|
|
Archives: no archives yet ( create) |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3650 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 60 sections are present. | |
|
Larry Monroe (radio personality)
Would you care to indicate why you removed the link from this page without an explanation?
BuffaloBob (
talk) 04:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
I just want to say a huge "Thanks!" for repeatedly coming in and fixing my spelling and grammar at Resolute desk as I am working on adding references and info to it. Spelling and grammar are my week points, I just like researching, so your fixes are very much appreciated!-- Found5dollar ( talk) 23:45, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Found5dollar Thank you! I'm enjoying seeing what tidbits you come up with. Love the JFK Jr photo. GA-RT-22 ( talk) 23:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Re: Carlene Carter.
You'll find the Nashville Ledger at www.tnledger.com. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Music Row Pro ( talk • contribs) 03:14, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi GA-RT-22. Thanks for your edit and message. I tried adding a link to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx06XNfDvk0 but that link was disallowed. The irregular rhythm is a slight extension between beats in the song at 2:04 and 2:47. Can you hear it? I guess some observations for example "The zebra is a quadruped" at /info/en/?search=Quadrupedalism are less in need of a reference. Maybe this irregular rhythm observation is so inconspicuous that it does need a reference. Any thoughts? Best wishes, Glen -- GlenCrust ( talk) 20:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! Have done so...-- GlenCrust ( talk) 20:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
I've given the user a month's block - hope that will do the trick. Deb ( talk) 14:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Grahaml35 ( talk) 18:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michigan Medicine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albert Kahn. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
I'm not interested in an ego battle when over 50 men have died in the most hideous circumstances, so I will leave your communities own article as a reference. USS Thresher. I know you were not being nasty, but these circumstances are not unique. 82.17.104.156 ( talk) 17:07, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Wonder if you can fix this minor goof? The article states, “William Shelley, a foreman at the depository, also testified that he saw Oswald making a phone call on the first floor”. Shelley actually said Oswald was “near” the phone, not talking on the phone. 213.104.125.141 ( talk) 12:09, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Discovered another minor goof: the article says that Oswald told Holmes he was “working on an upper floor when the shooting occurred, then went downstairs”. Looking though Harry Holmes testimony, especially on page 306, it is clear what Holmes meant where Oswald said he encountered the officer: ...as I started to go out and see what it was all about, a police officer stopped me just before I got to the front door, and started to ask me some questions... Mr. BELIN. By the way, where did this policeman stop him when he was coming down the stairs at the Book Depository on the day of the shooting? Mr. HOLMES. He said it was in the vestibule. Mr. BELIN. He said he was in the vestibule? Mr. HOLMES. Or approaching the door to the vestibule. He was just coming, apparently, and I have never been in there myself. Apparently there is two sets of doors, and he had come out to this front part. Mr. BELIN. Did he state it was on what floor? Mr. HOLMES. First floor. The front entrance to the first floor. Mr. BELIN. Did he say anything about a Coca Cola or anything like that, if you remember? Mr. HOLMES. Seems like he said he was drinking a Coca Cola, standing there by the Coca Cola machine drinking a Coca Cola. Based on this, I think the paragraph regarding Holmes on the “Police interrogation” section should be reflected to say “Holmes (who attended the interrogation at the invitation of Captain Will Fritz) said that Oswald replied that he was at the “front entrance to the first floor” when he encountered a policeman.” [1] 213.104.125.141 ( talk) 08:02, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Could you rewrite Holmes saying Oswald’s encounter took place at the first floor entrance? The Jack Ruby article in the “killing of Oswald” section, reads, “Oswald made a cry of anguish and his manacled hands clutched at his abdomen as he writhed with pain, and he slumped to the concrete paving, where he moaned several times. A moaning Oswald was carried back into the basement level jail office. He lost consciousness shortly thereafter.” This could be added within the Oswald article, in the paragraph of the "murder" section, worded something along the lines of:
