From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, AFC Bournemouth, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite ( talk) 17:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC) reply

League 1 Table

Hi, I have reverted your marking of Wimbledon and Doncaster as relegated on the league table template as they can in theory still stay up, even though it's unlikely because of the amount of goal difference they are behind by. Stifle ( talk) 13:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Stop marking all of your edits as minor

Information icon Hi GeorgeClashesWaterfall! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at 2022 EFL Championship play-off Final that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Sundayclose ( talk) 18:18, 31 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Eponymous

Please don't add "eponymous" to an album article if the title of the album and the name of the artist(s) are in the first sentence. It's redundant and very bad writing. "Eponymous" means "named for". It's unnecessary to say "The Beatles is an album named for The Beatles by The Beatles". Adding it just creates a problem that others have to fix. I understand that it is often added to articles, but most of the time it is done incorrectly and then copied from one article to another. Please don't revert again before carefully reading WP:BRD. When someone removes something from an article for good reason that is explained in an edit summary, it is inappropriate for you to revert it back without first discussing and getting consensus on the article's talk page. That is disruptive editing. If it happens repeatedly it can result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

De Mysteriis Dom Sathanas

Twice I've reverted your edits saying this is their debut album, when they'd debuted long before in the 1980s with Deathcrush and various other demos. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 21:50, 24 November 2022 (UTC) reply