Another editor has added the "{{ prod}}" template to the article Mythology of Mexico, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{ prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot ( talk) 22:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I have proposed an article that you have created for deletion. The article about Mythology of Mexico is not written in an encyclopedic style but is rather a collection od anecdotes, it cites no sources, it frequently misrepresents the origins and content of the tales it contains and it is not aptly named. I suggest that you rework the article completely into an actual encyclopedic style and move it to a more suitable title: for example "Mexican folklore" or something in that vein. In English the word mythology, as I believe it is also the case for the Spanish word mitología, is normally used for tales with an origin within a religious framework. Mexico being as you yourself write in the first paragraph of your article, a country with widely differing cultural and religious roots does not share a single mythology. I understand that many of the tales that you include in the article are widely known within Mexico and are considered a part of the national heritage - but this still does not mean that they form a "Mexican Mythology". They are rather folk tales, although some of them have origins in indigenous mythologies. I hope that you understand my point, and that I have been able to get it across without offending you.
Hola. He nominado para ser borrado un articulo que usted ha escrito. El articulo sobre mitología de México no está escrito en un estilo apto para una enciclopedia, es en efecto una colección de cuentos populares mexicanos, no cita ningunas fuentes, frequentemente se equivoca sobre los origenes de los cuentos y de detalles de los cuentos contenido, y no tiene un titulo apropriado - por lo tanto que México es un país y no una religion. Me permito sugerirle que vuelva a escribir el articulo en un estilo mas apropropiado para una enciclopedia y que lo mueva a un titulo mas apto para su contenido: podría ser por ejemplo "Mexican Folklore" o "Folktales of Mexico". En inglés la palabra "Mythology", como en español mitología, normalmente denota cuentos de origen religioso. México, siendo, como usted escribe en el primer parapho del articulo, un país con varías fuentes culturales y religiosos no comparte una mitología. Entiendo que muchos de los cuentos que usted recuenta en el articulo son muy conocidos en toda la republica y que se consideran parte de la herencia mexicana - pero eso no significa que constituyen una Mitología Mexicana. Más bien son cuentos populares, algunos de los cuales tienen su origen en mitologías indigenas. Espero que entienda mi punto de vista y que no le haya ofendido. ·Maunus· ·ƛ· 23:22, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
The file File:TOLUCAPALACIO.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Low quality file. Better alternative available.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Minorax«¦
talk¦» 04:49, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
The file File:TOLUCACOSMOVITRAL.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Low quality file. Better alternative available.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Minorax«¦
talk¦» 04:49, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
The file File:CARMENTOLUCA.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Low quality file. Better alternative available.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Minorax«¦
talk¦» 04:49, 13 February 2022 (UTC)