This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I saw that you're doing some very helpful edits against vandalism, which are a great contribution to Wikipedia. I do enjoy helping improve Wikipedia myself. It would be nice to catch you on IRC sometime and discuss how one can contribute against vandalism and what tools there are available for use. I saw that you're linking to a few IRC channels on freenode at the bottom of your userpage. I don't want to be rude and privately message you there without asking first. May I? :-)

-- dionyziz ( talk) 03:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC).

I'm not sure why User:74.227.143.119 decided to blank my talk page (I do a lot of new page patrol, which might explain it) but thanks for reverting it when I wasn't there to keep an eye on it. Much obliged. Accounting4Taste: talk 04:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

You reverted half a dozen constructive edits by a user here for no obvious reason. As before, please stop using automated tools to revert without carefully examining what you are rolling back, or your privileges of using them may be taken away again. krimpet ✽ 01:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, Compwhiz II^{( Talk)}_{( Contribs)} 01:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

It appears you've now rolled back an attempt by an IP at fixing vandalism, as well as given that IP a warning... as before, it is of utmost importance to double-check what you are doing when using automated tools. I'm sorry it had to come to this again, but I've removed your ability to use automated tools for one week. :/ krimpet ✽ 13:30, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

per this -  CobaltBlueTony™  _talk 17:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

It worked; thanks. I dunno why I thought you were an admin... -  CobaltBlueTony™  _talk 17:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry... I'll try to straighten up... I'm really sorry Mr. Compwhizii, sir. :)   jj137 (talk) 22:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! Peter G Werner ( talk) 01:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

I am a new member of Wikipedia and am inspired by your actions... I love to write and am currently working on my first expanding of a stub article called Joe Sutter. Yes, I like airplanes! A lot!

-- Airplaneman ( talk) 03:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey - how about not reverting every change? Just a thought... I was going to edit the Conjugate Gradient article but every little thing got reverted right as I was doing it. This is very counter productive. Unless your 13 year editors can fill out articles like this then please let users work on it. You can check in the next day and see if you want to revert the article then. This has been a very sour experience and I doubt I'll contribute monetarily or scientifically again. I heard google actually wants experts on their Knol site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.101.160.213 ( talk) 08:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Milk's_Favorite_Cookie#Editors_gone_wild —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.101.160.213 ( talk) 08:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Talk to me. What now? 68.101.160.213 ( talk) 01:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

I commented there.   jj137 (talk) 02:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Please look more closely at my edits before reverting them. A look at my edit summaries and Amen talkpage discussions make it clear that my changes are goodfaith ans constructive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanina ( talk • contribs) 02:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

{You know just like I do that this is not vandalism this article needs to be downsize, really it needs to downsize more} I left this comment for all to read I will down size this article again, not vandalism it but downsize it, I just don't have time right now also "I would be more than happy to work with you to downsize this article' THANKS TALK TO YOU LATER —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.104.238.191 ( talk) 02:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for rollback/Denied/February 2008#Compwhizii. RFRBot ( talk) 03:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Here's a free barnstar! Just feeling generous! Party! Talk to me! 03:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Watcha Think ---> CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 12:31, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much for posting on my talk page Tsubasa ( talk) 12:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

please don't do it again. adding sources and correcting errors is hardly unconstructive! much luff 80.5.156.202 ( talk) 13:39, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

the source is correct though, if you can find another source that fills the gap - replace it - otherwise I'd rather have an unrecognised source that IS correct, than none at all. also, you didnt need to revert LOADS of my edits did you? that's the sort of thing thats going to wind people up. much love 80.5.156.202 ( talk) 13:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

I do not cite it as a reliable source, but it is correct. If you know of a more reliable source then please cite it instead, it would be much appreciated. Again, you did not need to revert my hard work much luff 80.5.156.202 ( talk) 13:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Self-published material may, in some circumstances, be acceptable when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications. However, caution should be exercised when using such sources: if the information in question is really worth reporting, someone else is likely to have done so.

As the information is correct that says to me that it is ok (not great - but ok) to use SPS in this case - as a better source cannot currently be located. much luff 80.5.156.202 ( talk) 14:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

It says 'largely' which means there are exceptions. The fact has already been stated by scholars and the forum just restates this. stop messing around with the article, I doubt you even know the book. 80.5.156.202 ( talk) 23:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

What I am writing on the Archbishop Ryan page is completely true so cut me a break. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.202.22.1 ( talk) 16:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

What is the Wiki's policy with regards to the people that are proven liars? Are they in any way banned from further work on Wiki? Cebactokpatop ( talk) 16:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

I created that page and somehow you believe that I am vandalizing the page. Please repeal the decision. I was only separating the women's tennis from the men's tennis. thanks Hurricane06 ( talk) 17:31, 20 February 2008 (UTC).

