This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I (not-so) recently had my username changed from Ajl772 to radar33. If I move the indices page from User:ClueBot III/Indices/User talk:Ajl772 to User:ClueBot III/Indices/User talk:Radar33 (and any other of my userpages), will it screw up Cluebot's script, or will it still function okay?
I don't monitor Wikipedia as much as I used to, so if you would be to kind as to leave me a message on my talk page, or at least a notice that a response has been made here, I'd appreciate that. – radar 33 04:03, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
According to what I'm reading, Cluebot should be able to be set all the way to level 7.
I set it for 4, and had some odd results. please check the history of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure, for the last several bot edits.
It is also archiving "some" level 3 headers (though not others), which, from my understanding it shouldn't be doing at all.
Any thoughts/suggestions/fixes? : ) - jc37 12:53, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
hi!
we are trying to update the wiki page for bhaktivedanta college radhadesh. i am not familiar with the rules how texts should be added. can you kindly let me know why our text is reverted by you? or, if you know how it is done, maybe you can adjust our text. I see the issue with the photos displayed also. not great at all. would be nice to change them also.
thank you!
with best regards, dinadayal dasa (BC staff member) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.132.232.171 ( talk) 08:57, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
An IP user is repeatedly adding content from non reliable sources and i reverted it twice. That user added it for the third time and i explained the reason about my edits patiently. Please revert that IP's edit on the article because i cant do so adhering to WP:3RR. Thank you. Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 09:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
The change I've made in the article is constructive. I work directly for Cosculluela. The picture I put in the article, does not contain any form of vandalism. I want to help in Wikipedia. I take full responsibility for anything. I hope that picture can be in the article. I hope you respond soon. Thank you so much. -- MuekaDaBrain ( talk) 07:32, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
While ClueBot NG is up, I connected to #cluebotng-spam on irc.cluenet.org and I found no edits coming through. This basically makes tools like Huggle and STiki less effective, as well as breaks {{ Defcon}}. Who has access to the Cluenet servers that can fix this? Thanks. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 16:57, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Per the editnotice, I posted to
Rich Smiths' talk page, pinging Damian (who I now realize isn't active) (oops, I pinged the wrong damian. Sorry
DamianZaremba) and
Cobi, asking why ClueBot III tends to be on-and-off so often (going for a few hours, and then crashing).
Now, I haven't gotten a response and ClueBot III has been off for a day. Why is this? --
I dream of horses @ 23:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC) (changed at 04:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)) (fixed ping template at 04:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC))
First, yes I know the usual way to report these, but the bot didn't leave a revert ID or a message on the users talk page oddly enough. Diff is here. No vandalism to be found, but may be because of false warnings on that users talk page or a previous revert... EoRdE6( Come Talk to Me!) 00:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
User:ClueBot III archived a comment I added on 13 January eight days later, even though it was the only thread on the Talk page. I'm not happy about that. That Talk page only had a couple of edits per year. It doesn't need a bot, and even if one is used for it, it certainly should not archive threads after eight days. -- 82.136.210.153 ( talk) 12:31, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
|age=168
, which indicates that a thread should be archived once there have been no further posts within 168 hours of the last posting to that thread. 168 hours is exactly 7 days. --
Redrose64 (
talk) 14:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
|age=168
to e.g. |age=744
(31 days), or even removing the {{
User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis}} in its entirety. --
Redrose64 (
talk) 14:29, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, my edit on Ciara Discogrpahy page was by no means an attempt to vandalize. I am sorry if it looked that way but I am only new. Did you look at my source? http://hitsdailydouble.com/new_album_releases This source is the most recent announcement of the sales for the album 'Ciara' which is why I updated the sales to 208,000. I would appreciate if you would review my source and change the sales from 133,000 to 208,000. Thank you and I look forward to your feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brancott ( talk • contribs) 22:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC)