Junk.

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bob_at_Easel.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 10:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi Crtrue -- Although I have since edited away most of the census region organization that you tried out in the List of National Historic Landmarks by state article, I wanted to say thank you for trying it. The format wasn't working before. Now I hope the new sortable table, based on Ipoellet's idea, does work better. And, importantly, some of the organization by census bureau organization does remain, in the sections for "Commonwealths and Territories", "Associated States", and "Foreign States" that follow the 50 states (and in their corresponding articles-in-progress List of U.S. National Historic Landmarks in associated states. etc. Your contribution by providing those labels was a big help to me, as I edited the new version of the sortable table, and could justify moving out troublesome Puerto Rico, etc. into those sections. I just mentioned this on the talk page for the list. Keep up the good work, and by all means please continue to Be bold! Cheers doncram 21:13, 18 October 2007 (UTC) reply

A {{ prod}} template has been added to the article Port City Java, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{ db-author}}. Jameson L. Tai 12:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Please use the Wikipedia Sandbox when you are trying to create an article. I routinely perform new page patrols and I nominate articles that are not article-like or have major issues for speedy deletion. In your case, it is not nominated for speedy deletion, only nominated for regular WP:AfD. Please continue to work on your article and place {{hangon}} and {{inuse}} so that an admin doesn't delete your article while you're still editing. At the time I nominated your article seemed nothing more than a "yellow pages" listing. If you want to see that article survive, please expand the article and provide sources to justify why it is a notable article. Good luck and happy editing!  :-) Have a great day. Jameson L. Tai 12:29, 26 October 2007 (UTC) reply

The validity of the request to delete your article is verifiable by Wikipedia standards. As the article undergoes further editing, I have provided you tools to help keep your article. When I nominated your article for deletion, it was in fact unsourced and have notability issues. The article still has notability issues right now. The entire article (excluding external links) composes of two sentences. The five external links composes of the coffee shop's website and four short articles. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, which means, (to quote that article), "Someone or something that has been in the news for a brief period is not necessarily a suitable subject for an article in their own right."

I did not randomly apply a speedy deletion tag because it didn't warrant one. Your complaints are now borderline Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Please... (to quote that article) "Comment on content, not on the contributor."

• Wikipedia:About the Sandbox
• Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles

Jameson L. Tai 15:16, 26 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Port City Java, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Port City Java satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Port City Java and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Port City Java during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jameson L. Tai 15:02, 26 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Frances the Mute.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 ( talk) 20:56, 28 October 2007 (UTC) reply

I have nominated Independent Republic Quarterly, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent Republic Quarterly. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Rtphokie ( talk) 04:22, 29 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bob at Easel.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 ( talk) 07:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC) reply

==AfD nomination of Ocean Forest Hotel==

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ocean Forest Hotel, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ocean Forest Hotel. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ecoleetage ( talk) 22:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! -- SineBot ( talk) 07:36, 23 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi, I've rewritten Non-heterosexuals and would appreciate you revisiting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-heterosexuals to see if your concerns have been addressed. Thank you! Banjeboi 13:36, 24 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! -- SineBot ( talk) 00:27, 21 August 2008 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wikipedia IRA Blunder.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 05:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC) reply

I had never heard the term, or "SELL", even though I've been following this project since 2005 or 2006 online. I thought I'd have to create the article when I saw the term for the first time. I was relieved to see you already had. Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:20, 23 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello, Crtrue! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

-- Kumioko ( talk) 03:49, 4 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 11:21, 27 April 2011 (UTC) reply

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
-- Kumioko ( talk) 13:42, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Not a problem at all Carson. It was very clear to me that you weren't trying to damage anything on purpose. Those things happen. Have yourself a great day, and happy editing! :)  -- WikHead ( talk) 17:16, 3 October 2011 (UTC) reply

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
-- Kumioko ( talk) 04:31, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
-- Kumi-Taskbot ( talk) 18:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Amish POV.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:44, 6 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited

Date Saturday, December 8, 2012 Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104 Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand. Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki. Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration. Yours, Maximilianklein ( talk) 03:22, 1 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi - I may have just messed up your edit about the SC shooting - Could you go to 2015 Charleston, South Carolina shooting and re-add your content? There were two articles competing w each other and I wanted to get them consolidated ASAP. THanks and sorry for the inconvenience. KConWiki ( talk) 04:40, 18 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Not here thanks. The source image you used was at least the right species. - Peripitus (Talk) 12:25, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bob at Easel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 11:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC) reply