Most of your edits appear to be reverting a single user, and you haven't justified a single one of these reverts. Moreover, several of your edits removed sourced information without touching the refs, and changed sourced information to something incorrect. This behavior is stalking and possibly vandalism. Do not continue to remove information without giving an edit summary, or you may be blocked. -- Golbez ( talk) 15:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply

You need to use edit summaries when reverting, always. That said, please tell me how these edits you made reverted something false:

• [1] (The CIA factbook does indeed use the numbers you changed)
• [2] (these people do appear to be Azeri and from Shusha)
• [3] (This is just a link you deleted for no reason)
• [4] (He was a Turkic ruler and Azeri poet, yes?)
• [5] (How is an az interwiki false?)
• [6] (See previous two)

-- Golbez ( talk) 13:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply

• I didn't leave a note for him because all I saw was your apparent vandalisms, like removing an az interwiki and changing sourced numbers. I'll check in on him. -- Golbez ( talk) 14:17, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply

• • ".I think you close your eyes about his apparent vandalisms and just notice me because he is azeri just like yourself. " I love it when people accuse me of being Azeri. It means they haven't even tried. -- Golbez ( talk) 15:43, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply

very nice edit with the pictures of notable persian jews. how did you do that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boder111 ( talk • contribs) 08:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your comment my friend. it's my pleasure to make this picture for great jews people of persia. I made this pictures for other people of Iran like kurds and Persians. I hope you and other users like this pictures? Bahramm 2 ( talk) 08:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Just noticed that you have reverted the edit by User:Pournick. You might therefore like to have a look here. Kind regards, --BF 21:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC). reply

you yourself know that most of west azerbaijan is turk including urmia, khoy, miandoab, salmas makoo, ets. that map is cia;s map show the ethnic group wrong i, live in khoy i know this city is 100 percent turk not like that map you sent me Pournick ( talk) 21:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC) reply

regards. also i should mention i dont do wandalism! بی حساب کتاب رو مردم مارک نزنید! Pournick ( talk) 21:31, 17 February 2010 (UTC) reply

I had a look to the web page you've sent it to me. look at [7] or [8] or [9] and [10]. In some of them Urmia and other Turk cities belong to Turkish area, in some other same cities! belong to kurdish area! all are published by uni of Texas, shows that they themselves dont know anything about the demography of Azerbaijan and Iran. so these maps are not reliable. but I'll try to correct some mistakes of my map according to this one [11] which looks more reliable and detailed than others. Regards, Pournick ( talk) 23:58, 17 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Dear Bahram, It is not impoirtant at all which language comes first, as long as they are relevant and no foreign alphabets are used. I also do not understand your efforts to delete the languages of Iran on Pages like Tehran. I think Tehran as the capital of Iran deserves to have its name mentioned in multiple languages of Iran. Finally: Az man paniranisttar vojud nadare,. unruza ke hame peye raghasi budand man paniranist budam. Lotfan be dustan niz beguid ke kase ye daghtar az ash nashavand. Man bekhubi midunam chi be be nafe yekparchegi-ye Irane va chi nist, bavar befarmaid.-- Babakexorramdin ( talk) 11:46, 20 February 2010 (UTC) Dear Bahram you cannot compare Iran with fascistoid and intolerant countries such as Turkey, France, Netherlands and Denmark. I think we should praise the Iranian multiculturalism as a wealth. It does not matter when Kurds and Azeris have come to Tehran. If the antiquity is an argument then The original language of Tehran is Razi and not Persian. How about writing that on that page? All and all I think we have aminor problem in Iran and chauvinists on different sides are making it complicated. That is only good for anti-Iranians.-- Babakexorramdin ( talk) 13:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC) reply

I still wonder why you still oppose the inclusion of Razi on Tehran's page -- Babakexorramdin ( talk) 05:28, 21 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Could you possibly shed some light on this edit of yours? Why exactly was that sentence removed? Parishan ( talk) 10:43, 6 April 2010 (UTC) reply

من یک چیزی در آن صفحه بحث نوشتم.. متاسفانه آنچه تمام نمیشود همان نادانی است.. اگر چند نفر ایرانی فعال در ویکیپیدا بودند ما اصلا نیازی نداشتیم که در همان جمله اول نظامی گنجوی ننویسیم که شاعر پارسی.. متاسفانه ایرانیان خودشان همت نمیکنند... و فکر میکنند چهار پنج نفر باید همه کارها را انجام بدهند..

Dear Bahram

Please join debateand tell your opinion. This is the actual and very important topic nowadays. Thanks in advance...

-- Shahin Khalilov ( talk) 07:07, 23 July 2010 (UTC) reply