No its completely true and dont call me buddy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.202.22.1 ( talk) 18:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Because thats the last thing I would wanna be is your buddy you tool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.202.22.1 ( talk) 18:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

I edited the ^[1] Rey Mysterio page, saying he was attacked after his match and it's vandalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Extra714 ( talk • contribs) 19:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 19:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

I did it!!! I did it!!! I did it!!!! I beat Cluebot! Yes!!! - Milk's Favorite Cookie 20:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh. (In blanking pages?) You signature is messing up BTW. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 20:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Good :) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 20:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Took this as vandalism on your page so I reverted it. Hope you don't mind. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Again :) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

A third time :) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

You recently gave this user a level 2 warning for these two edits. While I agree that adding unsourced information & POV to articles is not ideal, it certainly doesn't have the appearance of someone out to do damage to the article. -- Sturm 20:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Sine per WP:NOT, the content was advert like so it was removed. I've had experience before in things like this, in the end they were removed. Please also see WP:SCH#WNTI for more info. CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 21:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

That's beside the point. I'm not saying you shouldn't have reverted – far from it. I was trying to say that the warning was out of proportion to the edits – {{ Uw-npov1}} and a pointer to the guidelines on school articles would've been more appropriate here. -- Sturm 22:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Ah! Okay. Will do! Thank you for bringing this to my attention. CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 22:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

For your warning at User talk:99.247.232.99. This anon IP has also left me a series of bizarre messages on my Talk page - up to three now. Thanks again, Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Not like this. Please ensure you revert to a good version - you reverted someone's vandalism, but the version you reverted to was also that of a vandal. You'll notice that the bot did the same thing before you, though I think it would be a bit futile to tell this to it. And the next editor did the same thing too, but assumed your version was vandal free. In fact, every editor since then seemed to do the same thing - which is why it's really important to revert to a good version. Cheers. Richard001 ( talk) 21:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

This header appears to be slightly condescending. The vandalism was coming in pretty rapidly from two accounts and an IP for about 18 minutes. Shit happens. I'm sure we've all reverted to a less than ideal version before. And in this edit a few minutes later, Compwhizii fixed the vandalism that Cluebot missed. So Compwhizii was pretty much aware of what was going on, but something got missed in the flurry of activity, and it was soon corrected. Not a big deal. Compwhizii, thank you for helping out. -- Bongwarrior ( talk) 22:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you Bong warrior! CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 22:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

We removed a comment on the Tim Clancy page that stated that "he was a twat" as we believed it personal and unjustified.

Kind regards, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.124.152.59 ( talk) 21:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

what does unconstructive mean? Female circumsision is referred to by its opponents as female genital mutilation and to proponents as female circumcision. male circumsision is referred to by its opponents as male genital mutilation and to proponents as circumcision. How come the female circumsision page says, ALSO known as female genital mutilation, but the Circumcision page does not. Explain why it is UNconstructive please. thank you. 70.114.38.167 ( talk) 21:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

I reverted what appears to be some erroneous edits at this article. Get back to my talk page if this was done in error by me. Bearian ( talk) 22:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

I reverted/rolled back my own edits. There was some sort of problem with a bot or tag. It made it a " category:speedy" article. I have not the foggiest what happened. Bearian ( talk) 23:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

There appears to be relics of vandalism: the mayor is not a dinasuar, and the template for the MSA is wrong/ a red link. Bearian ( talk) 23:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Dear sir, I created that entry and left a note on the discussion page demonstrating its importance, not sure why it's still deleted, please investigate thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saobi ( talk • contribs) 02:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Umm hey. I definitely wasn't vandalizing anything and you are like about to block me from editing things. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.236.0.73 ( talk) 02:18, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Do you work for the company? I mean maybe you'll get injured and fired for it too.. I hope you do. You deserve it.. I hope you can sleep at night. I can't walk anymore since I lost my legs.. and I don't get ANY money from compensation cause Dofasco lied to me and inspectors.. I hope you can sleep at night.. I loose my house tomorrow due to Dofasco — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.247.232.99 ( talk) 21:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Cebactokpatop has reverted the title of the Zizioulas image again. [1]

He also silently erased (under the pretext of 'rearranging') comments of mine on his talk-page, including my reply to your question. My comments are here. Seminarist ( talk) 19:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Fixed CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 19:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Cebactokpatop's reverted his talk-page again, deleting my comments again. Seminarist ( talk) 19:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi again. I'd like your advice. Cebactokpatop is continuing with incivility and personal attacks. In fact, every edit he makes which concerns me now contains both. I would like him to stop, but it is clear that he will continue. What can be done? Seminarist ( talk) 14:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Actually - it looks like maybe he has, against all odds, stopped for the time being. Seminarist ( talk) 15:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I do appreciate your work scanning for vandalism, but you'll find that my edits were as per a legitimate complaint, detailed on the talk page, and that the second edit was deisgned to make the edits a legitimate replacement for removed content. Looking forward to your response-- 72.255.83.201 ( talk) 02:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

• Coolbeans. Thanks. :)-- 72.255.83.201 ( talk) 21:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

WHy did you revert to Shahihd's version? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Itihaaskar ( talk • contribs) 13:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, This is Pragun and i tried to make an edit on an article titled Call Of Duty : United offensive, under the sub-head gameplay changes. The following changes were made by me

i changed the phrase "cook grenades" to "cock grenades"

Please note that i am not trying to introduce obscenities but merely making a correct change. Cock grenade is the correct phrase and cook grenade is not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.228.164 ( talk) 14:14, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I believe the ability to "cook" a grenade refers to the player being able to keep it after it is armed, so that it explodes more rapidly when thrown. "Cocking" a grenade may be a variant. · AndonicO ^Hail! 14:19, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Was going through what was going to be deleted to try and save some of it by giving alternative sources. If I deleted anything its because there wasn't, or I couldn't find the source.

Also, the parts that I have/will delte were parts of what I wrote, so I am only "vandalising" my own writing, that was going to be deleted anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Untileveryoneisfree ( talk • contribs) 15:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For not only reverting vandalism on my talk page several times, but reverting vandalism in the main space as well, I - Milk's Favorite Cookie hereby award you this barnstar. Good Job! - Milk's Favorite Cookie 15:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

WPRAO <-- Wikipedia-related acronym overload

ahahaha! _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{that one guy who buried stuff} 20:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar
		For your help in finally putting an end to the monstrous backlog at Articles for creation, I, Hersfold ( t/ a/ c), hereby award you the Articles for Creation Barnstar! Well done, and thank you for your dedication to the project! Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 22:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm off to bed now so I'll leave the user page creation up to you ;-) - It looks good from what I can see and I really appreciate you doing this for me :-) - Do you reckon you'd be able to finish it when you get home from school? I'll check it out in the morning if you do. Thanks mate. I'll be sure to reward your hardwork don't worry! Thanks again! See you tomorrow! Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 23:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Have you read the references provided? Not a single professional historian says akbar's wife was called jodha. So how are my edits controversial? It is just shahid who feels that he knows better then the historians that i am quoting. Though I have requested him to come up with citations to bolster his claim. He is yet to do that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Itihaaskar ( talk • contribs) 15:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Please read this: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Trade_not_invasion_brought_Islam_to_India/articleshow/2144414.cms

Scroll to the end of the article. Itihaaskar ( talk) 16:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Given your past involvement, you may be interested in contributing to a new discussion at Talk:Asia (band)#Proposal to re-insert certain external links. Bondegezou ( talk) 17:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

WTH, have I ever contributed to pornography articles? :/ Not in my knowledge... *reverts vandalism to talk page* · AndonicO ^Hail! 21:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

{{subst:uw-bv}} · AndonicO ^Hail! 21:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

On your user page, you misspelled Huggle (as 'huugle'). Not really a big deal, but just thought I'd let you know. :D -- SyntaxError55 ^talk 22:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the cookie. :) -- SyntaxError55 ^talk 22:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Your change to teapot was unecessary and unhelpful. It has hence been reverted. In the future please review people's change before resorting to heavy handed and unhelpful actions.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.21.246 ( talk) 23:01, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the vandal on my page I am assuming good faith with them but maybe I might be wrong. BigDunc ( talk) 23:09, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

on SR0G Im pretty sure that his correct spelling of the name is NiGHTS. sure in Japan I think his japanese name isn't spelt with capitals but in the English subtitles of Journey of Dreams the subtitles clearly states the name as "NiGHTS". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.33.91 ( talk) 23:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Please review people's changes before reverting, and especially before accusing them of vandalism. It is you after all who suggested to asume good faith. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.21.246 ( talk) 23:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

I recently made an edit to "role playing game" and it was deleted by you. It was in no way a promotional link. It was indeed an link to a new community for rpg fans. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barryrpg ( talk • contribs) 00:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

This is in response to the recent reversion of an update to the article that I hade written. I would like to draw your attention towards the discussion page for the article where I have summarised my motives and sources for the update I performed recently. As I am a new Wikipedian editor I had resorted to several attempts to update the article which probably appeared as though to be an act of vandalism, though I can confirm that it was nothing more than a lack of experience in the editing process. I hope you will consider my discussion favourably.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bank_of_Credit_and_Commerce_International#Majority_Shareholder_View

Thanks Syedshoaib ( talk) 10:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello!

• If you can write a suspected sock puppet report, please do so. But Itihaaskar ( talk · contribs) is not a suspected sock puppet. He is a sock puppet, and was blocked for that.
• Please have a look at the talk page discussion. I've made a long analisys of the matter. Please comment.

Regards, Shahid • ^Talk2me 09:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

He used this IP: 124.125.208.23 ( talk · contribs) and was subsequently blocked. So it doesn't matter. Shahid • ^Talk2me 17:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Could you please explain why you reverted discussion content and links I placed re: The City of Oakland's zoning revision study on the discussion page of Downtown Oakland, California I'm in an editing process with another editor, you deleted discussion content and reverted links to the city of Okaland's zoning study:"Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Downtown Oakland has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 18:29, 23 February 2008 (UTC)... Critical Chris ( talk) 18:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey guy, that "copyrighted" website to which you're referring is an open source public record link to the City of Oakland California's website. It is not copyright infringement. Please don't mis-characterize my links, and BE CAREFUL with your hasty reverts. Critical Chris (talk) 18:54, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I'm no patent and trademark attorney, but that was a government website with open source public policy information, none of which is privileged or protected by copyright laws. Critical Chris ( talk) 19:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on User_talk:Muslim_soldier. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Raphael1 19:05, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

WP:AGF "There will be people on Wikipedia with whom you disagree. Even if they are wrong, that does not mean they are trying to wreck the project. [...] Making unwarranted accusations of bad faith can be inflammatory, and is often unhelpful in a dispute." Even the first vandalism warning is unwarranted, unless you can prove that the editor in question is indeed trying to harm Wikipedia. Disagreeing with you on what images should be on Muhammad is not vandalism. -- Raphael1 19:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No, it doesn't make be happy, because anything written on a talk page is a personal opinion of the person who put it there. This is not in any way a policy of any kind. In fact it violates WP:Consensus_can_change which states, that "A small group of editors can reach a consensual decision, but when the article gains wider attention, others may then disagree. The original group should not block further change on grounds that they already have made a decision." This is in fact a Wikipedia policy! -- Raphael1 23:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm a brand new wikipedian... but I made a (hopefully) better edit to Bowler this time... (including reference)

