Hi Brother Jerome! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 ( talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Error has no rights shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ( t · c) buidhe 00:46, 24 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Brother Jerome, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Vermont, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Christ Child Crucified on Mount Pichincha, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christ Child Crucified on Mount Pichincha.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vermont}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vermont ( 🐿️— 🏳️‍🌈) 02:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello! The threshold for whether we can have an article on a topic is known as the general notability guideline. I recommend reviewing that prior to creating more articles, as it can result in wasted work if you write content on topics we cannot have articles on. Please let me know if you have any questions or things I can help with. Best, Vermont ( 🐿️— 🏳️‍🌈) 02:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC) reply