For older talk see

• User talk:DavidLevinson/Vitamins
• User talk:DavidLevinson/Acts
• User talk:DavidLevinson/Timelines
• User talk:DavidLevinson/Long Names

04:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

The article mentiones border change that include areas annexed by France between 1790-1792. However, I haven't found anything annexed in that period. Which exactly areas were swapped? Cautious 17:54, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

---

== Need help editting an article== Hey David I was just wondering if you could help me to edit a certain article because you are an admin. Its not questions about how to edit, its just something that needs an admin. So please respond, btw I don't really get how to view your response to this so if its not just on this page then please post something on my talk page (obeyel) thank you. Obeyel ( talk) Hi there. Question about "mid-1800s" on Talk:Victorian Internet, could you take a look? -- Manuel Bondarchuk

---

Hi, could you protect West Wickham as there is much vandalism such as the name Con/Cornelius Mendez being repeatedly added, and also Shivan Sheosunker. These are addded by students of Langley Park school for Boys Brainbox_112

---

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Brainbox 112 ( talk • contribs) 20:07, 9 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi and thanks for adding List of employer associations and List of labor unions to List of reference tables. I also added List of stock exchanges to it. These are important in the research we are doing for project http://www.consumerium.org/wiki/ . If you have any leads on if there is a list of "national registries" (or something like that) I'm looking for registers of Companies and Associations it'd be greatly appreciated. -- Juho 18:04 Mar 16, 2003 (UTC)

---

Archinatural is an orphan. Could you find an article or two to link to it? Manuel Bondarchuk 01:46 Apr 16, 2003 (UTC)

I was just getting it off of the Architecture page (since it didn't belong - probably some theory of some architecture grad student, but I don't think its important enough to link from there (given 0 google hits). Maybe a candidate for deletion? -- Manuel Bondarchuk

---

Hello, I don't really have a comment on an article, but I thought I'd say hello to a fellow Quizbowl person! Adam Bishop 22:17 16 Jun 2003 (UTC)

---

Hello

Would you have any transport input to add to the local food article ? Thanks User:anthere

---

I moved energy crisis back. Rationale at Talk:Energy crisis.

---

Thanks for pulling in USPS info to timeline of postal history! I think some of the entries are too minor to merit a mention in global postal history (otherwise you'll have hundreds of entries listing each country's first "simplified postmark" etc), plus a lot of entries are now unclear as to which country they refer to. Of course, if the US was the first to introduce an innovation, then those entries can stay. Stan 19:07 28 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Well, the USPS thing was grabbed from the usps history page, and so of course is biased (and tends towards minutia in later years. Feel free to cut what you think is unimportant, though even a minor change in the US is probably more important (affects more people) than when a minor country issues its first stamp. dml

In case you don't Watchlist Talk:Interstate highway, wanted you to have opportunity to consider checking my full edit beginning

Seeking further discussion of Interstates, including Route Nomenclature

The topics of nomenclature for both Interstates & state routes have been idle 14 months on this Talk:Interstate highway page. Before editing here on the subject, if it has been continued or made a standard elsewhere, can anyone direct me where? ... -- Manuel Bondarchuk

---

I'm in progress on a big edit & getting an edit conflict. How big is yours? -- Jerzy 00:49, 2003 Oct 26 (UTC)

OK, now i know how to survive an edit conflict, and realize the other guy in one can be done & gone when i'm experienceing it, if i'm slow enuf. I'm happy with what you did, & hope you'll be happy with where i went on from there. [smile] -- Jerzy 02:10, 2003 Oct 26 (UTC)

---

Hello. It seems that you are very valuable contributer to wikipedia, but I have not made your acquaintence yet, so I will now say, "Nice to meet you.", -- Alexandros 16:36, 16 Nov 2003 (UTC)

---

Re 4-H: it seldom ceases to amaze me how many and which articles the 'pedia is lacking, and why no-one seems to think of them for so long. Thanks for that one. - Hephaestos 03:26, 8 Dec 2003 (UTC)

--- Much thanks for the help on the external links for the Improved Order of Red Men. Now I understand. Manuel Bondarchuk

--- Just wanted to say "hi" to a anyone who cares about the AFSC :-) -- BCorr ¤ Брайен 23:03, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)

---

Are you sure that Gary Glitter's R&R2 is the theme to Dr Who? Dr Who pre-dates the song by a decade at least - did the theme music change at some time? I also wouldn't cosider R&R2 to be space rock at all. Bob Palin 05:35, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)

search for " Doctorin the Tardis" by the Time Lords, which is a variation on Gary Glitter's song (there have been more than one dr. who theme). Whether it is space rock or glam rock or something else is more subjective (there is no official board of space rock classification), but it is David Bowie like in my mind and he bridged the two. dml

I did search and it says simply that "a rythm" from R&R was used. Gary Glitter practically invented glam rock, in as much as he is like Bowie (and I don't think they are in the same league) it was during Bowie's more showy Ziggy days which are also considered glam rock. There really is no way to consider R&R a space rock tune. I like R&R2 btw, part of my youth.

here is a quote from Wiki on GG "Finally, Leander and Glitter decided that glam rock was the way to go, and began recording "Rock and Roll", a fifteen minute song that eventually became two parts ("Rock and Roll (Part 1)" and "Rock and Roll (Part 2)")."

"Doctorin' the Tardis" is a 1988 remix of the original 1963 Doctor Who theme by Ron Grainer together with Glitter's "Rock and Roll", made by the KLF performing under the name "The Timelords" (see The Timelords for details). It was part of a double A-side single with "What Time is Love". At no time was it the Doctor Who theme music. -- The Anome 16:02, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I am quite certain that watching Doctor Who reruns Saturday nights in the US on PBS in Atlanta c. 1988-89, the opening song was The Timelords version (having checked the MP3). I had always assumed it was older, but I am certain that it was in fact played at the opening of the episode. This may have been a local, US or temporary phenomenon, but somebody remastered at least the Tom Baker episodes for rerelease. Given that Dr. Who is science-fiction-like and involves space travel (as well as spooky Dr. Who sound effects), it is not too much a leap to call The Timelords version space rock. Whether that carries to Glitter, I don't know. dml 15:49, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)

having never seen Dr Who in the US I can't comment on that and I haven't seen much Dr Who at all since the 70s, it was however my favourite program growing up, seems a bit dated now. I think that the original theme for Dr Who was certainly one of the earliest pieces of space rock perhaps only predated by the Tornado's Telstar. These are not just space rock/music because of the space connection, they experiment with "space" related sounds. Of course they weren't called that at the time since the genre didn't exist. I bet that the members of Hawkwind (the best space rock by far) grew up as avid Dr Who fans. Good conversation.

---

Air raid shelter

David, how did you manage to remove all those paras from my air raid shelter article without showing your signature, somehow showing my name against the changes? You are saying instead you had reverted to my own page. I never removed my own pages. Please tell me. -- Dieter Simon 00:48, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I didn't. I don't have magic database access. Perhaps you inadvertantly reverted the page to the last page I had edited, or some other user did (though I don't know how your name would show up unless there is a bug). See User Contributions, the only thing I did on that day was with the World's Fair. Manuel Bondarchuk 12:47, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC).

Yes David, apologies, I have a feeling the site might have a software problem and might be corrupted. I'll try to find someone to take a look at it and see if that's the case. -- Dieter Simon

Can you explain how those pieces of legislation are related to the United States Office of Management and Budget? Kingturtle 02:03, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)

some more so than others, I had a list of important legislation, but not so important that it should go on List of United States federal legislation, so I moved it to the seemingly responsible agency. Some day, there will be an article on each of these (as I find time I will do this, but someone else is free to go first), and if you would like to better classify them, that would be great. dml 20:33, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Hi David, you might be interested in the debate going on at Wikipedia talk:Browse by category. I am somewhat partial to your cleanup, so you might be interested in following and joining in the discussion. I think there have been some good additions by Kenny sh, since the old http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Template:Wikipediatoc&oldid=2530290, but I think the current design is a little cluttered and the language and choice of terms somewhat idiosyncratic (compare to say, Encyclopedia Britannica). -- Lexor| Talk

May be better Thinking instead reasoning in TOC? Kenny 15:22, 2004 Aug 10 (UTC)

I picked reasoning because I wanted something like abstraction, thinking isn't quite the right nuance. Other one word suggestions are welcome dml 21:52, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Hi, Its a good idea of yours to have the main Architecture page on architecture(buildings). Its something I thought of doing after I created the disambiguation page. However, I don't know how long it will last that way because the reason I created the disambiguation page in the first instance was because people kept including the newly, and now equally well used, contexts:-). I will list the Architecture (built environment) page for deletion. KRS 18:13, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)

un-re-direct-ification: I assume making Talk:Architecture into a redirect to Talk:Architecture (disambiguation) was an accident, and fixed it. If we have 2 independent articles (one is not a redirect to the other), then we need 2 independent talk pages, right? -- DavidCary 20:20, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hello, just out of interest, did you realise you might be doing somthing controversial when you included the WB barrier in the category:walls? It's caused quite a controversy... [1] pir 19:32, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed that you depopulated Category:Natural sciences except for its title article, and put the articles in Category:Science. What's the reasoning behind this? Thanks — siro χ o 23:16, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)

Category:Science is linked from the front page. The general idea is that users/readers/editors should be able to find categories with the fewest number of clicks. Going from Category:Science to Category:natural sciences to Category:Biology is 50% more effort (and time with sluggish servers) than simply science to biology. dml 23:32, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Hi there! Thanks for adding the image Image:Michael iii.jpg. It currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, and I was hoping that you would add one as untagged images may be deleted eventually. (You can use {{gfdl}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) Thanks! -- David Iberri | Talk 19:55, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)

done (public domain) dml 12:35, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I happen to find this my most favourite story, so it's on my watchlist. I saw your edit about the king in see also. Please don't do that again, this could be counted as vandalism! - Ta bu shi da yu 23:48, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Don't insult me by threatening me with calling me a vandal. The king did explode (see the article), the items are related, as is obvious, by the potential change in chemistry/build up of gases in large mammals after death. You don't own the story or the article. The fact is correct (as far as is known), it does not interfere with the flow of the article, and is in fact related. Get over yourself. dml 00:46, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Hi!

