Welcome!
Hello, Brixton Busters, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
Vintagekits 18:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
The
Irish Republicanism WikiProject is a
collaboration of editors dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of
Irish republicanism,
Irish nationalism, and related organizations, peoples, and other topics.
(For more information on WikiProjects, please see Wikipedia:WikiProject and the Guide to WikiProjects). |
-- Vintagekits 18:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I see you have been edit warring on Tom Williams (Irish Republican). Please be aware that the policy WP:3RR exists to prevent this kind of destructive conflict, and that it emphatically does not entitle you to make 3 reverts in a 24 hour period. Please take any future conflicts to talk and discuss civilly towards a consensus. Thanks. -- John 15:28, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi ye, left a message on the admin noticeboard, came across posts on this subject. Do not know what effect it will have. Do not mind the editor john, you edit away. Just reference and back up all you work. If you want to stop them in their tracks ask them to back up their work with a reference. You take care, may take a few day off myself, have a pain trying to remain calm and polite. We will see how it goes. Regards -- Domer48 19:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
BB, please at least cut the guy a little slack here. It's a difficult time for him right now. Also, I'd been unaware that you were rapidly blanking talk page comments (such as this). It's your perogative, of course, but it's useful to note that another admin has also recently warned you re. this editor - Alison ☺ 16:21, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on M62 coach bombing. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. - Alison ☺ 18:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
User:SqueakBox has filed Wikipedia:Request for arbitration#User:Vintagekits and you are a mentioned party. Kittybrewster (talk) 14:28, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Go to this page, and edit it to your opinions. Dreamy \*/ !$! 16:38, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello. The above named arbitration case, in which you were named as a party, has opened. Please submit your evidence directly on the case page, or, if needed, submit it via email to an arbitrator or an arbitration clerk.
For the Arbitration clerk committee,
-
Penwhale |
Blast him /
Follow his steps 11:56, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello BB. I just wanted to apologise for not replying to [1] this thread, as I completely missed your, and sebsequent, comments. As it happens there was little more I feel I could have done at the time without checkuser support, though your evidence further solidified my belief that you are probably correct. Anyway, I have taken the opportunity to present this evidence at ArbCom - hopefully they will see fit to carry out a checkuser and get to the bottom of the issue. Rockpocke t 19:50, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Computer is broken at home, and do not know if or when it will be fixed. Thank you to those that were nice to me whilst I was here, and I hope my boys stop the Spaniards pushing their POV on Mairéad Farrell. 26+6=1, bye. Brixton Busters 08:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Please go here when you are finished putting your full information here, and in the first link, put only 5-7 sentences. I would like it concise. Dreamy \*/ !$! 21:52, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Could I ask you to add a bit here [2] to move the process on ? Love & Kisses Aatomic1 13:56, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
The above named Arbitration case has closed. The Arbitration Committee decided that [a]ny user who hereafter engages in edit-warring or disruptive editing on these or related articles may be placed on Wikipedia:Probation by any uninvolved administrator. This may include any user who was a party to this case, or any other user after a warning has been given. The Committee also decided to uplift Vintagekits' indefinite block at the same time.
The full decision can be viewed here.
For the Arbitration Committee, Daniel 08:24, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
You can go to this page, and talk about it. Dreamy § 19:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
As a party in The Troubles arbitration case I am notifying you that an amendment request has been posted here.
For the Arbitration Committee
Seddon talk| WikimediaUK 16:43, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
A case ( The Troubles) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee -- S Philbrick (Talk) 21:07, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)