If you want to blank this page, that's certainly your prerogative, but I must ask you leave the templates, especially AfD template on Rob Capriccioso as it says:

Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled

And as you can see, it is not yet resolved. Thank you. Ten Thousand Bullets ( talk) 18:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi Dwcash. You appear to have created this account solely to edit pages related to the very specific topics of Inside Higher Ed and Rob Capriccioso. While Wikipedia assumes good faith, please note that it is against Wikipedia policy to create a second account when you are already a registered user, especially with the aim of supporting your original account in arguments by appearing to be a different person with a similar viewpoint. It is also against Wikipedia policy to use an account to support a friend or colleague in a Wikipedia discussion so as to create the illusion of wide consensus from independent parties on a topic. Our policy on such actions can be found at WP:SOCK, and penalties for engaging in it including permanent bannings, and permanent bannings of the account that you are supporting. On the assumption that you are a good faith user who has been editing responsibly for some time and have only recently created an account, or that you were not aware of the relevant policies, can I suggest you avoid taking part in contentious issues until you have built a demonstrable history of good faith edits, to avoid accusations which, whether true or not, may hurt Hochungra in his attempt to create and preserve an article on Rob Capriccioso? Many thanks. - DustFormsWords ( talk) 06:21, 22 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hochungra for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:15, 1 December 2010 (UTC) reply