Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia. Hope you enjoy your stay. Just o point something out, when making talk edits, make sure you add 4 tildes (~~~~) to signatures. This way we know who posted those things and it's easier to answer you. Cheers. -- Wizardman 04:33, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Lets resolve this disupte once and for all. Let us analyze what you have rmeoved and since you are the one doing the removing, you must tell me why it is Islamaphobia. Why is this text making people have a hating fear or inspiring hating fear in people against Islam.
1) First, the below passage. Nothing here is anti-Islamic. It is an account, that has been referenced. Note that it does not say it is absolutely correct. Wikipedia wants verifiable knowledge. Show me what is Islamaphobic about it. If it is a criticsm of Islam, of it might unermine Islamic teaching, that is besides the point. What is important is that it is not made up without references.
The story of Muhammad's encounter with Bahira is found in the works of the early Muslim historians Ibn Hisham, Ibn Sa'd, and al-Tabari, whose versions differ in some details. When Muhammad was either nine or twelve years old, he met Bahira in the town of Bosra in Syria during his travel with a Meccan caravan, accompanying either Abu Bakr or Ali. [1] When the caravan was passing by his cell, the monk invited the merchants to a feast. They accepted the invitation, leaving the boy to guard the camel. Bahira, however, insisted that everyone in the caravan should come to him. [2] Then a miraculous occurrence indicated to the monk that Muhammad was to become a prophet. According to one version, those were the stigmata that Bahira found on the young Muhammad; other variants of the story say that it was a miraculous movement of a cloud or an unusual behavior of a branch that kept shadowing Muhammad regardless of the time of the day. The monk revealed his visions of Muhammad's future to the boy's companion (Abu Bakr or Ali), warning him to preserve the child from the Jews (in Ibn Sa'd's version) or from the Byzantines (in al-Tabari's version). Both Ibn Sa'd and al-Tabari write that Bahira found the announcement of the coming of Muhammad in the original, unadulterated gospels, which he possessed; the standard Islamic view is that Christians corrupted the gospels, in part by erasing any references to Muhammad. [1]
2)Now the next passage. Please expalin again what is Islamaphobic. Its referenced.
In the Christian polemics against Islam, Bahira became a heretical monk, whose errant views inspired the Qur'an. The names and religious affiliations of the monk vary in different Christian sources. For Al-Kindi, who calls him Sergius and writes that he later called himself Nestorius, Bahira was a Nestorian. After the 9th century, Byzantine polemicists refer to him as Baeira or Pakhyras, both being derivatives of the name Bahira, and describe him as an iconoclast. Sometimes Bahira is called a Jacobite or an Arian. Bahira is at the center of the Apocalypse of Bahira, which exists in Syriac and Arabic which makes the case for an origin of the Qur'an from Christian apocrypha. Christian authors maintain that Bahira's works formed the basis of those parts of the Qur'an that conform to the principles of Christianity, while the rest was introduced either by subsequent compilers such as Uthman or contemporary Jews. [1]
3) I have a slight problem with the below wording.
This concept (That Bahira gave Muhammad all his knowledge) is entirely rejected by Muslims as there is no apparent historical evidence for this assertion I would like it to be changed to the less POV Musims reject this concept as they claim there is no apparent historical evidence for this assertion.
4) This is far too un-encyclopedic:
Having recognized Muhammad as the, Bahira is reported to have said: "This is the master of all humans. Allâh will send him with a Message which will be a mercy to all beings."[7]
Abu Talib, the uncle of Muhammad is said to have asked: "How do you know that?" To which the monk replied: "When you appeared from the direction of ‘Aqabah, all stones and trees prostrated themselves, which they never do except for a Prophet. I can recognize him also by the seal of Prophethood which is below his shoulder, like an apple. We have got to learn this from our books."
This why; the use of long quotations in the text, without a third person perspective is missing here. Its an account according to Islamic tradition. Fine, this can go in its own section, perhaps to be incorporated or something, but as it stands on its own, very POV, it is not acceptable.
Respectfully
Tourskin ( talk) 02:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- For ease, lets keep the discussion on this talk page, so we don't hav to jump back and forth. I'll watch ur page for any comments by you. Tourskin ( talk) 03:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Many thanks for fleshing out this article so well and so quickly...! I've never seen an article come together so quickly. Kudos! kencf0618 ( talk) 04:10, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Mohammed Ansar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:22, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, you have done a lot of work on the article on Mohammed Ansar so I thought it would be polite to let you know that I have proposed it for speedy deletion on the grounds that Ansar, while he has clearly done valuable work and seems like a thoroughly nice chap, clearly does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Mohammed Ansar
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Talk:Mohammed Ansar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Q1445 ( talk) 16:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC) Q1445 ( talk) 16:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mohammed Ansar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Holland ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 17:40, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Message added 07:23, 16 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nomination of Ibn Farrukh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ibn Farrukh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibn Farrukh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shii (tock) 03:24, 7 January 2015 (UTC)