You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Carl Freer. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing.Pichku (
talk) 10:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Technically, it was not yet edit warring, and I had already stopped reverting and sought assistance. But nice to see that you got your last revert in before accusing me, I hope it made you feel good. —
Fugu Alienking (
contribs) 15:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Technicalities and
WP:Wikilawyering is not allowed on wikipedia and I feel appalled at your way of putting this. Now you have reverted again partially. A revert means changing content of another user in
whole or in part. I suggest you revert yourself to clear your self from this violation. --
Pichku (
talk) 10:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)reply
By your definition, every edit on Wikipedia is a revert. I reiterate my previous suggestion for you to carefully study
WP:OWN and consider your own actions toward the
Carl Freer article. —
Fugu Alienking (
contribs) 12:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)reply