The Good Sir J ( talk) 19:15, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I just transfered what was written in water damage previously. I will write a more definitive definition of water damage restoration. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monayuki ( talk • contribs) 20:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Glad to have you participating, By the way, we do not use the symbols at AfD--though they are used in various other places, such as checkuser. DGG ( talk) 00:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I added two references to Cowdenpark House. You may want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cowdenpark House. -- Eastmain ( talk) 03:10, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Why was my edit undone? All the data is properly sourced. World's busiest airports. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.226.229 ( talk) 04:08, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi,

I have made an article for water damage restoration. I will put the necessary wikipedia internal link and some external links. Just check it out if there are changes needed. I don't vandalize and just want accurate information on my specific subject of interest. I will also try to convert this to my native language but it will take time. Hope for your response.

Thanks

Water damage restoration is the process of restoring a property back to pre-loss condition or better after sustaining any level of water damage. As of now, there is no specific government law that requires procedures. Most companies use the IICRC procedural standard, which is the S500. It is based on reliable restoration principles, research and practical experience with extensive consultation and information gathered from numerous sources. These include but are not limited to, the scientific community, the international, national and regional trade associations serving the disaster restoration industry, chemical formulators and equipment manufacturers, cleaning and restoration schools, restoration service companies, the insurance industry, allied trades persons and others with specialized experience. The S500 water damage guide is subject to further revision as developments occur in technology, testing and processing procedures.

The IICRC S500 provides a specific set of practical standards for water damage restoration. It does not attempt to teach comprehensive water damage restoration procedures, rather it provides the foundation and basic principles of proper restoration practices. Prior to specifying the job scope and procedures, the S500 must be reviewed. This is important so that the individual circumstances of each restoration job is taken into account. Users of the S500 must be in pace with technology and follow all rules and regulations of a country whether it may be federal, state, provincial or local law. Each case of a water damage may be unique and common sense may require deviation from the S500.

The procedures to be followed and the precaution to be observed when performing water damage or sewage damage restoration of homes, buildings and other structures, and their contents describes specific guidelines or steps.

Loss Assessment and Evaluation Categorization of Water in Water Damage Principles in Drying Structural and Contents Consideration Monitoring Final Inspection and Completion

Some homeowners, property managers, building maintenance operators use their own personels to perform water damage restoration to save on the growing costs, it is prescribed to hire a professional water damage restoration company to perform these services since there are defining criterias and methods to be used for assessing water damage and establishing restoration procedures. Because of the unique circumstances of every water damage restoration project, it is impractical to issue blanket rules intended to a situation. In extenuating circumstance, deviation from portions of the S500 may be appropriate. In performing a job, carelessness is never acceptable and common sense should always prevail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monayuki ( talk • contribs) 12:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you so much for joining the random button. You are the first one to join (besides me). Please use the userbox if you can, and thanks again for joining the The Random Button! -- Nothing444 ( talk) 12:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Complaint resolved on 16:48, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

The following is a complaint by: Soxred93 |  talk bot On the page User talk:Compwhizii At about Whenever you put this up. The complaint is about a revert. Additional comments: You stole the code I used on WP:IFU! just kidding, you gave me permission to fill out this test report.

Soxred93 |  talk bot 16:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

The following is a complaint by: CWii( Talk| Contribs) On the page: User:Compwhizii At about: meh The complaint is about a: warning.Severity: {{{WikiProject Severe weather}}} Additional comments: Hi

CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 16:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

The following is a complaint by: CWii( Talk| Contribs) On the page: Sex At about: Never Severity: HIGH Additional comments: sdfdsgdsfgsdfgdsgerdvfdvfdsv

CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 17:00, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Got your message. I understand the concern very well and as much as possible I am being neutral in editing. If you could kindly check my edits just to make sure we are in the same page and I would very much appreciate it. I recently edited IICRC too and hope I am neutral with my edits. Thanks Monayuki ( talk) 20:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

You have previously expressed an interest in undergoing the Admin coaching program. We're currently engaged in a program reset to help things move more smoothly in the future. If you are still interested in the program, please go to Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests for Coaching and re-list yourself under Current requests, deleting your entry from Older requests. Also, double-check to make sure coaching is right for you at the Coachee checklist; WP:Adoption or WP:Editor review may be more appropriate depending on your situation and aspirations. We should get back to you within a day or so, once a coaching relationship has been identified. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 06:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, when relisting AfDs, please remember to move the AfD from the original log to a new log, see example diffs [2] [3]. Please check back all AfDs you have relisted to make sure they are in order. Best regards, -- PeaceNT ( talk) 13:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Good day, and thank you for applying to use the counter-vandalism tool VandalSniper. I am pleased to inform you that your application has been accepted, and you are now approved to use the tool. You are now welcome to download the program - and be sure to read the features guide, if you have not already done so. Please bear in mind that VandalSniper is a powerful program, and that misuse may result in your access being withdrawn by a moderator. Don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any questions, and once again welcome to VandalSniper! Kind regards, AGK ( contact) 18:38, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Since I experienced your radical reverting I came back to your page to say No Hard Feelings. So, we are all good.

Now I see other complaints exactly like mine. Wow. You really should stop reverting stuff you don't know anything about. Anyway, you've got a lot of problems to deal with - I am not one. If/when I edit the Conjugate Gradient article again just stay clear. Thanks :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.101.160.213 ( talk) 04:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Who are you? I mean, do you patrol all of Wikipedia or just certain pages, I'm new to this and got a vandalism warning.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Robpanini ( talk • contribs) 18:40, 14 February 2008

CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 18:53, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

This was placed on your user page:

Dear Compwhizii, is that your real name? Please use a real name while communicating to me as WikiPedia editors are rather well known to abuse their anonymity. I will not take our comments on my page seriously unless you appear as a real person.

Also, please explain how my comments were "unconstructive" in your opinion. Do you have the educational qualification or are you otherwise merited to evaluate what I say on your personal site? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.198.59 ( talk • contribs)

CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 18:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 18:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

i just edditied MY responce with th 4 ~ so that he could contact me i did not ,ean to pose a personal attack.—Preceding unsigned comment added by pitrand ( talk • contribs) CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 18:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

This is not a personal attack, since you said "I make mistakes", and sending me that threatening message was I hope a mistake. The changes I made were based on evidence I have viewed numerous times. Before you abuse your authority again, study and research what is being edited before you send another threatening message. I will report you the next time you do CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 18:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello, I am pleased to announce that you have been paired with User:Riana as an admin coachee. You now have two important tasks to complete:

1. Introduce yourself to Riana and explain to them why you want to be an admin.

2. Once they has confirmed the relationship to you, edit Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests for Coaching to move your name to Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Status to record the match.

Given the limited coaching resources of the Admin Coaching project, if you plan to take a Wikibreak of more than 30 days, please notify your coach or myself so that we will know not to tag you as retired and give your spot to another user. Remember that adminship is not a big deal and that it may take multiple RfAs before one becomes a sysop, even for a highly qualified, coached, editor. Also, remember that while admin coaching will help you prepare for the mop, there is no guarantee that completing this program will ensure passage of an RfA.

Congratulations again, and happy editing. MBisanz ^talk 20:33, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey matie - so this is how you found me! I had no idea, hehe :) I've started something up for you here. Since you gave me so much time with mine, I'll let you take your time with this ;) Good luck and if there are any questions at any point in time, you know where to find me. Talkpage is best, IRC is OK too. Cheers, ~ Riana ⁂ 06:44, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

·Add§hore· ^Talk/ _Cont 07:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I didn't know I was canvassing. I read it. Please, come back! Please. I am kind of new to wikipedia (joined last summer, 850+ edits) so I don't know this stuff. Please come back. Signed in Sorrow, Nothing 444 23:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I have deleted some canvassed messages by me. Please come back, Compwhizzii. Signed in Sorrow, Nothing 444 01:26, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, you just put a "Welcome" template on my user page. I've been editing a while now and had zero reverts of my work out of 1300-odd edits. Are you trying to tell me something? Pterre ( talk) 00:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks.

Complaint resolved on 01:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

The following is a complaint by: 66.142.41.240 ( talk) On the page: Article Name At about: Time Severity: Medium

66.142.41.240 ( talk) 01:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. I have seen that you use huggle by the fact that you have automatically updated the huggle white list(it does this when closing huggle). I was wondering if you would add the category [[Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle]] to your user page so that it fills out and we know who actually uses huggle. If you do not want to you do not have to. I am also sorry if i have already talked to you about this or you no longer use huggle but i sent it to everyone that has edited the page since mid January. I hope we can start to fill out this category. If you would like to reply to this message then please reply on my talk page as i will probably not check here again. Thanks. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/ _Cont 18:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Random, pan-topic edits are far more unconstructive than amateur chiding. One tip would to be that sticking to subjects of which you might actually know something about, rather than jumping on every topic you see. Asides from spelling and grammar, I would presume professional editors do not make such sweeping and random edits unless they are aware of the subject matter at hand. Don't threaten me with being blocked again unless you have reviewed your own conduct editing this website. You should attmept some amount of discernment rather than using a 'Bot' to do the work for you. OoohOoohAaah ( talk) 08:45, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your note asking me to stop leaving a note with a subject matter Wikiproject referencing an AfD nom. You're right. That's the wrong thing to do as it gives the potential for votestacking. While I read "Do not message editors about AfD nominations because they support your view..." before I commented on my first AfD, I didn't interpret/recognize it as meaning WikiProjects. On those occasions when I did contact a WikiProject, I stated it in my AfD comment. I thought I was being helpful. On 3/2, I read on some AfD nom that it was posted to a topic page; that seemed like fair notice. So effective 3/2, I stopped leaving a notice with respective WikiProjects. ( talk) 23:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)}}

• Compwhizii, Please revisit your comments to me after you read this. I started on AfD on 2/25/2008, so it shouldn't be too difficult to verify that on those occasions when I left a message on a WikiProject Talk page: it was only once per AfD nom, each message was neutral (i.e. "opportunity to comment"), my AfD comment included mention of my WikiProject Talk page message. I look forward to hearing back from you. Coffee4me ( talk) 00:19, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Your tools vandalized my page and in so doing, your actions breached the wiki Civility code. This is not acceptable. The cookie? That was an error on my part; I've retracted it. If you don't retract your comments, made in error, I'll take my grievance up the chain. Coffee4me ( talk) 04:38, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Watch your back. =) Malinaccier ( talk) 01:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