I'm writing to let you know that the Wikimedia Board of Trustees has approved the first stage of the Wikinews project. There's now a fully operational English demo site at demo.wikinews.org. This will be used for experimenting with various review models and basic policies before the site is launched officially in about a week. demo.wikinews.org will become the English version later.

You voted for the Wikinews project, so I'm asking for your participation now. Everything is open, nothing is final. What Wikinews will and can be depends in large part on you. There already is a global Wikinews mailing list for discussing the project. If you are interested at all, please subscribe -- coordination is of key importance. There's also an IRC channel #wikinews on irc.freenode.net. Realtime discussion can help to polish up articles.

If you're looking for something to do, check out the articles in development and articles in review. Or start a new story in the Wikinews workspace, or ignore the proposed review system - it's up to you. I hope you'll join us soon in this exciting experiment.-- Eloquence * 01:59, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

Would you mind removing your user page from Category:DavidLevinson? I'm trying to help to clean up Category:Orphaned categories, and your category is one that is turning up. It would be helpful (and in keeping with Wikipedia:User_page#What_should_I_avoid.3F) if you would remove your user page from that category and request that it be deleted. -[[User:Aranel| Aranel ("Sarah")]] 15:47, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)

done dml 16:49, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Hi, I've started the Free the Rambot Articles Project which has the goals of getting users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to...

1. ...all U.S. state, county, and city articles...
2. ...all articles...

using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) version 1.0 and 2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to the GFDL (which every contribution made to Wikipedia is licensed under), but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles (See the Multi-licensing Guide for more information). Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. So far over 90% of people who have responded have done this.

Nutshell: Wikipedia articles can be shared with any other GFDL project but open/free projects using the incompatible Creative Commons Licenses (e.g. WikiTravel) can't use our stuff and we can't use theirs. It is important to us that other free projects can use our stuff. So we use their licenses too.

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} template (or {{MultiLicensePD}} for public domain) into their user page, but there are other templates for other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} with {{MultiLicensePD}}. If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know at my talk page what you think. It's important to know, even if you choose to do anything so I don't keep asking. -- Ram-Man 16:24, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)

Should RFC pages be placed on VfD to be deleted? I'm considering removing Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Slrubenstein, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jwrosenzweig and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/John Kenney from WP:VFD. Each of them was listed by CheeseDreams. Your comments on whether I should do this would be appreciated. - Ta bu shi da yu 03:33, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:

• Image:Intstate.gif

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License, {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil| Peter O. ( Talk, automation script)]] 22:04, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

C/D roads are completely different from collector roads and distributor roads. The link to Hierarchy of roads does not belong on Collector/distributor road. -- SPUI 03:37, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Yes, they are different. (Though they have similar functions, collecting and distributing traffic from a higher level road). They are part of the hierarchy of roads however, allowing the separation of access and movement functions, enabling freeways to accomplish things that in their absence they could not. dml 03:39, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The only thing a C/D road allows a freeway to do is reduce weaving on its main lanes. It is simply a special type of ramp, and ramps are never included in the road hierarchy. -- SPUI 03:45, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)

It is a parallel roadway that allows the freeway to operate with less interference (and thus higher speed and flow), by shifting access functions away from the roadway. It is more than a ramp (hence the name C/D road in your terms, or C/D lanes as I have seen (e.g. Interstate 270 in Montgomery County, Maryland). dml 03:47, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)

In the case of I-270, the outer lanes are simply a freeway/arterial-class road. In the case of more minor C/D roads, they are a type of ramp. A collector road takes traffic between local roads and freeways. Ramps usually connect collectors to freeways, and are extensions of the freeway. The C/D road lies between the freeway and the ramps, and thus has nothing to do with a collector road. -- SPUI 03:50, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I made some changes to the hierarchy of roads article, feel free to elaborate. dml 04:05, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Eh, I made some changes, nothing major. I'll leave the link from C/D road, though I still don't really think it should be there, at least the article now discusses them. -- SPUI 04:08, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Dave, hi, I have written an article on Vailsburg, Newark. I wanted it to fit into a template so I wrote copies at Vailsburg, Newark, New Jersey; Vailsburg, Newark; and simply Vailsburg. Could you please delete the copies from Vailsburg, Newark, New Jersey; Vailsburg, Newark. I only want Vailsburg to continue to exist.

dinopup

The standard as far as I can tell is that neighborhoods would use the Vailsburg, Newark, New Jersey format (see the other neighborhoods as an example). Are you sure about this? Also the cat should probably just be Category:Newark, New Jersey Neighborhoods since that is in Category:Newark, New Jersey. dml 18:03, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Where did you obtain the figures for Kiwanis membership? The selected anniversaries and Kiwanis International website had report 600,000 members. -- Paraphelion 16:29, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[2] Kiwanis data. dml 02:16, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Please observe the style concerning the first major contributor to a page. Maurreen 19:29, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I'm interested in some rationale and references pertaining to the changes you made to the Transportation article ( Transportation article diff ) . Cycling as a major form of transport is and has been very popular in China and other countries, has been growing in Denmark and Holland especially, but also in countries like Sweden in recent years, and cities like Stockholm and London. Those countries are among the richest in the world and doing better than most other countries in terms of the Human Development Index (HDI) [3] The underlying causes for the decline in cycling seen in the western world, might well be other than affluency in itself. Perhaps Hollywood and advertising has played a major role. Wikipdia should be Wikipedia:NPOV, but not to the detriment of well argued and well referenced counterpoints to "common sense". I do admit that the contribution of pro-bicycling editor, also lacked somewahat in references though. -- Mokgand 22:04, 25 August 2005 (UTC) reply

I edited the section to be more NPOV and better written. The previous version asserted "sustainability" which is at best a nebulous concept. Evidence is people are more or less selfishly rational when choosing the modes they do given their income, their desire to reach preferred ends, etc. That cycling remains a minor mode in most developed countries, and is shrinking in share as most countries get wealthier is a fact. dml 03:40, 26 August 2005 (UTC) reply

I beg to differ, as I mentioned earlier, citing arguments and examples. Many people who cycle cite the apparrently selfish motivation of better health, and many studies support the notion that cycling might make a difference for health. Odense in Denmark increased cycling by 20% and saved millions in the health sector. I'll gladly give you sources if you want. What sources support your view  ? -- Mokgand 22:58, 3 September 2005 (UTC) reply

See e.g. [4], bike mode share in Beijing was significantly higher than any US city (and is declining as wealth increases). Obviously, some select flat European cities have high bike mode shares. We are not arguing whether or not more biking is a good thing, so that it saved millions in the health sector is quite irrelevant. The facts are simply that as countries develop the automobile gains share at the expense of less preferred modes. This is about analysis not advocacy. dml 23:21, 3 September 2005 (UTC) reply

Don't list Wikipedia:Votes for deletion for deletion, especially not if there is no previous discussion on Wikipedia Talk:Votes for deletion! -- Chris 73 Talk 01:45, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)

Barring unforseen circusmtances, it looks like you're going to win the half-million pool. Congrats. →Raul654 07:02, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)

Seems that way to me as well. Congratulations. -- Alexwcovington ( talk) 08:13, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Looks like the unforseen circumstances (database failure) caused you to slip to second place. Sorry. -- Cyrius| ✎ 21:58, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hi,

re: your club/team certification proposal, I have proposed something very similar in October 2002 [5]. My thinking on peer review has moved on a bit since then; I'm now trying to find a model which maintains uniform standards of quality throughout the project. But I thought you might be interested in reading the discussion thread that developed back then.-- Eloquence * 01:56, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)

There is a major debate going on, and I wondered if you might want to chime in. The debate involves how to deal with franchise moves in baseball. The question is whether Montréal Expos should be its own article or if it should redirect to Washington Nationals. All other instances of franchise moves in MLB redirect the old team name to the new team name, and the history of the franchise is covered within the new team name (for MLB, NBA and NFL examples, see here. Some people are confused and think the Expos and the Nats are different teams. Some people don't want to upset Canadian readers.

Indeed, the Washington Nationals are not a new team - the Montreal Expos franchise has moved to Washington, and the old franchise name should redirect to the new franchise name, just like the 20+ instances of this occuring in Wikipedia. For example, Brooklyn Dodger history resides in the Los Angeles Dodgers article. New York Giants history, including the Shot Heard 'Round the World, resides in the San Francisco Giants article.

If you have the time, maybe you could chime in on the conversation there, Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Montréal Expos. Kingturtle 21:05, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hi,

I noticed that in June 2002 (!!!) you added the datum that Ibn Nafis discovered the circulatory system in 1242 in the article Timeline of medicine and medical technology. However, this disagrees with the date of 1268 given in circulatory system by a whopping 26 years! I looked online for a source to no avail; do you have a reference for the datum in question? I would like to fix whichever article is in need of fixing, but I can't do it without a reference and unfortunately I can't find one myself. (Internal inconsistencies drive me crazy!) Thanks for your help.

- Bryan is Bantman 23:31, May 2, 2005 (UTC)

The timeline data came from Niel Brandt with permission (see Talk page), I don't know more than that. dml 01:08, 3 May 2005 (UTC) reply

I saw your work on the Los Angeles category. To conform with capitalization standards, Category:Los Angeles neighborhoods, with a small "n", would be preferable. Further, I see that you're assigning L.A. companies to that category, which strikes me as an odd choice. Would somehing like "L.A. businesses" be a better choice? Anyway, thanks for the effort. Cheers, - Willmcw 21:50, May 8, 2005 (UTC)

I note you've protected Category:Science twice now as a result of vandalism. However, both times there was only a single instance of vandalism, which is nowhere near enough to warrant page protection. Also, you didn't put Template:vprotected at the top of the page, you didn't put a note on the category talk: page explaining why you'd protected the page, and you didn't add it to Wikipedia:Protected_page#List_of_protected_pages. You should take a look through Wikipedia:Protection policy, these steps are important for keeping track of protected pages and letting people know what's going on with them. Bryan 07:07, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

It is a category linked from the main page, and they are the first thing vandals can get too, hence their high rate of vandalism (see also History, Geography, Personal Life). btw, the Protect this page ought to automatically put on some standard template if it is in fact standard. dml 21:45, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Just wanted to say 'Hi', and make known to you that the article on plastics seems to hold nothing on Polycarbonates. I'm just a dumb double-E working on Drum (Container), but this seems an fairly significant oversight in the article. Since you were involved back near it's genesis, thought you should know. If you don't want to handle the matter, what do you suggest? [[User:Fabartus| fabartus || TalktoMe]] 20:11, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• • Hi, I guess you can take it on if you want. dml 12:34, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hi David, I found you on the list of Wikipedians from Minnesota. I've been working on the Norman Borlaug article and we need some GFDL compatible images, are you in the vicinity of the University of Minnesota St Paul Campus? If so would you be able to take a picture of the bust of Borlaug and/or Borlaug Hall, you can see the non-free pic here Image:Borlaug2003.jpg. Many thanks if you can, and thanks anyway if you can't. --nixie 1 July 2005 03:53 (UTC)

Done and done. Jaberwocky6669 July 2, 2005 14:46 (UTC)

I'm not sure what the protocol is, but I responded to your comment to me on my talk page, but since you haven't answered, I thought I'd just note it here too. Feel free to delete this comment after checking out what I wrote.  :) TimNelson 11:21, 15 July 2005 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your response. I've continued our discussion on the Category_talk:Science page, to make it easier for both of us to follow this via our watchlists. TimNelson 14:24, 15 July 2005 (UTC) reply

Hi I see you merged the mathematics portal and category page. To be honest I'm personally not all that fond about it, but there also are some real problems

• The mathematics portal is under-maintained (I believe the last update was made in April) and the fact that the most prominent mathematics editors don't seem to have noticed the change yet, makes me doubt it will be in the future. Are you willing to help with this?

• You carelessly copied the potal over, destroying the rather carefully crafted one paragraph introduction to mathematics, didn't bother to update the COTW (which currently is Manifold), removed the nice fractal image, and replaced the not so good Major fields of mathematics with the even worse Categories from the portal, and removed several banners.

Cheers, -- R.Koot 19:44, 17 July 2005 (UTC) reply

I think the wording is kind of tough, but I agree with R.Koot's statement. Big changes of this kind be better discussed first at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics. Oleg Alexandrov 22:08, 17 July 2005 (UTC) reply

Sorry for the though wording, being a non-native writer I found it difficult to phrase it more constructivly. -- R.Koot 22:34, 17 July 2005 (UTC) reply

All of the other categories linked from the main page were merged with their portal pages. Please feel free to fix whatever you would like, the mathematics category page only refers to the boxes that are on the portal page. Hopefully increasing prominence will decrease undermaintenance. This being wikipedia, we act before we talk. It looks rather nice to me right now dml 11:33, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply

Hello DavidLevinson. I'm contacting you since you are listed at Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Minnesota. I'm going to be at a conference in Minneapolis and am planning a Wikipedia meetup for October 8. If you are near Minneapolis at that time, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Minneapolis. Angela . 20:55, 3 October 2005 (UTC) reply

Unfortunately things aren't exactly going as planned. May be a while before I make my way out there! Sorry... Jaberwocky6669 17:38, 4 October 2005 (UTC) reply

Hi there...quick question for ya. You added Category:Cooperatives to the Northern Breweries article. I'm just wondering if it really fits, given that Northern isn't a cooperative anymore. Bearcat 00:06, 6 October 2005 (UTC) reply

I suppose you could create Category:Former cooperatives, there are a few others that would belong as well. dml 00:52, 6 October 2005 (UTC) reply

Hi, I see you added Railbox and TTX to Category:Cooperatives... would you think that all the terminal roads (railways in and around a city owned by the major connecting railways in that city, for example Indiana Harbor Belt and union station companies (companies set up to operate large stations such as Chicago Union Station, etc) are also cooperatives? I'm wondering if adding these to that category actually adds information or not. Also, would you say that the Conrail Shared Assets Area is a cooperative? it is owned by the two railroads that use it (it's what remains after Conrail was demerged)... I would say it is not. Just curious as to your thoughts. ++ Lar 04:13, 11 October 2005 (UTC) reply

Maybe a new category Category:Rail cooperatives would be appropriate? dml 22:50, 12 October 2005 (UTC) reply

What do you think about renaming this to Category:Joint rail lines? That term is in use, while "rail cooperatives" seems to not be widely used. We also have an article at joint railway describing the situation. There is also a Category:British joint railway companies that would be a subcategory of it. -- SPUI ( talk) 13:21, 15 October 2005 (UTC) reply

That takes care of part of it, but what about Railbox and Railgon? dml 13:45, 15 October 2005 (UTC) reply

I don't have personal knowledge that Tappan is now part of Weedeater. I just discovered that the link to the Frigidaire page was dead, and located a new description under the Weedeater page. The corporate description here: Weedeater says that Weedeater is the North American division of Electrolux A.B., formed in 1997 by the consolidation of American Yard Products, Frigidaire, and Poulan/WeedEater. So perhaps it is more accurate to say that Tappan is still a part of Frigidaire, a division of Weedeater owned by Electolux A.B., although the Fridgidaire connection is not explicitly stated on the website. -- Blainster 01:29, 19 October 2005 (UTC) reply

I think the "we" at [6] refers to "Electrolux Home Products" rather than Weedeater. dml 01:31, 19 October 2005 (UTC) reply

After re-reading it, I agree, and restored the sense of your edit. -- Blainster 01:47, 19 October 2005 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Speedlimit.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Are you the one that deleted the Zagat's page that dealt with the SNL sketch? I wrote that, and there was a discussion going on about its deletion. I decided to merge it with other short-lived SNL sketches, and now I can't even find that original article, so I can copy it to another area. And who deletes a whole article and has the nerve to call it a minor edit? Leadpipevigilante 06:49, 3 November 2005 (UTC) reply

No dml 13:31, 3 November 2005 (UTC) reply

I saw your name on recent changes a few minutes ago, clicked on it, and I read your insightful composition. You might consider sub-paging it and categorizing it into Wikipedia essays for greater visibility. If you still want it on your front user page too, which I'm guessing you probably do, then just put:

<noinclude>[[Category:Wikipedia essays|{{PAGENAME}}]]</noinclude>

on it, and

{{/The Future of Wikipedia}}

on your main page. If you already know how to do this, forgive the apparent condescension... I just think it's something everyone should read. Regards. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE ( TALK) 03:57, 19 November 2005 (UTC) reply

Dave, Hitler's first name is spelt ADOLF, not ADOLPH. Kelisi 04:40, 1 December 2005 (UTC) reply

David - I'm having trouble figuring out why this post card is in the public domain. Could you add a line to the image description explaining why? Thanks! - SCEhard T 16:41, 3 December 2005 (UTC) reply

what do you think of this? -- Zondor 16:18, 4 January 2006 (UTC) reply

"I don't understand what you did by voting against Wikipedia for stable versions, editing the article by adding a misspelled link, and then nominating that different version with the misspelled link. This is never going to work if you fiddle the article and require a new vote each time. I thought you supported your proposal." - i do support the proposal. that misspelled link was not intentionally done by me. something must be wrong with the media wiki software. i meant to only fix the self reference. you dont expect the nomination to be rosy, do you? -- Zondor 16:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi David, a few days ago you reverted my edit to this page. I did nothing but delete the low-value links per the MoS. Why did you revert my edit? — EagleOne\ ^Talk 17:52, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply

I disagree that year links are low value. dml 22:28, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Year links, as a general rule, add very little information to an article. As such, I will continue to remove them wherever I find them (except for full date links). However, I do not want to get into an edit war over this, so I will leave the A&P article alone. — EagleOne\ ^Talk 21:05, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Schmidt's Blue Ribbon.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{ GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{ Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 04:04, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply

The notice was appreciated. Tweaking nearly finished articles is something I rather enjoy here, and the subject is interesting to me. I have already made two suggestions, and am reviewing the rest of the article as much as I am able.

→ P.MacUidhir (t) (c) 18:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi David. I actually don't edit on that page, i just reverted vandalism. But it seems good to me. Cheers-- Ugur Basak 14:50, 21 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Your article Distinction without a difference has appeared in the Dead End Pages list because it is not wikified. Please consult the Wikipedia Guide to Layout for more information on how to write a good, wikified article. I would encourage you to revisit your submissions and {{wikify}} them. Thanks and happy editing! James084 19:04, 1 March 2006 (UTC) reply

Just so you know - I have ruled that the article United Hardware, although it did seem somewhat spammish, has been rewritten to the point where it no longer does. So it's no longer in danger of being deleted. I've left Death Eater Dan a message to this effect as well. DS 23:47, 13 March 2006 (UTC) reply

You put a cleanup tag on Gold Bond medicated powder with the explination of "family values." Can you explain what that means? Thanks. -- Descendall 04:50, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply

Read what the article says, paragraph 4 doesn't seem appropriate, even if true. dml 16:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply

you recently moved an article to Simmons. Why? That is not the name of the business and there was already a redirect for that name. The standard around here is that the article should have the correct name of the business and alternate names are redirects. She we redirect Microsoft to MS? Simmons is a common enough name that a Disambiguate page might be better in the place of Simmons in any case. --- J.Smith 19:31, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply

Use common names is a principle, the full name the previous version The Simmons Manufacturing Co., LLC is quite unwieldy, is it Co. Company, Co, do you include LLC L.L.C, etc. the beginning of the name with "The" is also quite strange. dml 22:25, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply

I was just thinking of the case of AOL being redirected to America Online... but that makes sense I guess since they do business under both names. *shrug* I dunno. The newest name looks great, btw. Oh... thanks for your help on my little project of expanding the coverage of mattress companies! Are you involved in the industry? --- J.Smith 08:21, 27 March 2006 (UTC) reply

I didn't know if you knew about HereToHelp's RfA. I just found myself. hydnjo talk 04:13, 27 March 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi. I noticed that you were the original author of Soul City, North Carolina. I live nearby in Winston-Salem (er, sort of near by), and visited recently to take some pictures for an assignment. I spoke with the people at the Green Duke House for a while about their history, trying to take in some things that I could add onto the article here.

I was wondering how you had come across Soul City, and if you had any resources you could suggest to follow up with. It's an interesting story to be told, and I can see some things being added onto the article here. Drop me a line sometime and let me know if you've got any ideas. Thanks. Tijuana Brass 21:03, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply

I came across it via the HUD New Towns program. (I have an interest in New Towns, having grown up in Columbia, Maryland. I don't have any special sources, but their is a large literature on "New Towns" or "Model Cities". dml 21:16, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply

Sounds good, thanks. Tijuana Brass 06:26, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply

A dmrb♉ltz ( t • c • log) 18:00, 30 April 2006 (UTC) reply

In case you haven't noticed, GetCITED has been proposed for deletion. NickelShoe ( Talk) 16:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC) reply

On Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shopping malls by state: States: Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts I think you added an extra tilde. :) Just add three to the beginning so you can keep the original timestamp. Cheers. Wikibout- Talk to me! 04:10, 30 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Just doesn't look as good and caption is redundant. Such borders are often visual static on many Wikipedia pages. Doubly so here since it spoils the fresh, minty taste of the drop shadow. Pepso 20:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC) reply

It looks fine, and is standard, but more importantly, it includes the caption which is important for accessibility purposes. dml 02:30, 22 August 2006 (UTC) reply

I thought you'd like to know that List of United States federal legislation has been nominated to be a Featured List. It needs 4 votes by October 2 2006.

As I have labored hard on the article, I would appreciate your looking it over. You can find a discussion here: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of United States federal legislation.

Thank you!

— Markles 23:09, 23 September 2006 (UTC) reply

A meetup of Wikipedians in Minnesota is proposed: please stop by the discussion page if interested. Jonathunder 02:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC) reply

Reminder: Meetup October 29, one o'clock, Mall of America. Jonathunder 16:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi David, I reverted your edit to East Croydon station because the Geolinks you added overlapped existing ones rendering both illegible. Obviously, we can only have one type of title co-ordinates. However, this raises a wider question: which style of co-ordinates should be used? Decimals of degrees, or degrees, minutes, seconds? I personally grew up with the latter, so that is what I've been using on various railway stations etc. But I'm wondering whether there's a policy on which type to use. Do you know? Cheers, A bit iffy 13:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply

• I don't know about standards, but Wikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinates discusses the issue, it seems there is pluralism wrt to decimal degrees and degree/minute/second. dml 18:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply

An article that you have been involved in editing, Amara's law, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amara's law. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. -- Mr Stephen 16:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC) Mr Stephen 16:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:1832cvr100.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:1851cvr100.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Why have you restored this article deleted pursuant to a perfectly acceptable AfD? Am I missing something here? Erechtheus 17:43, 30 December 2006 (UTC) reply

I deleted your restoration as a clear WP:CSD#G4 — Recreation of deleted material, and posted a deletion review for you. Next time follow the process by yourself. You're an admin, you should know our policies. ~ trialsanderrors 19:46, 30 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks for adding the article on the Urban League!-- futurebird 15:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Fruit logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:40, 15 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello,

I am an employee of Yankee Publishing, Inc., of Dublin, New Hampshire.

Two months ago, I volunteered to update the Wikipedia listing for The Old Farmer’s Almanac – a publication owned by my employer.

I am contacting you because you have previously edited this listing.

I have endeavored to follow Wikipedia’s guidelines to the best of my knowledge and ability, and would appreciate your input on the RFC I posted today on the Almanac’s discussion page.

Best, NH-Nemesis 21:38, 12 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi, If you really meant to vote"oppose" in the poll Wikipedia:Attribution/Poll, you put your vote in the wrong column! linas 05:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply

It got moved somehow when their was an edit conflict. dml 10:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:NULlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Remember the dot ^{( talk)} 16:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Aaron'sLogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:02, 12 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:AFS Utah logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Remember the dot ^{( talk)} 01:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC) reply

The coordinates you added for the above article are incorrect, they are copied from those for Farringdon Station. Can you please fix them? Thanks -- DarTar 09:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC)-- DarTar 09:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I noticed one of your user subpages ( User:DavidLevinson/List of distressed shopping malls) had a Miscellaneous pages for deletion template on it. Is the page supposed to be up for deletion? --  kenb215 talk 21:36, 23 June 2007 (UTC) reply

no someone put that there, I don't think they should be deleting user pages, seems improper.

		The Original Barnstar
		To DavidLevinson, on the occasion of Minneapolis, Minnesota reaching featured article. With thanks - Susanlesch 06:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC) reply

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:UnitedHardwarelogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm working on the Baltimore Crisis, and the history page for it has you as the source of that Chile paid the US $75,000 in gold as the result of the Baltimore Crisis, and I was hoping you could help me with a documentary source for the info, or even better if you could add a foot note for the source to the Baltimore Crisis page, since if it is actually true it makes the thing very much more interesting than I had thought it was. Clearly if we can document it the info belongs in there. John5Russell3Finley John5Russell3Finley 22:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Never mind, I found it myself John5Russell3Finley 05:50, 14 August 2007 (UTC) reply

As one of the earliest editors to the article, your input would be appreciated at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/United States Secretary of Energy‎, Thank you.-- Southern Texas 22:45, 31 July 2007 (UTC) reply

A {{ prod}} template has been added to the article Carper Award, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{ db-author}}. — Disavian ( ^talk/ _contribs) 21:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Gordon Carper, by Closedmouth ( talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Gordon Carper is a redirect to a non-existent page ( CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Gordon Carper, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. -- Android Mouse Bot 2 04:53, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on N. Gordon Carper, by Closedmouth ( talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because N. Gordon Carper is a redirect to a non-existent page ( CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting N. Gordon Carper, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. -- Android Mouse Bot 2 04:54, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A {{ prod}} template has been placed on List of graphic designers, by Heavy1974 ( talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{ db-author}}.

Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. -- Grim Reaper Bot 06:54, 16 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi David. I just added a suggestion to this category (see Category talk:Garden suburbs). There is currently no category for Garden cities, and I think it would be better to have a single category covering both cities and suburbs rather than try to differentiate between them. What do you think? -- RichardVeryard 16:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC) reply

---

---

I noticed some revisions you made to the Input-Output Model article, and I was wondering if you would be willing to give me any feedback on additions I've made to the article Lange Model. Thanks so much! -- EMB330 04:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello David! I was cleaning up some pages today, due to ImageBacklogBot replacing any fair use image with Image:Example.jpg, and came across an image you'd uploaded, Image:TF-diamond-logo.gif, which used the image in the summary, so it was replaced with the example picture. I removed the example.jpg, but I noticed that the image did not have a {{ Non-free use rationale}}, so I went ahead and added one, but no source was given, so it is placed in the Images without source category. I realize it has been over 18 months since you uploaded it, but if you happened to recall where you got the image, could you please add it to the FUR for the source? I'd hate to see that image deleted! Ariel ♥ Gold 10:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:CumminsEngineLogo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Κaiba 01:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WestinghouseLogo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Κaiba 01:50, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:YaleLogo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Κaiba 01:50, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:DFA logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Mrs Butterworth's logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 17:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Mrs Paul's logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 17:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Biltmore-Atlanta.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:08, 13 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈ talk 22:08, 13 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:AG florida logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 20:17, 19 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Regislogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:UnitedHardwarelogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 02:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Aglogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 03:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:AFS Amarillo logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:American Tourister logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:HardwareHanklogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 23:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Graco baby products logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 23:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Graco baby products logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 06:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply

I have nominated List of shopping malls converted to outdoor format, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shopping malls converted to outdoor format (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 05:17, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello. Ive Noticed that you have posted something on the FFA Talk page so most likely you are part of FFA. Ive Recently proposed Wikiproject FFA. And I would appreciate if you voice your on it. Thankyou. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iwilleditu ( talk • contribs) 20:56, 22 March 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jmlk 1 7 06:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Don't mean to template you my friend... sorta automatically happened with WP:TWINKLE. :) Jmlk 1 7 06:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:AFSouthwest logo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 18:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:AF Midwest logo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 18:31, 21 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:AGMaine logo.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 18:35, 21 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thank you for uploading Image:AG South logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 18:37, 21 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:AWI Robesonia logo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 20:55, 21 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Biltmore-LA-interior.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 04:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Johnny Walker (DJ), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rtphokie ( talk) 12:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:REMAX balloon logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:10, 15 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sunbeam Bread, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sunbeam Bread seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sunbeam Bread, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot ( talk) 03:31, 17 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Schmidt's Blue Ribbon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:11, 17 May 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Schmidt Baking Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. OccamzRazor ( talk) 20:43, 17 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Blainslogo.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 07:26, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply

David, Do you recall why you restored Retailer Owned Food Distributors & Associates back in April? I would be curious to know because I have just AFD'd a similar trade association article, and though I was surprised by Hu12's "we are not a membership directory" deletion, it seemed reasonable at the time. I vaguely recall editing the article, but I don't remember if I tagged it for deletion, or tried to rescue it.

Also, it doesn't seem to have an edit history? Could you restore that too, please?

-- Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 14:01, 17 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Well I created it initially, and though we are not a membership directory, we are a compendium of human knowledge - which was the point, it describes an important (if obscure) organization in the coop market, which happens to have members, who mostly have articles, so it seemed reasonable to list. Certainly did not warrant speedy delete. I can't find the edit history somehow, so I don't know what step is required to get it. dml ( talk) 20:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC) reply

OK - thanks. I thought that the deleting admin's edit summary looked a bit odd. I really hope that you don't discover in the long lost history that I speedy tagged it! By the way, before the delete I tried to find significant online press coverage - and it was darned hard - because it is not a buying group, just really a networking kind of org, as far as I can tell. Maybe you have seen some dead tree coverage? -- Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 20:55, 20 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Congratulations on finding those sources. I am concerned because we need secondary sources to really save this article (there are a lot of sources about teams winning the tournament, but to meet WP:N, there really needs to be sources that directly address the topic, and there was nothing in what you left at the AfD that indicated that. Could you provide a link to those articles so that we could check and make sure they are secondary sources ... might even be able to wrap this thing up quick. Thanks much! LonelyBeacon ( talk) 19:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC) reply

No links possible as far as I know, they are pre-Internet, and they are copyrighted or I would include the text, but you can find them in Lexis-Nexis if you have access (most universities do). The Newsweek article is especially on point, describing the tournament, the others are basically winners of X, which I think is still valuable, but not as good. dml ( talk) 19:33, 18 July 2008 (UTC). reply

See also [7] for additional links, not optimal, but from reliable sources.

Hello again, David!

I noted that you are going to try at some point to bring back the NAC article when enough sources are put back together. That is your business, and I certainly will not oppose an article that is properly sourced.

However, I do ask that you consider the following:

There is, as you no doubt know, some very legitimate concerns about this tournament (plagiarism, outright cheating, favoritism) that have been documented publicly. Undoubtedly, because of the way these things are reported, these critiques will never turn up in a usable source. Thus, the article becomes rather inherently one-sided. As I stated before, the deletion of the criticisms section was a jumping off point for discussion about why the article should be deleted, however was not the reason that I began the nomination process. I would ask that if you are truly interested in writing an honest article, that you wait until such a time as these criticisms can also be brought to light. I do commend you for your hard work and effort, but I do ask you to think about the fact that there is "fact", and there is "honesty" (in terms of what an article presents), and that the facts so not always paint an honest picture. Take care and peace! LonelyBeacon ( talk) 00:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC) reply

While I don't particularly like NAC from what I've heard (never played it myself), I believe the deletion was wrongly decided by people who dislike the organization and want to delegitimize it, using the Wikipedia's AfD Calvinball process. At some point this will be recovered, though I don't plan to spend much time on it myself. Feel free to add anything to the working version on my page. What constitutes a usable source is a moving target, but for the basic facts there were plenty of usable sources. There are plenty of wikipedia articles less well sourced than this that would never be deleted. Granted, the criticisms of NAC may not have appeared in published articles, but they certainly appeared in observable sources (message boards, etc.) that can be used as additional references to complement more reliable sources. dml ( talk) 01:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello, Do you know what the coat of arms for scotland is if so can you please put it back onto settle this argument on the talk page -- 84.13.71.60 ( talk) 11:44, 17 September 2008 (UTC) reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rip Rapson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Rip Rapson

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Themfromspace ( talk) 21:42, 16 November 2008 (UTC) reply

An article that you have been involved in editing, GetCITED, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GetCITED. Thank you. Schuym1 ( talk) 21:50, 24 November 2008 (UTC) reply

You've uploaded File:Mrs Butterworth's logo.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:10, 6 January 2009 (UTC) reply

You've uploaded File:Mrs Paul's logo.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:11, 6 January 2009 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Palaisint2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Papa November ( talk) 13:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC) reply

File:CumminsEngineLogo.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Cummins logo.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Cummins logo.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 23:22, 3 April 2009 (UTC) reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Metropolitan Travel Survey Archive, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article has not demonstrated subject's notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~ Pesco ^{So say• we all} 01:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC) reply

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Metropolitan Travel Survey Archive, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. ~ Pesco ^{So say• we all} 05:37, 1 May 2009 (UTC) reply

I have nominated List of religious organizations, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of religious organizations. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ...but what do you think? ~ B F ^izz _{( talk)} 04:27, 19 June 2009 (UTC) reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ecolect, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The page contains only a dictionary definition of a neologism.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cnilep ( talk) 00:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC) reply

So I've been working hard on getting Georgia Institute of Technology to Featured status. It's at FAC right now ( over here), and it looks like it will pass. I even started a WikiProject about it. Today, I wondered who originally started the article; turns out that it was you! Figured you would like to know :) — Disavian ( ^talk/ _contribs) 00:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Sunny's Surplus. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

1. Place {{ hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
2. Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot ( talk) 21:01, 22 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Sunny's Surplus. Please use the {{ hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot ( talk) 21:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Sunny's Surplus. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot ( talk) 21:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi there, regardless of whether you are an administrator or not, the creator of a page shouldn't remove a speedy. However, in away you were correct to remove the speedy (correct in that the article passes CSD, but incorrect in that you shouldn't have removed it yourself). I think the articles main "claim to fame" is that it's won that award, so I'd suggest getting some sources in to it ASAP, so as to pass AfD (if the article is nominated for AfD. Sorry it took me a while to get back to you, I've been watching a film :). Best, - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 21:38, 22 August 2009 (UTC) reply

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of riots. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of riots. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:17, 4 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi David,

In July 2002, you created Wikipedia's article on the DuMont Television Network. Since that time, the article has grown, references have been added, and the article has been listed as a Good Article. I've used the article on DuMont as a basis for articles on the NTA Film Network and the Paramount Television Network, and others have used the article as a starting-point for an article at Citizendium. I'd like to solicit your advice on ways the DuMont article can be further improved. As the creator of the original article, you may have insight on areas which could be improved, need adjusting, or clarification. Let me know what you think. Firsfron of Ronchester 21:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply

you created that article and i want to help you improve it and i was woundring if you can tell me where i can find info on it so i can improve it for you thanks Oo7565 ( talk) 19:37, 15 September 2009 (UTC) reply

---

---

Update: the meetup will be at 1 p.m. Sunday, October 11, in St. Paul. Click here for more details and to R.S.V.P. Jonathunder ( talk)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of religious organizations. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of religious organizations (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:47, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The article United Drugs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable drug company; Google for "United Drugs" 1976 -Wikipedia fails to find any independent reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kimchi.sg ( talk) 03:56, 27 November 2009 (UTC) reply

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Orangutang. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orangutang. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:17, 1 December 2009 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:NULlogo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mononomic ( talk) 00:13, 3 December 2009 (UTC) reply

The article Journal of Transport and Land Use has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Journal of Transport and Land Use – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive ( reasoning) 22:48, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Palaisint2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 05:50, 20 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello DavidLevinson! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,194 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{ unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Herbert Mohring - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Paolo Soleri - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. John Portman - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 17:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Time–Life, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{ hangon}} on the top of Time–Life and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dappl ( talk) 18:36, 16 May 2010 (UTC) reply

I have nominated Gentlemen's agreement, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gentlemen's agreement. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:13, 20 June 2010 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Association of College Unions International, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{ hangon}} on the top of Association of College Unions International and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. _wjemather ^bigissue 13:23, 18 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Timeline of gravitational physics and relativity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

First, this appears to be a content fork WP:FORK from History of general relativity. Second this appears to a repository for internal links set up in a bulletd fashion WP:NOTREPOSITORY. Third, this does not conform to WP:MOS for article on Wikipedia. Furthermore, if the PROD tag is removed, and after which these issues are not resolved, then this article could go to WP:AFD

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Steve Quinn ( talk) 04:13, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:AFS Amarillo logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hugahoody ( talk) 21:51, 29 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Thank you for uploading File:Minnesota-LQ.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC) reply

User:DavidLevinson/List of distressed shopping malls, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DavidLevinson/List of distressed shopping malls and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DavidLevinson/List of distressed shopping malls during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{( Otters want attention)} 04:50, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Interstate Van Lines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sitush ( talk) 14:22, 18 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse ( consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot ( talk) 20:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Topco Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 05:49, 12 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Threatening another person is considered harassment. This includes threats to harm another person, to disrupt their work on Wikipedia, or to otherwise harm them. Statements of intent to properly use normal Wikipedia processes, such as dispute resolution, are not threats. Legal threats are a special case of threat, with their own settled policy. Users who make legal threats will typically be blocked from editing indefinitely.

========

:Ahh don't give me that bullshit. I get so sick of single purpose editors telling me this shit. No where in your extensive edit history have you reported a problem nor sought dispute resolution. Now take your complaints to the proper venue before you really piss me off and I say something you regret. - 4twenty42o ( talk) 21:49, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Is that an appropriate example of Wikipedia Policy for an Administrator with regard to civility and threats? Is this user an administrator or just posing as one? JohnLloydScharf ( talk) 23:16, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply

The article Good Neighbor Pharmacy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Small, non notable trade group association with no substantial claim to importance. Plenty of listings but Wikipedia is not a directory ( WP:NOTYELLOW). No reliable sources ( WP:RS) or references that assert notability for organisations per WP:ORG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 23:35, 7 September 2011 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Good Neighbor Pharmacy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Neighbor Pharmacy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:56, 9 September 2011 (UTC) reply

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thanks for creating Wikipedia:ACF Regionals answers in 2005. The last redlinked article was completed today. Jokestress ( talk) 02:56, 7 October 2011 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of power outages is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of power outages until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Secret ^account 02:30, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Category:Charities, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 06:15, 17 January 2012 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Junior Achievement requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Epeefleche ( talk) 20:21, 19 January 2012 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of power outages is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of power outages (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 01:16, 1 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Minneapolis History edit-a-thon

The Minnesota Wikipedia community and local historians are invited to edit entries in Wikipedia on Minneapolis history. Please help increase the depth of information on Minneapolis history topics by utilizing materials in the Minneapolis Collection. Find your own Minneapolis History topics to edit or work from a list developed by Special Collections Librarians.

Where: Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
When: Saturday, February 25, 2012, 10-5 pm
10 am - 11 am Orientation to Minneapolis Collection
11 am - 5 pm Edit-a-thon
Website: Hennepin County Library, Special Collections, Map & Directions
Parking: Metered street parking or pay ramp in basement, enter on 4th Ave

For more information see Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Minnesota#2012. — innotata 00:47, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Dear DavidLevinson,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar -- Jaobar ( talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck ( talk • contribs) 14:08, 14 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The article Restonic Mattress has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced; not notable; self-promoting to a degree

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Greenmaven ( talk) 09:31, 26 April 2012 (UTC) reply

In the area? You're invited to the Great American Wiknic.

Place: near Minnehaha Falls at Minnehaha Park, Minneapolis
Date: Saturday, July 7, 2012 (rain date July 8)
Time: 12–3 pm

• Accessible from the Minnehaha Park light rail station, bus, walk, bike, or car
• If driving, free parking available at 46th Ave. S, and pay parking in the park
• Food and drink options nearby, or bring your own... maybe even to share!

See the meetup talk page for more. — innotata 00:12, 16 June 2012 (UTC) reply

User:DavidLevinson/List of shopping malls converted to outdoor format, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DavidLevinson/List of shopping malls converted to outdoor format and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DavidLevinson/List of shopping malls converted to outdoor format during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 07:28, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

User:DavidLevinson/United Drug, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DavidLevinson/United Drug and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DavidLevinson/United Drug during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 07:29, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

User:DavidLevinson/List of shopping malls in Maryland, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DavidLevinson/List of shopping malls in Maryland and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DavidLevinson/List of shopping malls in Maryland during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 07:30, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect User:DavidLevinson/List of shopping malls in Massachusetts. Since you had some involvement with the User:DavidLevinson/List of shopping malls in Massachusetts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 07:33, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

User:DavidLevinson/Gaius Stern, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DavidLevinson/Gaius Stern and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DavidLevinson/Gaius Stern during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 07:34, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

User:DavidLevinson/Don Windham, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DavidLevinson/Don Windham and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DavidLevinson/Don Windham during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 07:34, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

User:DavidLevinson/List of international travel guides and web sites, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DavidLevinson/List of international travel guides and web sites and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DavidLevinson/List of international travel guides and web sites during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 07:35, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

User:DavidLevinson/List of state quizbowl links, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DavidLevinson/List of state quizbowl links and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DavidLevinson/List of state quizbowl links during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 07:36, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

User:DavidLevinson/National Academic Championship, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DavidLevinson/National Academic Championship and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DavidLevinson/National Academic Championship during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 07:36, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

User:DavidLevinson/Wealthy 100, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DavidLevinson/Wealthy 100 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DavidLevinson/Wealthy 100 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 07:37, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

User:DavidLevinson/List of oldest family businesses, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DavidLevinson/List of oldest family businesses and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DavidLevinson/List of oldest family businesses during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 07:37, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

User:DavidLevinson/Skaggs Family, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DavidLevinson/Skaggs Family and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DavidLevinson/Skaggs Family during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 07:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

User:DavidLevinson/Carper Award, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DavidLevinson/Carper Award and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DavidLevinson/Carper Award during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 07:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

User:DavidLevinson/MainPageTemp, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DavidLevinson/MainPageTemp and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DavidLevinson/MainPageTemp during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 07:39, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

User:DavidLevinson/Ampersand, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DavidLevinson/Ampersand and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DavidLevinson/Ampersand during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 07:39, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

In the area? You are invited to Wikipedia Loves Libraries in Minneapolis.

Hennepin County Library's Special Collections is hosting a Minneapolis history editathon on November 3. Help increase the depth of information on Minneapolis history topics by using materials in the Minneapolis Collection. Find your own topics to edit or work from a list developed by Special Collections librarians.

There will also be an intro for people new to Wikipedia, and tours of Special Collections.

Where: Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
Special Collections (4th floor)
When: 10am-4:30pm, Saturday, November 3, 2012

For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page. — innotata 14:50, 4 October 2012 (UTC) reply

The article Timeline of other background radiation fields has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Title doesn't identify topic. Contents unsourced and already covered by Cosmic ray and History of X-ray astronomy.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —  HHHIPPO 12:45, 4 May 2013 (UTC) reply

In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota meetups.

To kick-off monthly meetups in the Twin Cities, two events will be held in Special Collections at Minneapolis Central Library this summer. These are mostly planned as opportunities for Wikipedians to discuss editing, but all are welcome!

Special Collections contains many valuable historical resources, including the Minneapolis Collection, consisting of files on hundreds of topics related to Minneapolis from neighborhoods to politicians (it's best to call or email in advance to request materials). Free wifi and several public computers are available.

Place: Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
Special Collections (4th floor)
Dates: Saturday, June 1
Saturday, July 6
Time: 12:30pm–2:30pm+

For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.

This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. — innotata 14:05, 24 May 2013 (UTC) reply

In the area? You're invited to the Great American Wiknic.

Place: north of Minnehaha Falls in Minnehaha Park, Minneapolis
Date: Saturday, June 22, 2012
Time: 12–4 pm

• Accessible from the Minnehaha Park METRO station, bus, walk, bike, or car
• If driving, free parking available on 46th Ave. S, and pay parking in the park
• Food and drink options nearby, or bring your own... maybe even to share!

For more, and to sign up (encouraged, not required) go to the meetup talk page.

This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. — innotata 03:08, 13 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Category:Chicago, Illinois, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. p b p 15:00, 22 July 2013 (UTC) reply

In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota monthly meetup on August 3.

Place: Lavvu Coffee House
813 4th St SE, Minneapolis 55414
Date: Saturday, August 3
Time: 1:00pm-3:00pm+

For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.

This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list.

— innotata 23:40, 24 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Category:Cendant brands, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 17:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello, DavidLevinson. You are invited to join WikiProject Invention, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of inventions and invention-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000 (talk) 09:27, 29 August 2013 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of automotive fuel brands is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of automotive fuel brands until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Martin451 17:38, 2 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Assuming the names are not just coincidence, it's accepted as a guideline that people do not edit articles about themselves, except to ask for changes on the article talk p.-- see WP:Authobiography. We do not list names of people's students in articles, unless they are notable enough to have articles in WP. (If they are notable enough according to WP:PROF but don't have them, they need to be written!) If you know of other articles where this is being done, please let me know so I can remove them also; my experience is that it is very rare. I'm sure you don't want the article to be viewed as promotional. (And we'd normally list the factor that most clearly demonstrates notability first, which in the case of David Levinson is the named chair he hold.). DGG ( talk ) 18:51, 2 October 2013 (UTC) reply

- ok, someone (you) introduced grammatical errors in the edit, which is why I reverted it.

The article Associated Grocers of Louisiana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn ( talk) 21:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC) reply

In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota meetup in commemoration of Wikipedia Day.

• Place: Seward Cafe
  

2129 E Franklin Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55404

• Date: Saturday, January 18, 2014
  
• Time: noon

For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.

This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. — innotata 04:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Dear David,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, — Scott • talk 14:57, 4 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC) reply

The article Dakota Drug has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable company, fails WP:ORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jay Jay ^{What did I do?} 17:51, 10 July 2014 (UTC) reply

The article Central Grocers Cooperative has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn ( talk) 20:42, 20 August 2014 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Central Grocers Cooperative is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Grocers Cooperative until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn ( talk) 19:54, 21 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Category:Marches, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tim! ( talk) 08:38, 6 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:AG florida logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:18, 18 November 2014 (UTC) reply

I first suggested deleting this article a year ago. Mainly, I've just been talking to myself on that page. It seems totally orphaned, aside from the occasional addition of some piece, that most definitely did not cause a riot. There are two issues with the page. The first being the small number of pieces that actually caused something that could be considered a very weak version of what most people would consider a riot. That part alone is the most problematic, in my view. If one patron hits another with an umbrella, is that a riot?

Which leads to the second issue, which is that the definition of a classical music riot is woefully vague and completely unverified. Who has defined a classical music riot as "violent, disorderly behavior"? What constitutes "violent" behavior? Is booing or hissing "disorderly" behavior? Many of the footnotes provided for these pieces only prove that people booed or hissed at a premiere performance, which hardly rises to the level of a riot. Moreover, people boo and hiss at the Met pretty much every night of the week, depending on the production.

So, I've proposed a compromise wherein a category tag would replace this article. Something much more inclusive, which could lump the mild disturbance in with the more free-ranging ones, while also drawing to users' attention pieces that were met with some level of resistance.

The article List of classical music riots has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has been around for a decade without any sufficient citations. When they are provided, they don't support the page's own definition of what a riot is. Given the persistent lack of evidence to support the notion that these pieces caused a riot, the page should be deleted and replaced with a category.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Trumpetrep ( talk) 21:41, 6 May 2015 (UTC) Timestamp: 20150506212345 21:23, 6 May 2015 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of classical music riots is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of classical music riots until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arxiloxos ( talk) 20:44, 8 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Minneapolis Institute of Art edit-a-thon

Date: Saturday, October 24, 2015, 12pm–4pm Location: Minneapolis Institute of Art Friends Community Room, 2400 Third Avenue South, Minneapolis Sponsor: Minneapolis Institute of Art You are invited to attend an Art+Feminism edit-a-thon at Minneapolis Institute of Art which will be held on Saturday, October 24, 2015. This editing event is dedicated to improving and increasing the presence of cultural, historic, and artistic information on Wikipedia pertaining to women artists. For more information and to RSVP: → click here ←, you may register online for the event or call (612) 870-6323 -- gobonobo + c 20:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Face Off Minnesota is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Face Off Minnesota until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nsteffel ( talk) 18:54, 21 December 2015 (UTC) reply

The Loft Literary Center edit-a-thon

Date: Thursday, February 11, 2016, 6–8pm Location: Loft Literary Center, 1011 S Washington Ave, Room 203, Minneapolis Sponsor: The Loft Literary Center Hello DavidLevinson! You are invited to attend an edit-a-thon at the Loft Literary Center which will be held on Thursday, February 11, 2016. This editing event is dedicated to improving and increasing the presence of cultural, historic, and artistic information on Wikipedia pertaining to artists from marginalized communities. Please bring a laptop. Refreshments will be provided. For more information and to RSVP: → click here ←

We have also recently formed a user group for Minnesota editors. If you would like to join, please add your name to our page on meta. Thank you, gobonobo ^{+ c} 22:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big Sister (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Sister (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 01:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi DavidLevinson.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins). MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tchernobyl. Since you had some involvement with the Tchernobyl redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew ( talk) 17:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC) reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. ( T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. ( T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Tax Reform Act requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HapHaxion ( talk) 06:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GetCITED is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GetCITED (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello David,

I've just been alerted to the fact that you've restored Ashfield Mall, an article I deleted by way of a unanimous deletion discussion. To unilaterally overturn a recently achieved consensus at AfD is very much out-of-process, so I've deleted the article once again (technically mandated by CSD G4, since you made no edits to try addressing the notability and sourcing concerns). If you disagree with the deletion of the page – either because you believe I misinterpreted consensus at the AfD, or significant new evidence has surfaced since its closure – you may request a review at WP:DRV. Please do not restore the page again without following the proper procedure outlined in this guide. Thank you for your cooperation. Best regards, – Juliancolton |  ^Talk 00:34, 15 May 2017 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on UniGroup requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Amisom ( talk) 17:05, 27 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The article UniGroup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable company

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amisom ( talk) 09:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The article TomFolio.com has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources to indicate this website meets the notability requirements of WP:NWEB

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 13:49, 7 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative ( talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi David, I have recently created the Phillip J. Roth article and was wondering he uses Phillip Roth and 3 other names but could I possibly turn this redirect into a dismabiguation page to put all people under this name or similar into it, Feel free to message me if you have any ideas. D Eaketts ( talk) 10:04, 17 September 2017 (UTC) reply

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for creating Robert Venturi! Zigzig20s ( talk) 09:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The article Runnings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No citations since 2012 and still does not meet WP:CORP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RexPatricius ( talk) 02:35, 30 October 2017 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Runnings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 06:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Economies of agglomeration is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economies of agglomeration until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 18:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rip Rapson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rip Rapson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep ( talk) 22:08, 5 April 2018 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of store brands. Since you had some involvement with the List of store brands redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 17:49, 16 November 2018 (UTC) reply

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:13, 4 May 2019 (UTC) reply

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, - Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Dear DavidLevinson,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur ( talk) 19:11, 8 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:American Tourister logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  ★  Bigr Tex 19:42, 17 June 2019 (UTC) reply

I'm glad Wikipedia now has an article on micromobility! Sdkb ( talk) 03:55, 27 June 2019 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Handy Andy (tools) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Handy Andy (tools) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Willy No1lakersfan ( Talk - Edits) 02:52, 4 July 2019 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Carpet One, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 05:28, 27 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Hank's Root Beer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.onlineprimo.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:54, 13 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hey there David! I'm Windyshadow32, a new member of the sadly inactive Wikiproject Shopping Centers. I am trying to revive this project to highlight the unique stories of malls across the country and the world especially as we lose more and more of them. Undoubtedly, we will lose shopping malls due to the challenges we face at this moment. I want to document these stories before it is too late, but I can't do it without your help. I can tell by your contributions to Wikipedia and the pages/lists that you have created that you care about retail and will bring the right insight to the project. I would love to have your assistance in assessing the qualities of the different articles and placing them in the proper categories. Please let me know if you'd be willing to help; I really appreciate it!

Windyshadow32 ( talk) 06:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of famous engineers. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 27#List of famous engineers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC 678 16:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Toll booth. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 20#Toll booth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Aasim ( talk) 23:40, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Goody (brand), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 20:49, 8 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. / Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, DavidLevinson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Discount Drug Stores, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 00:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC) reply

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Wednesday June 8, 11am-5pm: New York Botanical Garden - Environment of the Bronx - Editing Wikipedia for Beginners

The LuEsther T. Mertz Library of the New York Botanical Garden and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite the general public of all experience levels to come to the Mertz Library in person and learn how to use Wikipedia! All skill levels welcome at the event! Experienced Wikipedia editors from the Wikimedia New York City chapter will be in attendance and available to help. A one hour training session will be offered at the start of this event covering introductory topics. Attendees familiar with editing Wikipedia can edit off of a worklist focused on the environment of New York City; as well as, a sub-list focused on the environment of the Bronx. The Mertz Library will pull topical media from their collection to assist the editing. -- Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC) reply (You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Hold the date. Meetup/NYC Wiknic in Crotona Park, Sunday June 26.

Watch Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Wiknic June 2022 for further details as they become available.

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC) reply

June 22, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit the Zoom link on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page. Wednesday June 22 WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC ( optional RSVP on-wiki). 7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

-- Wikimedia New York City Team 14:51, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

June 26, 3-6pm: Bronx Wiki-Picnic

You are invited to join us for a planned outdoor gathering with the local Wikimedia NYC community at the Charlotte Street barbecue area of the Bronx's Crotona Park. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate. Sunday June 26 Bronx Wiki-Picnic ( RSVP on-wiki). 3:00 - 6:00 pm ( Crotona Park, The Bronx)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

-- Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Thu July 14, 7-9pm: Astoria Beer Garden Wiki-Picnic

You are invited to join us for a planned outdoor gathering with the local Wikimedia NYC community at the beer garden of Queens's Bohemian Citizens' Benevolent Society, better known as "Bohemian Hall". All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate. Thursday July 14 Astoria Beer Garden Wiki-Picnic ( RSVP on-wiki). 7:00 - 9:00 pm ( Bohemian Citizens' Benevolent Society / "Bohemian Hall", Astoria, Queens)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

-- Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:40, 11 July 2022 (UTC) reply

July 27, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit the Zoom link on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page. Wednesday July 27 WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC ( optional RSVP on-wiki). 7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30) P.S. next in-person August 12-14 Wiki World's Fair for Wikimania

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

-- Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:43, 26 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Aug 12-14: Wiki World's Fair for Wikimania in NYC

You are invited to join the local Wikimedia NYC community for its flagship event to be held all-day on Saturday August 13, 2022 at the Queens Museum, in the context of the 1939/1964 fairgrounds at Flushing Meadows–Corona Park. There will also be smaller sessions for much of August 12-14 (Friday, Saturday, Sunday) as hybrid local gatherings for the global online conference Wikimania 2022. You are also encouraged to sign up for a lightning talk! All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate. Flagship event: Saturday August 13 Wiki World's Fair ( RSVP on-wiki). 10:00 am - 5:00 pm + evening ( Queens Museum and Flushing Meadows–Corona Park, in the evening Queens Night Market) Other sessions (subject to change, see full Agenda): Friday August 12 Evening welcome reception in Queens 6:00 pm - 10:00 pm Sunday August 14 Morning global breakfast banquet + Afternoon closing ceremony in Brooklyn 10:00 am - 3:00 pm

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

-- Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC) reply

August 24, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit the Zoom link on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page. Wednesday August 24 WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC ( optional RSVP on-wiki). 7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30) P.S. September 28 will be our chapter's online Annual Election/Members Meeting

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

-- Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:41, 23 August 2022 (UTC) reply

September 28, 7pm: ONLINE Wikimedia NYC Annual Election/Members Meeting

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our Annual Election/Members Meeting. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit the Zoom link on the meetup page. Important election info: register your chapter membership at wmnyc:Membership read the Election FAQ review and possibly add yourself to the board Nominations voting will be online, via emailed ballots, and the poll will be open for the 24-hour period of September 28 Wednesday September 28 ONLINE Wikimedia NYC Annual Election/Members Meeting ( optional RSVP on-wiki). 7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30) P.S. Sunday October 2 will be post-election picnic gathering at the Grecian Shelter in Prospect Park, Brooklyn.

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

-- Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:38, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Sun Oct 2, 2-5pm: WikiNYC Post-Election Wiki-Picnic

You are invited to join us for a planned outdoor gathering with the local Wikimedia NYC community at the Grecian Shelter of Brooklyn's Prospect Park. We will celebrate after Wednesday's Chapter Election, share some food, and informally discuss wiki-plans for the coming year. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate. Sunday October 2 WikiNYC Post-Election Wiki-Picnic ( RSVP on-wiki). 2:00 - 5:00 pm ( Grecian Shelter, Prospect Park, Brooklyn)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

-- Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:34, 28 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Sat Oct 29: Wikidata Day in NYC

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for Wikidata Day in NYC, an event marking the Wikidata 10th Birthday with a celebration and mini-conference. The all-day event will feature beginner workshops, keynote presentations, breakout group discussions, lightning talks and yes, CAKE. It is inspired by such past events as the Wikipedia Day tradition in New York City. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate. Brooklyn Public Library encourages the wearing of masks when indoors, and especially be mindful of those in your proximity. Saturday October 29 Wikidata Day in NYC ( RSVP on-wiki). 9:30 am - 5:30 pm ( Brooklyn Public Library, Grand Army Plaza, Brooklyn) P.S. Three days before, October 26 will be October Online WikiWednesday

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

-- Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Sat Nov 12: WikiConference North America in NYC

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for WikiConference North America in NYC, as a local satellite event and celebration of the primarily online WikiConference 2022 (Nov 11-13). The Saturday in-person event will feature beginner workshops, keynote presentations, breakout group discussions, and lightning talks. It is inspired by such past events as the Wikipedia Day tradition in New York City. In keeping with the online conference's partnership this year with Mapping USA and theme of "open knowledge allies", we are highlighting OpenStreetMap NYC efforts and other local organizing around various communities of practice. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate. Brooklyn Public Library encourages the wearing of masks when indoors, and especially be mindful of those in your proximity. Saturday November 12 WikiConference North America in NYC ( RSVP on-wiki). 9:30 am - 5:30 pm ( Brooklyn Public Library, Grand Army Plaza, Brooklyn)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

-- Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Nov 30: WikiWednesday @ BPL + on Zoom

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our WikiWednesday Salon, with in-person at Brooklyn Public Library by Grand Army Plaza, in the Central Library's Info Commons Lab, as well as an online-based participation option. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome! We are proud to announce that monthly PIZZA has returned! All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate. Brooklyn Public Library encourages the wearing of masks when indoors, and especially be mindful of those in your proximity. Wednesday November 30 WikiWednesday @ BPL ( RSVP on-wiki). 6:30 pm - 8:00 pm (note modified time) ( Brooklyn Public Library, Grand Army Plaza, Brooklyn) Also online via Zoom

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

-- Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:38, 25 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Clarityfiend ( talk) 21:50, 10 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Dec 28: WikiWednesday @ BPL + on Zoom

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our WikiWednesday Salon, with in-person at Brooklyn Public Library by Grand Army Plaza, in the Central Library's Info Commons Lab, as well as an online-based participation option. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome! We are proud to announce that monthly PIZZA has returned! All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate. Brooklyn Public Library encourages the wearing of masks when indoors, and especially be mindful of those in your proximity. Wednesday December 28 WikiWednesday @ BPL ( RSVP on-wiki). 6:30 pm - 8:00 pm ( Brooklyn Public Library, Grand Army Plaza, Brooklyn) Also online via Zoom P.S. Next big event January 15 will be Wikipedia Day NYC 2023, and you can sign up now for your lightning talk!

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

-- Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:27, 23 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Sunday January 15: Wikipedia Day 2023 NYC

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our Wikipedia Day 2023 at Jefferson Market Library in Greenwich Village, a Wikipedia and Public Domain Day celebration and mini-conference as part of birthday festivities marking the project's founding in 2001. In addition to the party, the event features presentations by Jason Scott of the Internet Archive and Anne Hunnell Chen of the International (Digital) Dura-Europos Archive, panels, and, of course, lightning talks. Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! And there will be WIKICAKE. Sunday January 15 Wikipedia Day 2023 ( RSVP on-wiki). 1 - 5PM at Jefferson Market Library, 425 Sixth Avenue in Manhattan After 5PM, migration to afterparty at Ace Hotel, 20 West 29th St Livestreaming is likely, watch the wiki meetup page All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate. New York Public Library encourages the wearing of masks when indoors, and especially be mindful of those in your proximity. P.S. Next regular event February 15 will be Feb WikiWednesday.

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

-- Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:48, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Feb 15: WikiWednesday @ BPL + on Zoom

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our WikiWednesday Salon, with in-person at Brooklyn Public Library by Grand Army Plaza, in the Central Library's Info Commons Lab, as well as an online-based participation option. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome! We are proud to announce that monthly PIZZA has returned! All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate. Brooklyn Public Library encourages the wearing of masks when indoors, and especially be mindful of those in your proximity. Wednesday February 15 WikiWednesday @ BPL ( RSVP on-wiki). 6:30 pm - 8:00 pm ( Brooklyn Public Library, Grand Army Plaza, Brooklyn) Also online via Zoom

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

-- Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:51, 7 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Mar 8: WikiWednesday Salon by Grand Central

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community and visitors from the global Wikimedia Foundation for our WikiWednesday Salon by Grand Central, in-person at Convene 101 Park Avenue in the vicinity of Manhattan's Grand Central Terminal. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome! This is somewhat of a sequel to last year's Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Brunch in terms of the participants, though this time it is an evening event in a different borough. We may leaven the event with a few impromptu lightning talks, a Wiki-fashion show (yes, really!), and likely an afterparty tour. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate. Wednesday March 8 WikiWednesday Salon by Grand Central ( RSVP off-wiki at Eventbrite to attend in-person). 5:30 pm - 7:00 pm ( Convene 101 Park Avenue, near Manhattan's Grand Central Terminal)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

-- Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:41, 28 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, DavidLevinson! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! // GMH Melbourne ( talk) 09:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Drmies ( talk) 20:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Georgia Tech has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Bneu2013 ( talk) 21:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC) reply

DuMont Television Network has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke ( talk) 01:39, 8 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The article Journey to work has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not make sense as it says "Journey to work is data" without any cite whereas by common sense a journey to work is an action

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 ( talk) 18:32, 29 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Chidgk1 ( talk) 07:56, 4 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:UnitedHardwarelogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:10, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Wright brothers has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 00:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC) reply