This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | ← | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | → | Archive 40 |
I have nothing against moving, but I made the effort to create the article and giving as a reason him being a zoo director is off base when this is his actual job does not make sense. Hekerui ( talk) 13:43, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Jeffree Star Proof.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:52, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
For the welcome back and the help on the health section at Mississippi. Only wished your hard work would have been taken into more consideration there. I know you, wikiwise anyway. Unfortunately, the others over there apparently do not. ;] - ✰ ALLST☆R✰ echo 01:17, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
I have formulated a version of the BBL template that perhaps you will find more to your liking. It frames the issue in a clearer and more neutral way. Though getting various SPS's to back up what it says admitted here will be hard. Take a look. Template talk:BBL sidebar/(Template)Autogynephilia theory (Tounge in Cheek) :-) -- Hfarmer ( talk) 17:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
A Nobody
My talk is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
-- A Nobody My talk 02:18, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
add and DYK asap. -- Banjeboi
Hello,
You are being informed of this topic on the reliable sources notice board because you, commented on the question the last time, or are editor of the article The Man Who Would Be Queen, or you edited a related article. This was originally raised in October 2008. This is a complex topic and hopefully you will remember what this was all about and be able to comment insightfully and help us reach a consensus. I have asked that the comments found in the archive of the original discussion be taken into account this time since I am sure those other editors will return at some point. It is my hope that these can be comprehensively settled this time. To see why This is being asked again check out Talk:The Man Who Would Be Queen.
Please please don't confuse up this discussion with things about other tangentially related discussions. Please please focus on just the question of sources. (Don't take anything in this message personally as it is being sent to everyone involved.)
Thankyou for your help. -- Hfarmer ( talk) 12:56, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
clean-up. -- Banjeboi
Hello, Benjiboi. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Topic Ban of User:Benjiboi. Thank you.— Dæ dαlus Contribs 09:18, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Glad to have you helping out. I know I was a bit messy, but I wanted to address the nom's issues before anyone else chimed in a delete based upon the WP:ADVERT the original article was. Good job! Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:30, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
And my quick-fix for Julianne is not perfect... but take a look at the before and after. The assertions of notability were all over the place and just need sources and cleanip. How could the nom not even looked for her awards and nominations?? Sheesh. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Just saw you're there. Damn, you're fast!! Thanks. I owe you. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:36, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
This makes no sense. It is perfectly legitimate to respond to comments as I did, and your movement of my response isn't supported. I'm confused why you did it, as my response no longer appears in relation to the comment I addressed. I restored my comments which you refactored without asking me. Please ask an administrator to review this issue before acting unilaterally again. I see nothing wrong with how my comments addressed and replied to your comments, and your refactoring isn't supported. It is perfectly acceptable to respond in the way that I did. Viriditas ( talk) 07:50, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Viriditas, I have again moved your comments out of the middle of mine and it should be quite clear that I don't appreciate you inserting your rebuttals between my responses as if a conversation had occurred which didn't; as if you commented then I completely ignored what you stated. These actions, IMHO, seem like the edit-warring behaviours you accuse me of doing so I want to state clearly I don't appreciate it, I find it uncivil and unhelpful. Wikipedia isn't a battleground and discussions aren't won or lost. I disagree with your stance but am unwilling to mount a defense for what I see as a rather silly argument. A BBC health reporter noted the state is humid most the year round and the residents find outdoor exercise uncomfortable, in part due to that climate condition. In an article discussing overall health issues and relating to an obesity crisis in the state this seemed completely relevant. I'm sure some scientist can be found who can verify these rather obvious facts but no bother. I'm sure the needed content will eventually be worked out. By the way, that isn't refactoring although inserting your comments between mine misrepresents the discussion both in spirit and context. -- Banjeboi 02:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Viriditas's style of commenting is acceptable. In fact, it's the same as mine. If you want your comments to be treated as one long comment, place your signature at the end of that comment. It isn't deceptive at all, unless you use it to deceive people. If you want your comment to be treated as a response to your previous comment, use one more asterisk/colon than the previous comment. - Josh ( talk | contribs) 15:15, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
[2]. Genius. -- Banjeboi 16:42, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
I am honored to have you working with me to rescue articles. The Shannon's Rainbow, Frank E. Johnson, and Julianne Michelle articles are better for your efforts. I appreciate it big time. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:42, 30 December 2008 (UTC) |
The inscription is in the description. --David Shankbone 00:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Leigh Bowery Multi glasses from Taboo art showing .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle ( talk) 10:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
add auto-archiving and clean. Banjeboi
add archive and clean. Banjeboi
Must build. -- Banjeboi
Per GLAA's website they are the same organization, with the L added as so many organizations did to placate the lesbians. ;-) I will put together the information in the next day or so; at the moment I'm a bit shall we say under the weather. Otto4711 ( talk) 02:54, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
refs and EL's deleted; research and restore article in case of notability strike. Benji boi
convert Harvards into cite. Benji boi
Yikes, what a mess. Do a proper read and sort out sections. Banje boi
Also need section, maybe in London part, about lover/roomate. Banje boi
former lovers, roomates, collaborators, etc Banje boi
HI Benjeboi. I see that you're interested in a lot of the same topics as me. I've been working on defining a problem I see in the LGBT category structure and working on a few proposals. Would you take a look and give me some feedback? User:Scarykitty/LGBT Categories. Scarykitty ( talk) 20:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 45 | 24 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 46 | 1 December 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
ArbCom elections: Elections open | Wikipedia in the news |
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System | Features and admins |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 1 | 3 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)