In addition, the paragraph about the police detective (identified as Billy Combest on the Jack Ruby article) who shouted an expletive as Ruby shot Oswald could be removed as this fits more appropriately on Ruby’s article and doesn’t connect with Oswald himself. Billy Combest’s testimony to Oswald shaking his head in one last declaration before he lost consciousness on the Jack Ruby article also fits more on LHO article than JR. The Ruby article even says “point blank range” rather than “close range”. Could this be another change as well, or does it depend on experts’ determination of the bullet range? The muzzle flash from Ruby’s pistol burned Oswald's sweater, from what I read. 217.137.41.147 ( talk) 08:13, 29 October 2021 (UTC) I think Oswald’s reaction at the midnight press conference as written by Bugliosi is pertininent, and WP:NPOV requires that we present various sides of a story, if there are good sources. Bugliosi is an excellent source, and I see no problems with his book cited in the “Arrest at the Texas Theatre” lines, like how it is cited in the “interrogation” section. The sentence that could be rewritten is this: “Later, at an arranged press meeting, a reporter asked, "Did you kill the President?" and Oswald – who by that time had been advised of the charge of murdering Tippit, but had not yet been arraigned in Kennedy's death – answered, his voice breaking, "No, I have not been charged with that. In fact, nobody has said that to me yet. The first thing I heard about it was when the newspaper reporters in the hall asked me that question." [2] A reporter informed Oswald that he had been charged. Oswald reacted with a look of dismay. [3] If you can’t see the quote, it’s also on the “parkland” book. [1] 217.137.41.147 ( talk) 08:45, 30 October 2021 (UTC) LHO suggestionsDon’t forget the above suggestions for the Lee Harvey Oswald article. 80.2.22.199 ( talk) 15:45, 4 November 2021 (UTC) This could be added within the Oswald article, under the last paragraph of the "Other investigations and dissenting theories" section, worded something along the lines of:
In the more detailed and scholarly works concerning Oswald, I think Bugliosi’s comment on Oswald’s reaction and Harry Holmes testimony as to what floor Oswald was on when he encountered the officer should go on the article. 62.254.70.42 ( talk) 09:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC) References
|
Hey, thanks for adding a photo to my Joshua Scott Jones article. However, do you have something more recent and that reflects that he's a solo artist? Cteddie1 ( talk) 20:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)cteddie1
Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. -- rchard2scout ( talk) 14:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- @
Rchard2scout: Thanks, although if you look closely you'll see that my auto-archiver doesn't really do anything. I'm curious though, how did you spot this?
GA-RT-22 (
talk) 16:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- ( talk page watcher) I was going to ping you about the settings right after you added it, we know because your talk page is on (at least mine) my watchlist. - FlightTime ( open channel) 16:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
If you care to do it yourself, just click view details on image and it should bring you to commons page. In desktop mode on the left side menu is a link "nominate for deletion". Its a wizard that does the work for you. Slywriter ( talk) 00:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Ronnie Spector
On 16 January 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ronnie Spector, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 19:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I just tried to edit the List of American state and local politicians convicted of crimes article but because I didn't have a long standing account I wasn't able to, so i've just made one. I saw that you were someone who had edited it before so I was wondering if you might add some more editions to the page at all as I have sourced them all.
Developigng ( talk) 15:40, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
The Herve Villachaize recording was never released by LAPD. A simple google search will tell you there is no recording to be found on the internet. Thus LAPD has never made this public (the recording of his suicide). So I think you should put this back into the article. Up to you. Photolarry ( talk) 05:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)photolarry
Thank you for reverting on the Titanic talk page, it's a shame you undid your revert so I've had to revert it back again. The discussion on this silly issue hasn't produced a policy reason to refactor another editor's comment. Canterbury Tail talk 21:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, the discussion was so long I didn't read it and assumed it had been resolved.
GA-RT-22 (
talk) 22:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
- No worries, no reason to get yourself involved. Probably best not to :) Canterbury Tail talk 22:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Partially restoring part of your changes. [2] I will take it to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling because most articles about pro wrestlers use the same format. So WP:PW members can talk about it and reach a consensus. -- Mann Mann ( talk) 04:13, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- The discussion: Removing "currently" from the lead of articles about pro wrestlers -- Mann Mann ( talk) 04:39, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
I would like to extend my thanks for reverting my edit on "Titanic" as I was not previously aware of that convention, but I do wonder why that is the case? L'Mainerque ( talk) 21:31, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- It's nautical nonsense, as Spongebob would say. Like calling ships "she". I wouldn't call the singer "The Taylor Swift", she's just "Taylor Swift". Same with ships. If you check the archives at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships you'll probably find a discussion.
