|
Please describe your edits in edit summaries. When you are deleting large pieces, please explain your actions in talk pages, especially when dealing with controversial topics. Otherwise this may well be considered vandalism. `' mikkanarxi 17:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Please consider yourself warned of vandalism for the Van, Turkey, Artvin, and Kars articles. Serouj 02:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. This is your last warning. pschemp | talk 04:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm not removing informaiton. In fact i really wonder if you ever had read my edits.-- BlueEyedCat 06:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Your changes seemed somewhat POV and unecessary to me. I'm not sure what the problem is about having the legend is—it's not even stating it as a fact, it's just saying that there's a legend that exists. As for "byzantine coffee", you might want to see this, which states:
On the second case, the act of drinking coffee has generated trips of coffee-service usually in commercial areas: a man or a woman serve clients (shop keepers) within a commercial area bringing a very fine blended coffee in small cups, called "turkish coffee" or "greek coffee" or "byzantine coffee".
Finially, I don't understnad what the point is in saying, "Though it's generally known as Turkish Coffee..." The title of the article is already Turkish coffee, so I think that makes it pretty obvious. Khoi khoi 02:08, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
You have been blocked for 24 hours for continuing to remove information from articles without discussion or reason which is highly disruptive. Edits include diffs like this. Please rethink your editing strategy. pschemp | talk 02:20, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Please stop reverting without explanations of your actions and without discussions. Further pattern of this kind of editing will probably makes you blocked. `' mikka 02:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 20:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
It's not me but you who had deleted information from the article. If you consider that it was first you who had reverted my edits, than you would realize how funny to leave a message in my talk page about 3R rule. However, i'm open to discussions about the article. Please explain why you have removed my referenced information from the article ?
PS. You've once accused me to act like vandal in one of your edit explanations. I will be happy if you manage to refrain from personal attacks, esp to me.-- BlueEyedCat 11:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
I have removed a small section of your edits, since does not correspond with the citation that you have provided – and even differs. However, I have moved it to Talk:Nasreddin, and if you have another citation, to support the claim, by all means please reinstall it back to the article page. But please do not RV it, since there are further edits by other contributors. Thanks. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 05:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited İş Yatırım, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ISE ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:41, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)