think its now salvaged, stubby yes, but not incoherent. PS as you are in Kent have you heard of the London meetups? Ϣere SpielChequers 16:22, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
I thought they were often called Bernardines. Kanguole 12:27, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I misread the page. I have undone my edit. God Emperor ( talk) 16:28, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. Kanguole 23:28, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. You recently redirected "-cides" to -cide following closure of the afd debate for "-cides". Does this mean that the discussion is closed for the other article, List of -cide words, which was added to the discussion as an identical copy of "-cides". God Emperor ( talk) 09:44, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- While I'm happy to answer questions, it looks like your question could have been answered and resolved more quickly if you had used my message wizard. It's linked as "Talk" after my name and at the top of my talk page. Why not try it next time?
- I missed that one. I've redirected it now. Stifle ( talk) 13:50, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Noted, thanks for the heads up. Does Twinkle actually still do that automatically if the pages are accessed from somewhere other than Special:NewPages?--ClubOranje T 11:31, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmm, just tested it, didn't seem to, - accessed from Special:Contributions/newbies and refreshed Special:NewPages, still unpatrolled and had to mark manually, and I had definitely let it finish. Will keep an eye on that and check next few I do.--ClubOranje T 11:42, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that you have listed Andy Biggs as an afd on the photography page. I'm going to support the deletion, but I noticed their is actually no afd on the Andy Biggs page so you might want to add it. Jenafalt ( talk) 07:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey bro, we all know the helicopter army guys picture is never going to be promoted, but it's not so constructive ripping the newbie to shreds about it. It is a pretty striking image at (small) thumbnail, I don't blame them for thinking "Hey this image is pretty cool, I wonder if it could be a FP". Peace! Aaadddaaammm ( talk) 20:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Look at his last edit to his user page... Aaadddaaammm ( talk) 08:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I've added an alternate version to the Featured Picture Candidate: The "New" Blue Marble. As you have already voted at the nomination (linked above), could you please give some feedback or show a preference between the original or the alt? Thank you for your time. Dusty777 ( talk) 21:16, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, God Emperor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, God Emperor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, God Emperor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)