GA-RT-22 (
talk) 23:14, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- I would obviously not call Swift that either. I have a tendency to write the same as how I would speak it, and using "The" when introducing a ship made sense to me, my bad. L'Mainerque ( talk) 03:24, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
I noticed you
removed an archive URL with an edit summary of "this is the second time someone has added this bogus archive url, can we stop now please?"
I'm not exactly sure I know what this means. Could you please clarify?
Nythar (
💬-
🍀) 03:57, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- It doesn't support the material it's attached to. Please discuss on the article talk page. GA-RT-22 ( talk) 03:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, GA-RT-22,
It's important that every time you tag a page for any type of deletion (CSD, PROD or AFD/RFD/MFD/etc.), you post a notification on the talk page of the page creator. This is especially important with Proposed deletion because there may be ways of addressing the deletion rationale before the week-long period is over. Most editors handle these notifications by using Twinkle to tag pages for deletion. It's an editing tool that helps with so many processes, it basically remembers templates so that editors don't have to or go to search to see what templates to use for warning editors or setting up deletion discussions or reporting editors to noticeboards. You just need to set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator" and then when you tag a page for deletion, Twinkle will post these notices on your behalf. Twinkle will even maintain deletion logs for you if you want to keep track of what's happened to articles you've tagged for deletion. I encourage you to give it a try. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 20:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi! could you explain your reasoning a tad further on this revert? thanks ^.^ (not a big deal, just wondering) -- Licks-rocks ( talk) 20:11, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- The article is about OceanGate, so it's not necessary to repeat the name of the company in the caption. I see now that we never say he was the CEO, so that should be added, but it should go somewhere in the History section, not in the caption. Please discuss this on the article talk page.
GA-RT-22 (
talk) 20:16, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- I've attempted to accommodate your objection in my subsequent change, and left an explanation of my considerations in the edit summary. any further discussion we can take to the article talk page if you feel it's neccesary. Cheers! 👍 -- Licks-rocks ( talk) 20:34, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Your unwarranted tampering with my profile is not appreciated.
-Kenneth L. Kantor 2601:644:200:EDD0:455:7BBF:B80D:1ECA ( talk) 07:18, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- If you are Kenneth L. Kantor, you have an undeclared conflict of interest. Please read our COI guideline at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. At the very least you need to disclose your COI; see WP:DISCLOSE.
- Also please take a look at WP:V. When you add or change anything on Wikipedia you need to provide a citation to a reliable source. If you don't do this, your changes can and will be challenged and reverted. GA-RT-22 ( talk) 13:10, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello GA-RT-22!
- The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg)
Lisa Marie has been dead for 8 months. Slimdog45 ( talk) 15:19, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
GART, I wanted to thank you again for your note of July 15 about putting the ref tag immediately after the fact being cited and to make sure that there isn't a space. Since then, I haven't had an edit conflict from a bot fixing the spaces problem. I appreciate the very practical advisory. Mandsford 13:57, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry for assuming you were doing this to make some kind of point.
GA-RT-22 (
talk) 14:00, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- No problem, we're good... Mandsford 18:35, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
I understand the rationale for Special:Diff/1195760959, but I will tell you why the article is written that way: it is the station's city of license. I changed this to "licensed to", which I feel to be a bit too jargony for the lead of an FA, for now.
Unlike most businesses, broadcast stations in the U.S. (and some other countries) are identified with certain communities not by the location of their physical plant (studios or transmitter) but by a formal community of license designation. Legally and in station IDs, the station is licensed to Detroit, though its facilities may be elsewhere. Sometimes, the inverse happens: a station is licensed to a nearby suburb and has its studios and/or transmitter in the largest city in the area (e.g. KCPQ, which has not had studios in Tacoma, Washington, since 1997, or KPNX, which has not had studios in Mesa, Arizona, since 1953 or so).
Ever since the abolition of the FCC's main studio rule, some stations—primarily minor broadcasters of satellite-fed national commercial or religious programming—do not have a studio facility in the area where they broadcast. WPXG-TV (covered in WBPX-TV) is a good example. Its transmitter is in Epsom, New Hampshire. Its city of license is Concord, New Hampshire. Its main studio on paper? 312 Walnut Street, Suite 2800, Cincinnati, Ohio. Yet calling WPXG-TV, or WBPX-TV, or any Ion Media station a "Cincinnati station" would be contrary to anyone's expectations. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)