- Warthog Demon 02:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Complaint resolved on 21:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

The following is a complaint by: rspeer / ɹəədsɹ On the page: Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Non-Free Content Compliance Bot At about: 20:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC) Severity: Medium Additional comments: I disapprove of what you said at the Non-Free Content Compliance Bot discussion. In the midst of an already touchy discussion, you attacked one of the users involved. Saying "I'm surprised your ass hasn't been indef blocked yet." was inappropriate to the situation and helps nothing. Also, this complaint box is silly, and I can't reasonably follow your directions. I have to put something in Subject/Headline, or else I'm making an edit with no summary.

rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 06:45, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I came here for the same reason as Rspeer. I found your remarks on the page highly unhelpful and offensive. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 19:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Apologies for that. Snowolf was contacted through IRC. CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 21:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Get back on gmail right now —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.196.173 ( talk) 22:45, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello Compwhizii,

Please allow the link edited into this page as it relates directly to the development of mobile payments in the history of banking. I stumbled across it on You Tube and I believe it relates to a presentation to the banking community explaining the release to the public of the first mobile payment process linked to a persons bank account.

Thanks

Hans

Sir, the Israel defense force is responsible for the design, manufacture, and refinement of the Desert Eagle. Please stop vandalizing my correction before I have you reported.

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.177.193.13 ( talk) 01:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm only thirteen what do you expect? Leave me alone!-- ~*~Lil'GKhanster~*~Take Care & Live Life ( talk) 01:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh my bad! anyways... guess you're just trying to help then...-- ~*~Lil'GKhanster~*~Take Care & Live Life ( talk) 01:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

It is not of American origin. The Israelis have plenty to do with the design and refinement. If not change it to Israel at least show dual origin. It is a common known fact that US and Israel private and government weapons manufacturers work hand in hand. The Magnum Research Inc. is no exception. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.177.193.13 ( talk) 01:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi John, I'm sorry I've been so busy :( I've responded to some of your answers, and will have some more questions/tasks up by tomorrow. ~ Riana ⁂ 12:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Test John Bot ( talk) 20:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Sup it's Alex, can u take a wiki break and test my new game? go on gmail http://www.sendspace.com/file/60fd0c —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.196.173 ( talk) 00:28, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I'd love to use your form, but right now, I'm entirely too drunk to figure it out. Your bot just added a rune stone article, Burestenen, to some geology wikiproject. Please fix whatever's causing it to do that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamrush ( talk • contribs) 02:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Complaint resolved on 23:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

The following is a complaint by: Verisimilus  T On the page: Burgsvik beds At about: Time Severity: Low Additional comments: I'm just intrigued to know how your bot decided to classify this article as a stub? Verisimilus  T 02:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Verisimilus  T 02:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Um, yeah complaint! I keep trying to stop vandals, and you keep getting in the way by reverting! PLEASE STOP or else you will be blocked for being faster at reverting than me (this is a joke) -- Alisyn ^talk 22:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

The following is a complaint by: DavidBlackwell ( talk) On the page: Boston and Albany Railroad At about: March 9, 2008 7:30PM The complaint is about a: revert. Severity: High Additional comments: My references are very good references and are constructive. This is second time someone like you has reverted my constructive additions. It is very annoying. You do not appear to be looking at this change I made. The references were to the 1871 Atlas of Mass and the original survey of the railroad. DavidBlackwell ( talk) 23:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC) They are not spam they are links to maps of the railroad at the Essex County Registry of Deeds. and links to the original plan of the Railroad. Why do say that they are links to spam? Read what they link to. Give me a call. I can explain further. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidBlackwell ( talk • contribs) 23:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC) The Boston and Albany Railroad goes across several counties and cities. There is no good table of contents at the Registry of Deeds. People just get confused going to the one link. If you want you can move the references to the external link area, but I think it better in the references section. DavidBlackwell ( talk) 00:21, 10 March 2008 (UTC) So can you please revert your revert. Thanks. DavidBlackwell ( talk) 01:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC) You have reverted a reference that is clearly not vandalism, which is clearly a constructive addition and is related to the article. Regarding your quibble about the format, you could have edited out any non relevent links and try to explain why you thought it non relevant. Of course that requires that you read the article and think about it. Or you could have put the reference into an external links section. These references are valuable and needed. they show where the railroad was built and how the original survey was made in 1829. I think your revert borders on vandalism itself. I think you should admit that your bot is not working properly. Please explain yourself. DavidBlackwell ( talk) 02:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

DavidBlackwell ( talk) 23:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

No no, thank you for helping me out this morning! Seems there are only two of us around! Bobo . 00:50, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Botar is a former Member because he was killed Look on bs01. It is all there. User:Kazi22 10 March —Preceding comment was added at 01:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I really don't think this AfD should have been closed. I think it needed a re-list (yes, another) as no evidence at all, forget about actual reliable sources to back up the claims was ever provided and there's no evidence that it passes WP:CORP in the slightest. What was your reasoning in closing it? TRAVELLINGCARI ^{My story} _{Tell me yours} 01:56, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

The following is a complaint by: 68.6.121.5 ( talk) On the page: Article Name At about: Time Severity: Medium

68.6.121.5 ( talk) 02:38, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey Compwhizii,

I just wanted to stop by and let you know that when you relist debates, you should go ahead and comment out their transclusion on the existing log using standard HTML comments tags (<!-- -->)--otherwise the discussion stays on the original log and is listed as open on WP:AFDO. Specifically, I noticed that you just relisted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out Da Darkness Of Da Kut‎ and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carrom Federation of Sri Lanka on the current log without removing them from the old one. I'll go ahead and fix those for you, but please keep an eye out in the future.

Also, when closing a debate as you did here, it's generally recommended that you note your non-admin status in your closing statement (see WP:DELPRO#NAC). Thanks! -- jonny- m t 03:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and I just thought you should also know that Firefox doesn't like your talkpage formatting--I'm showing two columns and bunch of random text right now ;) -- jonny- m t 03:55, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Heya John, left some questions for you yesterday (well, quite a lot actually!) Just checking to see whether you noticed. Take your time, as always! ~ Riana ⁂ 16:11, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

The following is a complaint by: 76.116.26.149 ( talk) On the page: Article Name At about: Time Severity: Medium

76.116.26.149 ( talk) 00:07, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

The following is a complaint by: 76.116.26.149 ( talk) On the page: Freeshia At about: 8:00 PM Severity: Low Additional comments: I did not vandilize an article it said I did

76.116.26.149 ( talk) 00:10, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi! My edits to CRH were not remotely vandalistic. Could you pls take a look and see what was evidently misinterpreted. Thanks!! StewiekilledLois!! ( talk) 00:33, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

The following is a complaint by: 68.116.156.96 ( talk) On the page: Article Name At about: Time Severity: Medium

68.116.156.96 ( talk) 00:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop reverting all my Burden Brothers threads, the infobox rightfully goes into their pages.

Sweeeeeet. Thanks for the add. InvisibleDiplomat666 ( talk) 01:16, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

The insertion of this whacking gigantic table puts undue emphasis on the Green Gulls' men's basketball team, at the expense of the entire rest of the history of the school. That is why I have to concur that the scores should stay out. -- Orange Mike | Talk 01:26, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

You might want to post a conciliatory note on ZKPilot's talk page, too. -- Orange Mike | Talk 01:29, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Dear John, thank you for taking part in my RfB. As you may know, it was not passed by bureaucrats. I would, however, like to thank you for taking the time to voice your support, despite concerns cited by the opposition. Although RfA/B isn't really about a person, but more about the community, I was deeply touched and honoured by the outpouring of support and interest in the discussion. I can only hope that you don't feel your opinion was not considered enough - bureaucrats have to give everyone's thoughts weight. I also hope that the results of this RfB lead to some change in the way we approach RfBs, and some thought about whether long-entrenched standards are a good thing in our growing and increasingly heterogenous community. I remain eager to serve you as an administrator and as an editor. If at any point you see something problematic in my actions, please do not hesitate to call me out. ~ Riana ⁂ 12:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I made a change earlier because I thought it was allowed but since you guys warned me I thought it would be good to remove the blatant link spam on the Dress page. If you see the revision I made it is removing a link spam which you can clearly see by clicking through to the site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.193.159.110 ( talk) 01:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

The following is a complaint by: 72.193.159.110 ( talk) On the page: Dress At about: Time Severity: Low Additional comments: you changed a revision where I removed spam. You can check out the revision and see.

72.193.159.110 ( talk) 01:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

The following is a complaint by: 72.193.159.110 ( talk) On the page: Dress At about: Time Severity: Low Additional comments: Can you explain how that is not spam. I tried adding something like that earlier and was warned. That link is just placed in through a ref tag and there is no useful information to reference from the site. If you could explain your views on why it is not spam.

72.193.159.110 ( talk) 01:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

aplogize for that but it is spam, easy to see by clicking to the site. There is not useful information to reference. I guess as long as you throw a ref tag with spam it works right —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.193.159.110 ( talk) 01:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi Compwhizii. At a request for arbitration, this edit you made several days ago was mentioned. I apologise for bringing it up now, but at the time I remember thinking it was an unhelpful comment, and re-reading it has reinforced that impression. In particular, saying "I'm surprised your ass hasn't been indef blocked yet" is not at all helpful. Please, in future, do not speculate about indefinite blocking in that manner, particularly in the middle of a dispute. It does not help and only inflames things. Thanks. Carcharoth ( talk) 16:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi: I have created a "framework for clarification" to help resolve the editorial conflicts at the Temple Shalom of Northwest Arkansas page, see Talk:Temple Shalom of Northwest Arkansas#Framework for clarification that should help deal with this. Thanks, IZAK ( talk) 22:50, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

User:ComputerGuy890100/Fooled

Put {{User:ComputerGuy890100/Fooled|Compwhizii}} in your awards area to show you were fooled! ComputerGuy89010 0 ^Talk _Polls 01:04, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Will Calhoun Jeroen Tel Procedural animation PageDefrag Charlie Hunter Old Town, Prague Corey Glover Leo Beenhakker BartPE Windows Personal Web Server Operation Southern Watch Session Description Protocol Willie Dixon Danelectro Bass note Darryl Jones Reggie Lucas Blood in My Eye Noto

Cleanup Marco van Basten Demographic history of the United States Network operating system Merge Old school hip hop MSDE Guitar tuning Add Sources B. B. King The Glimmer Twins Going Dutch Wikify Brussels-Halle-Vilvoorde Analytic Hierarchy Process Transportation in the United States Expand Grandmaster Flash Windows Workflow Foundation Bootsy Collins

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 14:34, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

I thought you’d like to know that I’ve just filed over at COI/N regarding all the reverts over at Rent to own. — Wulf ( talk) 07:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello! I'm here to inform you that the Tzatziki Squad has begun a new collaboration, history of timekeeping devices. The goal for the article is Featured status. Please pitch in as much or as little as you can, we appreciate your help! Keilana| ^{Parlez ici} 21:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey you said on the ASIA discussion page no my space links, then please remove the john Payne official myspace link on the john payne wiki page if you claim ASIA's official my space link does not belong because NO MY SPACE LINKS BELONG ON WIKIPEDIA! If so... here is a violation! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Payne_%28singer%29 Please act or make it clear that the official ASIA my space page belongs on the ASIA wiki site, and reinstate it! 70.188.184.84 ( talk) 03:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)AP

Compwhizii, I've added a comment to this duplicate question to AP (70.188.184.84) on my page here, feel free to comment, expand, dismiss, shoot down or ignore.. ect/ect. cheers ;)-- Hu12 ( talk) 04:40, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

You only have to look at my edit and careful work and my contributions to see that my edit was not vandalism, should not have been reverted, and the reversion should have been explained. If someone reverts an appropriate improvement to an article, they should explain their reason for doing so. Asking this of another editor is not vandalism under any definition of the word. -- Blechnic ( talk) 01:19, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

That revert was not mine. Thank you. CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 01:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

You're correct, what you reverted was my question of the reverter. If someone reverts an edit inappropriately, it is a good start to simply ask them why they did so. Your accusing me of vandalism for taking the obvious first step, asking for clarification, was closer to vandalism than my asking what was going on. -- Blechnic ( talk) 01:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

I'd be gratefull for any explanation why my edit was reverted? There is a discussion page where I ask for reasoning behind these signs, strangely enough I can find no post from you... Reverting without explanation - THAT is vandalism.

If you think the article needs cleenup - suggest changes. If you think article need references, tell us what is wrong with the referencing that is already in the article. If you know nothing about the subject, please switch your attention somewhere else... I am sure you understand the difference between fighting vandalism and fighting for stagnation on wikipedia.

Just for your information below I paste links to articles dealing with the same subject: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piperi_clan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bjelopavli%C4%87i_%28clan%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku%C4%8Di

As you can see there are no sighns there. And they need it much more than Vasojevici

Looking forward to your CONSTRUCTIVE contribution

Mikolaj Dragovic —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drmiko ( talk • contribs) 21:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for that :). I have added the tags to the other articles you gave me. Thank you! CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 21:40, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

If you are trying to insult me you are making a progress. Still I think I just did not make my point clear. Once again: I was expecting some constructive contribution. If you are unfamiliar with the term please check it out in the dictionarry (no offence meant). I politely ask you once again: if you want those signs in the article I have no problems with that just give reasoning so we can all improve the article. If you cannot provide any arguments and you revert only for the sake of fighting vandalism than, I am afraid, your reverting is vandalism. Drmiko ( talk) 09:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

It is so sad that such an overly-zelous and arogant child policeman has such a power on Wikipedia... I have asked you politely and calmely three times for a constructive approach, or in fact any reasoning of your reverts. And still you did not give me any answer. Therefore I am removing the sign from the article. And I will continue removing them so long as you do not explain your reverts. If you think that that is vadalism and my contribution to Wikipedia is not wanted feel free to ban me, or whatever else you can do. I will take steps from there. Drmiko ( talk) 21:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

kind regards p.s. I took a look through your archive. Wow, it seems you are a recidivist

Looks like you're a n00b. CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 22:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Amazing... "No, you listen to me mister. The article needs formatting and clean up." Now, that is specific... "Looks like you're a n00b." Now, that is constructive (btw, yes I am a noob, so? I created the article from the scratch, that's a start). So for the forth time, I ask for reasoning. And, of course, I removing the sign. Drmiko ( talk) 23:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drmiko ( talk • contribs) 23:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

sigh. CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 23:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

sigh... "needs cleanup". I am amazed how patient I can be... So, what do you meen by clenup? I beleve it is quite vague Drmiko ( talk) 00:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

It's a mess! it needs cleanup! VAGUE IT IS!! CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 00:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Blink tag removed. Don't be a dick. dihydrogen monoxide ( H₂O) 00:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

"You are a n00b". Is that comment on content or people? Correct me if I am wrong but "It's a mess" is not specific for me. Drmiko ( talk) 00:28, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Drmiko. I think the main issue with the article is the Structure of the Vasojevići Tribe section - it contains some information that might not belong in an encyclopedia, like the lists of branches/brotherhoods, etc. Otherwise, the article mostly looks OK - thanks for your contributions! If you have any questions, you're welcome to ask them on my talk page. Regards, dihydrogen monoxide ( H₂O) 00:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry all. Lost mai cool ;) CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 00:34, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your mediation Dihydren Monoxide, I appreciate it. Drmiko ( talk) 00:38, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Steals and eats it muh ha ha ha! ;) CWii_{( Talk| Contribs)} 00:40, 5 April 2008 (UTC)