From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Henry Stickmin Collection (September 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Simply, lacks any reviews or coverage. Sources pointing back to the creators of the game itself does not indicate notability, and there is no evidence the game is notable enough for an article.
ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 12:55, 11 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Richard Uihlein

I have removed material from this article that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.

Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written pursuant to WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:NOR. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.

WP:NPOV WP:BLPBALANCE

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Arsonxists! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 23:32, Friday, September 11, 2020 ( UTC)

Get Help
About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Note about "Edit warring".

I'm assuming that comment on List of Texas state symbols was targeted at me rather than the anonymous IP? If so, thank you for the warning, but I think I ought to point out that if you're reverting obvious vandalism, that doesn't count as an edit war. See Section 4 of WP:NOT3RR.

(Also, for the record, you might be better off mentioning something like that on a user's talk page rather than in an edit summary.) Thegreatluigi ( talk) 23:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply

You accidentally left that warning on the user page of the account instead of the user talk page... :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 23:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Narugopal Mandal (December 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 ( talk) 00:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Arsonxists! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 ( talk) 00:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nintendo DSi Shop (December 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 ( talk) 00:18, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Great job reverting vandalism! Thanoscar21 talk contribs 01:27, 14 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi there, have you seen the WP:CVUA? It's a program to help people learn about counter-vandalism. Also, have you considered using WP:REDWARN? It's just an alternative to Twinkle that has clean, flat icons. Sorry to pepper you with questions, but as you haven't been welcomed yet, welcome to Wikipedia! Thanoscar21 talk contribs 01:27, 14 December 2020 (UTC) Thank you for the barn-star! I installed RedWarn and it works good and is faster than Twinkle. Thank you! Arsonxists ( talk) 15:13, 14 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Rollback on Gauri Khan

Hello, I think you may have mistakenly rolled back my edits on Gauri Khan, as my edit's purpose was to remove the unconstructive editing left on the article. No worries though, cheers. --

That was a mistake. Sorry. Arsonxists ( talk) 01:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC) reply

That's alright, it's fine. I guess we both happened to be reviewing an article at the same time. --

Why are you accusing me of "dispruptive edits"

Why are you sending me a message acccusing me of disruptive edits? I changed something that was misrepresenting the article it was citing, and you reverted it without comment and threatened to ban me. I will report you to wikipedia to see if they will revoke your account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C55:6700:342:65B7:4913:28E7:5AFF ( talk) 23:28, 14 December 2020 (UTC) ===That was an accident. I thought you had a bad edit, but in this case it wasn't. Sorry. Arsonxists ( talk) 23:40, 14 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nintendo DSi Shop (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 01:16, 25 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC) reply

April 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ruby K. Payne. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Uh, what? I only reverted one time. Out of revisions on that page, there were 4... I made the 3rd one. Arsonxists ( talk) 19:41, 8 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 17 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Concern regarding Draft:Nintendo DSi Shop

Information icon Hello, Arsonxists. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nintendo DSi Shop, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 02:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Your draft article, Draft:Nintendo DSi Shop

Hello, Arsonxists. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Nintendo DSi Shop".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC) reply

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service

Hi Arsonxists! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over six months.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

  1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
  2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
  3. Paste {{ Frs user|Arsonxists|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
  4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC) reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply