 | This user may have left Wikipedia. CL has not edited Wikipedia since 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
|
Current |
I don't mind Ad, it is simpler :p though the first time I saw it, I was like..? WTF? But thanks for the star, and lets hope it makes it through its ACR. -- Admrb♉ltz ( t • c • log) 00:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi CL, Sorry to say I'm burned out on highway copyedits for a while. I've done five in the last few weeks. I'd suggest trying the WP:PRV volunteer list or recruiting an editor from one of the highway projects. My best. Finetooth ( talk) 01:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
OK
- The name, thats cool
- dash - I have seen it with and with out dashes through out UTSH articles, we do use the dash then?
- I listed the two non-SR interchanges because in the route log they were listed as "federal aid routes" which I figured would be important for a major intersections list
- And you meddled with my exit list, I was using the junction boxes from the USRD article templates section
-- Admrb♉ltz ( t • c • log) 12:05, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Re the exit list, okay, that works. The federal aid routes I guess is fine too, I just was doing a quick scan of the highway log. (Hey at least UTs are easy, but WA's highway log is 1 big 2000 page file, but there is a lot more info, like the speed limit, number of lanes, etc). -- Admrb♉ltz ( t • c • log) 20:20, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Yay, go us :-p --
Admrb♉ltz (
t •
c •
log) 20:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
That works - I was hesitant on the split of the I-15 interchange, so thats not a big issue, and the AADT section was a bit wordy, thanks for clearing it up.
Ndash is part of WP:MOSDASH -- Admrb♉ltz ( t • c • log) 21:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hrm, okay. Never mind then, I didn't see anything "specific", and the {{ jct}} template doesnt use it either. Nevermind. -- Admrb♉ltz ( t • c • log) 21:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC)'
| Interested in attending a Utah Wikipedia Meetup? |
|---|
|
If you are interested in a Utah meetup, please visit
Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Utah and voice your interest. |
Hello! I just wanted to pass along my thanks for your support in my RfA from earlier this week. I hope I did not disappoint you. I am going on Wikibreak and I will let you know when or if I am back on the site -- I am trying to take time away to clear my thoughts and refocus on this and other priorities. Be well. Ecoleetage ( talk) 04:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
|
The Utah State Highways Barnstar | |
| Utah State Route 128 passed FAC, it couldn't have done so without your pictures and copyedits. Thanks. Dave ( talk) 05:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks for the heads-up. I added the green icons to both. I'm avoiding the complication of "A" class to keep my already busy page from getting busier. I really to see these articles succeed. Seeing all those stars and green icons on start-up is pleasing every time. Kudos for your efforts and congrats on your success. Finetooth ( talk) 04:47, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Think shes ready for WP:FAC? -- Admrb♉ltz ( talk) 04:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- I have to ask since we are equal contributers to the article. If I do end up taking her to FAC, care to co-nom? -- Admrb♉ltz ( talk) 03:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
care to take a peek at Michigan highway system now and make a few suggestions on the talk page? The article always had a map in it. I'm hoping to get a newer, better one though. Also last night I was on an unstable WiFi connection while working on the M-22 article. I wanted to make sure that at least I could get the GAN stuff done with my laptop. iPhones don't have copy and paste so nominations are much easier to start on my laptop. I can edit articles on my phone. I built M-22's junction list on night on my phone out of boredom. Soon Charter should be finally installing my cable and Internet service here and I will be online in my own apartment. Imzadi1979 ( talk) 17:21, 12 September 2008 (UTC) (posted by iPhone)
|
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (166/43/7). I appreciate your comments and in my actions as an administrator I will endeavor to maintain the trust you have placed in me. I am honored by your trust and your support. Thank you, Cirt ( talk) 02:13, 16 September 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter | ||
| Volume 2, Issue 6 • 8 September 2008 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
- — Rschen7754bot ( talk) 03:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that you added what looks like control cities to the intersection list. Where do you find that information? I'd like to incorporate it into any future articles I start.
Thanks in advance. DeFaultRyan ( talk) 22:44, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
-_Good_pic.jpg)
|
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC) |
So what is a cut out? InFairness ( talk) 19:52, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
You might find [1] (and [2] - sheesh) useful. -- NE2 07:19, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Can you please withdraw your support vote at this time (RMHED has withdrawn his), and we really should try to follow this new proposed process to see how it works, even if it doesn't. Icewedge ( talk) 04:32, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Wait, never mind. It seems that section has been removed in its entirety. Icewedge ( talk) 04:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Could you update the leader board on WP:USRD/B? -- Admrboltz ( talk) 21:28, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- There is no need for doing that. I just did it. ~~ C o m p u t e r G u y 20:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Could you do the honors since you did the nomination for the USRD blog? -- Rschen7754 ( T C) 06:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
It's a dead mall so I can't actually buy you a gift there. And I was never in it. Regards, Durova Charge! 16:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, CountyLemonade. There is a new contest for U.S. and Canada roads that you may be interested in. To sign up or for more information, please visit User:Rschen7754/USRDCRWPCup. The contest begins Saturday at 00:00 UTC. Regards, Rschen7754 ( T C) 01:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Not hard at all. I'll start on them soon. -- Fredddie ™ 04:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Done That was actually way easier than I thought it was going to be. --
Fredddie
™ 06:02, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
It's official, well-sort of the Gov still has to sign the bill. Unfortunately this does not have the SR-7 update. Most curious. [3] Dave ( talk) 06:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for cropping that image. I think we had the same reaction when we saw it. Thanks for doing something about it. Dave ( talk) 19:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. For the record, I knew US 491 wouldn't make it for some time. It was getting pretty beat up in the nomination process. Also, for the record, I'm debating re-doing the article, yes it passed FA, but were I to write the article today, I'd do it differently with the stuff I've since learned. However, voting is going on for Utah State Route 128 for April 6th, and so far so good. What are you up to lately, still doing vandalism revert duty? (a truly noble task) or back to article work? One final comment, I hope you know I wasn't attacking your efforts when I said the I-15 article needed work, but the history section of the most important highway in Utah is a single paragraph and tagged for cleanup =-) I know you've worked hard to improve many articles. Dave ( talk) 05:23, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- FYI, I butted into the conversation going on at NE2's talk page. Hope that's ok [4] Dave ( talk) 19:29, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, am back. Now I just need to figure out what I'm supposed to be doing here. And where I left my Monmouth County atlas I was using for my sandbox project.... -- Kacie Jane ( talk) 19:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Made the same mistake myself earlier. American_and_British_English_spelling_differences#Miscellaneous_spelling_differences SunCreator ( talk) 16:39, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Heh, thanks. ;) - Well, I want to get this to FAC again, but I would like an allover copyedit first. Mitch/ HC32 11:23, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Yes, I know it's not very good. Pzrmd ( talk) 05:54, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hey I just got your message at commons. Thanks! I thought you were being sarcastic here. I have the Google Maps links on my talk page and some ideas for the caption but I'm not sure which one we should use. Pzrmd ( talk) 00:31, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Well if its anything like Sounder commuter rail in Seattle, which is a very similar setup, they will be separated at SL Central. But Sounder only runs "commute" hour trains. They may be the same line and if we hear that its going to go that way I can fix the s-line templates and such not to reflect this, but I doubt UTA will do that...
And trust me, I am not a fan of them truncating the Sandy/Salt Lake Line to Arena, I live about a mile from Ball Park and use to go all the way to Central Station to catch FrontRunner. I don't mind for gateway trips though, we use to get off at Arena, we can do it again. Planetarium was just a bit more convenient. -- Admrboltz ( talk) 23:22, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Or how you have to switch trains at Ogden to get to Pleasant View (only 3 trains each way am/pm)... I'm pretty sure they will do something stupid. That and the fact that most
Utah County people won't use it. They don't use masstransit. Hell they are just now expanding their section of
I-15. --
Admrboltz (
talk) 23:28, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well hold off on your praise of UTA for the Sandy/Univ line - its green on the new map. The same color as the Mid-Jordan line. ON the printed schedule map it says "service past Murray is temporary" which means that it will be a mid-jordan / university line for the residents of Day Break... And yeah, the Pleasant View thing is a joke, but I can understand some, it is a shared trackage with UP, and they don't want to see something like Metrolink in CA with that last crash they had (which humorously enough Metrolink is leasing some of our Comet trains, still wrapped in UTA markings :p --
Admrboltz (
talk) 01:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well from what I have seen the Airport line will terminate at Arena as well, and connect w/ frontrunner at a new station on North temple street that FrontRunner will service once its built... -- Admrboltz ( talk) 02:05, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well hold off on your praise of UTA for the Sandy/Univ line - its green on the new map. The same color as the Mid-Jordan line. ON the printed schedule map it says "service past Murray is temporary" which means that it will be a mid-jordan / university line for the residents of Day Break... And yeah, the Pleasant View thing is a joke, but I can understand some, it is a shared trackage with UP, and they don't want to see something like Metrolink in CA with that last crash they had (which humorously enough Metrolink is leasing some of our Comet trains, still wrapped in UTA markings :p --
Admrboltz (
talk) 01:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Good Luck at GAC. I hope you don't mind. I was searching for sources to support the earlier trails being routed along 2100st south. My intent was not to step on any toes, rather have backup sources just in case. I did find some good sources and added them in. I did not replace Dan Stober's website, but rather added content to clarify and back up what he said. I hope you don't mind.
I do like the work you've done to the article. I especially like that it now focuses on SR-201's past as far as the general public is concerned, and not just the state legislature. Good luck! Dave ( talk) 07:46, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Congratulations. Thanks for the barnstar, although I think you deserve the credit. You just jabbed me in the butt a bit to dig through some old maps. Thanks though, I needed the jab; I've found my motivation level dropping as of late, that was a help to get back into it. Dave ( talk) 07:41, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Hey, Noticed you fixed up the UT 201 map. Looks good to me! Just wanted to mention that was how the map was requested way back when. 25or6to4 ( talk) 00:01, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, looks like they updated the ending point after I made the map. No worries. I get the GIS data from gis.utah.gov. I have the old database, but the new SGID93 database is regularly updated and should suffice for you. 25or6to4 ( talk) 20:38, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
If you check the leaderboard for a blog update, be advised that there's a bug in the stats it's reporting. The categories and the assessment log are up to date, but the chart the assessment bot generates is not updating, meaning Rschen's bot is being fed the wrong data. The MI data is 4 days out of date on that chart, NY is 10 days old, UT is over 2 weeks old. I only discovered this because I have a spreadsheet where I'm tracking MI's assessments from the template I added to the top of the MI categories, like Category:Start-Class Michigan road transport articles, and that template has live numbers. My WW number and Rschen's don't match. I have 3.317 (or 3.320 with the CDH subproject added in) vs. his 3.369. I've reported the bug to the WP 1.0 Team, finding out that there are other projects that's this bug is affecting too. I thought that I'd let you know in case you went up update the blog. Imzadi1979 ( talk) 07:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I noticed. I was going to update the blog last night then saw the SR-201 GA hasn't yet been added to the assessment. I suppose I'll post a notice on the blog stating the delay. Thank you for clarifying this. CL ( T · C) — 17:59, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 | ||
| Volume 3, Issue 1 • April 2010 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
I saw enough. I opened a SPI case ( Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/71.219.177.7). -- Chris.urs-o ( talk) 10:39, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Calmer Waters 08:51, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ksltvlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 05:38, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 2 • Summer 2010 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 3 • Fall 2010 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
Business Loop 80 is back up for ACR. -- Admrboltz ( talk) 02:11, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Message added 04:11, 9 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
| ||||
| Volume 4, Issue 1 • Winter 2011 • About the Newsletter | ||||
|
|
Project reports for
| ||
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||||
- —
JCbot ( talk) 01:01, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
That page is bot driven and will be updated Sunday. I have rolled back your edits, but thanks for thinking of my poor ole BL-80 :). -- Admrboltz ( talk) 03:58, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Move & Edit on Area codes 801 and 385
Area code 801 was put into service before 385, also in many areas (including mine), the overlay code is seen less likely. Those two reasons are why the page should be called Area codes 801 and 385, and not Area codes 385 and 801. -- S1312 ( talk) 21:17, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
| |||||
| Volume 4, Issue 2 • Spring 2011 • About the Newsletter | |||||
|
|
Project reports for
| |||
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | |||||
- — Rschen7754bot ( talk) 02:01, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
I've replied to your comments on my talk page. (Yes I saw your edit notice, but I wasn't sure if I'd been added to your watchlist since you weren't logged in at the time.) Thatotherperson ( talk/ contribs) 11:14, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
| |||||
| Volume 4, Issue 3 • Fall 2011 • About the Newsletter | |||||
|
|
Project reports for
| |||
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | |||||
| Christmas, Michigan, is a small town along M-28 in the Upper Peninsula | Merry Christmas |
| Here's wishing you and yours safe travels, full gas tanks and good writing in the new year! Imzadi1979 ( talk) 22:49, 25 December 2011 (UTC) |
sign.jpg){kind=link}
- Thank you! Merry Christmas, and may your 2012 be fruitful. CL ( T · C) — 04:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 1 • Winter 2011 • About the Newsletter | ||
| This edition is going out to all USRD WikiProject members (current, former, or potential) in addition to other subscribers as part of a roll call to update the participants list. Anyone that would like to continue to receive this newsletter in the future needs to update the subscription list if they are not already subscribed. | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
- — Imzadi 1979 → 21:58, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 2 • Spring 2012 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
- — Imzadi 1979 → 00:07, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Utah State Route 269 has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Dough 48 72 15:24, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 3 • Summer 2012 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
- — Imzadi 1979 → 22:54, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Multiple items...
First, LOVE you system maps!
Second, just about the time you got Pleasant View removed from the FrontRunner maps, its back again.
Third, what do you know about the "North Temple Bridge/Guadalupe" FrontRunner/TRAX Station? UTA is frequently inconsistent with its nomenclature. Is “North Temple” or “North Temple Bridge” the name of the lower FrontRunner Station and “Guadalupe” the name of the upper TRAX Station?
Fourth, with a West Valley Central and Murray Central (and not counting the new stations south that are sometimes called Orem Central and Provo Central) we would highly recommend that the station associated with the Salt Lake Intermodal Hub be referred to as “Salt Lake Central” instead of simply “Central Station” to minimize confusion.
Fifth, regarding your claim:
"Ogden Intermodal Center" is used by no one, including UTA maps / station announcements
While we cannot speak for station announcements and, as indicated on the Wikipedia page for the station in question, UTA is inconsistent what it calls the station, we don’t know the basis of the claim it “is used by no one”. The current UTA FrontRunner Route 750 web page refers to it as “Ogden Intermodal Center”, the current and future UTA TRAX & FrontRunner maps both show “Ogden Transit Center”, the current and future UTA FrontRunner schedules both list “Ogden Intermodal Center”, the UTA bus route web pages refer to it as the “Ogden Intermodal Center”, the UTA bus route schedules list “Ogden Intermodal Center”, the UTA bus route maps show “Ogden Transit Center”, and Ogden City’s website calls it the “Ogden Transit Center”. (We have to wonder how long the previous list would be if “someone” used the name instead of just “Ogden Station”?)
Beyond the aforementioned examples, it is desirable to reinforce the concept that is not just another UTA transit center (which probably deserve a combined Wikipedia page as well for the non-TRAX/FrontRunner tranist centers). It currently includes at least two major, non-UTA transportation providers (Greyhound Lines and Amtrak, via Thruway bus service), and strong potential for more, including Amtrak trains. (Yes, we know that technically, even if Amtrak resumes the Pioneer train route, it would stop at the “Union Station” rather than the “Ogden Intermodal Transit Center”, but it is certainly “close enough for government work”. However, that in and of itself is another reason to create a greater distinction between and correctly labeling of the two stations.) Moreover, several of the local hotels and other shuttle service providers regularly serve the station (unlike nearly all other FrontRunner and TRAX stations). Finally, other than Salt Lake Central, how many other FrontRunner or TRAX stations have indoor waiting areas?
For these reasons, we stand by the most proper name “Ogden Intermodal Transit Center”.
Having said all that, your input and suggestions are appreciated. THANKS!
161.119.83.87 ( talk) 10:28, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Good to see you're still around! We miss you! -- Rs chen 7754 08:28, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 | ||
| Volume 6, Issue 1 • Winter 2013 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
- — EdwardsBot ( talk) 19:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
| ||
| Volume 6, Issue 2 • Spring 2013 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
- — EdwardsBot ( talk) 22:38, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
| ||
| Volume 6, Issue 3 • Summer 2013 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
- — EdwardsBot ( talk) 22:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
| ||
| Volume 6, Issue 4 • Fall 2013 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
- — EdwardsBot ( talk) 03:25, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
| ||
| Volume 7, Issue 1 • Winter 2014 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
- — MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Kstulogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:23, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
| ||
| Volume 7, Issue 2 • Spring 2014 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
- — MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of Imzadi1979
| ||
| Volume 7, Issue 3 • Summer 2014 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
- — MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979, 21:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
| ||
| Volume 7, Issue 4 • Fourth Quarter 2014 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
- — MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 ( talk · contribs) 10:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
| ||
| Volume 7, Issue 4 • Fourth Quarter 2014 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
- — MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 ( talk · contribs) 10:48, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
| ||
| Volume 8, Issue 1 • Winter 2015 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
- — MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 ( talk · contribs) 18:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
| ||
| Volume 8, Issue 2 • Spring 2015 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
- — MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 12:11, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
| ||
| Volume 8, Issue 3 • Summer 2015 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
- — MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) delivered on behalf of Imzadi1979 05:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Volume 8, Issue S1 • September 2015 •
About the Newsletter
- Happy 10th Anniversary!
- —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 ( talk) on 23:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Volume 8, Issue 4 • November 2015 •
About the Newsletter
|
|
- —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 ( talk) on 22:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Volume 9, Issue 1 • Spring 2017 •
About the Newsletter
|
|
- —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 on 01:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Volume 10, Issue 1 • Fall 2023 •
About the Newsletter
- Features
- —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Imzadi 1979 → on 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)