An editor has asked for a deletion review of Image:Twiggy promo.jpg. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — An gr 22:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I have noticed that you have deleted the image File:Arashk Band.jpg which I had uploaded before by using the comment "Replaceable fair use". Sorry, But I can not understand what you mean as it is not explained in Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted?. This picture is released in [1] and represents the image of Living Persons. Maybe last time I forgot to mention its source... -- Xaqzasta 11:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Ed, could you provide the specific reason and link to policy (as specifically as possible) for your removal of Heroes images? I'd like to know what we can do to remedy what you see as a problem. Also, could you provide an example of an article using a screenshot in a way that you feel does follow proper fair use? -- Milo H Minderbinder 16:34, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
WTF? the screenshots weren't just a "gallery", they were used to illustrate the progress made during evolution of Windows CE. What's the next step, maybe purging Wikipedia:Main Page/Screenshots of anything but Mozilla shots? -- tyomitch 15:13, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
You deleted four images with the following statements:
All four of these images met Wikipedia criteria for posting and were documented on the page as to why they met the criteria. You removed those images. So I have three questions:
-- Paul McDonald 15:18, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
The license drop down box is a collection of shortcuts to commonly used licenses. Some images are allowed under fair use - however it also contains some "traps" - such as for buildings and living people - that automatically get marked for deletion. The reasoning is that if people get a "you can't upload that picture" warning they might pick a wrong license instead. Deleting images which we know are copyvios is much easier than detecting copyvios that have been labelled as "My work: GFDL licensed". As for uploading your own work, it's up to you which license you choose, although you are limited to ones which allow free redistribution and modification. I suggest also uploading to Wikimedia Commons so the images can be used across projects. The drop down box also gives some suggestions for licenses under "Your own work (best practises)". ed g2s • talk 19:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Please see my humble comments to the template. This affects the featured article of the California Gold Rush and many other WP:CAL project pages. Ronbo76 11:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Er, that's great - but neither you, nor WP:CAL own any articles. ed g2s • talk 11:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi ed, you contributed actively to a discussion of the use of colors in Infoboxes for television episodes. In a drive towards limiting the amount of spin-offs of Template:Infobox Television episode, this issue has again come up, and I was wondering if you would care to comment on my ideas to come to a "best effort solution". Thank you for your time. TheDJ ( talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 04:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
An image uploaded by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
Image:Jack plug.png, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
KFP (
talk |
contribs) 20:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Are you the leader (or whatever it may be called) of the project United Nations? Yaanch 17:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.
Thank you. — Remember the dot ( t) 18:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm just a little confused at the moment as to why the image was deleted. As far as I know, I had what I took to be a fairly good reason (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong), and, at the time it was deleted, the image had been tagged for 15 days, at which point I assumed the debate had been abandoned. Can you shed a little light for me please? -- JB Adder | Talk 13:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lcd layers.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Remember the dot ( t) 17:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ed, I wanted to let you know that I am undeleting the Jim Gray image you deleted recently. The reasons I feel it no longer is a violation of the first fair use rule are: subject is now dead, so no new free photos can be made, and a Creative Commons search on Flickr, Yahoo, and Google did not yield any free images. -- Zippy 23:21, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
While I might disagree on the pertinence of many deletion, I'm not opposing them, however, what I do want to gripe about is the apparent frequent occurences of deletions that do not even attempt to remove the links to these articles. It is my belief that littering articles with red image links is more damageable than having Fair Use images that might be replaceable, but are still consistent with the spirit, if not the law of WP:FUC. To take a specific example,when you deleted Image:Mharris.jpg, Image:Mcguinty77.jpg and Image:Eves.jpg, you created 14 redlinks, 3 of which in a featured list, not counting those that probably have been since caught since. Please take the time to deal with this issue when deleting images. Circeus 23:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
You might wanna check the upload history. I uploaded an older image that was subsequently replaced (and I assume deleted by that upload by the system) with the one up for deletion done by another user. I merely helped in trying to sort out the fairuse stuff in a couple of areas. Ergo, your message was wasted to a now non-existant image that is acredited to me. Sorry that Wikipedia's coding problems led to the mixup. -- 293.xx.xxx.xx 20:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello! Tonight, I happened to stumble upon two articles containing broken transclusions of images deleted by you. Do you routinely delete these images without orphaning them? If so, why? — David Levy 04:53, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Do you still need somebody to code the bot? I don't totally understand what is going on but I should be able to do it. BJ Talk 05:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Awarded to Ed g2s for improving Wikipedia with your photographic skills and contributions. You are appreciated! Cricket02 14:35, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
(kit template is for general colours, not sponsors etc. (they're also a copyright violation))
sponsors? its the bloody team name.... a lot of work went into those custom kits, the whitecaps fan community appreciated them, why would you remove them... i have permission to use the whitecaps logo... i know the entire front office staff and the director of soccer operations, Bob Lenarduzzi
and ive seen custom kits on other pages, are the whitecaps no good enuf to have custom kits...
- Morbital
Why haven't you informed me that you proposed EV-In.svg for deletion? It's your responsability to tell me, cuz i'm the uploader if you didn't know. Armando.O talk • Ev 03:17, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed that you've removed all of the photos from today's FA. I understand you have good rationale for doing this, but I think having no photos in the main page FA makes Wikipedia look bad. Equally, Wikipedia would look bad by misusing photos in the main page FA.
Could I therefore invite you to check articles at FAC rather than waiting for it to appear on the main page? That particular article was at FAC for nearly a month. There was discussion there about the images fair use licensing, size, position, captioning etc and the cricket WikiProject would have welcomed your input at that point.
To that end, I'd like you to take a look at some other FAs and one nominee that I'm involved with, to check their images, Paul Collingwood, Adam Gilchrist and West Indian cricket team in England in 1988. Thanks, -- Dweller 12:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. Learning loads. Generally speaking (ie not just about this particular article) I would presume that the "decorative" issue becomes quite subjective and difficult to deal with, with POV issues coming into play. -- Dweller 12:51, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Please, don't vandalise the Evanescence article. If you to test something, try the Wikipedia:Sanbox. Armando.O talk • Ev 21:03, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
You have made a revert, but between the last version and the version you reverted, were m,any significant edits. I'm also reporting you, you have violated the WP:3RR policy. Sorry, but you may be blocked. Armando.O talk • Ev 00:02, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Ed g2s, when you removed your earlier note and changed the indentation level of Matthew's comment on Wikipedia talk:Fair use you made it appear as if Matthew was replying to Fritz, when he was replying to your comment. If you'd like to withdraw your prior comment, it'd be more polite to Matthew for you to restore your earlier message, but strikeout your comment by putting <s> before and <s> after your comment. Not that I think Matthew's comment is very sensible, mind you :-) — RP88 14:14, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
[3] I knew I recognised that jumper and untidy mop. Sorry if idle banter isn't allowed on your talk page by the way. ...adam... 18:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
It's a fair point. Some day I would like to be as right as you are, but until then it's all a bit hit and miss. I'm learning though. ...adam... 18:38, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Regrading this edit, is there any specific reason you changed the style of the template? -- Bluerain talk 18:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I wondered if you could cast an eye over the images in this (the article itself is currently at peer review, if you want to comment on the text) before I take it to FAC! Much obliged. -- Dweller 20:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I'm requesting some photos from friends which I plan to upload. I've never done this before. What do my friends need to do to make them free use? Where will I find idiot-proof instructions to uploading, so I don't screw it up? :-) Cheers, -- Dweller 09:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_Seven_Network_slogans&action=history — pd_THOR | =/\= | 00:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello:
I noticed that you deleted the image image:DanielMendelsohn.jpg last month. I received express permission for use of the headshot from the photographer, Matthew Mendelsohn, brother of the subject -- as I specifically noted in the image description. It should be returned.-- Leflyman Talk 21:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
If an image is replaceable then replace it, simple eh? Wikipedia should have good articles after all. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dmanning ( talk • contribs).