Index
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Hi, I noticed in several of your edits to 2024 Noto earthquake (e.g., most recently here) that you've been naming Japanese newspapers as "shimbum"; this is a misspelling. The works in question are spelled "shimbun". For example, Yomiuri Shimbun, The Asahi Shimbun, Sankei Shimbun, Mainichi Shimbun, Kobe Shimbun, etc. :) Best, Rowing007 ( talk) 14:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
| Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive |  |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
( t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Sorry Dora the Axe-plorer, I missed out on that discussion, seems entirely appropriate though. Mikenorton ( talk) 12:55, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Glad you can agree with the redirect. On another note, thanks for updating the NGDC references Dora the Axe-plorer ( explore) 13:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- The NGDC updates pretty much suit by abilities right now - only another 250 or so to go. It's a shame that they didn't reach out in advance like the ISC did recently. I kind of feel that this is something that could be done by a bot, but that's way outside my capabilities, Cheers. Mikenorton ( talk) 13:52, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Where to get past earthquakes in USGS? I can't find the Sawu Sea earthquake on USGS.
Also, for 'considering every global agency as well' is unnecessary because if USGS is the most reliable source, then I agree, but if other agency (especially if it is local agency) recorded it beyond >6.0 M, we need to consider it, making USGS less reliable than it.
Furthermore, I think this is very bad idea, if too dependent on USGS only as it may violate WP:WORLDWIDE. Especially, there are no rigid 'standardization' on wikipedia. Like I said in the talk page, if wanted to only include source from USGS only, consider change it to "List of earthquakes in 2024 by USGS" as the current title "List of earthquakes in 2024" is very misleading to people around the world, including me apparently.
And also, no offense, I'm sorry if I did too bold actions, I just want to help. Peace, EdhyRa ( talk) 06:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @ EdhyRa, I am not the coordinator of Wikipedia, so do reach out to Mikenorton on his inputs. He's been around longer than I have so he has a better perspective of things.
- Note that WP:WORLDWIDE is not a guideline hence cannot be violated. The USGS covers earthquakes globally (M4+) so I don't see any issue with that even if it was a policy.
- The Savu Sea event is
here
Dora the Axe-plorer (
explore) 07:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reach out, I just checked, and it indeed has 5.7M on USGS. The distance is also different, 104 km from BMKG, 85 km from USGS.
- If in the end, the Sawu Sea earthquake is not included, then I'm legawa. Legawa is Indonesian-ism of Javanese word legowo. If using Google Translate it translated to 'relieved', but I think is mistranslated. Legawa is more like 'surrender/give up, but with good/happy feeling – not the usual resent one'.
- Also, pardon me for bits of broken English, I'm from Indonesia, a Javanese currently living in Malang. The 6.4M East Java earthquake in 22 March 2024, I felt that – my first earthquake tbh. After that, I become interested in List of earthquakes in 2024, so yeah I'll admit include the Sawu Sea earthquake is may kinda bias from myself.
- Best regards,
EdhyRa (
talk) 07:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Your English is fine, don't worry. Glad you have an interest in Wikipedia's Earthquake project.
- you may still raise the USGS ref problem in the talk page. But I just see it as standardisation sake. Dora the Axe-plorer ( explore) 09:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello Dora the Axe-plorer,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
ITN recognition for 2024 Taiwan earthquake
On 5 April 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Taiwan earthquake, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Harvici ( talk) 09:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Remember Wikipedia is not a place for personal attack, next time you will be reported, i edited the article long before you, you are no one to judge which is problematic and which is not check July 2022, alswo I gave WP:RS. Anyway I don't want to engage with Wp:EW but this is a STRICT warning, next time you falsely accuse me of problematic edit be ready to be reported! See WP:ASPERSIONS. I am a busy person now and to avoid WP:EW which seems to be your desire will refrain now but will add it later again when am free, but if you are gonna edit Wikipedia follow the rules and never engage in Personal Attack! Dilbaggg ( talk) 09:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- And your reply here is a threat whichI can also report FYI@ Dilbaggg Dora the Axe-plorer ( explore) 09:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- This is not a reply it is called a warning, we have the right to warn those who violate Wikipedia guidlines, anyway unlike your aggressive
WP:EW mentality edit I decided not to start content dispute now as per
WP:TRR, but I warn you again not to leave personal attacks on your edit summary and I will fix the mess later, no time to seek
WP:DR at the moment cause of my busy life but hope to fix it tgo the actual older version where this entry was there before when I am free.
Dilbaggg (
talk) 10:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- @
Dilbaggg Falsely accusing someone of personal attacks when you don't have evidence is a problem. You are not warning, you are threatening me without basis. Present your evidence
Dora the Axe-plorer (
explore) 10:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- This is again another warning, be grateful that I did not report you yet, see edit summary you canot change it
[1] quoting you " Disrupting the list", "causing problems" these are personal attacks, check
WP:ASPERSIONS, I am letting you also cause you are new to the guidelines, but do not test my patience, I gave valid reason and long before you started editing this entry was removed without proper consensus, I hope you can learn from this mistake, anyway it may be added back later as it was removed without consensus, sadly I am currently kinda busy and don't want
WP:TRR broken, but do not engage in personal attacks again and best wishes to you on your future on Wikipedia, take care.
Dilbaggg (
talk) 10:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- The list has been ranked with the top 10 entries, you added an additional one to make it 11, that's not disruptive?
Dora the Axe-plorer (
explore) 10:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- I did that cause I didn't want to remove the 1920 earthquake just yet, we are allowed to change the title, check the title before 2010, then before 2020, titles can change, ok maybe it wasn't right to change title heading but I did that to not exclude the 1920 earthquake just yet but if any gets removed than its that one, as the list is of the highest estimated death toll,
WP:RS supports it and check old edits and you can see even 2 years ago 1556 earthquake was there and was removed without consenus. Anyway no hard feelings, you seem to be a good editor, but just don't accuse other editors of wrong things which count as personal attack and assume
WP:AGF and 1556 one can be added back anytime as it was removed without consensus.
Dilbaggg (
talk) 10:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- @ Dilbaggg I started a discussion in the list's talk page, I hope we can find common grounds and agree on something. Dora the Axe-plorer ( explore) 10:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- I did that cause I didn't want to remove the 1920 earthquake just yet, we are allowed to change the title, check the title before 2010, then before 2020, titles can change, ok maybe it wasn't right to change title heading but I did that to not exclude the 1920 earthquake just yet but if any gets removed than its that one, as the list is of the highest estimated death toll,
WP:RS supports it and check old edits and you can see even 2 years ago 1556 earthquake was there and was removed without consenus. Anyway no hard feelings, you seem to be a good editor, but just don't accuse other editors of wrong things which count as personal attack and assume
WP:AGF and 1556 one can be added back anytime as it was removed without consensus.
Dilbaggg (
talk) 10:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- The list has been ranked with the top 10 entries, you added an additional one to make it 11, that's not disruptive?
Dora the Axe-plorer (
explore) 10:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- This is again another warning, be grateful that I did not report you yet, see edit summary you canot change it
[1] quoting you " Disrupting the list", "causing problems" these are personal attacks, check
WP:ASPERSIONS, I am letting you also cause you are new to the guidelines, but do not test my patience, I gave valid reason and long before you started editing this entry was removed without proper consensus, I hope you can learn from this mistake, anyway it may be added back later as it was removed without consensus, sadly I am currently kinda busy and don't want
WP:TRR broken, but do not engage in personal attacks again and best wishes to you on your future on Wikipedia, take care.
Dilbaggg (
talk) 10:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- @
Dilbaggg Falsely accusing someone of personal attacks when you don't have evidence is a problem. You are not warning, you are threatening me without basis. Present your evidence
Dora the Axe-plorer (
explore) 10:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- This is not a reply it is called a warning, we have the right to warn those who violate Wikipedia guidlines, anyway unlike your aggressive
WP:EW mentality edit I decided not to start content dispute now as per
WP:TRR, but I warn you again not to leave personal attacks on your edit summary and I will fix the mess later, no time to seek
WP:DR at the moment cause of my busy life but hope to fix it tgo the actual older version where this entry was there before when I am free.
Dilbaggg (
talk) 10:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Anyway this warning is not a punishment, it is your chance to become a better editor and comply with
WP:NPA and avoid
WP:EW and actually learn guidlines, also I can add it back (after a certain time) as it was originally there long before you came and it was removed without
WP:RfC, a consensus would be needed to remove it, not add it, but am busy for now, good day.
Dilbaggg (
talk) 10:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- BTW telling me you have edited the page before I for personal validation to prove you are "superior" .. tell me that's not a threat/attack Dora the Axe-plorer ( explore) 10:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Anyway this warning is not a punishment, it is your chance to become a better editor and comply with
WP:NPA and avoid
WP:EW and actually learn guidlines, also I can add it back (after a certain time) as it was originally there long before you came and it was removed without
WP:RfC, a consensus would be needed to remove it, not add it, but am busy for now, good day.
Dilbaggg (
talk) 10:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- I am not trying to be superior, I have the right to warn editors about personal attacks! Don't do it again and take care.
Dilbaggg (
talk) 10:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- I strongly disagree with that, looking at the wording in your edit summaries. That felt like an attack and if I interpret it as an attack or threat, it is one, irregardless of your actual intentions. Dora the Axe-plorer ( explore) 11:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- I am not trying to be superior, I have the right to warn editors about personal attacks! Don't do it again and take care.
Dilbaggg (
talk) 10:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
| New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
|
The Writer's Barnstar |
| Thanks for your work on TTPD-related articles so far! I hope you're enjoying the album(s). — Bilorv ( talk) 09:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC) |
- Cheers! Happy listening Dora the Axe-plorer ( explore) 12:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Regarding your creation of this article, we would not stylize the article title like that anyway per MOS:CT and MOS:CAPS. Also, I think you know there was nothing located at So High School, so you should have at least requested a move of So High School (song) at WP:RM/TR, even though this song isn't particularly notable on its own yet, so don't be surprised if another Taylor Swift-focused editor comes along and redirects it. Thank you. Ss 112 04:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- @
Ss112 If you looked into the article history, I was in the midst of developing. I don't have another set of arms to complete two tasks at the same time. Thanks for completing the move
Dora the Axe-plorer (
explore) 05:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- You don't need "another set of arms". Fair enough that you may have been in the process of developing the article, but after creating an article, it would have taken a matter of seconds to pull up another tab (which every modern Internet browser is capable of doing) and navigate to WP:RM/TR to request it be moved. In case you're in the process of making them, not every one of Swift's album tracks needs an article—Ippantekina and another user redirected several you created the other day. All that being said, this isn't to say that you wouldn't have requested the move. But in case you weren't going to, this is also for future reference. Ss 112 14:38, 21 April 2024 (UTC)